Alphabet's earnings exceeded expectations but operating income was below projections. Iran-US talks may continue on Friday in Muscat about nuclear issues. Continue Reading: Discover Alphabet’s Financial Report and Iran’s Latest Developments The post Discover Alphabet’s Financial Report and Iran’s Latest Developments appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

GRT's RSI at 29.79 is in the oversold region with bounce potential, but the MACD negative histogram and position below EMA20 reinforce bearish momentum. Downtrend dominant, likely to test 0.0267 su...

BitcoinWorld US Stocks Mixed: Dow’s Resilient Gain Defies Tech-Led Market Decline NEW YORK, NY – U.S. equity markets delivered a split performance at Tuesday’s close, presenting investors with a classic tale of two markets. The three major U.S. stock indices closed mixed, a development highlighting significant sector divergence and shifting investor sentiment. While the Dow Jones Industrial Average posted a solid gain, the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite suffered a notable decline. This divergence immediately signals a rotation away from recent market leaders and toward more traditional industrial and defensive names. Market analysts point to a complex interplay of economic data, bond yield movements, and corporate earnings expectations as the primary drivers behind this fragmented session. US Stocks Mixed: Dissecting the Divergent Close The session’s closing figures revealed clear fault lines within the market. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) climbed 0.53%, showcasing resilience. Conversely, the broad-market S&P 500 index retreated by 0.51%. The Nasdaq Composite experienced the sharpest pullback, falling 1.51%. This pattern of US stocks closing mixed is not uncommon, but its magnitude today warrants closer examination. Typically, such divergence occurs when macroeconomic forces impact sectors differently. For instance, rising interest rates often pressure high-growth technology stocks while potentially benefiting financials. Today’s action suggests a similar dynamic was at play, with money flowing out of speculative growth areas and into value-oriented segments. Furthermore, this split performance underscores the importance of index composition. The Dow, a price-weighted index of 30 large industrial and consumer companies, often behaves differently from the market-cap-weighted S&P 500 and Nasdaq. A strong day for components like Boeing, Caterpillar, or Johnson & Johnson can lift the Dow even as the broader market struggles. Analyzing the sector breakdown within the S&P 500 provides crucial context for the mixed close. Today, energy, financials, and industrials likely provided support, while information technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services dragged on the index. Market Drivers and Economic Context Several key factors contributed to the day’s uneven trading. First, movements in the U.S. Treasury market exerted significant influence. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note edged higher throughout the session. Higher yields decrease the present value of future earnings, which disproportionately affects growth-oriented technology stocks with valuations based on long-term profit projections. This dynamic directly pressured the Nasdaq. Second, investors digested the latest remarks from Federal Reserve officials. Commentary emphasizing a data-dependent but still vigilant stance on inflation reinforced expectations for sustained higher interest rates, further catalyzing the rotation out of rate-sensitive sectors. Expert Analysis on Sector Rotation Financial strategists observed a clear rotation underpinning the mixed close. “Today’s action is a textbook example of sector rotation in response to shifting macro expectations,” noted a senior market strategist at a major investment bank, referencing internal research memos. “The market is repricing risk. Money is moving from the high-flying, long-duration assets of the Nasdaq toward the more economically resilient, cash-generative companies found in the Dow.” This rotation is often seen during periods of economic uncertainty or when investors anticipate a change in the business cycle. Historical data from the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) system shows similar patterns preceding periods of economic moderation. Additionally, corporate-specific news created crosscurrents. Positive earnings pre-announcements from several industrial giants buoyed the Dow. Simultaneously, profit-taking and valuation concerns in the mega-cap technology space, which had seen a powerful rally in prior weeks, weighed heavily on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq. The table below summarizes the key index movements and their primary sector influences: Index Performance Key Influencing Sectors Dow Jones Industrial Average +0.53% Industrials, Financials, Healthcare S&P 500 Index -0.51% Technology (Drag), Energy (Support) Nasdaq Composite -1.51% Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary Historical Precedents and Market Psychology Periods where US stocks close mixed have frequently served as inflection points. A review of market data from the past decade reveals that sustained divergence between the Dow and Nasdaq often precedes broader market corrections or significant leadership changes. For example, similar patterns emerged in early 2018 and late 2021, periods later marked by increased volatility. Market psychology plays a critical role here. The Nasdaq’s decline can dampen overall investor sentiment, as it is viewed as a barometer for innovation and growth. However, the Dow’s strength can provide a floor, suggesting underlying confidence in the core economy’s health. This creates a tension that typically resolves with one trend absorbing the other. Volume and market breadth statistics from today’s session add another layer of understanding. While the Nasdaq fell sharply, declining volume did not overwhelmingly outpace advancing volume across all exchanges, indicating a lack of panic selling. This suggests the move was more rotational than fundamentally bearish. The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), often called the market’s “fear gauge,” showed only a modest increase, supporting the view that this was a controlled, sector-specific adjustment rather than a broad-based risk-off event. The Impact on Investor Portfolios For the average investor, a day where US stocks close mixed reinforces the importance of diversification. A portfolio overly concentrated in technology stocks would have experienced meaningful losses. Conversely, a balanced portfolio with exposure to industrial, financial, and defensive sectors would have seen muted impact or even gains. Financial advisors consistently stress that asset allocation, not timing daily market moves, is the primary determinant of long-term returns. Days like today serve as a real-world stress test for portfolio construction, highlighting the value of holding uncorrelated assets to smooth out volatility. Conclusion The mixed close for US stocks presents a nuanced picture of the current financial landscape. The Dow Jones’s gain against the decline of the S&P 500 and Nasdaq underscores a significant sector rotation driven by interest rate expectations and economic recalibration. This divergence highlights the market’s ongoing digestion of monetary policy and its uneven effects across different industries. For investors, the key takeaway is the reaffirmation of market complexity and the enduring value of a diversified, long-term strategy over reactive trading. As economic data continues to unfold, such split performances may become more frequent, demanding careful analysis of underlying sector dynamics rather than broad index-level reactions. FAQs Q1: What does it mean when US stocks close mixed? It means the major market indices did not move in the same direction. Typically, it indicates sector rotation, where money flows out of some industries (like technology) and into others (like industrials or energy), often due to changing economic expectations or interest rate outlooks. Q2: Why did the Dow Jones go up when the Nasdaq went down? The Dow and Nasdaq have different compositions. The Dow includes 30 large, established companies in industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. The Nasdaq is heavily weighted toward technology and growth stocks. When interest rates rise or growth concerns emerge, Nasdaq stocks often fall while more stable Dow components may hold or gain value. Q3: Is a mixed market close a bearish or bullish signal? It is neither exclusively bearish nor bullish. It is a signal of divergence and uncertainty. It shows investors are discriminating between sectors based on perceived risk and future earnings potential. It can precede a broader market move in either direction once the tension between sectors resolves. Q4: How should an investor react to a mixed trading day? Investors should generally avoid reactive trading based on a single day’s action. Instead, they should review their portfolio’s asset allocation to ensure it remains aligned with their long-term risk tolerance and goals. A mixed day underscores the importance of diversification across sectors and asset classes. Q5: What economic data do traders watch that causes such splits? Traders closely monitor Treasury yield movements, inflation reports (CPI, PCE), Federal Reserve meeting minutes and speeches, monthly jobs data, and early corporate earnings guidance. Differing impacts of this data on various sectors—like tech versus banks—is what frequently leads to a mixed market close. This post US Stocks Mixed: Dow’s Resilient Gain Defies Tech-Led Market Decline first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Taking your first steps into cryptocurrency trading can feel like learning a new language, especially with so many platforms and security concerns to consider. For aspiring traders eager to seize opportunity yet wary of risk, setting up a trading account is the foundation for all future strategies. By focusing on a secure setup and a strong awareness of how exchanges work, you put yourself in the best position to manage volatility and maximize profits as you enter the world of digital assets. Quick Summary Key InsightExplanation1. Choose a Reliable ExchangeSelecting a reputable cryptocurrency exchange ensures security and user-friendly experience for trading.2. Implement Risk ManagementUse strategies like stop-loss orders and position sizing to protect your investments from market volatility.3. Diversify Your PortfolioSpread your investments across various cryptocurrencies to minimize risk and maximize potential returns.4. Track Your PerformanceRegularly analyze your trading metrics to assess effectiveness and make necessary adjustments to your strategy.5. Establish a Clear Trading StrategyDefine entry and exit rules to guide your trading decisions and reduce emotional influences in the market. Step 1: Set Up Your Crypto Trading Account Setting up a crypto trading account is your gateway to entering the dynamic world of cryptocurrency markets. This step will guide you through creating a secure and functional trading platform that enables you to buy, sell, and manage digital assets. To begin, you'll need to select a reputable cryptocurrency exchange. Top platforms like Coinbase, Binance, and Kraken offer user-friendly interfaces for beginners. Understanding crypto trading platforms is critical before making your selection. Consider these key factors when choosing an exchange: Security features and track record Available cryptocurrencies Transaction fees User interface and mobile compatibility Geographic restrictions The account setup process typically involves several standard steps. First, create your account by providing basic personal information like your name, email address, and a strong password. Most exchanges require identity verification through a process called Know Your Customer (KYC), which involves submitting government-issued identification and proof of address. Next, you'll need to link a payment method. This can include bank transfers, credit cards, or digital payment platforms. Be aware that each method carries different transaction fees and processing times. Some exchanges also support direct cryptocurrency transfers from existing wallets. Pro tip: Always enable two-factor authentication (2FA) to add an extra layer of security to your trading account. Pro tip: Start with a small initial deposit to familiarize yourself with the platform's features and trading mechanics before committing significant funds. Step 2: Analyze Market Trends and Select Coins Analyzing market trends and selecting the right cryptocurrencies is a crucial skill that can significantly impact your trading success. This step will help you develop a systematic approach to evaluating crypto assets and making informed investment decisions. Professional crypto market analysis requires a comprehensive approach that combines multiple analytical methods. You'll need to master three key analysis techniques: Fundamental Analysis: Evaluate the project's core strengths Team credentials and experience Technology and innovation Whitepaper quality Real-world use cases Technical Analysis: Study price charts and market indicators Trading volume Price patterns Moving averages Relative strength index (RSI) On-Chain Analysis: Examine blockchain-specific metrics Transaction volumes Active wallet addresses Network growth Token distribution Start by identifying cryptocurrencies with solid fundamentals and proven track records. Look for projects with clear technological advantages, strong development teams, and demonstrable real-world applications. Pay close attention to the coin's market capitalization, trading volume, and historical price performance. Successful crypto investing requires a balanced approach that combines rigorous research with strategic thinking. Pro tip: Always diversify your portfolio across multiple cryptocurrencies and allocate no more than 2-5% of your total investment to any single asset to manage risk effectively. Step 3: Develop Your Trading Strategy Developing a robust trading strategy is the cornerstone of successful cryptocurrency investing. This step will help you design a personalized approach that aligns with your financial goals, risk tolerance, and market understanding. Cryptocurrency trading strategies vary widely, and selecting the right approach is crucial for managing the market's inherent volatility. Consider these primary trading strategies: Day Trading Execute multiple trades within 24 hours Requires constant market monitoring Suitable for high-engagement traders Swing Trading Hold positions for several days to weeks Capitalizes on market momentum Less time-intensive than day trading HODLing Long-term investment strategy Minimal active trading Best for believers in specific crypto projects Your strategy should incorporate clear entry and exit rules. This means establishing precise conditions for when you'll buy or sell a cryptocurrency. Develop a risk management plan that includes stop-loss orders to protect your capital from significant downturns. Consider setting maximum loss thresholds and stick to them rigorously. Here's a comparison of popular crypto trading strategies and their suitability for different trader profiles: Strategy TypeTime CommitmentRisk LevelIdeal ForDay TradingHigh (all day)HighActive, experiencedSwing TradingModerate (days)MediumPart-time, analyticalHODLingLow (long-term)LowerPatient, long-term view A well-defined trading strategy is your best defense against emotional decision-making in the volatile crypto market. Pro tip: Create a detailed trading journal to track your strategies, recording every trade's rationale, entry and exit points, and performance to continuously refine your approach. Step 4: Execute Trades and Manage Risk Successful cryptocurrency trading hinges on your ability to execute trades strategically and protect your investment from potential losses. This step will teach you how to navigate the volatile crypto market with confidence and discipline. Top rules for successful trading emphasize the critical importance of risk management. Your trading approach should include several key defensive strategies: Position Sizing Limit investment per trade to 1-2% of total capital Prevents catastrophic losses from single trades Allows sustained trading during market volatility Stop-Loss Orders Automatically sell when price drops to predetermined level Caps potential losses Removes emotional decision-making Risk-Reward Ratio Target at least 1:2 ratio Potential gain should be double potential loss Helps maintain long-term profitability Implement precise trade execution rules that remove emotional impulses. This means establishing clear conditions for entering and exiting trades based on technical indicators, market analysis, and your predefined strategy. Always have a backup plan and be prepared to adapt quickly to changing market conditions. Consistent risk management is more important than occasional big wins in cryptocurrency trading. Pro tip: Never invest more than you can afford to lose and maintain a separate emergency fund completely separate from your trading capital. Step 5: Track Performance and Adjust Tactics Maintaining a successful cryptocurrency trading strategy requires continuous monitoring and strategic adjustments. This step will teach you how to systematically evaluate your trading performance and refine your approach based on real market data. Cryptocurrency trading performance tracking involves several critical analytical techniques. Develop a comprehensive approach to measuring your trading effectiveness: Performance Metrics Total portfolio returns Win/loss ratio Average profit per trade Maximum drawdown Risk-adjusted return Tracking Tools Spreadsheet logs Professional portfolio trackers Cryptocurrency exchange reports Third-party analytics platforms Evaluation Frequency Weekly performance review Monthly strategic assessment Quarterly comprehensive analysis Review your trading journal meticulously, documenting every trade's context, rationale, entry and exit points, and emotional state. This practice helps identify patterns in your decision-making and reveals both successful strategies and potential psychological biases that might impact your trading performance. Below is a quick-reference guide to key metrics for evaluating your crypto trading performance: MetricWhat It MeasuresWhy It MattersTotal Portfolio ReturnOverall gains or lossesTracks overall successWin/Loss RatioNumber of profitable tradesShows trading effectivenessRisk-Adjusted ReturnReturn relative to risk takenAssesses performance quality Successful traders view performance tracking not as a chore, but as a critical investment in their future profitability. Pro tip: Create a standardized template for tracking trades that captures all relevant information, making your performance reviews more objective and insightful. Master Crypto Trading With Expert Insights and Trusted News Navigating the fast-paced world of cryptocurrency trading can feel overwhelming. This step-by-step guide highlights essential challenges like setting up secure accounts, analyzing market trends, and developing strong trading strategies. If you want to refine your skills in technical terms such as risk management, stop-loss orders, and portfolio diversification you need reliable guidance and real-time data to make informed decisions confidently. Stay ahead by visiting Crypto Daily , the leading source for the latest insights on Bitcoin, Ethereum, blockchain technology, and much more. Access expert analysis and breaking news that empowers you to track market performances and adjust tactics effectively. Start mastering crypto trading now by exploring trusted resources and up-to-date news at Crypto Daily. Don’t miss the chance to turn market volatility into opportunity. Your profitable crypto journey begins here. Frequently Asked Questions How do I set up my crypto trading account? To set up a crypto trading account, choose a reputable exchange and complete the registration process by providing your personal information. Link a payment method and enable two-factor authentication for extra security. What factors should I consider when selecting cryptocurrencies for trading? When selecting cryptocurrencies, evaluate their fundamentals, market trends, and technical indicators. Focus on projects with strong development teams, clear use cases, and proven market performance to make informed trading decisions. What trading strategies are effective for beginners in crypto trading? Effective trading strategies for beginners include HODLing for long-term gains, swing trading for moderate engagement, and day trading for active participation. Determine your risk tolerance and time commitment to select a strategy that aligns with your trading style. How can I manage risks in cryptocurrency trading? Manage risks by implementing position sizing, using stop-loss orders, and maintaining a healthy risk-reward ratio. Limit your investment per trade to no more than 1-2% of your total capital to prevent significant losses. What metrics should I track to evaluate my trading performance? Track performance metrics such as total portfolio returns, win/loss ratio, and average profit per trade to evaluate your trading effectiveness. Conduct weekly and monthly reviews to adjust your strategies based on insights gained from your performance data. How can I refine my trading strategies over time? Refine your trading strategies by maintaining a detailed trading journal and regularly reviewing your trades. Analyze the reasons behind each trade's outcome to identify patterns and make data-driven adjustments to improve future performance. Recommended Copy Trading in Crypto: A Guide to Pros, Cons, and Finding the Right Trader - Bitzo How to Combine Live and Pre-Match Bets in One Crypto Strategy - Bitzo How to Bet Live Using Crypto: Trusted USDT Sportsbooks Explained - Bitzo Make Your BTC Holdings Work for You: How to Get Interest on Crypto Instantly - Bitzo Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Kyle Samani steps back from Multicoin Capital to explore new tech, as LINK falls 5.47% to $9.33 amid bearish indicators and BTC downtrend.

