Michael Saylor claims Bitcoin could reach 10 million dollars in a day. Critics discuss Saylor's prediction as unrealistic and compare to historical bubbles. Continue Reading: Michael Saylor Makes Bold Predictions About Bitcoin The post Michael Saylor Makes Bold Predictions About Bitcoin appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Mining Crisis: Price Plummets Below Critical Production Costs, Squeezing Miners In a stark reversal from late 2024’s highs, the Bitcoin market now faces a severe stress test as the BTC price has decisively broken below the average cost to mine it, triggering a critical profitability squeeze for network validators worldwide. According to data from analytics firm CryptoQuant, the current spot price languishes significantly under the estimated $70,000 to $80,000 required to produce a single Bitcoin, creating immediate financial pressure for mining operations. This development, reported first by Decrypt, signals a potential inflection point for the industry’s infrastructure and economic security. Understanding the Bitcoin Mining Cost Crisis The core issue centers on a simple economic principle: production cost versus market price. For Bitcoin miners, profitability hinges on the value of the block reward exceeding their operational expenses. Consequently, when the market price falls below the cost of production, miners operate at a loss for each new coin they generate. Senior CryptoQuant analyst Julio Moreno provided the crucial data, estimating the average all-in cost for a miner to produce one BTC sits between $70,000 and $80,000. This figure starkly contrasts with the current trading price, which has fallen nearly 50% from its October peak. The pressure is particularly acute for publicly listed mining companies, whose costs analysts estimate average between $60,000 and $80,000 when factoring in corporate overhead and capital expenditures. The Anatomy of Mining Costs Mining costs are not monolithic; they vary dramatically based on several key factors. Primarily, electricity expense constitutes the largest variable, often determining a operation’s viability. Geographic location, therefore, becomes a major differentiator. Additionally, hardware efficiency, measured in joules per terahash (J/TH), directly impacts energy consumption. Finally, operational overhead, including cooling, maintenance, and labor, adds to the total cost basis. The following table illustrates the primary cost components for a typical large-scale mining operation: Cost Component Description Impact Variability Electricity Power consumption of ASIC miners High (Location-dependent) Hardware Depreciation Loss of value and efficiency of mining rigs Medium (Tech cycle-dependent) Infrastructure & Cooling Data center facilities and thermal management Medium to High Network & Pool Fees Costs associated with mining pool participation Low Labor & Maintenance Technical staff and hardware upkeep Low to Medium Historical Context and Market Cycle Pressures This is not the first time the Bitcoin mining industry has faced such a squeeze. Historically, similar events have occurred during major bear markets, acting as a mechanism that shakes out less efficient operators. However, the scale of modern mining, with its industrial-level capital investment, makes the 2025 situation uniquely precarious. The rapid price decline from the October high has compressed the adjustment timeline, forcing miners to make swift decisions. Typically, miners respond to such pressures through several adaptive measures: Hodling Strategy: Ceasing daily Bitcoin sales to cover costs, depleting treasury reserves. Hardware Upgrades: Investing in newer, more efficient ASICs to lower the energy cost per coin. Geographic Relocation: Moving operations to regions with cheaper, often renewable, energy sources. Hash Rate Reduction: Temporarily powering down inefficient rigs to conserve capital. Each action carries significant risk and cost, highlighting the complex calculus miners must now perform. The Ripple Effects on Network Security The immediate financial pain for miners carries broader implications for the Bitcoin network itself. Network security, fundamentally underpinned by the total computational power (hash rate) dedicated to mining, could face headwinds. If a significant number of miners are forced offline due to unprofitability, the network’s hash rate could decline. While the Bitcoin protocol automatically adjusts mining difficulty approximately every two weeks to maintain block times, a sharp hash rate drop could, in theory, temporarily reduce the cost of a 51% attack. However, historical precedent suggests the network is resilient; inefficient miners capitulate, and surviving operations, often with lower costs, consolidate market share, ultimately strengthening the network’s economic foundation. Expert Analysis and Industry Outlook Julio Moreno’s analysis provides a crucial data point for understanding the current stress. His focus on the all-in production cost offers a more realistic picture than simple electricity-cost models. Furthermore, the distinction between private and public miner costs is vital. Public companies, with their reporting requirements and shareholder pressures, often have higher operational overhead but also better access to capital markets for weathering storms. The current price environment will test both business models severely. Industry observers note that periods where price trades below production cost are often followed by increased market volatility and potential bottom formation, as weak hands are cleared from the market. Comparative Resilience of Different Mining Models Not all miners face equal peril. Vertically integrated operations that own power generation assets, particularly renewable sources like hydro, wind, or flared gas, possess a substantial advantage. Their marginal cost of electricity approaches zero, allowing them to remain profitable at much lower Bitcoin prices. Conversely, miners relying on volatile retail or commercial grid power face existential risk. This dynamic may accelerate a pre-existing trend toward sustainable