CME Group is looking at launching its own coin on a decentralized network, while moving crypto products to 24/7 trading as volumes jump 92%.

The release of documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has sparked renewed debate within the crypto community, as newly surfaced details appear to show deeper — though still indirect — links between Epstein and some of the earliest institutions and figures connected to Bitcoin (BTC). While none of the material provides evidence that Epstein played a role in creating Bitcoin itself, the disclosures have fueled questions about how early crypto infrastructure was funded during a critical period. Epstein’s Alleged Crypto Investments The discussion gained momentum after a widely shared social media post by market analyst Hugo Crypto, who summarized what he described as verified information drawn from DOJ documents. According to that assessment , Epstein’s involvement with crypto was primarily as an investor and networker, rather than a technical contributor. One of the most notable revelations involves US-based crypto exchange Coinbase. DOJ records reportedly show that Epstein invested approximately $3 million into Coinbase in 2014 through IGO Company LLC, an entity organized by Brock Pierce and Blockchain Capital. The documents further suggest that Coinbase co-founder Fred Ehrsam was aware of Epstein’s involvement and had expressed interest in meeting him personally. In 2018, Epstein allegedly sold part of his Coinbase stake back to the company for roughly $15 million. Another area drawing attention is Blockstream, a major Bitcoin infrastructure company. According to the documents, Epstein participated in Blockstream’s seed round through Joi Ito, with an initial commitment of $50,000 that was later increased to $500,000. An April 2014 email attributed to Epstein shows him telling Bitcoin developer Amir Taaki that he had recently hosted “Andy Back,” understood to mean Adam Back, on his private island, Little Saint James. Adam Back has since stated that Epstein’s investment in Blockstream was unwound. Early Bitcoin Funding At MIT Media Lab The documents also shed light on Epstein’s indirect connection to Bitcoin Core developers through the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Media Lab. After the collapse of the Bitcoin Foundation in 2015 left core developers without funding, Joi Ito reportedly helped bring three of the five core developers — Wladimir van der Laan, Gavin Andresen, and Cory Fields — to MIT’s “Digital Currency Initiative.” That initiative was allegedly funded by Epstein’s donations to MIT, which totaled about $850,000 between 2002 and 2017, with roughly $525,000 directed specifically to the Digital Currency Initiative. In an internal message cited in the files, Ito allegedly thanked Epstein for gift funds that allowed MIT to “move quickly and win this round.” The developers themselves have said they were unaware of the source of the funding, and internal MIT communications reportedly referred to Epstein as “Voldemort.” Satoshi Nakamoto Speculation Speculation around Bitcoin’s anonymous creator has also resurfaced. A screenshot of an email allegedly sent by Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell, claiming that “the pseudonym Satoshi works perfectly,” circulated widely online but has since been debunked. Hugo Crypto asserts that the documents confirm that in a 2016 email, Epstein claimed he had “spoken with some of the founders of Bitcoin.” Additionally, Epstein’s personal guest lists reportedly include an entry labeled “satoshi (bitcoin)” for a United Nations (UN) Climate Week event, listed alongside figures such as Larry Summers and Peter Thiel. Who that reference was meant to identify remains unknown. While the documents suggest Epstein had financial exposure to early crypto companies and supported institutions that housed Bitcoin developers , there is no evidence linking him to Bitcoin’s code, cryptography, wallets, or technical design. In that sense, claims that Epstein “built” Bitcoin appear unfounded. Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Executives from self-driving car companies Waymo LLC and Tesla testified at the Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday about the future of federal regulation in the industry. The firms’ officials urged Congress to speed legislation on the deployment of self-driving vehicles, warning of competitive threats from China. The Senate hearing included testimony from Waymo, Tesla, and others on efforts to accelerate the deployment of robotaxis by those companies. Congress is also focused on legislation that would make it easier for firms to deploy robotaxis without human controls. U.S. self-driving companies warn of China’s threat to the AV industry Here is the full opening statement today before the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee from Lars Moravy, VP of Vehicle Engineering at @Tesla . “ For America to maintain its position in global technological development and grow its advanced manufacturing capabilities, we must enact a… pic.twitter.com/mDXA9pDKhk — Sawyer Merritt (@SawyerMerritt) February 4, 2026 Democratic Senator Gary Peters argued that self-driving technology is a huge part of the future of the global automotive industry. He also pointed out that Beijing is heavily investing in the production of autonomous vehicles. The U.S. official added that it’s imperative that the Trump administration take action to ensure American innovation and standards lead the way on the world stage, rather than China. Senate Commerce Committee Chair Ted Cruz called for modernizing regulations on self-driving vehicles. He argued that innovation won’t stop if Congress fails to act fast, but U.S. officials will simply push it elsewhere. Cruz also acknowledged that China is aggressively working to deploy autonomous transportation at scale. Waymo’s Chief Safety Officer, Mauricio Pena, urged Congress to pass legislation to advance autonomous vehicles in the U.S. He argued that U.S. leadership in self-driving companies is currently under threat from Chinese companies. Waymo’s official acknowledged that the U.S. and Chinese AV companies are competing for the future of autonomous driving. Pena said the firm considers autonomous vehicles a trillion-dollar industry, on par with the importance of flight and space travel. “We believe Congress has a once-in-a-generation opportunity to secure American leadership in this industry by creating a national AV legislative framework that sets a high safety standard for this industry.” – Mauricio Pena , Chief Safety Officer at Waymo. Pena believes that greater certainty in the industry will unlock more investment. He also argued that greater certainty will prevent bad actors from undermining public trust in the AV technology. Pena also cautioned that Chinese self-driving companies are scaling rapidly due to state support. Chinese AV companies have the largest AV fleets in the world, followed by Waymo. He believes that the absence of U.S. leadership on national AV legislation will make Chinese AV competitors set the safety and technical standards for the rest of the industry. Waymo reports incidents with its autonomous vehicles The Senate hearing comes as multiple U.S. states are allowing Waymo’s self-driving vehicles despite the company’s autonomous cars having had recent incidents. A report by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) initiated a probe into Waymo late last year after at least 19 incidents in Austin in which Waymo vehicles drove past stopped school buses. One of the firm’s automobiles also struck a student in Santa Monica, California. Justin Kintz, Waymo’s Head of Global Public Policy, argued that the incidents are edge cases, given that the company is taking over 400,000 trips per week. He also argued that the Santa Monica incident was likely better handled as a person-driven incident. Cruz also pointed to the potential for autonomous vehicles to minimize traffic, reduce crashes, and help people with disabilities gain independence. He believes that a flurry of federal and state laws would make it much more difficult to introduce safer, more advanced self-driving vehicles into the industry. The Senate chair is confident that Wednesday’s hearing examined how outdated regulations are holding back lifesaving technology and that Congress’s plan to fix it. Tesla Vice President of Vehicle Engineering Lars Moravy and Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association CEO Jeff Farrah also testified at today’s hearing. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

CME is building its own coin. Not a theory. It’s happening. On an earnings call, Terry Duffy, the Chairman and CEO, confirmed that a tokenized cash product is in the works and will be released in 2026. It’s being developed with Google Cloud, and the plan is to run it on a decentralized network that other financial firms can also use. Terry didn’t say exactly what kind of coin this is going to be. It might be its own CME-issued token, or it could just be a tool for handling settlements and margins, kind of like JPMorgan’s JPMD deposit token. When someone from Morgan Stanley asked about tokenized collateral, Terry called it “pretty deep” but said they’re building their own coin either way. CME lays out the risks tied to accepting crypto assets as margin CME is already deep in crypto. It started with bitcoin futures, then added ETH, SOL, and XRP. This new product takes things further. Terry said the launch will use “another depository bank that will help facilitate those transactions.” So CME won’t handle all of it alone. He also said they’re looking into other types of on-chain collateral, including stablecoins and tokenized money market funds, but there’s a line they won’t cross. “It all depends on who is issuing the token and giving it to us,” Terry said. “And it would also depend on the risks associated with that token. Would we haircut it to a point where it’s even worth being taken or not?” Terry made it clear: CME won’t accept just any token. He said if someone brings a token from a systemically important financial institution, he might take it seriously. But a third-tier or fourth-tier bank? “That’s probably something I would not accept,” he said. Terry also added , “We’re not going to put the enterprise at risk by taking something we can’t get our arms around.” CME beats Wall Street with strong Q4 and full-year numbers Let’s talk numbers. CME crushed expectations again. For the fourth quarter of 2025, it reported $1.6 billion in revenue and $1.0 billion in operating income. Net income was $1.2 billion, with $3.24 in diluted earnings per share. On an adjusted basis, net income was $1.0 billion, and EPS was $2.77. Full-year revenue for 2025 hit $6.5 billion, with $4.2 billion in operating income. Net income landed at $4.1 billion. Adjusted EPS was $11.20. Terry said, “Last year, CME Group delivered the best year in our history and our fourth consecutive year of record revenue, adjusted operating income, adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share.” The platform hit an all-time high for average daily volume, hitting 28.1 million contracts in 2025. That included a 12% jump in commodities trading and a 5% rise in financials. For Q4 alone, volume hit 27.4 million contracts per day, the best fourth quarter on record. Outside the U.S., volume reached 8.3 million contracts, up 9% from the year before. Asia was up 18%, while EMEA rose 6%. Revenue from clearing and transaction fees hit $1.3 billion in Q4. Each contract pulled in about $0.707. Market data revenue was $208 million. By the end of 2025, CME had $4.6 billion in cash, including $200 million placed with the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation. It also carried $3.4 billion in debt. And it paid out $3.9 billion in dividends for the year. Since it adopted its variable dividend policy back in 2012, it’s returned nearly $30 billion to shareholders. Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

SYRUP is squeezed between critical levels at $0.30; watch for a breakout above $0.3395 for upside, below $0.2879 for downside. BTC's downtrend increases altcoin risk, while volume and momentum sign...

Controversy is sweeping across the XRP community after a crypto market commentator shared shocking details linking Coinbase and American financier and convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein , with former regulatory actions that impacted XRP. The claims have ignited debate within the community over whether compliance concerns solely drove previous exchange decisions and enforcement activity targeting XRP . Claimed Ties Connect Coinbase, Epstein, And XRP’s SEC Lawsuit Shocked reactions have emerged from XRP community members after market expert Crypto Bitlord raised allegations suggesting a possible link between Coinbase’s early investment history, communications tied to Epstein’s legal counsel, and subsequent events surrounding XRP. He argued that emails shared from Coinbase’s early fundraising period showed that entities connected to Epstein invested early in the crypto exchange through intermediary Limited Liability Companies (LLCs). The emails show Coinbase Co-founder and CEO Brian Armstrong communicating with Darren Indyke, a lawyer who represented Epstein, about a $3 million investment made when Coinbase was still in its early stages. In the messages, Armstrong discussed the possibility of buying back the early investors’ stake since Coinbase had grown in value. He also mentioned changing the name of the company that had initially invested, possibly for privacy or legal reasons. Crypto Bitlord claimed that these Epstein emails suggest that funds linked to the deceased sex offender were previously invested in Coinbase. He argued that this link might help explain why the crypto exchange delisted XRP in the US after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit against Ripple Labs. According to the expert, the timing of XRP’s delisting and the SEC investigations suggests coordinated pressure from early Coinbase investors allegedly linked to Epstein, who reportedly wanted to limit XRP’s growth during its formative years. He claimed these investors had pushed for XRP to be removed from the market long before regulatory action followed. As a result, Crypto Bitlord described the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple as a “rigged setup from day one.” While there is no public evidence supporting Crypto Bitlord’s claims, he said he is working to piece together the timelines and gather proof. So far, neither Coinbase nor the US SEC has confirmed any Epstein-linked involvement with XRP. The SEC has also consistently maintained that its lawsuit against Ripple was based on securities law concerns . Leaked Emails Show The Bill Gates Foundation Evaluating Ripple In 2017 In other news, leaked emails from the Bill Gates-backed Foundation reveal early assessments of Ripple and Stellar compared to the Mojaloop payment platform. The messages, dating back to October 2017, were shared by crypto analyst SMQKE and highlighted internal discussions on overlaps between blockchain systems and potential integrations. Myrle Krantz, a developer associated with Apache Fineract, an open-source platform for core banking systems, noted that Mojaloop, a Ripple fork, shares similarities with Stellar , which was also created as a fork of the original Ripple codebase. The correspondence highlights the Gates Foundation’s focus on Ripple’s technology and its influence on Mojaloop’s design.

HYPE surged, Story delayed, and supply fear met demand.

To achieve profits, investors need to think beyond the immediate price actions and look for fundamental and timing factors. Even though Solana (SOL) is rising and Shiba Inu (SHIB) is at a symbolic low price, their short-term performance is still dependent on the overall market environment. If investors want to achieve substantial profits, a project in the presale phase with a live product is a better option. Among such projects, Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is a standout as it is in Phase 7 of its presale phase and is the final window to catch a $0.04 price before a near 20% jump. Therefore, it is a definitive choice among the best cryptos to buy for profit-oriented investors. Solana and Shiba Inu: Profits Tied to Market Waves Currently, Solana (SOL) is attempting a technical recovery after finding support at $96 and is headed for a test at $120. The technical recovery is dependent on the overall market environment. Solana has also had issues with its network and therefore poses a significant risk for investors. Shiba Inu (SHIB), on the other hand, is at a symbolic low price of $0.0000666 and may benefit from a technical recovery or a relief rally. However, even Shiba Inu is a meme token and does not offer a definitive promise for profits. Perfect timing is required for investors to achieve substantial profits with Solana and Shiba Inu. The Presale Advantage Mutuum Finance is a project offering the best of both worlds: timing and profit opportunities. The project is offering its token at $0.04 during its Phase 7 presale, but this phase is ending fast and will go into a new phase at a higher price. The final launch price is set at $0.06. For an investor who puts $1,000 into MUTM today, this launch price means a $500 profit even before the token has gone live. Analysts believe that potential top-tier exchange listings, the real yields from the live protocol, and multichain plans will create a demand that will drive the price of this crypto asset 9x higher than its current price. This means that the investment of $1,000 could rise to $9,000. This makes it one of the most profitable opportunities that can be had from investing in new crypto assets. A Live Testnet Demonstrates Functionality One of the key profit indicators that must always be met by a new crypto asset is the demonstration of the functionality of the asset. Mutuum Finance has already achieved this milestone. For instance, the company has already launched its V1 protocol on the Sepolia testnet . This means that the public can already test the entire lending protocol. This is important because it provides a demonstration of the functionality of the asset. This testnet has already been shown to demonstrate features of asset deposits, loans, and even auto-liquidations. Daily Incentives In addition to the presale, Mutuum Finance has also developed profit incentives that can provide users with daily profits. For instance, the company has developed a leaderboard that ranks the top participants in the presale. This leaderboard provides a $500 MUTM bonus every day for the first-place depositor. This provides users with incentives. In addition, Mutuum Finance has also developed security features that provide users with safety. For instance, the team has developed a $50,000 bug bounty program in conjunction with CertiK. Users get rewarded to identify potential security threats related to the MUTM token smart contract. One could for instance, make $200 from a low-risk threat and up to $2,000 for a high-risk threat. This makes MUTM one of the best cryptos to buy for users who are interested in profit and security. Positioning for a Profitable Future As SOL and SHIB ride market volatility, Mutuum Finance offers an established framework with several drivers for profit: early access to the presale, testnet success, daily rewards, and security. To the investor wanting to know which are the top cryptos to buy for maximizing returns on their investment, MUTM represents the ultimate combination to build their profits. For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below: Website: https://mutuum.com/ Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance

Mitsubishi is now planning for a much bigger jump in electric vehicle sales across Europe, right after posting a surprise rise in production for FY Q1 2026. On Wednesday, the Japanese automaker confirmed a 6.3% increase in global output to 76,688 vehicles, up from 72,118 in Q1 2025. Mitsubishi’s production inside Japan has surged 16% to 45,336 units, while factories outside Japan reported a drop of over 5%, ending at 31,352 units. At the same time, Mitsubishi’s domestic sales (including imported models) fell 7% to 9,285 units in December. But exports jumped, climbing 25% to 27,589 vehicles, thanks to a massive 83% spike in shipments to North America, where it sent out 14,208 units. Mitsubishi expands EV push with new Eclipse Cross SUV for Europe The company confirmed that Mitsubishi Motors Europe B.V. will start rolling out the new Eclipse Cross battery electric vehicle (BEV) before the end of 2025. This model will be built at the Renault Group’s ElectriCity Douai plant in France under the OEM agreement between the two automakers. This follows earlier collaborations on the ASX compact SUV, the Colt hatchback, and the Grandis hybrid. The new Eclipse Cross is fully electric, built on the CMF-EV platform, and designed with about 600 kilometers of range. It will ship with Google built-in features and what Mitsubishi describes as the latest safety tech. The SUV features the company’s usual Dynamic Shield front-end design. Takao Kato, Mitsubishi’s CEO, said, “Following the launch of the Outlander plug-in hybrid EV and the Grandis hybrid EV, rolling out the all-new Eclipse Cross marks a crucial step in our electrification strategy in Europe.” Kato also added that the company sees this as part of its mission toward carbon neutrality and is focused on expanding its electrified lineup to meet demand across Europe. He said Mitsubishi will keep offering different kinds of EVs to meet changing customer needs in each market. Global annual production down, exports to North America up sharply Even though December looked strong, the company’s full-year numbers told a different story. In 2025, Mitsubishi produced 883,828 vehicles globally, down 6.4% from 944,708 units the year before. Domestic output slipped 2.1% to 471,467 units, and overseas production dropped even more, down 11% to 412,361 units. Japan sales for the year fell 1.3% to 117,896 units, and total exports dipped 2.9% to 227,760 units. The company is betting that the upcoming EV launches in Europe will help turn things around. But it’s not just Mitsubishi making headlines. Banking giant MUFG said it already hit 86% of its full-year profit forecast of 2.1 trillion yen, with no plans to revise the target. Smaller rivals Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group and Mizuho Financial Group reported 12% and 14% profit growth, respectively. But Takayuki Hara, MUFG’s CFO, warned that possible policy changes after Japan’s next general election could impact their outlook. Back to Mitsubishi, the FY2025 Q2 earnings showed a drop in underlying operating cash flow, down from ¥527.3 billion to ¥446.3 billion. Net income also shrank to ¥355.8 billion versus ¥618.1 billion in Q1 2025, due to weaker Australian coal market conditions and no major capital recycling gains like last time. Still, both numbers were on track with the yearly plan. The ¥1 trillion share buyback also kept moving, with ¥578.2 billion already repurchased as of September 30. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

BitcoinWorld Revealing a16z’s $1.7 Billion AI Infrastructure Strategy: What Gets Funded and What Gets Ignored Andreessen Horowitz’s recent $15 billion fundraise represents a seismic shift in venture capital deployment, with $1.7 billion specifically earmarked for AI infrastructure investments. This massive allocation, announced in February 2026, signals the firm’s conviction that AI’s foundational technologies represent the most critical investment opportunity of the decade. The infrastructure team, led by general partner Jennifer Li, now commands unprecedented resources to shape the future of artificial intelligence development across multiple layers of the technology stack. a16z’s AI Infrastructure Investment Thesis Andreessen Horowitz’s infrastructure team operates with a clearly defined investment philosophy that prioritizes foundational technologies over application-layer solutions. The team focuses on what Jennifer Li describes as “the heartbeat of AI development”—everything from semiconductor design to developer software stacks. This comprehensive approach reflects a16z’s belief that infrastructure investments create the most durable competitive advantages in the rapidly evolving AI landscape. The firm’s infrastructure portfolio includes prominent names like OpenAI, ElevenLabs, Ideogram, and Fal, representing diverse infrastructure categories from foundational models to specialized tooling. According to investment data analyzed from public filings, a16z’s infrastructure team has consistently received larger allocations than other vertical teams within the firm. In 2024, the team managed $1.25 billion from a $7.2 billion fundraise, demonstrating the firm’s long-standing commitment to infrastructure investing. The $1.7 Billion Deployment Strategy Jennifer Li’s investment strategy emphasizes three core infrastructure categories: compute infrastructure, developer tools, and specialized AI platforms. Compute infrastructure includes investments in chip design companies and cloud optimization technologies that address the growing computational demands of advanced AI models. Developer tools encompass everything from AI-assisted coding platforms like Cursor to specialized deployment frameworks that simplify AI integration. Specialized AI platforms represent the third category, including companies like ElevenLabs for voice AI and Fal for multimodal model marketplaces. These platforms provide essential building blocks that enable broader AI adoption across industries. The infrastructure team’s investment criteria prioritize companies solving fundamental technical challenges rather than those focusing primarily on user-facing applications. What a16z Is Actually Funding in 2026 The current investment focus reflects several emerging trends in AI infrastructure. First, the team prioritizes technologies that address the AI talent shortage through automation and abstraction. Companies that reduce the expertise required to deploy sophisticated AI systems receive particular attention. Second, search infrastructure has emerged as a critical investment area, with Li noting its importance exceeds common perception. Third, the team funds technologies enabling AI specialization across vertical domains. Rather than pursuing general-purpose solutions, a16z backs infrastructure that allows customization for specific industries and use cases. Fourth, data management and curation platforms represent another priority area, addressing the growing recognition that data quality often matters more than model architecture. a16z AI Infrastructure Investment Categories Category Example Companies Investment Rationale Compute Infrastructure Black Forrest Labs Addressing GPU scarcity and optimization Developer Tools Cursor, Various SDKs Reducing AI implementation complexity Specialized Platforms ElevenLabs, Fal Providing vertical-specific AI capabilities Data Infrastructure Multiple portfolio companies Solving data quality and management challenges Portfolio Company Success Factors Analysis of a16z’s most successful AI infrastructure investments reveals several common characteristics. These companies typically demonstrate: Technical differentiation: Proprietary approaches to solving fundamental infrastructure challenges Developer adoption: Strong traction within technical communities before enterprise sales Platform potential: Ability to support multiple applications and use cases Talent density: Exceptional technical teams with deep domain expertise Market timing: Solutions addressing immediate, painful infrastructure gaps Jennifer Li emphasizes that successful infrastructure companies often emerge from founders who have personally experienced the problems they’re solving. This firsthand understanding enables more effective solution design and faster market adoption. What a16z’s Infrastructure Team Is Ignoring Equally revealing are the areas receiving less attention from a16z’s infrastructure team. Contrary to popular narratives, the team maintains skepticism about several widely discussed AI trends. First, Li expresses measured views about AI’s near-term potential to replace human creativity, preferring investments that augment rather than replace human capabilities. Second, the team shows limited interest in consumer-facing AI applications unless they demonstrate clear infrastructure characteristics. Third, highly speculative AI research without immediate commercial applications receives less funding priority. Fourth, me-too solutions that merely replicate existing infrastructure with marginal improvements rarely secure investment. Fifth, the team avoids investments in areas where regulatory uncertainty creates significant business risk. Sixth, pure research organizations without clear paths to productization receive less attention than companies balancing research with commercial deployment. This selective approach reflects the infrastructure team’s focus on building sustainable businesses rather than pursuing technological novelty for its own sake. The Talent Crunch in AI-Native Startups Jennifer Li identifies talent availability as a critical constraint affecting AI infrastructure development. The most successful portfolio companies typically feature founding teams with exceptional technical backgrounds and prior experience building at scale. This talent concentration creates both opportunities and challenges for new entrants. The infrastructure team actively seeks founders who combine deep technical expertise with pragmatic business understanding. Companies addressing the talent shortage through better tools and automation receive particular interest. This focus reflects the reality that AI infrastructure development requires specialized skills that remain scarce despite growing educational initiatives. Emerging Opportunities in AI Infrastructure Several infrastructure gaps remain despite significant investment activity. First, technologies that bridge different AI modalities—combining text, voice, image, and video processing—represent substantial opportunities. Second, infrastructure supporting AI safety and alignment continues to receive attention, though investment levels remain below some experts’ recommendations. Third, edge AI infrastructure enabling decentralized AI deployment presents growing opportunities as privacy concerns and latency requirements drive computing toward endpoints. Fourth, specialized hardware for particular AI workloads beyond general-purpose GPUs shows increasing promise. Fifth, infrastructure supporting AI governance and compliance represents an emerging category as regulatory frameworks mature. Jennifer Li notes that voice AI technologies, while increasingly important, still face adoption barriers related to user comfort and technical limitations. Similarly, multimodal AI systems require more sophisticated infrastructure than single-modality approaches. These challenges create investment opportunities for companies developing next-generation infrastructure solutions. The Search Infrastructure Imperative Search infrastructure represents a particularly important but underappreciated investment area according to a16z’s analysis. As AI systems process increasingly diverse information sources, specialized search capabilities become essential infrastructure components. Companies improving how AI systems discover, retrieve, and verify information receive growing attention. This focus reflects the recognition that information retrieval fundamentally limits AI system capabilities. Better search infrastructure enables more accurate, timely, and comprehensive AI responses across applications. The infrastructure team evaluates search technologies based on their scalability, accuracy, and integration capabilities with existing AI workflows. Conclusion Andreessen Horowitz’s $1.7 billion AI infrastructure investment represents a calculated bet on the foundational technologies that will enable artificial intelligence’s next evolution. The firm’s strategy prioritizes compute optimization, developer tooling, and specialized platforms over application-layer solutions. Jennifer Li’s team maintains selective investment criteria focusing on technical differentiation, market timing, and founder quality. The infrastructure team’s approach reveals both conviction about AI’s transformative potential and pragmatism about implementation challenges. By funding technologies that address fundamental infrastructure gaps while ignoring speculative trends, a16z aims to build the durable foundations supporting AI advancement through 2026 and beyond. This investment strategy will significantly influence which AI capabilities become widely available and which remain constrained by technical limitations. FAQs Q1: What percentage of a16z’s new fund goes to AI infrastructure? The infrastructure team received $1.7 billion from Andreessen Horowitz’s recent $15 billion fundraise, representing approximately 11.3% of total capital. Q2: What types of AI infrastructure companies does a16z typically avoid funding? The team generally avoids consumer applications without infrastructure characteristics, highly speculative research without commercial paths, regulatory-risk-heavy sectors, and me-too solutions with marginal improvements. Q3: How does a16z’s current AI infrastructure investment compare to previous years? The $1.7 billion allocation represents a 36% increase from the $1.25 billion the infrastructure team received in 2024, demonstrating growing conviction in AI infrastructure opportunities. Q4: What makes AI infrastructure different from other technology infrastructure investments? AI infrastructure requires specialized approaches to computational scaling, data management, model deployment, and integration complexity that differ significantly from traditional technology infrastructure. Q5: How does a16z evaluate potential AI infrastructure investments? The team assesses technical differentiation, founder expertise, market timing, platform potential, and addressable market size, with particular emphasis on solving fundamental infrastructure challenges. This post Revealing a16z’s $1.7 Billion AI Infrastructure Strategy: What Gets Funded and What Gets Ignored first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Ethereum crypto game Axie Infinity is introducing a new token that will be airdropped to stakers and those who play its upcoming land game.

Gold is currently trading at $4,906/oz as macro desks keep paying for convexity in the oldest hedge, while Bitcoin is trading at $72,639 after a bounce to $78,376. Same tape. Different bid. Gold Flows Tell the Story The “receipt” for gold’s new regime sits in flow math, not slogans. World Gold Council data for full-year 2025 shows global gold ETF holdings of +801 tonnes (second-strongest year on record) and Q4 ETF inflows of 175 tonnes, alongside Q4 bar-and-coin demand of 420 tonnes, the strongest Q4 in 12 years. In the U.S., WGC reports U.S. gold demand of 679 tonnes in 2025 (+140% y/y) and U.S. gold-backed ETF demand of 437 tonnes, bringing holdings to 2,019 tonnes (about $280bn in AUM as of Dec. 31, 2025). That’s known as allocation-scale buying. JP Morgan pushed the forward curve higher, as a Reuters-reported note set a $6,300/oz target for end-2026 and penciled in 800 tonnes of central-bank buying for 2026. JPMorgan predicts gold will surge to $6,300 per ounce by year-end. Analyst Gregory Shearer remains bullish, citing robust demand from central banks. https://t.co/YFCCFq9K5O — Business Insider (@BusinessInsider) February 2, 2026 Positioning mechanics have also amplified the move. CME raised margin requirements for Comex gold futures to 8% from 6% for non-heightened risk profiles (and to 8.8% from 6.6% for heightened-risk), with silver margins to 15% from 11%, tightening the noose on leveraged metals books after violent daily ranges. Bitcoin did not print the same “forced buyer” profile in this drawdown. CoinMarketCap’s tape shows BTC is still ~40% below its ATH of $126,198 , which keeps systematic vol-control and risk-parity style sizing mechanically smaller than in trend regimes. The market cleared risk by selling what trades like a high-beta liquidity proxy. How Desks Treat Gold vs. Bitcoin A gold bid backed by ETF balance-sheet absorption (801t in 2025) and central-bank flow expectations (800t in 2026) trades through rate scares and margin hikes because allocators can average in with low tracking error against benchmarks. Bitcoin’s “hedge” bid behaves like a risk-budget inventory on desks that fund it through liquidity. When margins rise, real yields reprice, or equity vol spikes, those desks cut BTC first because BTC sizing keys off VAR, not a quarterly asset-allocation committee memo. The post Same Macro Tape, Different Bid – Gold Absorbs Flows as Bitcoin Swings appeared first on Cryptonews .

BNB Chain has deployed infrastructure that will identify and verify AI agents on Mainnet and Testnet. The ERC-8004 and BAP-578 launched by BNB Chain are AI programs that can function independently and complete different tasks without human interference How does ERC-8004 change how AI agents interact on BNB Chain? BNB Chain has officially announced the deployment of the ERC-8004 infrastructure on both the BSC Mainnet and Testnet. This provides a standard for “Trustless Agents” and allows software programs to have their own verifiable identities and reputations on the blockchain. ERC-8004 is often described as a “passport” and a “credit score” for AI. In the past, if an AI agent wanted to buy something or perform a task for a user, other systems had no way to know if that agent was legitimate. ERC-8004 has introduced the Identity Registry, the Reputation Registry, and the Validation Registry to solve this. The Identity Registry gives every AI agent a unique ID on the blockchain. This ID is an ERC-721 token, which is the same technology used for NFTs. Because it is on-chain, any other person or smart contract can check the agent’s ID to make sure it is not an imposter. This registry includes a “Token URI” that points to a file describing what the agent can do and how to talk to it. This makes AI agents easy to find and verify across the entire internet. The Reputation Registry keeps a permanent record of agent performances. If an agent completes a task, it gets feedback that is stored on the blockchain and is therefore unable to be changed or deleted. The Validation Registry gives users the ability to check an agent’s work using advanced technology like zero-knowledge proofs (zk-proofs) or Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs). BNB Chain has launched BAP-578 BNB Chain is also launching BAP-578, a new type of standard called a BNB Application Proposal that introduces Non-Fungible Agents (NFA). An NFA can own its own digital wallet. This means the AI agent can hold its own money and pay for the services it needs to finish a job. For example, if a user hires an AI agent to plan a trip, it can use its own wallet to book the flights and hotels. The agent uses its on-chain identity to prove it is authorized to spend the funds and creates a system where software can trade with other software. BNB Chain is an ideal place for this because of its low fees and fast speeds. AI agents often need to do many small tasks very quickly. If gas fees are too high, it becomes too expensive for an agent to operate. A company called Fingerprint launched a new system to detect “Authorized AI Agents.” They are working with big names like OpenAI and AWS to help websites tell the difference between “good” AI agents and “bad” bots. Coinbase and Cloudflare also recently highlighted the x402 protocol that uses old internet codes to allow agents to make instant payments using stablecoins. The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