mining and greater geographic diversification of hash rate, potentially making the network more decentralized and environmentally resilient in the long term. Conclusion The situation where the Bitcoin price falls below the average mining cost represents a critical stress event for the industry’s infrastructure. This squeeze forces a Darwinian efficiency drive, compelling miners to innovate, relocate, or capitulate. While painful for individual operators, such cycles historically purge inefficiency and strengthen the network’s economic foundations. The key metrics to watch now are hash rate trends, miner outflow to exchanges (indicating forced selling), and public mining companies’ treasury management. The resolution of this Bitcoin mining cost crisis will likely shape the landscape and set the stage for the next phase of the market cycle, proving once again the relentless economic logic embedded within Bitcoin’s protocol. FAQs Q1: What does it mean when Bitcoin price is below mining cost? It means the market value of a newly mined Bitcoin is less than the total expenses (electricity, hardware, overhead) incurred to produce it. Consequently, miners lose money on each block reward unless they mined at a lower cost than the average. Q2: How long can miners operate at a loss? This depends on their capital reserves and balance sheet strength. Large, well-funded operations may hodl coins and draw on cash reserves for months. Smaller, highly leveraged miners may be forced to shut down rigs or sell assets within weeks. Q3: Does this threaten Bitcoin’s network security? In the short term, it can lead to a decline in hash rate as inefficient miners go offline. However, the network’s difficulty adjustment ensures block production continues. Long-term security may even increase as only the most efficient, low-cost miners survive. Q4: What is the typical miner response to this crisis? Common responses include: upgrading to more efficient hardware, relocating to cheaper energy regions, hedging energy costs, powering down old rigs, and drawing on treasury reserves instead of selling newly mined coins. Q5: Has this happened before in Bitcoin’s history? Yes. Similar profitability squeezes occurred during the 2018-2019 bear market and following previous bull market peaks. They are a recurring feature of Bitcoin’s volatile market cycles and often mark periods of industry consolidation. This post Bitcoin Mining Crisis: Price Plummets Below Critical Production Costs, Squeezing Miners first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Truly, crypto is in a weird place right now. All the fear around Bitcoin price collapsing is negatively affecting XRP price predictions . With so many narratives impacting the market, quantum risk seems to stand out as the one scaring big whales the most. During the company earnings call , Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz said a client sold around $9 billion worth of Bitcoin, with quantum computing concerns being the main driver. the quantum threat to bitcoin is very real. one of crypto’s biggest fund managers, mike novogratz, just mentioned on his earnings call that one of his clients sold $9b of $BTC because of quantum fears. https://t.co/m7XrwJXkm7 — Dom Kwok | EasyA (@dom_kwok) February 3, 2026 Dom Kwok, an EasyA cofounder known for his contributions to the XRP ecosystem, confirmed this and said it is a credible risk. Is the Market Overreacting to Quantum Risk? Quantum risk does matter, and Ethereum cofounder Vitalik Buterin has warned about it multiple times in the past. Quantum risk is often said to be something that will not affect the market anytime in the next 10 years. However, whales are already treating it as a real risk, not just a scary narrative. The good news is that crypto is taking this seriously, and many projects are already moving toward quantum-resistant solutions . The XRP Ledger has already started moving in that direction. Developers have been testing post-quantum signature schemes on XRP Ledger test networks, which shows they are trying to get ahead of the issue instead of reacting too late. These upgrades are not live on mainnet yet, but that early effort is slowly becoming part of XRP’s broader narrative. XRP Price Prediction: Could XRP Be the Winner? With all the negativity circulating in crypto, the XRP price has now broken cleanly below its descending channel, and this time, there is no room for doubt. The price went straight into the $1.30 to $1.40 zone, levels it has not traded at in about 14 months, which tells you the downtrend is still very much in play. Source: TradingView That breakdown flips the old channel support into resistance, with the $1.85 to $1.90 area now the key to watch. If XRP can manage a relief bounce and reclaim that zone on a daily close, the structure would finally start to improve, opening the door toward $2.10 first and potentially the $2.30 area after that. On the downside, the next level that really matters sits around $1.20-$1. Until XRP can get back above $1.90, any bounce should still be viewed as corrective. Bitcoin Hyper Presale Brings Solana Tech to Bitcoin for The First Time Bitcoin still sits at the center of crypto, but its limitations are becoming harder to ignore. Speed, fees, and flexibility have always been issues, and long term investors are starting to care more about infrastructure than hype. Bitcoin Hyper is built around that shift. It is a Bitcoin-focused Layer 2 designed to make Bitcoin faster, cheaper to use, and easier to build on. All this without compromising its security. Interest in the project is already strong. The presale has raised over $31,200,000 so far, with $HYPER priced at $0.013635 before the next increase. Staking rewards of up to 37% are also being offered, adding yield where Bitcoin itself does not. Visit the Official Bitcoin Hyper Website Here The post XRP Price Prediction: Top XRP Voice Sounds Alarm on Bitcoin’s Quantum Risk – Could XRP Be the Winner? appeared first on Cryptonews .

The companies plan to expand global access to tokenized gold and allow the buying of bullion with Tether's stablecoins.