BitcoinWorld A16z AI Infrastructure Fund: The $1.7 Billion Masterstroke Reshaping Tech’s Foundation In a monumental move that signals a strategic deepening of its technological bets, Silicon Valley venture capital titan Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) has allocated a staggering $1.7 billion specifically to its infrastructure team. This substantial capital infusion, drawn from its recent $15 billion fundraise, targets the foundational layer powering the artificial intelligence revolution. Consequently, this investment will directly fuel companies building the next generation of AI compute, data, and model infrastructure. A16z AI Infrastructure Fund: Decoding the $1.7 Billion Bet Andreessen Horowitz announced its latest $15 billion fundraising round in May 2025, marking one of the largest venture capital pools ever assembled. Significantly, the firm designated $1.7 billion for its dedicated infrastructure investment team. This team, led by general partner Jennifer Li, boasts a formidable portfolio including early and growth-stage investments in industry leaders like OpenAI, ElevenLabs, and emerging forces such as Cursor, Ideogram, and Fal. Therefore, this capital allocation underscores a deliberate pivot towards enabling technologies rather than just application layers. The firm’s infrastructure thesis centers on a critical insight: the exponential growth of AI is straining existing computational and data paradigms. For instance, training advanced large language models requires unprecedented scale. A16z’s strategy addresses this by investing across three core pillars: compute innovation , data infrastructure , and foundational model development . This approach ensures the firm supports the entire stack necessary for AI progress. The Strategic Vision Behind the Capital Deployment Jennifer Li, the a16z general partner overseeing this massive fund, articulates a clear and focused investment thesis. Her team primarily seeks startups that solve fundamental bottlenecks in AI development and deployment. Firstly, they target companies revolutionizing compute efficiency through novel hardware or optimized cloud architectures. Secondly, they invest in platforms that manage, label, and synthesize the vast datasets required for training. Finally, they back teams building the next wave of foundational models and the tools to serve them reliably. This vision translates into tangible market movements. The fund’s capital will accelerate innovation in several high-stakes areas. For example, specialized AI chips, efficient data pipelines, and robust inference engines are all priority sectors. Moreover, this investment comes amid a global race for AI sovereignty and technological leadership, amplifying its strategic importance beyond mere financial returns. Expert Analysis: Why Infrastructure Now? Industry analysts consistently highlight the infrastructure gap as the primary constraint on AI advancement. Training costs for frontier models have soared into the hundreds of millions of dollars. Simultaneously, enterprises struggle to deploy AI at scale due to integration and performance hurdles. A16z’s targeted fund directly addresses these pain points. By funding the picks and shovels of the AI gold rush, the firm positions itself at the most critical and defensible layer of the value chain. Historical context further illuminates this strategy. During the cloud computing boom, foundational investments in platforms like AWS generated outsized, long-term value. Similarly, a16z anticipates that the companies building AI’s core infrastructure will become the indispensable utilities of the coming decade. This long-term, thesis-driven approach is a hallmark of the firm’s investment philosophy. Market Impact and Competitive Landscape The announcement immediately influences the venture capital and startup ecosystem. Other major funds will likely reassess their own allocation strategies, potentially triggering a broader wave of infrastructure investing. Furthermore, for startups in this space, a16z’s move validates their market and provides a clear signal of available capital for ambitious projects. The competitive landscape in AI infrastructure is intensifying. A16z’s portfolio companies now join a field containing tech giants like NVIDIA, Google, and Amazon, as well as other well-funded startups. The table below outlines the primary investment categories within a16z’s infrastructure thesis: Investment Category Example Focus Areas Strategic Rationale Compute & Hardware AI accelerators, cloud optimization, energy-efficient chips Reduces cost and increases accessibility of model training Data Infrastructure Synthetic data generation, data labeling, vector databases Improves model quality and solves data scarcity issues Model Development &Ops Foundational models, MLOps platforms, inference engines Accelerates development cycles and ensures reliable deployment This structured approach allows a16z to diversify its risk while systematically strengthening the entire AI ecosystem. The fund’s scale enables it to make substantial bets across each category, from seed-stage experiments to large growth rounds for maturing leaders. Conclusion Andreessen Horowitz’s $1.7 billion commitment to AI infrastructure represents a profound strategic bet on the underlying architecture of the future. By channeling unprecedented capital into compute, data, and foundational models, the a16z infrastructure fund aims to solve the most critical bottlenecks facing the industry. This move not only empowers its existing portfolio of leading AI companies but also sets the stage for a new wave of innovation. Ultimately, the success of this masterstroke will be measured by its ability to build the resilient, scalable, and efficient foundation upon which the next decade of artificial intelligence will depend. FAQs Q1: What is the a16z AI infrastructure fund? The a16z AI infrastructure fund is a $1.7 billion capital pool within Andreessen Horowitz’s latest $15 billion fundraise, specifically managed by its infrastructure team to invest in foundational AI technologies like compute hardware, data systems, and core model development. Q2: Who leads the a16z infrastructure investment team? General Partner Jennifer Li leads the a16z infrastructure team. She oversees major investments in companies like ElevenLabs, Ideogram, and Fal, and is responsible for deploying the $1.7 billion fund according to a clear thesis on AI’s foundational needs. Q3: Why is AI infrastructure considered a critical investment area now? AI infrastructure is critical because the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence is creating massive bottlenecks in computing power, data management, and model deployment. Investing in this layer addresses these constraints, enabling broader and more efficient AI adoption across all sectors. Q4: How does this fund differ from a16z’s other AI investments? While a16z invests in AI applications and consumer-facing tools through other funds, this infrastructure fund specifically targets the “picks and shovels”—the underlying platforms, hardware, and systems that all AI applications require to function, representing a deeper, enabling layer of the tech stack. Q5: What impact will this fund have on the broader AI startup ecosystem? The fund will provide significant capital for high-risk, high-reward infrastructure startups, validate the market importance of this sector, and likely encourage more venture investment in similar areas. It aims to accelerate innovation that benefits the entire ecosystem by lowering costs and increasing capabilities for all AI developers. This post A16z AI Infrastructure Fund: The $1.7 Billion Masterstroke Reshaping Tech’s Foundation first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

TIA at $0.37 in LH/LL downtrend; $0.3721 BOS expected. Break below $0.3676 confirms bearish continuation.

Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, the founder of Binance, has publicly identified and dismantled a coordinated misinformation campaign against him and the exchange. CZ exposed a long-running fake account that apparently used AI-generated images to pose as a loyal supporter before posting critical “feedback.” The Unraveling of a Fake Supporter The incident began when CZ noticed a post from an account named “Wei 威 BNB” claiming to close a Binance account due to alleged manipulation. The account had 863,000 followers and used imagery from a BNB Chain event, making it appear legitimate. However, the former Binance CEO said that concerns about the account’s veracity emerged after some close inspection. For starters, the account, which had blocked him, had posted several images purportedly featuring Zhao posing with the user, all of which appeared altered. One photo showed Zhao wearing a shirt in a color he said he does not own, while another mixed low-resolution images of him and Binance executive Yi He with a sharper image of the account holder. CZ claimed the original photo featured Aster CEO Leonard. He also claimed the account history suggested it either changed hands or was compromised years ago. The account’s history shows it originally belonged to a woman and posted exclusively female photos until July 2015, when it abruptly switched to crypto-only content without removing earlier material. “Either a hacked takeover or bought,” CZ wrote. He criticized the campaign as “lazy” and suggested it was likely orchestrated by a “self-perceived” competitor more focused on Binance than its own business. Influencer ShirleyXBT also noted the account’s profile picture was an artificial copy of her own photo. Community Backing and a Pattern of Scrutiny The exposure drew some support from the crypto community, with World of Dypians CEO Teki thanking CZ for the clarification and admitting the initial post had briefly seemed believable. Commentator Vegas offered a broader analysis, suggesting attackers fall into three categories: opportunists farming engagement, genuinely frustrated traders, and organized FUD campaigns. They also claimed to have been offered payment to spread negative sentiment about Binance, implying possible coordination by large market players or direct competitors. This latest revelation has come amid sustained scrutiny of CZ and Binance. On January 28, the crypto entrepreneur faced backlash for allegedly promoting harmful market behavior after he advocated a buy-and-hold investment strategy, forcing him to clarify that his advice was personal and did not apply to every token. Furthermore, on January 30, Binance announced it would convert the $1 billion in its SAFU insurance fund from stablecoins back into Bitcoin, a move some commentators viewed as a bullish signal but which also kept focus on the exchange’s financial strategies. Despite the criticism, Binance’s market position is still quite strong, with data shared by CryptoQuant at the beginning of the year showing the exchange captured 41% of spot trading volume and 42% of Bitcoin perpetual futures volume among top-tier platforms in 2025. The post CZ Flags AI-Generated Fake Account Behind Binance FUD appeared first on CryptoPotato .

BitcoinWorld MicroStrategy Stock Loss: Devastating 60% Plunge Hits 11 US State Pension Funds NEW YORK, March 2025 – Eleven U.S. state pension funds now confront staggering losses exceeding 60% on their MicroStrategy stock investments, according to a recent DL News investigation. These public retirement systems, responsible for the financial security of millions of teachers, firefighters, and government workers, collectively face paper losses of approximately $330 million. Consequently, this situation highlights the profound risks associated with volatile cryptocurrency-linked equities entering conservative public portfolios. MicroStrategy Stock Loss Exposes Public Pension Vulnerability The report identifies specific funds bearing significant exposure. For instance, the New York State Common Retirement Fund and the Florida State Board of Administration hold substantial positions. Together, these eleven entities own nearly 1.8 million shares of MicroStrategy (MSTR). Initially, their combined investment stood near $570 million. However, the current market value has plummeted to roughly $240 million. This dramatic decline represents a catastrophic erosion of capital earmarked for future retiree benefits. MicroStrategy’s stock performance directly fueled these losses. Over the past six months, MSTR shares have fallen a precipitous 67%. This drop closely tracks the extreme volatility of Bitcoin, which the company holds as its primary treasury asset. Therefore, public pensions indirectly experienced crypto market turbulence through this corporate proxy. The strategy, once hailed for its bold innovation, now serves as a cautionary case study in concentration risk. The Anatomy of a High-Stakes Bet on Crypto MicroStrategy, under CEO Michael Saylor, radically pivoted its corporate strategy in August 2020. The company began aggressively converting its cash reserves into Bitcoin. It adopted Bitcoin as its primary treasury reserve asset. This move essentially transformed the traditional business intelligence software firm into a publicly-traded Bitcoin holding vehicle. The stock price subsequently became a leveraged bet on Bitcoin’s price appreciation. Many institutional investors, including some pension fund managers, viewed MSTR as a regulated gateway to crypto exposure. They could buy a NASDAQ-listed stock instead of navigating the complexities of direct Bitcoin custody. Initially, this thesis delivered spectacular returns during bull markets. However, the inherent volatility of the underlying asset created immense downside risk, which has now materialized fully. Concentration Risk: Funds overweight in a single, volatile stock. Correlation Risk: MSTR’s price became nearly synonymous with Bitcoin’s. Liquidity Risk: Selling large positions could further depress the stock price. Expert Analysis on Fiduciary Duty and Alternative Assets Financial analysts and pension governance experts express deep concern. “Public pension funds operate under a strict fiduciary duty to act prudently,” notes Dr. Sarah Chen, a professor of pension law at Stanford University. “While diversification into alternative assets is common, the scale and nature of this exposure to a single, hyper-volatile stock raises serious questions about due diligence and risk management frameworks.” Furthermore, a timeline of events reveals a pattern. Pension funds reportedly increased positions during 2021 and early 2022, near market peaks. The subsequent crypto winter and regulatory pressures triggered the sustained decline. This timing suggests a potential lapse in strategic entry and exit planning. The impact extends beyond balance sheets, potentially affecting future contribution rates for state employers or benefit security for members. Comparative Impact on the Affected Pension Systems The table below illustrates the scale of the paper loss faced by the collective group of funds. While individual fund losses are not fully disaggregated in the report, the aggregate numbers are stark. Metric Figure Context Initial Investment Value ~$570 Million Capital allocated to MSTR stock Current Holding Value ~$240 Million Market value as of report date Total Paper Loss ~$330 Million Value erosion on the investment Average Loss for 10 Funds ~60% Percentage decline on cost basis MSTR 6-Month Performance -67% Driver of the pension funds’ losses These losses occur against a challenging backdrop for public pensions. Many systems already contend with underfunding issues due to demographic shifts and low interest rates. Consequently, high-risk investments that underperform can exacerbate funding gaps. This scenario forces difficult decisions for trustees, such as reducing assumed rates of return or seeking increased taxpayer contributions. Regulatory Scrutiny and Future Implications This event will likely trigger increased scrutiny from state auditors and legislators. Public pension investments are subject to “prudent person” standards. Lawmakers may demand reviews of investment policies regarding digital asset exposure. Additionally, this case may influence the ongoing national debate about cryptocurrency regulation and institutional adoption. It provides concrete evidence of the transmission of crypto volatility into the traditional financial system and public finance. Moving forward, pension boards may implement stricter limits on single-stock positions, especially those tied to speculative assets. They might also enhance stress-testing scenarios for extreme volatility. The episode underscores the critical need for transparent communication with pension members about investment risks. Ultimately, the primary goal remains securing retirement benefits, not pursuing speculative gains. Conclusion The MicroStrategy stock loss incident serves as a powerful reminder of the risks embedded in volatile, concentrated investments. Eleven state pension funds now grapple with a 60% decline in value on their MSTR holdings, translating to hundreds of millions in paper losses. This situation underscores the complex interplay between innovative asset classes, fiduciary responsibility, and public trust. As the financial landscape evolves, the imperative for rigorous risk management and prudent stewardship of public retirement assets has never been clearer. The long-term consequences for pension funding and policy will undoubtedly unfold in the coming years. FAQs Q1: Which pension funds lost money on MicroStrategy stock? According to the DL News report, eleven U.S. state pension funds are affected, including the New York State Common Retirement Fund and the Florida State Board of Administration. The full list includes other major state retirement systems. Q2: How much did the pension funds lose in total? The collective group initially invested approximately $570 million in MicroStrategy (MSTR) stock. The current value of their holdings is about $240 million, representing a total paper loss of roughly $330 million. Q3: Why is MicroStrategy stock so volatile? MicroStrategy’s stock volatility is primarily driven by its substantial Bitcoin holdings. The company’s market valuation is heavily correlated with the price of Bitcoin, making MSTR a leveraged proxy for crypto market movements. Q4: What does this mean for pension fund members? While these are currently unrealized “paper” losses, significant investment losses can impact a pension fund’s overall financial health. In severe cases, this can lead to increased contributions from employers (like state governments) or, over the long term, affect the fund’s ability to meet its future obligations. Q5: Will this affect how pension funds invest in the future? This event will likely prompt pension fund boards and investment committees to review their policies regarding single-stock concentration and exposure to highly volatile asset classes like cryptocurrency. It may lead to stricter risk limits and enhanced due diligence processes. This post MicroStrategy Stock Loss: Devastating 60% Plunge Hits 11 US State Pension Funds first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

The Shiba Inu futures market experienced a dramatic imbalance over the past 12 hours. Data from CoinGlass reveals long liquidations exceeded short positions by 8,972%. The disparity signals mounting pressure on leveraged traders betting on price increases. Approximately $18,710 in long positions were liquidated during this period. Short liquidations totaled just $208.85 by comparison. The skewed ratio suggests one-sided market positioning and declining buyer confidence in the meme coin's near-term prospects. Death Cross Formation Confirms Bearish Momentum Technical indicators paint a concerning picture for SHIB holders. The token has formed a death cross pattern, with its 23-day moving average crossing below the 50-day moving average. Traders commonly interpret this signal as a precursor to extended downward price movement. At the time of writing, SHIB trades at around $0.000006707, hovering dangerously close to a critical support level at $0.00000667. The proximity to this threshold raises concerns about potential downside scenarios. A breakdown below this support could push the token into lower-liquidity zones where reliable price floors become difficult to identify. The combination of lopsided liquidations and bearish technical patterns creates a challenging environment for the asset. Market participants appear hesitant to establish new long positions given recent price action. Volume metrics support this observation, showing reduced trading activity compared to historical averages. Institutional Criticism Adds to Market Uncertainty Broader sentiment surrounding meme tokens faces scrutiny from institutional players. Evgeny Gaevoy, CEO of Wintermute, criticized current token economic models today. The institutional market maker executive described existing buyback and lockup mechanisms as fundamentally flawed in their implementation. His comments arrive at a particularly sensitive time for SHIB. The token already contends with technical weakness and unfavorable derivatives positioning. Criticism from respected institutional figures may further erode confidence among retail and professional investors alike.

Ethereum endured its sharpest decline of the year, losing $100 billion in market value and dropping nearly 27% in a week, with prices hitting $2,107, the lowest since May 2025. Institutional Movement and Macroeconomic Pressures While bitcoin’s steady erosion dominated the news cycle this week, ethereum (ETH) stole the spotlight for all the wrong reasons,

The digital asset market is currently navigating a period of intense structural realignment. As of February 4, 2026, Bitcoin (BTC) is trading at around $73,350, reflecting a modest 24-hour decline of over 1.50% Although Bitcoin’s price is moving slowly right now, two main trends are shaping the market. First, there is a cautious mood as AI changes the tech sector. Second, more institutional-level Bitcoin infrastructure is emerging. The “Morning Bid” Effect: AI Winners and Losers Reuters’ latest “Morning Bid” notes that the AI boom is becoming more selective. Anthropic’s new AI “agents” have shaken up the software and data services industries, as investors start to see which companies will benefit from AI and which could be replaced. Software giants like Microsoft and AMD have faced recent ups and downs, even with strong earnings. Meanwhile, Walmart became the first retailer to reach a $1 trillion market value, showing that traditional companies using AI to cut costs are now favored by the market. This uncertainty has made Bitcoin’s market slow, and the asset is having trouble gaining strength after reaching its lowest point since before the 2024 US election. Bitcoin (BTC/USD) Technical Analysis: Navigating the “Three Black Crows” Bitcoin price prediction seems bearish as BTC’s technical indicators show the market is going through a needed correction. The weekly chart shows a “Three Black Crows” candlestick pattern, which points to ongoing selling pressure. Bitcoin Price Chart – Source: Tradingview Key Technical Levels to Watch: Support: The 200-week Exponential Moving Average (EMA) near $68,400 remains the critical floor. Resistance: A reclamation of the $83,598 level (the previous support-turned-resistance) is required to invalidate the current bearish bias. Momentum: The RSI (Relative Strength Index) is around 30, which means the market is oversold. This could mean a bounce is coming, but experienced traders want to see RSI divergence before calling a bottom. RWA and DeFi: The Fundamental Bull Case Even though Bitcoin’s price is flat in the short term, its uses are growing quickly. Mercado Bitcoin, a top digital asset company in Latin America, has issued over $20 million in tokenized private credit on the Rootstock Bitcoin sidechain and aims for $100 million by April. This helps connect traditional private debt with Bitcoin-backed liquidity. At the same time, Fireblocks announced it will add the Stacks layer to bring institutional-level DeFi to Bitcoin. This change cuts transaction times to about 29 seconds, much faster than Bitcoin’s usual 10-minute blocks, and lets institutions use BTC for lending and earning yield. Right now, about $5.5 billion is locked in Bitcoin DeFi, providing a strong base for the next phase of growth. 2026 Forecast: The Road to Recovery The “Path Tool” on the chart suggests a period of re-accumulation between $68,000 and $72,000 for the remainder of Q1. If Bitcoin can maintain its position above the 200-week EMA, a double bottom could act as the springboard for a move back toward $83,000 and eventually a rally toward psychological resistance at $100,000. For long-term investors, the current drop is a “quantum-ready” transition. As AI keeps changing traditional software, Bitcoin’s appeal as a decentralized and independent settlement system is growing. The combination of RWA tokenization and faster DeFi shows that even though prices are calm now, the groundwork for the next bull run is quietly being put in place. Bitcoin Hyper: The Next Evolution of BTC on Solana? d for security, Bitcoin Hyper adds what it always lacked: Solana-level speed. The result: lightning-fast, low-cost smart contracts, decentralized apps, and even meme coin creation, all secured by Bitcoin. Audited by Consult , the project emphasizes trust and scalability as adoption builds. And momentum is already strong. The presale has surpassed $31.2 million, with tokens priced at just $0.013675 before the next increase. As Bitcoin activity climbs and demand for efficient BTC-based apps rises, Bitcoin Hyper stands out as the bridge uniting two of crypto’s biggest ecosystems. If Bitcoin built the foundation, Bitcoin Hyper could make it fast, flexible, and fun again. Click Here to Participate in the Presale The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: BTC’s $73K Pivot, Is the “Digital Gold” Purge Over or Just Getting Started? appeared first on Cryptonews .

Months ago, a prominent crypto analyst outlined a precise window where the Bitcoin price could enter a violent downside phase. At the time, the projection seemed extreme. Now, with price behavior beginning to align with that roadmap, the analyst has released a far more expansive update — one that not only reinforces the crash call but also maps what comes before and after the next major pivot. Bitcoin Price Multi-Cycle Model Signals A Structural Reset In the update shared on X, the analyst integrates yearly, monthly, and weekly cycles to define both the potential magnitude of decline and the timing of the next pivot. On the yearly timeframe, Bitcoin sits in what he labels an extreme risk zone ahead of a projected pivot around February 2. The structure is left-translated with distributive price action — a formation linked to late-cycle weakness. Related Reading: How To Trade The XRP Price In The Short Term After The Massive Crash He compares the current setup to a previous harmonic phase where Bitcoin dropped roughly 50% from its all-time high before reaching the same pivot window. That decline produced a rebound of about 40% but failed to reach a new all-time high, suggesting the February pivot may bring relief rather than expansion. He also identifies a macro risk window from April to September 2026. On the monthly cycle, the analyst marks a decisive pivot around December 22. Historical drawdowns in similar harmonics were 56%, 77%, and 34%, depending on the cycle context. The 77% drop occurred during a bear market, while the 34% retracement formed a mid-bull cycle. Upside rebounds ranged between 140% and 375%, with a later 158% expansion, showing that monthly harmonics often host the sharpest price dislocations. On the weekly timeframe, a nearer-term pivot appears around November 19. Past pullbacks ranged from 20% to 34%, followed by upside expansions of 99%, 96%, 95%, 127%, and 69%, providing the tactical signals traders may rely on for short-term adjustments within the broader trend. What’s More: Refined Crash Targets And The Bottom Window Beyond confirming the original crash call, the analyst refines the downside roadmap by synchronizing all three cycles. When harmonics align, volatility and pivot significance increase. While the full drawdown ranges 20%–77%, he narrows the likely decline to 34%–55% from the all-time high, noting deeper bear-market conditions are not yet confirmed. Related Reading: Dogecoin Price Could Continue To Decline If This Doesn’t Happen; Analyst The November weekly pivot appears too early for a macro bottom, with higher-timeframe pressure likely pushing the true pivot into January. A late-November dead-cat bounce is possible before further downside. Key levels: $90,000 (~30% drop) for November, $72,000 (~43% below the high) for January, with further support at $45,000 and $28,000 if selling intensifies. The analyst remains cautious, noting the last comparable yearly harmonic rallied 40% without surpassing the all-time high, with similar limits expected before the May–September 2026 risk window. However, while his four-month-old crash call held, he believes Bitcoin’s path is far from over—investors should prepare for further downside and a multi-stage recovery shaping the next macro cycle. Featured image created with Dall.E, chart from Tradingview.com

Nasdaq, the US stock exchange best known for listing major tech companies, has proposed a new rule called “fast entry.” Its aim is to speed up the addition of newly listed large companies to its index. In a statement, Nasdaq said, “As corporate structures evolve and index-linked assets under management continue to grow, it’s increasingly important that the methodology ensures timely inclusion of the largest Nasdaq-listed non-financial companies and maintains replicability for passive managers.” The proposal comes as 2026 is shaping up to be one of the busiest years, with large-cap firms in the widely followed equity benchmark slated to go public. The planned revision would allow a new listing to join the Nasdaq 100 after the first 15 trading days. This is a significant break from the current waiting period of at least 3 months. If Nasdaq’s index-management committee approves it after soliciting input, the change will take effect after the upcoming quarterly rebalance in March. Elon Musk’s SpaceX to rank among the top 40 current index constituents Among companies expected to make initial public offerings this year is SpaceX. Its potential $1.3 trillion valuation would make it rank among the top 40 current index constituents. The company would be exempt from standard seasoning and liquidity requirements. According to Nasdaq, it would not replace an existing index member and would temporarily increase the number of constituents until the next annual reconstitution, in line with the treatment of spin-offs. Anthropic is also actively preparing for a potential initial public offering (IPO) this year. The AI startup has already hired IPO lawyers and begun early planning. As reported by Cryptopolitan, the AI company is putting together a deal that will increase its valuation to at least $350 billion. Kaasha Saini, head of index strategy at Jefferies, stated , “There could be concern that passive funds will be missing out in a scenario where the new stock does rally even further and then requires higher turnover when adding it in, The proposed change would make the index more representative of the market in a timely way.” The Nasdaq 100 is directly linked to more than $600 billion in exchange-traded funds worldwide. It has been a key indicator of the stock market, as the AI boom has driven huge profits for the biggest tech companies. When it comes to IPOs, Nasdaq faces competitors like the New York Stock Exchange. Market watchers say the size of index funds linked to the Nasdaq 100 is likely to help its case for new listings. Free float requirement changes Nasdaq also proposed calculating a market cap based on both listed and unlisted shares, rather than only listed shares currently. However, that won’t affect the companies’ weightings in the index, since that will continue to be determined by the value of the shares eligible for listing on the exchange. Additionally, Nasdaq’s planned revision involves a stock’s free float, or the amount of shares available for trading. The minimum 10% float requirement for eligibility will be removed. However, a new approach is being designed to include companies whose shares are mostly owned by corporate insiders or are not tradable. These stocks will have their market value multiplied by 5 times, with a cap of 100%, if their free float is less than 20%.That way, funds that use the Nasdaq 100 as a benchmark can still buy in stocks with low float. Antti Petajisto, head of equities at Brooklyn Investment Group, stated, “Apparently, the idea is to keep low-float firms in the index if they are economically large enough.” The IPO market has regained momentum. Global IPO proceeds in 2025 rose to about $171.8 billion, up approximately 39 % from the prior year. The fourth quarter was the strongest in value terms since late 2021, with record fundraising and deal volume. Additionally, this week alone marks one of the highest concentrations of IPO activity since 2021 in the US. Several companies are preparing to raise at least $100 million each. Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free .

BitcoinWorld Trump Fed Nominee Kevin Warsh Wouldn’t Be Chosen If He Wanted Rate Hikes: A Revealing Political Ultimatum In a statement that sent immediate ripples through financial markets, President Donald Trump declared that his Federal Reserve Chairman nominee, Kevin Warsh, would not have received the appointment if he had advocated for interest rate hikes. This direct assertion, reported by Walter Bloomberg citing NBC, provides a stark window into the political pressures shaping one of the world’s most critical economic institutions. The revelation underscores a significant moment where presidential preference for monetary easing collided with the Federal Reserve’s traditional mandate for independence. Trump’s Fed Nominee and the Rate Hike Ultimatum President Trump’s comments specifically addressed his nominee, Kevin Warsh. He emphasized Warsh’s understanding of the administration’s desire for rate cuts. Consequently, this public framing of the nomination criteria marked a departure from conventional protocol. Historically, presidents have avoided explicit commentary on an individual nominee’s stance on specific rate actions. This approach preserves the Fed’s operational autonomy. The statement, however, directly linked the nomination to a pre-existing policy alignment. Financial analysts quickly noted the potential implications for Fed governance. Furthermore, the context of the 2017-2019 period is crucial. The U.S. economy was experiencing sustained growth following the 2008 financial crisis. The Federal Reserve, under then-Chair Janet Yellen and later Jerome Powell, had begun a gradual process of normalizing interest rates. This process aimed to prevent overheating and control inflation. President Trump frequently criticized these hikes, arguing they undermined economic expansion. His selection of Warsh, a former Fed governor known for his hawkish views during the financial crisis, was initially seen as a complex choice. Trump’s recent clarification recontextualizes that decision entirely. The Historical Context of Federal Reserve Independence The Federal Reserve was designed to operate free from short-term political influence. This independence allows it to make decisions based on long-term economic data, even when those decisions are politically unpopular. For instance, raising rates to curb inflation can slow job growth—a politically sensitive outcome. Past administrations have typically respected this boundary through public statements. President Trump’s explicit condition breaks with decades of this established precedent. Several key historical moments highlight this norm: The Truman-Eccles Dynamic (1940s-1950s): President Harry Truman disagreed with Fed Chair Marriner Eccles but maintained public deference to the institution’s independence. The Nixon-Burns Era (1970s): While private pressures existed, public ultimatums linking appointment to specific rate actions were avoided, though the period later faced criticism for inflationary policy. The Greenspan Years (1987-2006): Chairs were appointed based on economic philosophy, not direct promises on rate direction, serving under multiple presidents from both parties. This historical backdrop makes Trump’s condition notable. It shifted the discussion from a nominee’s broader economic philosophy to a specific policy outcome. Market observers expressed concern that such a stance could undermine the credibility of monetary policy. Credibility is essential for managing inflation expectations among businesses and consumers. Expert Analysis on Political Influence and Market Trust Monetary policy experts reacted with measured concern to the reported statement. Dr. Sarah Jensen, a political economist at the Brookings Institution, noted, “While presidents always prefer lower rates to stimulate growth, explicitly stating it as a nomination condition challenges the normative independence of the Fed. The real test is whether such public statements alter the deliberative process of the Federal Open Market Committee.” Her analysis points to the core issue: the potential chilling effect on internal Fed debates. Market response, while muted in immediate price action, showed signs of heightened uncertainty. The Volatility Index (VIX) experienced a slight uptick. Bond yields showed increased sensitivity to political news headlines. A comparison of key indicators before and after similar presidential statements in recent history reveals a pattern. Market Sensitivity to Presidential Comments on Fed Policy Event Date Presidential Comment VIX Change (Next Day) 10-Yr Treasury Yield Change July 2019 Criticism of Fed rate policy +1.2 points -3 bps June 2020 Suggestions of negative rates +0.8 points -5 bps This Statement (Contextual) Nomination tied to rate stance +0.9 points (est.) -2 bps (est.) This data suggests financial markets price in a risk premium when political influence appears to intensify. The long-term impact depends on whether the appointed officials maintain their independent judgment once in office. Kevin Warsh’s own record as a Fed governor showed a strong, analytical approach. However, the explicit precondition created a new layer of public scrutiny on his potential decisions. Kevin Warsh’s Background and Potential Policy Path Understanding Kevin Warsh’s profile is essential. He served as a Federal Reserve Governor from 2006 to 2011. His tenure spanned the financial crisis. During that period, he was generally viewed as a hawkish voice, concerned with inflation and moral hazard. He often advocated for a more cautious approach to unconventional monetary tools. This background made him an interesting candidate for a president publicly demanding lower rates. Several factors defined his potential policy approach: Crisis Experience: Hands-on role during 2008 shaped his views on financial stability risks. Communication Style: Known for favoring clear, rule-based guidance over discretionary policy. Regulatory Focus: Emphasized the importance of bank capital and resilience post-crisis. If confirmed, Warsh would have faced an immediate dilemma. Balancing the expressed desires of the appointing president against his own economic analysis and the Fed’s dual mandate would have been challenging. Most analysts believed his deep institutional knowledge would have led him to prioritize data over politics. Nonetheless, the public framing of his nomination would have cast a shadow over every policy vote he took. The Broader Impact on Global Central Banking Norms The statement also resonated in international financial circles. Central bank independence is a cornerstone of the modern global financial system. Major institutions like the European Central Bank and the Bank of England guard their autonomy fiercely. Public political pressure in the United States, home to the world’s reserve currency, can encourage similar movements elsewhere. This phenomenon, sometimes called “political contagion,” can lead to less effective global inflation control. For example, emerging market economies often look to the Fed’s independence as a model. A perceived erosion of that independence can complicate their own monetary policy decisions. It can also affect currency stability and capital flows. International investors seek predictability in the rules governing major central banks. Any shift toward overt political influence introduces a new variable into their risk models. Conclusion President Trump’s statement that Kevin Warsh would not have been his Fed nominee if he wanted rate hikes provides a clear, unprecedented example of political conditions being placed on a central bank appointment. This event highlights the ongoing tension between executive branch preferences and the Federal Reserve’s operational independence. While the nomination did not ultimately lead to Warsh’s confirmation, the revelation remains a significant case study in monetary policy politics. It underscores the importance of institutional norms in maintaining economic stability and market trust. The focus on the Trump Fed nominee and his stance on rate hikes will continue to inform debates about the appropriate boundaries of political influence over technocratic economic institutions. FAQs Q1: Who is Kevin Warsh? Kevin Warsh is a former member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors (2006-2011). He was a key figure during the 2008 financial crisis and was later considered by President Trump for the position of Federal Reserve Chair. Q2: What did President Trump say about Warsh and interest rates? President Trump stated that Warsh “understands his desire for interest rate cuts” and explicitly said Warsh would not have been appointed as his Fed nominee if he had wanted to raise interest rates. Q3: Why is Federal Reserve independence important? Fed independence allows monetary policy decisions to be based on long-term economic data rather than short-term political cycles. This is crucial for controlling inflation and maintaining stable economic growth without political interference. Q4: How did financial markets react to this news? While immediate reactions were nuanced, such statements historically correlate with slight increases in market volatility (VIX) and sensitivity in bond yields, as investors assess risks to policy predictability. Q5: Was Kevin Warsh ultimately confirmed as Fed Chair? No, Jerome Powell was ultimately nominated and confirmed as Federal Reserve Chair. Kevin Warsh remained a candidate who was seriously considered but not selected for the top position. Q6: What is the Fed’s dual mandate? The Federal Reserve’s dual mandate, set by Congress, is to promote maximum employment and stable prices (low and stable inflation). This framework guides its interest rate decisions. This post Trump Fed Nominee Kevin Warsh Wouldn’t Be Chosen If He Wanted Rate Hikes: A Revealing Political Ultimatum first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

LIT at $1.58 is sideways with mixed signals, open to both scenarios. Watch for a breakout above $1.60 for upside, and a breakdown below $1.43 for downside; BTC correlation will be decisive.