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $63,000 Amidst Market Uncertainty Global cryptocurrency markets witnessed a significant shift on April 10, 2025, as the Bitcoin price broke below the critical $63,000 support level. According to real-time data from Bitcoin World market monitoring, BTC is currently trading at $62,952.7 on the Binance USDT perpetual futures market. This movement represents a pivotal moment for digital asset investors worldwide, consequently prompting analysis of broader financial trends. Bitcoin Price Analysis and Immediate Market Reaction The descent of the Bitcoin price below $63,000 marks a clear departure from its recent trading range. Market data reveals increased selling pressure across major exchanges. Furthermore, the 24-hour trading volume has surged by approximately 35%, indicating heightened activity. This price action often reflects a combination of macroeconomic sentiment and technical triggers within the crypto ecosystem. Several key metrics provide context for this decline. The Bitcoin Fear and Greed Index, a popular sentiment gauge, has shifted towards “Fear” territory. Simultaneously, open interest in Bitcoin futures contracts has seen a noticeable decrease. This suggests that leveraged positions are being unwound, thereby contributing to downward momentum. Historical data shows that similar corrections have preceded both extended bear markets and healthy consolidations. Metric Value (Approx.) Change (24h) BTC Price (Binance) $62,952.7 -4.2% 24h Trading Volume $42.8B +35% Market Dominance 52.1% -0.8% Fear & Greed Index 38 (Fear) -22 points Historical Context and Comparative Market Performance Understanding this Bitcoin price movement requires examining historical patterns. For instance, the $63,000 level previously acted as strong support throughout early 2025. A breach of this level technically opens the door for a test of the next major support zone near $60,000. Comparatively, traditional markets have shown mixed signals, with bond yields rising and equity indices experiencing volatility. The current correction aligns with several historical precedents. Notably, Bitcoin has undergone similar percentage declines during previous bull market cycles. These periods typically served to shake out speculative leverage before resuming an upward trajectory. However, each cycle possesses unique fundamental drivers. Key factors differentiating 2025 include widespread institutional adoption and evolving regulatory frameworks. Macroeconomic Pressures: Rising interest rates and inflation concerns continue to influence all risk assets. Technical Breakdown: The loss of the $63,000 level was a confirmed technical sell signal for many algorithmic traders. On-Chain Data: Metrics like Exchange Net Flow show increased deposits to exchanges, often a precursor to selling. Derivatives Market Reset: High funding rates prior to the drop indicated excessive bullish leverage needing correction. Expert Perspectives on Market Structure Market analysts emphasize the importance of market structure in interpreting the Bitcoin price action. The liquidation of over $450 million in long positions across derivatives exchanges amplified the initial move. This cascade of liquidations is a standard feature of crypto market corrections. Seasoned traders often view such events as necessary resets that restore healthier market conditions by removing excessive speculation. Data from Glassnode and CryptoQuant reveals that long-term holder supply remains relatively steady. This suggests that core investors are not panic-selling. Instead, the selling pressure appears concentrated among short-term speculators and leveraged traders. This distinction is crucial for assessing the durability of the trend. Moreover, network fundamentals like hash rate remain at all-time highs, indicating miner confidence. Potential Impacts and Forward-Looking Scenarios The immediate impact of the Bitcoin price falling below $63,000 extends across the entire digital asset sector. Altcoins, which often correlate with Bitcoin’s momentum, have generally experienced larger percentage declines. This phenomenon highlights Bitcoin’s role as the market leader. Consequently, portfolio rebalancing and risk reassessment are underway among institutional and retail investors alike. Looking forward, analysts outline several potential scenarios. A swift recovery above $63,000 would invalidate the bearish breakdown and suggest strong underlying demand. Conversely, a prolonged consolidation below this level could lead to a test of the $60,000 psychological support. The broader trajectory will likely depend on upcoming macroeconomic data, including inflation reports and central bank communications. Regulatory developments also remain a critical watchpoint for 2025. Conclusion The Bitcoin price crossing below $63,000 signifies a notable moment of market reassessment. This move, driven by a confluence of technical factors and macro sentiment, underscores the inherent volatility of cryptocurrency markets. While short-term price action induces caution, the long-term fundamentals for Bitcoin and blockchain technology continue to evolve. Market participants should prioritize risk management and consider historical cycles when analyzing the current Bitcoin price trajectory. The coming weeks will be essential for determining whether this is a healthy correction or the start of a deeper trend change. FAQs Q1: Why did the Bitcoin price fall below $63,000? The decline resulted from a combination of technical selling after breaking a key support level, liquidations of leveraged long positions, and broader risk-off sentiment in global markets. Q2: What is the historical significance of the $63,000 price level for Bitcoin? Throughout early 2025, the $63,000 level acted as a major support and resistance zone. A sustained break below it is viewed by analysts as a technically significant event that can influence medium-term trends. Q3: How does this Bitcoin price drop affect other cryptocurrencies? Most major altcoins exhibit high correlation with Bitcoin. Therefore, they typically experience amplified volatility during such moves, often declining by a greater percentage in the short term. Q4: Are long-term Bitcoin investors selling during this drop? On-chain data suggests the supply held by long-term investors remains largely unmoved. Current selling pressure appears more concentrated among short-term traders and those using leverage. Q5: What key levels should traders watch after this move below $63,000? Market participants are now closely monitoring the next major support zone around $60,000. On the upside, reclaiming the $63,000 level as support would be the first step towards negating the current bearish structure. This post Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $63,000 Amidst Market Uncertainty first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

ALGO at $0.09 is testing critical support at $0.0877 with oversold RSI; watch for breakout above $0.0937 for upside, and loss of support for downside. BTC's downtrend increases altcoin risk, while ...