Markets are ending the day on edge as sharp moves ripple across stocks, commodities, and crypto. AMD slumped despite an earnings beat, underscoring how unforgiving investors have become around AI expectations. Oil prices jumped as US–Iran tensions flared back into focus, while gold and silver staged a violent rebound after last week’s washout. In crypto, bitcoin slid deeper into correction territory, with traders eyeing key support levels amid heavy liquidations. AMD stock crashes despite earnings beat AMD CEO Lisa Su moved to calm nerves after the chipmaker’s shares slumped , insisting AI demand is running far hotter than its latest outlook suggests. Speaking to CNBC a day after AMD beat fourth‑quarter estimates but issued what investors saw as cautious guidance, Su said orders for data‑center chips and CPUs have “exploded” over the past two to three months. AMD forecast first‑quarter revenue of about 9.8 billion dollars, slightly above Wall Street’s consensus, but below the hype that had built around AI. Su argued the company is still early in a multi‑year growth cycle as new AI systems ramp up. Oil prices soar on US-Iran tensions Oil prices jumped on Wednesday after a report said planned US-Iran nuclear talks were on the verge of collapsing, reigniting fears of supply disruptions in the Middle East. US West Texas Intermediate crude climbed about 3% to trade near 65 dollars a barrel, while Brent pushed toward 69 dollars. The move reversed Monday’s pullback, when hopes of negotiations had briefly eased tension premiums. The Axios report said Washington and Tehran were deadlocked over the venue and format of this week’s meeting, just days after the US military shot down an Iranian drone near a US aircraft carrier. Gold, silver extend rebound Gold and silver extended their dramatic rebound on Wednesday as bargain hunters and short‑covering piled in after last week’s crash, but traders are still bracing for wild swings. Spot gold jumped more than 2% to trade back above 5,000 dollars an ounce, while silver rallied nearly 6% toward the 90‑dollar mark, clawing back a chunk of Friday’s 30% plunge. Analysts say the move looks more like a technical snapback than the start of a fresh vertical leg higher. With the dollar, bond yields, and Fed expectations all in flux, few expect the recent, nerve‑shredding volatility to disappear quickly. Bitcoin looks at the $66,000 support level Bitcoin is back under pressure after a sharp 19% slide over the past month, dropping from a local peak near $95,000 to about $75,000. That level is crucial support, but leverage is still unwinding. CoinGlass data show more than $6 billion of positions have been liquidated in recent days, including a single-session hit of $2.4 billion in longs on January 30. Futures open interest has climbed even as prices fell, pointing to increasingly one‑sided bearish bets. If $75,000 gives way, chart watchers flag $66,000 as the next obvious downside target before any durable bottom can form. The post Evening digest: AMD's crash, US-Iran tensions, Bitcoin may slump to $66K level appeared first on Invezz

BitcoinWorld Coinbase Listing Roadmap Expands: Strategic Addition of RNBW and RAVE Tokens Sparks Analysis In a move closely watched by the digital asset industry, Coinbase Global, Inc. has officially updated its public listing roadmap to include two new assets: RNBW and RAVE. This announcement, made on April 2, 2025, from the company’s San Francisco headquarters, represents a critical step in the exchange’s transparent asset evaluation process, potentially paving the way for future trading availability for these tokens. Consequently, the inclusion on the roadmap often triggers significant market analysis and discussion regarding the underlying projects’ technology and compliance frameworks. Decoding the Coinbase Listing Roadmap Process Coinbase’s public listing roadmap serves as a formal declaration of its exploration into specific digital assets. Importantly, inclusion on this list does not guarantee an eventual listing. Instead, it initiates a comprehensive technical and legal review. The exchange’s asset listing team rigorously evaluates each project against a stringent set of criteria. These criteria encompass security, compliance with local regulations, and the project’s overall health within the blockchain ecosystem. Furthermore, this transparent approach aims to reduce market speculation and provide clarity for both investors and project teams. The process typically involves multiple stages, including due diligence, integration testing, and regulatory assessments. For instance, a similar roadmap announcement for other assets in previous years has led to formal listings after successful completion of all internal and external requirements. Therefore, the addition of RNBW and RAVE marks the beginning of a detailed evaluation period that the broader market will monitor closely. An In-Depth Look at the RNBW Token Project The RNBW token is the native utility asset of the Rainbow Wallet ecosystem, a user-centric decentralized application (dApp) and wallet interface designed primarily for the Ethereum network. The project focuses on simplifying user interaction with decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). RNBW facilitates governance within the Rainbow DAO, allowing token holders to vote on proposals concerning the wallet’s development, treasury management, and feature roadmap. From a technical perspective, the wallet aggregates liquidity across various decentralized exchanges, providing users with optimized swap rates. The potential integration of RNBW onto a major centralized exchange like Coinbase could significantly enhance its liquidity profile and mainstream accessibility. Notably, the project has emphasized a strong security posture and a transparent development process, factors that likely contributed to its consideration by Coinbase’s compliance teams. Expert Analysis on Infrastructure Token Listings Industry analysts often view the listing of infrastructure-focused tokens like RNBW as a bellwether for the maturity of the Web3 user experience layer. “When a major exchange evaluates a wallet or infrastructure token, it signals a broader industry shift beyond mere speculative assets,” noted a blockchain infrastructure report from Delphi Digital in Q4 2024. “It reflects an assessment of sustainable utility, developer activity, and long-term ecosystem viability.” This perspective suggests Coinbase’s review extends beyond market capitalization to evaluate genuine product adoption and technological robustness. Examining the RAVE Token and Its Ecosystem RAVE is the core token of the Ravendex platform, a decentralized exchange and lending protocol built on the Cardano blockchain. The project aims to provide automated market maker (AMM) functionality and cross-chain asset transfers within the Cardano ecosystem. RAVE tokens are used for trading fee discounts, liquidity mining rewards, and platform governance, giving holders a say in protocol upgrades and fee structures. The Cardano blockchain, known for its research-driven, proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, has seen a gradual expansion of its DeFi landscape. The consideration of RAVE by Coinbase could be interpreted as a strategic acknowledgment of Cardano’s growing developer activity and total value locked (TVL). A successful listing would provide a regulated, fiat on-ramp for exposure to Cardano’s native DeFi sector, which has historically been less accessible than its Ethereum-based counterparts. Market Impact and Historical Precedents Historically, the announcement of a token’s addition to Coinbase’s roadmap has produced measurable market effects. According to data aggregated by The Block Research, assets added to the roadmap between 2023 and 2024 experienced an average price volatility increase of 15-25% in the subsequent week, though this did not always correlate with positive price movement. The effect is often attributed to increased visibility and speculative trading on other platforms where the assets are already available. The table below outlines typical phases following a roadmap announcement: Phase Typical Duration Key Activities Roadmap Announcement Day 1 Public disclosure, initial market reaction Due Diligence & Integration Weeks to Months Security review, legal compliance, technical testing Listing Decision Variable Internal approval or rejection based on review Launch (if approved) Announced with notice Trading pairs go live, often with post-only mode initially It is crucial for investors to understand that a roadmap placement is not a listing guarantee. Several assets have remained on the roadmap for extended periods without proceeding to a full listing, often due to unresolved regulatory questions or technical hurdles. Regulatory Context and Compliance Considerations As a publicly traded company in the United States, Coinbase operates under intense regulatory scrutiny from bodies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Every asset considered for listing undergoes a legal analysis to determine its classification. The Howey Test and other regulatory frameworks are applied to assess whether the token could be deemed a security. This regulatory environment has made Coinbase’s listing process notably meticulous. The inclusion of RNBW and RAVE suggests the exchange’s preliminary analysis indicates these tokens may have a plausible path to compliance, possibly as utility tokens or commodities under current interpretations. However, the final determination will depend on the full findings of their legal team and ongoing dialogues with regulators, a complex factor that ultimately influences the timeline and outcome of any potential listing. Conclusion The addition of RNBW and RAVE to the Coinbase listing roadmap marks a significant development for both projects and their respective ecosystems. This action highlights Coinbase’s continued methodical expansion of its supported assets, focusing on projects with defined utility across different blockchain networks like Ethereum and Cardano. While the roadmap is a positive initial step, the journey to a full listing involves rigorous technical, security, and legal reviews. The market will now observe how these tokens navigate the subsequent phases of Coinbase’s evaluation process, a procedure that underscores the exchange’s commitment to compliance and asset quality in an evolving regulatory landscape. FAQs Q1: Does being on the Coinbase roadmap mean RNBW and RAVE will definitely be listed? A1: No. Inclusion on the roadmap indicates Coinbase is formally exploring and evaluating the asset for a potential listing. The final decision depends on the successful completion of security, compliance, and technical integration reviews. Q2: How long does it take from roadmap addition to actual listing? A2: There is no fixed timeline. The process can take weeks, months, or in some cases, may not result in a listing at all. The duration depends on the complexity of the reviews and regulatory considerations. Q3: Can I buy RNBW or RAVE on Coinbase now? A3: No. The tokens are not yet available for trading on Coinbase. They are only under evaluation. They may be traded on other decentralized or centralized exchanges that have already listed them. Q4: What are the main benefits for a token listed on Coinbase? A4: A primary listing typically provides greater liquidity, enhanced legitimacy and trust from a regulatory perspective, access to Coinbase’s large user base, and easier fiat on-ramps for investors in supported regions. Q5: What happens if Coinbase decides not to list RNBW or RAVE after the roadmap? A5: If an asset fails the evaluation, Coinbase will remove it from the public roadmap without a formal listing. The company does not always publicly disclose specific reasons for rejection, which can relate to technical, market, or legal findings. This post Coinbase Listing Roadmap Expands: Strategic Addition of RNBW and RAVE Tokens Sparks Analysis first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Aragon debuts a new framework and live dashboard that make token ownership verifiable, launching with Uniswap, Curve, Lido, Aerodrome, and other leading protocols as the first cohort to set a new standard for onchain transparency and accountability. Tuesday 04 February, Zug, Switzerland — Aragon today announced the public launch of the Ownership Token Framework, a new evidence-based standard for evaluating crypto tokens on fundamentals rather than narrative. Alongside the framework, Aragon launched the Ownership Token Dashboard, a public product designed to make token ownership auditable in practice. The launch addresses one of the crypto industry’s most persistent problems: tokens are widely traded and invested in, yet there is no shared standard for assessing what a token actually owns or can credibly claim. As a result, many tokens trade on assumptions about governance influence, future fee capture, or alignment with a protocol’s success, without clear evidence that tokenholders have enforceable rights over the assets and value flows that determine economic outcomes. Where those rights are weak, discretionary, or bypassable, markets typically discount tokens accordingly. According to a recent CoinGecko study , 11.6 million crypto tokens failed in 2025 alone, accounting for roughly 86 % of all recorded project failures between 2021 and 2025, a clear signal that many tokens in the market aren’t sustaining long-term viability. The Ownership Token Framework is designed to make those realities transparent.Rather than treating “governance” as a proxy for ownership, the framework evaluates whether tokenholders have programmatic, enforceable control over economically material decisions and value flows. It relies on primary evidence, including deployed contracts, execution and upgrade paths, value routing mechanisms, and verifiable offchain dependencies that may reinforce or undermine tokenholder rights. “Smart contracts make it possible to encode and enforce economic rights directly in code, but those rights only exist where systems actually implement that control plane,” said Anthony Leutenegger, CEO at Aragon. “When ownership is discretionary or unverifiable, tokenholder exposure becomes a matter of trust. The framework is built to educate market participants on the hard power a token has, and furthermore, point out offchain dependencies that may create misaligned incentives that could negatively impact a token's value. ” The framework evaluates tokens across four core dimensions and provides hard evidence to back up the evaluation: Onchain Control: Whether tokenholders are the ultimate authority over economically material actions, including upgrades, parameter changes, emergency controls, and supply modification. Value Accrual: Whether a live, rule-based mechanism produces observable value flows or token-scarcity effects that accrue to tokenholders. Verifiability: Whether economically material code and deployments can be independently verified from primary onchain evidence. Token Distribution: Whether ownership and effective voting power are meaningfully distributed rather than concentrated in common-control blocs. Offchain dependencies: whether incentives are aligned or misaligned offchain to ensure value and security isn’t leaked away from the token Alongside the framework, Aragon launched the Ownership Token Dashboard, a live product that operationalizes the methodology and presents structured ownership profiles for real protocols. The dashboard applies the framework using continuously updated, publicly verifiable onchain and offchain data, allowing users to inspect how ownership claims map to deployed systems in practice. The initial launch includes profiles for UNI, CRV, LDO, AERO, and AAVE, with more tokens set to be released soon. These profiles were developed in collaboration with the listed token’s respective protocols, with each project engaging directly on scope, evidence, and accuracy of representation. This collaborative process ensures that listings reflect validated deployments and governance structures rather than third-party interpretation or speculation. Each dashboard profile links directly to the underlying evidence supporting its assessment, including deployed contracts, governance execution paths, and relevant offchain structures where applicable. New token listings will be added on a rolling basis, with the dashboard designed to evolve into a living reference for token fundamentals as the standard expands. The Ownership Token Framework and dashboard were developed in collaboration with participating protocol teams and reviewed by governance, legal, and policy experts focused on onchain systems and digital asset structures. The review process was designed to surface how ownership and control actually function after a token launches, including the risks introduced by discretionary or opaque dependencies. “Aragon's framework provides much needed transparency for network tokens. It shows who still has power over a token after it launches, what that means for users and investors, and what risks come with those hidden dependencies,” said Miles Jennings, General Counsel at a16z crypto. The Ownership Token Framework and dashboard do not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice. About Aragon Aragon creates the systems that help networks run securely at scale, from how they allocate capital to how they make decisions and manage ownership. Founded in 2017, Aragon is a leading onchain infrastructure provider powering governance, capital allocation, and protocol ownership for some of the largest networks in crypto. Its modular frameworks are used to manage tens of billions of dollars in assets and support high-profile implementations including Lido, Curve, Polygon, Taiko, Morpho, Katana, and others. At the core of the Aragon stack is Aragon OSx, a modular execution and permissions layer that separates decision-making from execution, allowing governance and ownership systems to evolve without risky migrations. On top of this foundation, Aragon provides products and services for tokenomics design, incentive and capital distribution, treasury management, and secure, upgradeable governance. Aragon emphasizes security, modularity, and long-term resilience. Its infrastructure has operated for more than eight years without security incidents and is designed to help networks coordinate value, adapt over time, and build systems worth owning. Learn more at aragon.org. Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

暗号資産（仮想通貨）市場では、投資家たちは常に「次の大きな波」を探し求めています。しかし、今回のトレンドは少し毛色が違います。「注目の新しい仮想通貨が話題になる理由とは」――この問いへの答えは、単なる価格高騰への期待から、ブロックチェーンが抱える積年の課題を解決できるか（ソリューション）という実用面への期待へとシフトしているのです。 CoinPostやCointelegraph Japanといった主要メディアが報じるように、資金の流れは「ミームコイン」のような投機的なものから、Bitcoin（ビットコイン）の拡張性やEthereumのガス代問題といった、インフラストラクチャの改善に取り組むプロジェクトへと移っています。特に、Bitcoinのセキュリティを維持しつつ、スマートコントラクトや高速処理を実現しようとする「Bitcoin Layer 2」領域。ここは今、機関投資家や大口保有者（クジラ）が最も熱い視線を送るセクターと言っても過言ではありません。 なぜこれほど注目されるのか？ その理由は、既存のブロックチェーンが抱える「トリレンマ（分散性・安全性・拡張性の両立）」を解決する技術革新にあります。この文脈で、現在プレセール段階ながら（そして、まだ広く知られていないものの）、BitcoinエコシステムにSolana（ソラナ）のスピードを持ち込むという大胆なアプローチで話題をさらっているのが Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) です。市場が求めているのは、単なる新しいトークンではありません。Bitcoin Hyperのような「使える技術」なのです。 Bitcoinの堅牢性とSVMの超高速処理を融合させる技術革新 Bitcoin Hyper になぜこれほど資金が集まるのでしょうか。正直なところ、その核心は極めて合理的な「ハイブリッド構造」にあります。Bitcoinは世界で最も安全な分散型ネットワークですが、送金は遅く、手数料も高い。おまけに、複雑なプログラムを動かすのが苦手です。一方でSolanaは爆速ですが、過去にネットワークが不安定になるなどの課題もありました。 そこでBitcoin Hyperは、世界初の「SVM（Solana Virtual Machine）を統合したBitcoin Layer 2」として設計されました。これはつまり、開発者がSolanaの圧倒的な処理速度（低レイテンシー）と安価なコストでdApps（分散型アプリケーション）を作り、最終的な決済（セツルメント）はBitcoinの強固なセキュリティの上で行う、という「いいとこ取り」のアプローチです。 技術的に言えば、これまでBitcoin上では不可能に近かった「高速なNFTゲーム」や「リアルタイム決済」、そして「複雑なDeFi取引」が現実のものとなります。Rust言語を使った開発キットの提供や、BTCを簡単に転送できるブリッジ機能は、EthereumやSolanaの開発者をBitcoin経済圏へ引き込む強力な武器になるでしょう。この技術的な優位性が、 Bitcoin Hyper のプレセール参加を加速させています。 クジラが動く理由：3100万ドルの調達額とオンチェーンデータ 数字は嘘をつきません。公式データによると、 Bitcoin Hyper はこれまでに $31,228,293.92 （約3100万ドル）という巨額の資金調達に成功しています。現在のトークン価格は $0.0136751 。この段階での参入は、単なる個人投資家のFOMO（取り残される恐怖）だけでは説明がつきません。 オンチェーン分析を見ると、さらに興味深い動きがあります。Etherscanのデータによれば、直近で2つの大口ウォレット（クジラ）が合計$116K相当のトークンを蓄積しました。特に目を引くのが、2026年1月15日に記録された $63K（約6万3000ドル） の単独購入トランザクションです（ Etherscanで詳細を見る ）。 過去のサイクルを振り返ると、こうした「スマートマネー（玄人筋の資金）」の動きは、しばしば相場の先行指標となります。彼らがこれほどの規模で資金を投じているという事実は、Bitcoin Hyperの「高APYステーキング（TGE直後から開始）」や「コミュニティガバナンスへの報酬」といった設計が、長期的な価値を生むと判断されている証左でしょう。また、プレセール購入者に設定された7日間のベスティング（権利確定）期間も、上場直後の売り圧力を防ぐための賢明な措置として評価されています。 Bitcoin Hyperの公式サイトで詳細を確認する 免責事項 本記事は情報提供のみを目的としており、金融アドバイスではありません。暗号資産（仮想通貨）への投資は高いリスクを伴い、元本割れの可能性があります。投資判断は自己責任で行ってください。

Crypto sentiment is shifting decisively. While Bitcoin hovers around critical resistance levels, the real capital velocity is moving elsewhere. Seasoned investors are looking beyond simple price action on the majors and focusing on the “Best Altcoins Right Now” narrative—a story increasingly dominated by infrastructure plays rather than speculative meme assets. The driver here is structural. As institutional capital cements Bitcoin’s role as the digital economy’s pristine collateral, the friction of using the network—think slow block times and prohibitive fees—has become a massive bottleneck. The market is screaming for scalability solutions that don’t sacrifice security. That matters. Liquidity historically flows from the hardest asset (Bitcoin) to the protocols that unlock its utility. We’re seeing the early innings of a “DeFi on Bitcoin” supercycle, echoing Ethereum’s 2020 expansion but potentially far larger given Bitcoin’s trillion-dollar market cap. Smart money is currently hunting for projects that bridge the gap between Bitcoin’s security and the high-speed execution needed for modern apps. Data suggests a pivot to modular solutions—architectures that separate settlement from execution. Within this emerging landscape, Bitcoin Hyper has surfaced as a serious contender, using the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) to bring high-frequency trading capabilities directly to the Bitcoin network. Bitcoin Hyper Integrates SVM To Solve The Scalability Trilemma Frankly, the thesis driving Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is simple: technological convergence. For years, developers were stuck choosing between Bitcoin’s security and Solana’s speed. By integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) as a Layer 2 atop Bitcoin, this project attempts to eliminate that trade-off entirely. The implications are huge. The SVM is widely considered the most performant execution environment in crypto (capable of thousands of transactions per second with sub-second finality). Bringing this engine to Bitcoin enables order-book exchanges, high-speed gaming dApps, and complex DeFi protocols that were previously impossible on the mainnet due to scripting limitations. This approach fixes the “programmability gap” that’s left billions in BTC sitting idle. Through a Decentralized Canonical Bridge, users can move assets seamlessly between the secure L1 and the high-speed L2. This utility proposition—high-speed payments in wrapped BTC and Rust-based smart contracts—positions the project as critical infrastructure rather than just another governance token. The market generally assigns higher valuations to protocols that solve fundamental throughput issues, suggesting that Bitcoin Hyper is positioning itself to capture real value from the growing Bitcoin L2 ecosystem. Explore the Bitcoin Hyper ecosystem. Whale Activity Spikes As Presale Funding Crosses $31 Million Tech whitepapers are easy to write. On-chain capital flows? Those are harder to fake. The fundraising data for Bitcoin Hyper indicates substantial early backing. Per the official presale page, the project has already banked $31,228,293.92 —a figure that screams institutional interest rather than retail speculation. Currently priced at $0.0136751 , the token is attracting attention from high-net-worth individuals looking to position themselves before the Token Generation Event (TGE). Etherscan records show 2 whale wallets have swept up $116K. The biggest single buy? A $63K clip on Jan 15, 2026. This type of accumulation often precedes wider market recognition, as smart money tends to enter during the “infrastructure build” phase rather than the “public hype” phase. Then there are the tokenomics. Staking is available immediately after TGE with high APYs, designed to lock up circulating supply while the network matures. Plus, a 7-day vesting period for presale stakers mitigates the risk of immediate post-launch dumping—a mechanism that helps stabilize early price discovery. For investors analyzing the best altcoins right now, the combination of heavy capital accumulation and vesting structures points toward a project built for sustainability, not just a quick flip. Join the Bitcoin Hyper presale. Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrencies are volatile; conduct your own due diligence before investing. Key Takeaways Infrastructure Rotation: Capital is shifting from major assets into protocols that solve Bitcoin’s scalability and programmability issues. Technological Convergence: Projects merging Bitcoin’s security with high-speed execution environments like the SVM are capturing developer attention. Smart Money Signals: Bitcoin Hyper has raised over $31 million, with confirmed whale accumulation indicating strong conviction in the Bitcoin L2 narrative. Utility Focus: Investors are prioritizing tokens that offer tangible utility, such as high-speed bridging and decentralized finance capabilities.

BitcoinWorld Hyperion DeFi’s Ingenious Strategy: Using HYPE Tokens as Options Collateral to Unlock Revenue In a strategic move that could reshape revenue models in decentralized finance, Nasdaq-listed Hyperion DeFi has announced a plan to leverage its substantial HYPE token holdings as collateral for options contracts. This innovative approach, detailed by CFO David Knox, aims to generate premium income without speculative trading, marking a significant evolution in corporate cryptocurrency asset management. The decision involves over 1.8 million HYPE tokens, valued at approximately $64 million as of early December, and represents a sophisticated blend of traditional finance mechanics with blockchain-native assets. Hyperion DeFi’s Core Strategy: Collateralizing HYPE Tokens Hyperion DeFi, a strategic investor in the Hyperliquid (HYPE) ecosystem, is implementing a nuanced financial strategy. The company will use its HYPE token treasury not for direct market speculation but as essential collateral for writing and settling options contracts. Consequently, this allows Hyperion to earn revenue through the premiums and fees collected from these options. Furthermore, this income stream will directly supplement the returns already generated from its HYPE token staking activities. David Knox emphasized the non-directional nature of this strategy, distinguishing it from mere market betting. This approach demonstrates a mature application of derivatives within the volatile crypto asset class. The mechanics are straightforward yet powerful. By posting HYPE tokens as collateral, Hyperion can sell options contracts to other market participants. These contracts give the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell HYPE at a set price before a certain date. In return for taking on the obligation, Hyperion collects an upfront premium. If managed within a defined risk framework, this can create a consistent yield. Industry analysts often refer to this as a “covered call” or “cash-secured put” strategy when applied to equities. Its adaptation to digital assets is a clear sign of market maturation. The Broader Context of DeFi and Corporate Treasury Management Hyperion’s announcement arrives during a pivotal period for corporate digital asset management. Numerous public and private companies now hold cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum on their balance sheets. However, most treat these assets as static, long-term holdings, similar to digital gold. Hyperion’s move with HYPE tokens introduces an active treasury management concept. It seeks to put otherwise idle assets to work, generating yield without selling the underlying tokens. This model could inspire other firms holding significant crypto treasuries. Expert Analysis on Risk and Reward Financial experts note that while selling options can generate income, it is not without risk. The primary risk is being assigned the obligation to buy or sell tokens at an unfavorable price if the market moves sharply. However, by focusing on providing collateral rather than directional speculation, Hyperion mitigates some volatility risk. The strategy’s success hinges on sophisticated risk management, accurate pricing models, and deep liquidity in the HYPE options market. According to reports from The Block, Hyperion’s leadership has expressed confidence in these market fundamentals. This strategy reflects a broader trend of institutional players seeking yield in decentralized finance (DeFi) through more complex, structured products. The timeline of this development is also noteworthy. Hyperion disclosed its 1.8 million HYPE holding in early December. The formal announcement of the options collateral strategy followed, indicating careful planning. The impact is twofold: it provides a new revenue model for Hyperion and could increase utility and demand for the HYPE token itself. A healthy options market requires deep liquidity and active participants. Hyperion’s entry as a major collateral provider could stimulate this ecosystem, benefiting all HYPE stakeholders. Comparing Traditional and Crypto-Native Yield Strategies To understand Hyperion’s move, it helps to compare yield-generation methods. The table below outlines key differences. Strategy Traditional Finance Example Crypto/DeFi Example Primary Risk Staking Dividend-paying stocks Proof-of-Stake network validation Network slashing, token price volatility Lending Corporate bonds Supplying assets to lending protocols (e.g., Aave) Counterparty default, smart contract failure Providing Liquidity Market making Depositing token pairs in an AMM like Uniswap Impermanent loss, contract risk Writing Options (Hyperion’s method) Covered calls on equity holdings Using tokens as collateral for options contracts Assignment risk, volatility spikes Hyperion’s approach is distinct because it uses a traditional finance instrument—options—applied to a digital asset. This hybrid model leverages the programmability and transparency of blockchain while employing time-tested derivatives strategies. Key benefits of this method include: Enhanced Yield: It potentially offers returns above basic staking rewards. Capital Efficiency: The same asset (HYPE) serves as both a staking and collateral asset. Market Development: It supports the growth of a sophisticated derivatives layer for the HYPE token. Conclusion Hyperion DeFi’s plan to use HYPE tokens as options collateral represents a sophisticated leap in crypto asset management. This strategy moves beyond passive holding or simple staking, introducing a yield-generating mechanism familiar in traditional markets but novel for corporate crypto treasuries. By focusing on earning premiums as a collateral provider, Hyperion aims to boost revenue while supporting the broader HYPE ecosystem’s liquidity and maturity. As decentralized finance continues to intersect with traditional corporate finance, such innovative applications will likely become benchmarks. The success of this Hyperion DeFi strategy will be closely watched as a case study in active, risk-managed cryptocurrency treasury operations. FAQs Q1: What is Hyperion DeFi’s new strategy with its HYPE tokens? Hyperion DeFi plans to use its HYPE token holdings as collateral to write options contracts. This allows the company to earn revenue from the premiums paid by options buyers, supplementing its income from staking HYPE tokens. Q2: How is this different from speculative trading? According to CFO David Knox, the strategy is not directional. Hyperion is not betting on the price of HYPE going up or down. Instead, it acts as a collateral provider, earning fees for facilitating options contracts, which is a service-based revenue model. Q3: How many HYPE tokens does Hyperion hold for this strategy? As of early December, Hyperion DeFi held over 1.8 million HYPE tokens. At the time, this holding was valued at approximately $64 million, forming the substantial treasury base for this options collateral program. Q4: What are the potential risks of using tokens as options collateral? The main risk is “assignment risk,” where Hyperion may be obligated to buy or sell HYPE at a predetermined price if the option is exercised, potentially at a loss if market prices move unfavorably. Effective risk management is crucial to mitigate this. Q5: Could this strategy influence other companies holding cryptocurrencies? Yes. If successful, Hyperion’s approach could set a precedent for other corporations and investment firms holding digital assets. It demonstrates a method to generate yield from crypto treasuries beyond simple appreciation or basic staking, promoting more active and sophisticated treasury management. This post Hyperion DeFi’s Ingenious Strategy: Using HYPE Tokens as Options Collateral to Unlock Revenue first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

The “risk-on” signal is back. You can see it everywhere, but nowhere is it louder than in the resurgence of the meme coin sector. As Bitcoin takes a breather after its recent rallies, capital is aggressively sliding further out on the risk curve, chasing high-beta returns in assets like Dogecoin (DOGE), Pepe (PEPE), and dogwifhat (WIF). We’ve seen this movie before: liquidity cycles from Bitcoin to Ethereum, then to altcoins, and finally to meme assets. It’s the classic signal of a maturing bull run where retail FOMO starts outrunning institutional accumulation. But this cycle feels different. While the appetite for speculative assets is returning, sophisticated investors aren’t just buying “animal coins” blindly. The data points to a growing demand for infrastructure plays that can actually support the insane volume these tokens generate. The bottleneck? Bitcoin itself. It holds the liquidity ($1+ trillion of it), but it lacks the speed to host the vibrant DeFi and meme ecosystems thriving on Solana or Base. That gap has created a massive vacuum in the market. Traders want the security of Bitcoin’s network but demand the snap-execution speed of Solana. Naturally, capital is flowing toward solutions that bridge this gap—moving away from pure speculation toward utility-driven protocols. Leading this infrastructural shift is Bitcoin Hyper , a protocol built to finally bring high-performance execution to the Bitcoin network. Bitcoin Hyper Integrates SVM to Solve Bitcoin’s Liquidity Trap While the hunt for the best meme coins dominates headlines, the real problem has been staring us in the face: Bitcoin can’t participate in the “degen economy.” Its base layer is secure, sure—but it’s also notoriously slow and expensive. That makes it unsuitable for the high-velocity trading required by meme coin markets and DeFi apps. Bitcoin Hyper addresses this by deploying the first-ever Bitcoin Layer 2 powered by the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM). Why does this architecture matter? Simple: it fundamentally changes the value proposition of Bitcoin assets. By integrating the SVM, Bitcoin Hyper allows for sub-second transaction finality and negligible fees, effectively porting Solana’s user experience over to Bitcoin’s massive capital base. For developers, this means the ability to build sophisticated dApps, swap platforms, and meme coin launchpads using Rust, all while anchoring state to Bitcoin’s L1 for settlement. The implications here are huge. Right now, billions in Bitcoin capital remain dormant because holders lack viable yield-generating opportunities or fast trading venues native to the ecosystem. By unlocking this liquidity through a decentralized canonical bridge, Bitcoin Hyper positions itself not just as another token, but as the transactional engine for the next wave of Bitcoin-native assets. With a modular design separating execution (SVM) from settlement (Bitcoin L1), the old distinction between “store of value” and “medium of exchange” is starting to look obsolete. Visit the Bitcoin Hyper Official Site Whales Accumulate $HYPER as Presale Breaches $31 Million Smart money positioning is often the best leading indicator we have, and on-chain metrics for Bitcoin Hyper suggest high-conviction accumulation is already underway. According to the official presale page, the project has successfully raised $31,228,293.92 , a figure that underscores significant institutional interest before the token even hits public exchanges. With the token currently priced at $0.0136751 , early entrants are positioning themselves before the protocol fully deploys its mainnet capabilities. Digging into the granular data, we see specific high-net-worth behavior. Etherscan records show that two whale wallets have scooped up $116K in recent transactions. The heavy hitter? A single transaction of $63K executed on Jan 15, 2026. This type of accumulation during a presale typically signals that large-scale investors are hedging against the volatility of standard meme coins by betting on the infrastructure that will likely host them. It’s not just about raw capital inflows, though. Retention mechanics play a huge role. Bitcoin Hyper offers high APY opportunities with immediate staking available post-TGE (Token Generation Event). Plus, the inclusion of a 7-day vesting period for presale stakers—and rewards for governance participation—aligns incentives properly. This reduces the likelihood of the immediate “dump” often seen in lower-quality projects. For investors navigating the return of risk appetite, Bitcoin Hyper represents a leveraged bet on the convergence of Bitcoin security and Solana speed. Check Bitcoin Hyper Presale Details Disclaimer: The content provided in this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile, and presale tokens carry inherent risks. Always conduct your own due diligence before making any investment decisions. Key Takeaways Risk-On Shift: Global liquidity is rotating from Bitcoin into high-beta sectors, waking up the meme coin market. Infrastructure Focus: Smart money is prioritizing Layer 2 protocols that enable high-frequency trading on secure networks rather than just buying speculative tokens. Best of Both Worlds: Bitcoin Hyper uses the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) to bring high-speed smart contracts to the Bitcoin ecosystem. Institutional Interest: Significant whale activity and over $31 million raised in presale suggest strong confidence in Bitcoin L2 solutions.

Deciding what crypto to invest in right now is getting tricky. The market is pivoting from simple accumulation to a hunger for utility and yield. For most of the last cycle, the winning strategy was passive holding—treating Bitcoin like a digital rock, immovable and secure. But that’s changing. Recent on-chain data suggests a rotation is underway. Capital isn’t just sitting in cold storage anymore; it’s seeking velocity. Money is flowing toward infrastructure plays capable of unlocking the trillion-dollar liquidity trapped inside the Bitcoin network. That shift fundamentally alters the risk-reward calculus. Investors want it all: Bitcoin’s security coupled with the execution speed modern DeFi demands. The narrative is drifting from “store of value” to “medium of execution.” While Ethereum has long dominated this layer, its congestion issues (and fragmented liquidity) have left a wide opening. Smart money is watching closely. The race is on to solve the “Bitcoin Trilemma”—keeping the network secure while making it fast and programmable. Frankly, it’s not just speculation; it’s an architectural necessity. As demand for scalable Bitcoin infrastructure heats up, liquidity is funneling into Layer 2 solutions promising to modernize the legacy chain. One project, Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) , has emerged as a key beneficiary, using high-performance architecture to bridge the gap between Bitcoin’s deep liquidity and modern speed. Bitcoin Hyper Brings Solana Speeds to the Bitcoin Network The main friction point right now? Layer 1 Bitcoin’s technical limits. It’s robust, sure—but painfully slow for decentralized apps. Bitcoin Hyper tackles this by integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) directly as a Layer 2 solution. That matters. It creates a hybrid environment: the settlement assurance of Bitcoin combined with the sub-second finality developers expect from high-speed chains like Solana. Using a modular blockchain architecture, Bitcoin Hyper handles execution on a real-time SVM L2 while relying on Bitcoin L1 for settlement. This effectively fixes the programmability gap that’s long handicapped the ecosystem. For developers, the inclusion of Rust-based SDKs opens the door to porting complex DeFi and gaming apps—stuff that was previously impossible to run on Bitcoin. The protocol employs a Decentralized Canonical Bridge for trustless BTC transfers, letting users move assets into a high-speed lane with minimal fees. (While “wrapping” BTC is standard practice, doing it via SVM offers a distinct technical edge over EVM-based competitors.) By enabling high-speed payments and SPL-compatible tokens, the project aims to capture the transactional volume that usually bleeds out to Ethereum or Solana. Bridge BTC to the SVM Layer. Presale Data and Whale Activity Signal Institutional Interest While the tech provides the fundamental case, the financial data surrounding Bitcoin Hyper points to serious early capital allocation. In a market where liquidity is usually fragmented, the project has consolidated massive backing. According to the official presale page, Bitcoin Hyper has raised $31,228,293.92 —a figure that blows past typical seed rounds for Layer 2 infrastructure. That level of funding signals high conviction in the “Bitcoin L2” thesis. The token, $HYPER, is currently sitting at $0.0136751 . Beyond the retail raise, on-chain activity suggests deeper pockets are taking positions. According to Etherscan records , two whale wallets have accumulated $116K. The largest single transaction ($63K) hit the chain on Jan 15, 2026. That specific timing—occurring alongside broader market shifts—suggests smart money is positioning itself before the protocol’s full mainnet launch. For investors chasing yield, the project offers immediate staking after TGE. While APY rates fluctuate based on participation, the setup is aggressive. Notably, there’s a 7-day vesting period for presale stakers—a mechanism designed to prevent immediate dump-pressure. It’s a move that attempts to align incentives with long-term governance, theoretically turning passive holders into active participants. Join the Bitcoin Hyper Presale. Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrencies, particularly presale tokens and new Layer 2 protocols, carry high volatility and risk. Always perform your own due diligence and consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions. Key Takeaways Market Rotation : Capital is shifting from passive Bitcoin holding to active infrastructure plays that unlock BTC liquidity for DeFi and gaming. Technical Hybrid : Bitcoin Hyper is the first Bitcoin Layer 2 to integrate the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), enabling sub-second transactions on the Bitcoin network. Strong Backing : The project has raised over $31.2 million in its presale, with confirmed whale activity signaling smart money interest. Yield Potential : Investors can access immediate staking rewards post-TGE, capitalizing on the demand for high-performance Bitcoin infrastructure.