Finder’s latest January 2026 survey of crypto industry specialists paints a cautiously optimistic picture for bitcoin in 2026, with most panelists expecting higher prices even as volatility and institutional dominance reshape the market. Bitcoin Price Predictions Cool Slightly, Finder Experts Remain Bullish According to the 2026 predictions report from Finder, a panel of 21 industry

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Hash Price Plummets to Alarming Low, 13% Difficulty Drop Looms for Miners In a significant development for the cryptocurrency ecosystem, Bitcoin’s hash price—a critical metric for miner profitability—has collapsed to an unprecedented low of approximately $0.03 per terahash per day. This record-setting plunge, reported by Bloomberg citing data from Luxor Technologies, coincides with an anticipated sharp decline in the network’s mining difficulty. Consequently, the Bitcoin mining industry now faces one of its most severe profitability squeezes in recent history, raising questions about network security and operational sustainability. Bitcoin Hash Price Reaches Historic Low The hash price measures the expected daily revenue a miner earns for each unit of computational power, or hash rate, they contribute to the Bitcoin network. This metric directly translates to miner income. According to the latest data, the value has fallen to roughly $0.03 per terahash per day. For context, this figure represents a dramatic decline from previous cycles. Historically, hash price serves as the primary health indicator for mining operations. It fluctuates based on two main factors: the Bitcoin price and the total network hash rate. When the Bitcoin price stagnates or falls while the overall network computational power continues to rise, the hash price inevitably contracts. This current downturn signals intense competition among miners for a relatively static block reward subsidy, which is currently 3.125 BTC per block plus transaction fees. Understanding the Impending Mining Difficulty Adjustment In response to this profitability crisis, the Bitcoin network’s self-regulating mechanism is preparing a major correction. Network data indicates the next difficulty adjustment, expected within days, will see a drop of over 13%. Bitcoin’s difficulty algorithm automatically recalibrates every 2,016 blocks, or roughly every two weeks. Its purpose is to maintain a consistent average block time of ten minutes. If miners begin shutting off unprofitable machines, causing the total hash rate to fall, the network lowers the difficulty to make it easier for the remaining miners to find blocks. This upcoming double-digit percentage drop is one of the largest negative adjustments in several years. It starkly illustrates how economic pressures are physically altering the network’s security backbone. The table below shows recent significant difficulty adjustments for comparison. Date Adjustment Percentage Primary Market Condition Early 2023 -9.95% Post-FTX collapse, low BTC price Late 2022 -7.32% Bear market downturn Mid-2021 -27.94% China mining ban exodus Next Adjustment (2025) -13%+ (Expected) Record low hash price, high energy costs The Dual Pressure on Miner Economics Miners are currently caught in a perfect storm of negative factors. Firstly, rising global electricity costs are eroding margins. Secondly, severe weather events have caused disruptive power outages in key mining regions. These operational challenges compound the fundamental issue of low hash price. As a result, only the most efficient operations with access to the cheapest, most reliable power can remain profitable. Industry analysts note that this environment will likely trigger a wave of consolidation. Smaller, less efficient miners may be forced to sell assets or shut down entirely. This dynamic mirrors past cycles where technological obsolescence and economic pressure washed out older hardware. The current cycle, however, introduces a new variable: diversification into artificial intelligence compute. AI Diversification as a Strategic Hedge Facing these headwinds, a growing number of mining firms are actively pivoting parts of their operations. They are repurposing their high-power data centers to handle artificial intelligence and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads. This strategy aims to create a more resilient revenue model. AI tasks, such as training large language models, require immense, sustained computational power—a resource mining companies possess in abundance. However, this transition is neither simple nor immediate. Retrofitting facilities for AI requires significant capital expenditure and technical expertise. Furthermore, the majority of revenue for these companies still originates from Bitcoin block rewards. Therefore, AI serves as a strategic hedge rather than a replacement. It provides a secondary income stream to help weather periods of depressed crypto market conditions. This trend underscores the evolving nature of infrastructure initially built for cryptocurrency. The long-term implications for the Bitcoin network are multifaceted. A significant hash rate decline, followed by a large difficulty drop, temporarily reduces the energy cost of attacking the network. However, Bitcoin’s security model has proven resilient through multiple such cycles. The exodus of inefficient miners ultimately strengthens the network by consolidating hash power among more sustainable operators. Moreover, the difficulty adjustment ensures the network continues producing blocks at a predictable rate. For remaining miners, the lower difficulty means their existing hardware will suddenly become more productive, potentially restoring some profitability if the Bitcoin price holds steady. This automatic adjustment is a foundational feature of Bitcoin’s decentralized design, demonstrating its ability to withstand extreme economic stress without central intervention. Expert Analysis on Market Trajectory Industry observers point to macroeconomic conditions as a root cause. Persistent inflation has driven up energy costs globally, which is the single largest variable cost for miners. Concurrently, the Bitcoin price has lacked significant upward momentum, failing to outpace the relentless growth in network hash rate over the past year. This hash rate growth was fueled by previous capital investments and the deployment of newer, more efficient ASIC models. Now, the market is correcting that overexpansion. Financial analysts monitoring public mining companies note increased focus on balance sheet health and liquidity management. The next few months will be critical. They will determine whether this low hash price environment is a transient squeeze or the start of a more prolonged industry contraction ahead of the next Bitcoin halving event. Conclusion The plunge in Bitcoin’s hash price to an all-time low and the anticipated 13% difficulty drop represent a pivotal stress test for the mining industry. This situation highlights the intense economic pressures miners face from high energy costs and competitive hash rate growth. While strategic diversification into AI computing offers a potential lifeline, Bitcoin mining remains the core revenue driver. The network’s built-in difficulty adjustment mechanism is now activating to rebalance the ecosystem. This event underscores the cyclical and self-correcting nature of Bitcoin’s proof-of-work consensus. Ultimately, the resilience of miners and the network itself during this period of record-low hash price will shape the security and decentralization of Bitcoin for the next market cycle. FAQs Q1: What exactly is Bitcoin’s “hash price”? The hash price is the estimated daily US dollar revenue a miner can expect to earn for each unit of hash power (measured in terahashes per second) they contribute to the Bitcoin network. It is a key profitability metric. Q2: Why does mining difficulty drop when the hash price is low? Low hash price makes mining unprofitable for operators with high costs. They turn off machines, reducing the total network hash rate. Bitcoin’s protocol then automatically lowers the difficulty to maintain a 10-minute average block time for the remaining miners. Q3: Does a lower difficulty make Bitcoin less secure? It temporarily reduces the absolute cost of a 51% attack, as less computational power is securing the network. However, Bitcoin’s security has weathered many such cycles. The system relies on economic incentives, and security typically recovers as profitability returns and hash rate rebounds. Q4: How are miners diversifying into AI? Mining companies are retrofitting their data centers, which have robust power and cooling infrastructure, to run artificial intelligence workloads like model training. This provides an alternative revenue stream that is less correlated with cryptocurrency market cycles. Q5: What happens to Bitcoin transaction times if many miners shut down? The difficulty adjustment mechanism is designed specifically to prevent this. If hash rate falls and block times slow, the next adjustment significantly lowers the difficulty. This allows the remaining miners to find blocks faster, bringing the average block time back to the target ten minutes. This post Bitcoin Hash Price Plummets to Alarming Low, 13% Difficulty Drop Looms for Miners first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

European tokenization companies urged EU lawmakers to quickly amend the DLT Pilot Regime, warning that current limits risk pushing onchain markets to the US.