Crypto’s capital rotation is predictable in rhythm but wild in its targets. While retail chases the tail end of meme rallies, “smart money” is quietly positioning in a sector that’s historically been sluggish but holds the industry’s deepest liquidity: Bitcoin infrastructure . The narrative is shifting. We’re moving away from pure speculation toward “fat protocols”—infrastructure plays solving critical bottlenecks. That matters. Despite holding 50%+ of the market cap, Bitcoin is largely dormant capital—digital gold, not a productive asset. And with mainnet congestion spiking fees (again), there’s a vacuum for scaling solutions. Unlike Ethereum’s mature L2 ecosystem, Bitcoin’s landscape is barely out of the cradle. Smart money is tracking projects that don’t just “wrap” Bitcoin—they program it. The “Modular Bitcoin” thesis is gaining serious traction. The idea? Use Bitcoin solely for settlement while offloading execution to faster environments. Investors want the best of both worlds: Solana’s speed with Bitcoin’s security. This convergence creates a high-beta opportunity for early infrastructure plays like Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) , designed to bridge that exact gap. SVM Integration Signals a New Era for Bitcoin DeFi Bitcoin’s primary barrier to DeFi adoption has always been technical. Its scripting language is intentionally limited (for security), making complex smart contracts nearly impossible on the base layer. Bitcoin Hyper fixes this by integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) directly as a Layer 2. Why does that matter? It lets developers write in Rust—the dominant language for high-performance chains—and deploy apps that settle on Bitcoin but run at Solana speeds. By using a modular architecture, Bitcoin Hyper separates the heavy lifting. Mainnet handles security; the SVM L2 handles execution. The result? Sub-second finality and negligible gas fees—effectively solving the “trilemma” plaguing previous forks. For developers, this finally unlocks high-speed payments, NFT platforms, and complex gaming dApps that were previously impossible on the network. The implications are huge. If Bitcoin Hyper captures even a fraction of Bitcoin’s idle capital, $HYPER’s velocity could decouple from broader trends. Using a trusted sequencer with periodic L1 anchoring, the project ensures that while processing happens off-chain, the ultimate “truth” stays on Bitcoin. Visit the Bitcoin Hyper Presale Whale Accumulation Points to Infrastructure Bet Price action follows volume; sustainable explosions follow accumulation. On-chain analysis suggests whales are actively positioning in the Bitcoin Hyper presale before public listing. Smart money is moving. Etherscan data reveals two high-net-worth wallets accumulated $116K recently, with the largest single buy hitting $63K on Jan 15, 2026. That kind of pre-market positioning signals strong conviction that the asset is undervalued. View the whale activity on Etherscan . The numbers back this up. According to official data, the project has already raised $31,228,293.92 —validating the market demand for Bitcoin scaling. With tokens currently priced at $0.0136751 , the entry point offers the kind of asymmetric upside traders hunt for in early-stage infrastructure. Plus, the tokenomics encourage holding. Stakers get high APY immediately after the Token Generation Event (TGE), with a modest 7-day vesting period for presale participants. This mechanism aims to reduce sell pressure at launch—a setup smart money looks for to ensure stability during price discovery. The combination of massive capital raises and verifiable whale activity suggests the market is pricing in a major shift toward Bitcoin programmability. Explore the Bitcoin Hyper Community Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry high risks, including total loss. Key Takeaways Capital Rotation : Smart money is shifting from speculative assets to infrastructure plays, specifically targeting the undeveloped Bitcoin Layer 2 market. The Modular Thesis : The industry is favoring modular blockchains that separate settlement (Bitcoin) from execution (Layer 2s) for maximum efficiency. Technical Convergence : Projects merging Bitcoin’s security with the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) are unlocking new use cases for $1 trillion in idle BTC capital. Bitcoin Hyper’s Momentum : With over $31 million raised and confirmed whale entries of up to $63K, $HYPER is positioning itself as a leader in the BTC L2 race.

Blockchain upgrades rarely make noise, but they often reshape the future quietly. While traders track charts and headlines chase volatility, the XRP Ledger continues to advance at the protocol level . This latest update targets a long-standing barrier to institutional adoption: how to support strict compliance requirements without undermining decentralization. In a recent post on X, XRPL developer and community contributor Vet confirmed that the Permissioned Domain amendment is now active on the XRP Ledger. The activation marks a critical milestone in XRPL’s roadmap toward regulated, enterprise-grade decentralized finance. Understanding the Permissioned Domain Upgrade The Permissioned Domain feature allows developers to create controlled on-ledger environments where access depends on verified credentials. These domains can restrict participation to approved entities while still operating on a public blockchain. The core ledger remains open and permissionless, but specific applications can enforce rules that align with regulatory obligations. For those interested, after the timer expires of amendment activation the XRP Ledger checks at the next flag ledger (every 256th ledger is a flag ledger )if the votes are still there and then the blockchain itself sends a so called pseudo transaction out "EnableAmendment" this… — Vet (@Vet_X0) February 4, 2026 This approach gives institutions the flexibility they need to interact with decentralized infrastructure without violating compliance standards. Instead of forcing regulation onto the base layer, XRPL enables optional compliance at the application level. Building Blocks for a Compliant DEX Ecosystem Vet explained that the Permissioned Domain joins credentials as the second of three key compliance components now live on XRPL. Credentials allow identity or compliance attestations to exist on-ledger, while Permissioned Domains define where and how those credentials apply. The final piece, the Permissioned DEX amendment, still awaits a few additional validator approvals. Once activated, these three elements together will enable compliant decentralized exchanges on XRPL, suitable for regulated liquidity and enterprise payment flows such as Ripple Payments. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 How Amendment Activation Works on XRPL Vet also clarified how XRPL amendments officially go live. After an amendment meets the required validator support and its activation timer expires, the ledger does not activate it instantly. The network waits until the next “flag ledger,” which occurs every 256 ledgers. At that point, if validator votes remain in favor, the blockchain automatically issues a pseudo-transaction called EnableAmendment. That transaction formally activates the feature on-ledger. This process explains why amendments often activate shortly after, rather than exactly at, the timer’s expiration. Why This Matters for XRP and Institutions The activation of Permissioned Domains reinforces XRPL’s long-term strategy. Instead of competing solely on speculation or narrative, the network continues to prioritize real-world financial integration. Institutions require atomic settlement, reduced counterparty risk, and programmable compliance. XRPL now supports all three without sacrificing decentralization. While price action may remain volatile, infrastructure progress tells a different story. As regulated capital increasingly moves on-chain, upgrades like Permissioned Domains position the XRP Ledger as a serious settlement layer for compliant, global finance. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Permissioned Domain Just Got Activated on the XRP Ledger. Here’s What It Means appeared first on Times Tabloid .

Market volatility is often misdiagnosed as purely negative. For the inexperienced, red candles signal danger. But for smart money? They signal a reset—a shift in valuations that opens the door for high-beta assets. As Bitcoin consolidates, liquidity is fracturing, moving away from stagnant legacy alts and toward specific sectors solving real technological bottlenecks. The current chop in the charts matters less for the price action itself than for what it reveals about investor psychology: the market is hunting for yield in undervalued infrastructure plays. Finding the “best cheap crypto to buy now” isn’t just about hunting for tokens under $1. It’s about identifying projects where the market cap hasn’t caught up to fundamental utility. Right now, the most aggressive capital rotation is targeting the Bitcoin Layer 2 ecosystem. While Ethereum solved scaling years ago, Bitcoin remains notoriously slow (and expensive). This gap represents a trillion-dollar opportunity for developers who can unlock programmability on the world’s most secure blockchain. Here, the narrative shifts from speculation to utility. Amidst this volatility, Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) has emerged as a serious contender for liquidity. By fusing Bitcoin’s settlement security with the speed of the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), the project is positioning itself to capture capital currently sidelined by Bitcoin’s technical limitations. Bitcoin Hyper Integrates Solana Virtual Machine To Solve Scalability The fundamental problem with Bitcoin has always been the “trilemma” trade-off: it’s secure and decentralized, but painfully slow. Past scaling attempts—think Lightning Network or Stacks—have often hit friction regarding user experience or finality speeds. Bitcoin Hyper approaches this differently. By integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) directly as a Layer 2 execution environment, it allows developers to write smart contracts in Rust (the language preferred by high-performance dApp builders) while anchoring the final state to Bitcoin. That distinction matters. It signals a shift in how the market views Bitcoin scaling. It’s no longer enough to just “be on Bitcoin”—the infrastructure must support the high-frequency trading and complex DeFi applications users expect from modern chains. By using SVM, Bitcoin Hyper targets sub-second finality and negligible gas fees, bringing Solana-like performance to Bitcoin’s rails. For investors, the utility case is simple. The project creates a decentralized bridge for BTC transfers, allowing holders to put their assets to work in a high-speed DeFi ecosystem without trusting centralized intermediaries. From swaps to gaming dApps, the protocol unlocks capital efficiency for dormant BTC. Plus, the integration of a single trusted sequencer with periodic L1 state anchoring balances speed with the immutable security of the main chain. Explore the Bitcoin Hyper Presale Whales Accumulate $116K As Presale Crosses Major Milestone Technology drives long-term value, but capital flows drive price. Analyzing presale data gives us a peek into where institutional sentiment is leaning. According to the official site, Bitcoin Hyper has raised an impressive $31,228,293.92 . That level of capital commitment—especially during a volatile market—signals high conviction from early backers betting on the L2 narrative. The pricing structure fits the “cheap crypto” thesis perfectly. With tokens currently at $0.0136751 , the entry point is accessible relative to established L2s trading at multi-billion dollar valuations. But what’s even more telling is the on-chain behavior of larger wallets. According to Etherscan records, two whale wallets have accumulated $116K in the presale. The largest transaction ($63K) hit the chain on Jan 15, 2026. Why care? Because whales rarely deploy that much capital into unlisted assets without rigorous due diligence. Their positioning suggests they expect post-launch volatility to favor the upside. View this whale activity on Etherscan. Additionally, the project offers immediate staking after the Token Generation Event (TGE) with a 7-day vesting period for presale stakers. This mechanism helps reduce sell pressure upon listing—a common pitfall for new tokens. By incentivizing holding through reportedly “high APY” rewards, the protocol aligns retail behavior with long-term network health. Visit the official Bitcoin Hyper site Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and carry significant risk. Always perform your own due diligence before investing. The dates and figures mentioned regarding whale activity are based on provided data points. Key Takeaways Volatility as Opportunity : Market turbulence is driving a rotation into infrastructure plays, specifically those solving Bitcoin’s scalability issues. Technological Convergence : By integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), the project brings high-speed smart contracts to the Bitcoin network. Institutional Interest : Presale data showing over $31M raised and verified whale entries signals strong confidence from “smart money.” Value Proposition : Low token pricing combined with high-utility L2 architecture presents a distinct risk-reward profile compared to legacy altcoins.

AERO is maintaining the LH/LL structure in the downtrend, $0.3670 resistance is the BOS level. If $0.3518 support breaks, bearish continuation, BTC correlation increases risk.

The crypto market is currently undergoing a decisive rotation. While early cycle quarters were defined by meme-driven chaos and volatility, Q4 data signals a massive capital flight toward infrastructure. Specifically, smart money is positioning for the “Bitcoin Renaissance.” It’s a thesis driven by one massive, unignorable fact: there is trillion-dollar liquidity dormant on the Bitcoin network, and it needs somewhere to go. Bitcoin’s dominance remains high, yet its ecosystem has historically suffered from a lack of programmability (compared to Ethereum or Solana, at least). That matters. Capital efficiency is becoming the primary driver of institutional flows. Investors aren’t just asking “will number go up?” anymore; they’re asking “what yield can this asset generate?” As global liquidity tightens, sentiment has shifted away from vaporware toward projects building tangible scaling solutions. The data points to a specific gap: high-performance execution layers. Frankly, while Stacks and Lightning Network have been around for years, they struggle with latency issues that alienate modern DeFi users accustomed to sub-second finality. This creates an asymmetric opportunity for presales targeting this exact bottleneck. The search for the “Best Crypto Presales to Invest In” is narrowing down to protocols that can actually merge Bitcoin’s security with the speed modern dApps demand. One project capitalizing on this shift is Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) , which has emerged as a frontrunner by integrating the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) directly as a Bitcoin Layer 2. Bitcoin Hyper Bridges the Gap Between Security and Speed The fundamental problem with Bitcoin development has always been the trade-off between security and speed. Bitcoin is secure, sure—but it’s slow. Existing L2s often sacrifice too much decentralization or fail to deliver the throughput needed for complex DeFi. Bitcoin Hyper attacks this via a technical architecture that’s distinct in the current landscape: it utilizes the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) for execution while relying on Bitcoin L1 for settlement. That architecture matters. It allows developers to write in Rust—the language of high-performance dApps—while inheriting Bitcoin’s finality. Instead of waiting 10 minutes for a block confirmation (an eternity in DeFi), Bitcoin Hyper offers the low-latency processing characteristic of Solana. For the end-user, this translates to high-speed payments in wrapped BTC and complex DeFi interactions (swaps, lending) costing fractions of a cent ($0.01 fees). What most coverage misses is the “stickiness” of the SVM. By adopting Solana’s architecture, Bitcoin Hyper isn’t just building a faster chain; it’s effectively onboarding the entire existing ecosystem of Solana developers to Bitcoin. It creates a Decentralized Canonical Bridge allowing for seamless BTC transfers. This effectively turns Bitcoin from a passive store of value into a productive asset capable of earning yield. The technical specs reveal a modular approach: a single trusted sequencer ensures immediate throughput, while periodic L1 state anchoring maintains the trustless nature of the Bitcoin network. It’s a hybrid model that suggests the project is prioritizing user experience (UX) to compete directly with high-speed L1s. Explore the Bitcoin Hyper presale here. Smart Money Flows into $HYPER as Fundraising Passes $31 Million Market sentiment is best tracked not by Twitter threads, but by on-chain volume. The financial data surrounding Bitcoin Hyper indicates a level of demand rarely seen in early-stage presales. According to the official presale page, the project has raised a staggering $31,228,293.92 , with tokens currently priced at $0.0136751 . This magnitude of capital injection suggests high-net-worth individuals are hedging against the limitations of legacy L2s. On-chain data corroborates this institutional interest. According to Etherscan records, 2 whale wallets have accumulated $116K in $HYPER allocations. The largest single transaction ( $63K ) occurred on Jan 15, 2026 ( view on-chain whale activity ). The risk here—as with all presales—involves the vesting schedule. However, Bitcoin Hyper has structured its tokenomics to mitigate immediate dump pressure. While staking is immediate after the Token Generation Event (TGE), presale stakers are subject to a 7-day vesting period. This short lock-up, combined with high APY incentives for governance participation, aims to align long-term holder interests with protocol health. For investors tracking market shifts, the volume of this raise serves as a leading indicator. It signals that the market is willing to pay a premium for infrastructure that finally solves the “Bitcoin programmability” problem without compromising on speed. Visit the official Bitcoin Hyper presale site. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially presales, carry high risk and volatility. Always conduct your own due diligence before investing.