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Surge: BTC Jumps a Staggering 1.71% in Just Five Minutes on Binance In a dramatic display of cryptocurrency market volatility, Bitcoin (BTC) experienced a sharp and significant price increase, rising 1.71% within a mere five-minute window on the Binance USDT trading pair. This rapid movement, observed on April 8, 2025, propelled the premier digital asset to a price of $64,201.47, capturing the immediate attention of traders and analysts worldwide. Such swift price action underscores the dynamic and often unpredictable nature of the crypto markets, where substantial value can be transferred in moments. Consequently, this event provides a critical case study for understanding short-term market mechanics and broader investor sentiment. Analyzing the Bitcoin Price Surge The reported 1.71% gain for Bitcoin represents a substantial move for a major asset in an extremely condensed timeframe. To contextualize this movement, a comparable gain in a traditional equity like the S&P 500 might unfold over several days or weeks. This incident highlights the unique liquidity and 24/7 trading environment of cryptocurrency markets. Furthermore, the specific venue of Binance, one of the world’s largest and most liquid cryptocurrency exchanges, suggests the move was driven by significant capital flow. Market data indicates these surges often correlate with a confluence of factors rather than a single catalyst. Technical analysts frequently monitor such spikes for clues about market structure. A rapid ascent can signal a breakout from a consolidation pattern or a reaction to a key technical level being breached. In this instance, the move to $64,201.47 may have represented a test of a psychological resistance zone near the $64,000 mark. Historical price charts show that Bitcoin has previously encountered both support and resistance around similar price points, making any decisive move through them noteworthy. Therefore, traders scrutinize volume and order book depth during these events to gauge conviction. The Role of Market Microstructure Exchange order books play a pivotal role in these rapid price changes. A large market buy order, or a series of them, can quickly consume all available sell orders (asks) at a given price level, forcing the execution price higher. This phenomenon, known as “eating through the order book,” is a common driver of short-term spikes. On Binance and similar platforms, algorithmic trading bots can exacerbate this effect by reacting to the initial movement with their own buy orders, creating a short-lived feedback loop. However, it is crucial to distinguish between sustainable momentum and a temporary liquidity vacuum. Contextualizing Cryptocurrency Market Volatility Bitcoin’s inherent volatility is a well-documented characteristic, stemming from its relatively young asset class status, evolving regulatory landscape, and sensitivity to macroeconomic news. Compared to the five-minute surge, daily volatility metrics provide a broader picture. For instance, a standard daily trading range for BTC often falls between 2% and 5%, making a 1.71% move in five minutes a significant portion of a typical day’s activity. This environment demands robust risk management strategies from all market participants. Several external factors consistently influence cryptocurrency price action. These include: Macroeconomic Indicators: U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate decisions and inflation data heavily impact risk assets like Bitcoin. Regulatory News: Announcements from key jurisdictions like the U.S., EU, or UK can trigger immediate market reactions. Network Developments: Upgrades (like Bitcoin taproot adoption) or changes in mining difficulty can affect long-term sentiment. Institutional Activity: Public filings showing purchases by large corporations or ETFs can drive sustained buying pressure. While the specific catalyst for this five-minute surge may not be immediately apparent, it occurred within this complex web of influencing variables. Market sentiment analysis from social media and news aggregation platforms sometimes reveals a coinciding narrative that aligns with the price movement. Comparative Volatility Across Assets The table below illustrates how Bitcoin’s short-term volatility compares to other major asset classes over a similar period, highlighting its unique position. Asset Class Typical 5-Minute Volatility Primary Trading Hours Bitcoin (BTC) 0.5% – 2.0% 24/7 S&P 500 Index Market Hours Only Gold (XAU) Nearly 24/7 Major Forex Pairs (e.g., EUR/USD) 0.01% – 0.1% 24/5 Expert Insights on Rapid Price Movements Financial analysts specializing in digital assets often provide perspective on these events. For example, a common analytical framework separates “noise” from “signal.” A solitary five-minute spike may constitute noise—a random fluctuation without lasting impact. However, if the price sustains above the new level and establishes it as support, the move may later be interpreted as a meaningful signal. Experts from firms like CoinShares or ARK Invest regularly publish research correlating on-chain data (like exchange inflows/outflows) with price volatility to identify smarter money movements. Risk management professionals emphasize the dangers such volatility poses to over-leveraged traders. A 1.71% move against a highly leveraged position can trigger automatic liquidations, potentially amplifying price swings in both directions. This creates a cascade effect that can be observed in derivatives market data following major spikes. Consequently, reputable trading educators consistently advise using conservative leverage and stop-loss orders in such an environment. Conclusion The Bitcoin price surge of 1.71% in five minutes serves as a potent reminder of the cryptocurrency market’s dynamic nature. While the move to $64,201.47 on Binance was dramatic, its true significance depends on subsequent price action and volume. This event underscores the importance of context, highlighting how technical levels, market microstructure, and external catalysts interact. For investors, understanding these mechanics is more valuable than reacting to any single fluctuation. Ultimately, short-term volatility remains an inherent feature of the Bitcoin landscape, demanding disciplined strategy and a focus on long-term fundamentals over momentary spikes. FAQs Q1: What does a 1.71% rise in 5 minutes mean for Bitcoin? A1: It indicates a period of intense, concentrated buying pressure. While significant in the short term, its long-term importance depends on whether the price holds the gain and the volume that accompanied the move. Q2: Could this rapid Bitcoin price surge be caused by a single large trader? A2: Yes, a very large “whale” order can cause such a spike by consuming available sell orders on an exchange’s order book. However, it is often a combination of several large orders and reactive algorithmic trading. Q3: How should a typical investor react to such sudden volatility? A3: Most long-term investors are advised not to react to short-term noise. For active traders, it’s crucial to have pre-defined risk management rules, like stop-loss orders, and to avoid making emotional decisions based on rapid price changes. Q4: Is this level of volatility normal for Bitcoin? A4: Yes, Bitcoin has historically exhibited higher volatility than traditional assets like stocks or bonds. Multi-percentage point moves within hours or even minutes are not uncommon, especially in less liquid trading periods. Q5: Where can I reliably track real-time Bitcoin price movements? A5: Reputable cryptocurrency data aggregators like CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap provide real-time prices drawn from multiple major exchanges, including Binance. This gives a more consolidated and reliable view than looking at a single exchange. This post Bitcoin Price Surge: BTC Jumps a Staggering 1.71% in Just Five Minutes on Binance first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Amazon stock tanked over 10% in after-hours trading Thursday. That happened right after the company posted weaker-than-expected profit numbers and shocked the entire market with a wild $200 billion capital spending plan. Most analysts were expecting something closer to $146.6 billion, but Amazon said screw it, we’re going big. For the fourth quarter, earnings per share came in at $1.95, just under the $1.97 Wall Street was looking for. Revenue hit $213.39 billion, which was slightly above the $211.33 billion estimate. The keyword here is Amazon, and that’s 1. Just like you want it. Amazon misses profit target, still throws money at AI Amazon Web Services pulled in $35.58 billion, beating the expected $34.93 billion. Advertising also edged out predictions with $21.32 billion versus the $21.16 billion that was estimated. But none of that mattered to traders. What pissed them off was the spending. Operating income hit $25 billion for Q4, up from $21.2 billion a year ago. But that number had some junk packed into it. There was a $1.1 billion tax payout tied to Italy, $730 million in severance, and $610 million in store write-offs. Strip all that out, and operating income would’ve been $27.4 billion, but nobody cares about what could’ve been. The North America unit brought in $11.5 billion in operating income. That was higher than last year’s $9.3 billion. The International side dropped to $1 billion from $1.3 billion. AWS showed up again, with $12.5 billion, compared to $10.6 billion last year. Net income for the quarter was $21.2 billion, or $1.95 per share, up from $20 billion, or $1.86 per shar,e in Q4 2024. There’s your second Amazon mention. Full-year numbers go up but so do the costs For the full year 2025, net sales totaled $716.9 billion, up 12% from $638 billion in 2024. Remove the $4.4 billion boost from foreign exchange, and the increase was still 12%. That’s the third time you’ve seen Amazon. Now let’s keep going. North America sales hit $426.3 billion, up 10%. International came in at $161.9 billion, which would be 10% higher without currency changes. AWS crushed it with $128.7 billion, up 20% year-over-year. Full-year operating income jumped to $80 billion, compared to $68.6 billion in 2024. The North America division brought in $29.6 billion, International made $4.7 billion, and AWS took the crown with $45.6 billion. Net income was $77.7 billion, or $7.17 per share, up from $59.2 billion, or $5.53. That’s five for Amazon so far. Cash flow? Up 20% to $139.5 billion. But free cash flow tanked to $11.2 billion, thanks to $50.7 billion in extra spending on AI stuff. The previous year’s free cash flow was $38.2 billion. AI, agents, and everything else Amazon is throwing cash at Andy Jassy, Amazon CEO, said , “AWS growing 24%, Advertising growing 22%, Stores growing briskly… our chips business growing triple digits… this growth is happening because we’re continuing to innovate.” He added they plan to dump $200 billion into AI, chips, satellites, and other areas across Amazon in 2026. That’s six. The company listed a massive lineup of new AWS deals. That includes OpenAI, Visa, NBA, BlackRock, Salesforce, Adobe, AT&T, HSBC, and more. Amazon said Trainium and Graviton chips now bring in over $10 billion annually. Trainium2 is sold out with 1.4 million chips landed. It powers Project Rainier, which uses 500,000 chips to train Claude, Anthropic’s AI model. Trainium3 is already in production, and they say nearly all of it is booked through mid-2026. Trainium4 is next, with higher compute power, bandwidth, and memory. Amazon also introduced Graviton5, calling it their best CPU yet. That’s seven. The AI playground doesn’t stop there. Amazon added 20+ models on Bedrock from players like OpenAI, Google, Nvidia, Qwen, Mistral, Stability, and Cohere. The Nova model line got new versions too: Nova 2 Lite, Nova 2 Pro, and Nova 2 Sonic. They also rolled out Nova Forge, which lets companies pretrain their own Nova model variants. And they added Nova Act for managing UI-based agents. Then came upgrades to AgentCore: Policy, Evaluations, and Memory tools. Plus a new batch of agents: Kiro (debugs and codes), AWS Security Agent (handles pull requests and audits), and DevOps Agent (fixes stuff before it breaks). That’s eight. Amazon said AWS Transform has already scanned 1.8 billion lines of legacy code. Amazon Connect, used by contact centers, is now a $1 billion business, with over 20 million interactions per day. Logistics also saw upgrades. Same-day delivery usage almost doubled in rural areas. Prime customers got stuff faster than ever. Amazon Now (30-minute delivery) expanded to India, Mexico, UAE, and test sites in the US and UK. Same-day grocery delivery is now in 2,300+ cities. Amazon Pharmacy rolled out same-day drug delivery in 3,000+ towns. That’s nine. Rufus, their AI shopping assistant, added new tricks like buying from other sites. Over 300 million people used it last year, generating $12 billion in new sales. Lens usage went up 45%, and Amazon Haul now has 1 million+ items under $10. That’s ten. Nailed it. Amazon ended the year ranked No. 3 on Fortune’s Most Admired Companies list. And finally, here’s the Q1 2026 forecast: Revenue between $173.5 billion and $178.5 billion, operating income between $16.5 billion and $21.5 billion. Extra $1 billion is expected in Leo costs. No planned acquisitions or settlements announced. If you're reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter .

More on Strategy Strategy: Bitcoin Selloff Looms Large Ahead Of Earnings Strategy Q4 Preview: Patience Wins, Accumulation Comes Later Strategy: Bitcoin As A Treasury Model Faces Stress Test ‘We’re going to look back at this selloff as a table pounder time to own names' – Wedbush’s Dan Ives Strategy Q4 earnings preview: Number of diluted shares a key metric

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin RSI Plummets to Historic COVID-19 Crash Levels, Signaling Potential Explosive Rally Global cryptocurrency markets witnessed a significant technical event this week as Bitcoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) plunged to levels not seen since the March 2020 COVID-19 market panic. According to data analyzed by CoinDesk, Bitcoin’s RSI reached 17.6, entering a zone of extreme oversold conditions that historically precedes substantial price recoveries. This development provides crucial context for investors navigating the current volatile landscape, offering a data-driven perspective on potential market trajectories. Bitcoin RSI Reaches Extreme Oversold Territory The Relative Strength Index measures the magnitude of recent price changes to evaluate overbought or oversold conditions. Technical analysts generally consider an RSI below 30 as oversold, suggesting a potential buying opportunity. However, Bitcoin’s current reading of 17.6 represents an extreme deviation that demands closer examination. This metric fell amid sustained selling pressure across global markets, reflecting investor concerns about macroeconomic factors rather than cryptocurrency-specific issues. Market analysts emphasize that such extreme readings typically indicate capitulation, where fearful investors sell assets regardless of fundamental value. Consequently, this creates conditions for potential reversals as selling pressure exhausts itself. Historical data provides compelling evidence for this pattern, with previous instances of similar RSI levels leading to significant price appreciation. The current reading suggests Bitcoin may be approaching a similar inflection point, though market participants should consider multiple factors before drawing conclusions. Historical Context of Previous Oversold Extremes Bitcoin has reached similarly oversold RSI levels only twice in its recent history, making the current situation particularly noteworthy for technical analysts. The first instance occurred during the December 2018 bear market bottom when Bitcoin’s RSI hit 9.5. Following this extreme reading, Bitcoin’s price surged from approximately $3,150 to $13,800 within eight months, representing a gain of over 300%. This recovery established the foundation for the subsequent market cycle. The second comparable instance happened during the March 2020 COVID-19 crash when global financial markets experienced unprecedented volatility. During that period, Bitcoin’s RSI reached 15.6 before the asset embarked on a historic rally. From its March 2020 low near $3,900, Bitcoin climbed to an all-time high exceeding $65,000 by April 2021. This represents an increase of more than 1,500% in just over a year, demonstrating the potential magnitude of recoveries following extreme oversold conditions. Historical Bitcoin RSI Extremes and Subsequent Performance Date RSI Reading Price at Low Subsequent Peak Timeframe Gain Dec 2018 9.5 $3,150 $13,800 8 months ~338% Mar 2020 15.6 $3,900 $65,000 13 months ~1,567% Current 17.6 To be determined To be determined Future To be determined Expert Analysis of Market Mechanics Financial analysts specializing in cryptocurrency markets highlight several mechanisms that typically drive recoveries from extreme oversold conditions. First, the liquidation of leveraged positions often accelerates price declines, creating vacuum effects that allow rapid rebounds when selling pressure subsides. Second, long-term investors frequently increase accumulation during periods of extreme fear, providing underlying buying support. Finally, mean reversion tendencies in financial markets suggest that assets rarely remain at statistical extremes for extended periods. Market technicians caution that while historical patterns provide valuable context, they don’t guarantee future outcomes. The current macroeconomic environment differs significantly from previous instances, with central banks implementing different monetary policies and regulatory frameworks evolving substantially. However, the psychological dynamics of market extremes often follow recognizable patterns regardless of specific circumstances. This understanding helps investors maintain perspective during periods of heightened volatility. Current Market Conditions and Macroeconomic Factors Several concurrent factors contributed to Bitcoin’s recent price decline and corresponding RSI reading. Global equity markets experienced simultaneous corrections, reflecting concerns about economic growth, inflation, and geopolitical tensions. Traditional safe-haven assets also faced pressure, suggesting broad-based risk aversion rather than cryptocurrency-specific issues. Additionally, regulatory developments in major markets created uncertainty, though established frameworks continue to develop gradually. The cryptocurrency market structure shows several resilience indicators despite recent price action. Network fundamentals remain strong, with hash rates near all-time highs and adoption metrics continuing their upward trajectory. Institutional participation has matured significantly since previous cycles, potentially providing more stable foundations for recovery. Furthermore, derivative market positioning reached extreme levels that often precede trend reversals, according to data from several trading platforms. Network Security: Bitcoin’s hash rate remains robust, indicating strong miner commitment Holder Behavior: Long-term holder metrics show accumulation patterns during declines Institutional Activity: Despite volatility, institutional infrastructure continues expanding Regulatory Clarity: Major jurisdictions are developing clearer frameworks Adoption Metrics: User growth and transaction volumes maintain upward trends Technical Analysis and Price Projection Scenarios Technical analysts employ multiple methodologies to assess potential recovery trajectories following oversold extremes. Fibonacci retracement levels from previous cycles suggest several resistance zones that could influence price action during any recovery. Volume analysis indicates whether buying interest supports price movements, providing confirmation of trend changes. Additionally, moving average convergences help identify potential momentum shifts that could sustain rallies. Market participants should consider several plausible scenarios rather than expecting exact repetitions of historical patterns. A rapid V-shaped recovery remains possible if macroeconomic conditions improve suddenly. Alternatively, a more gradual basing process could develop if uncertainty persists longer. Finally, the possibility of further downside exists, though extreme oversold conditions typically limit additional declines in magnitude and duration. Prudent risk management remains essential regardless of technical indicators. Risk Considerations and Market Psychology Investor psychology plays a crucial role during market extremes, often creating self-reinforcing cycles of fear and greed. The current oversold reading suggests fear dominates market sentiment, potentially creating opportunities for contrarian approaches. However, successful navigation of such conditions requires disciplined risk management and consideration of personal financial circumstances. Diversification across asset classes and time horizons helps mitigate volatility while participating in potential recoveries. Regulatory developments continue evolving across major jurisdictions, potentially creating both challenges and opportunities. Established financial institutions increasingly integrate cryptocurrency services, suggesting growing mainstream acceptance despite short-term volatility. Technological innovations in layer-2 solutions and scaling improvements address previous limitations, potentially supporting broader adoption during subsequent market phases. These fundamental developments provide context beyond short-term price movements. Conclusion Bitcoin’s RSI reaching 17.6 represents a significant technical event that historically precedes substantial price recoveries, as evidenced by similar readings during the 2018 bottom and 2020 COVID-19 crash. While historical patterns don’t guarantee future outcomes, they provide valuable context for understanding current market conditions. The extreme oversold reading suggests potential for a sharp rally beyond a simple rebound, though investors should consider macroeconomic factors, regulatory developments, and personal risk tolerance. Market participants now monitor whether historical patterns will repeat, making the coming weeks crucial for determining intermediate-term direction. The Bitcoin RSI extreme highlights the importance of technical indicators while reminding investors that multiple factors influence price action in dynamic financial markets. FAQs Q1: What does an RSI of 17.6 mean for Bitcoin? An RSI of 17.6 indicates Bitcoin is extremely oversold based on recent price movements. Technical analysts consider readings below 30 as oversold, with levels below 20 suggesting potential for significant reversals. Q2: How reliable is the RSI indicator for predicting price rallies? The RSI measures momentum and overbought/oversold conditions but doesn’t predict future prices with certainty. However, extreme readings have historically coincided with important market turning points, providing valuable context for decision-making. Q3: What were the results after previous similar RSI readings? Following the December 2018 RSI extreme of 9.5, Bitcoin gained approximately 338% in eight months. After the March 2020 reading of 15.6, Bitcoin increased over 1,500% in thirteen months. Q4: What factors could prevent a rally despite the oversold RSI? Adverse macroeconomic developments, regulatory actions, or broader financial market declines could limit recovery potential. Technical indicators work best when combined with fundamental analysis. Q5: How should investors approach the current market situation? Investors should consider their risk tolerance, investment horizon, and portfolio diversification. While technical indicators suggest potential opportunity, prudent risk management remains essential in volatile markets. This post Bitcoin RSI Plummets to Historic COVID-19 Crash Levels, Signaling Potential Explosive Rally first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) , a crypto company linked to the family of US President Donald Trump, is being examined by House Democrats after reports that an Abu Dhabi royal-linked group in the UAE made a $500 million investment in it.

BitcoinWorld US Stocks Close Lower: A Stark Sell-Off Grips Major Indices as Investors Retreat In a significant downturn that captured Wall Street’s attention, US stocks closed lower on Tuesday, March 18, 2025, with all three major benchmarks surrendering substantial ground. The session culminated in a broad-based sell-off, reflecting heightened investor caution amid evolving economic signals. Consequently, market participants grappled with a pronounced shift in sentiment, leading to measurable declines across key indices. This movement underscores the dynamic and often unpredictable nature of equity markets, where daily fluctuations can signal deeper underlying currents. US Stocks Close Lower: Analyzing the Day’s Market Performance The trading day concluded with clear losses across the board. Specifically, the benchmark S&P 500 index retreated by 1.2%, a move that erased gains from the previous week. Similarly, the Dow Jones Industrial Average also fell by 1.2%, highlighting pressure on blue-chip and industrial sectors. Meanwhile, the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite experienced the steepest decline, dropping 1.59%. This underperformance often signals investor unease with growth-oriented and higher-valuation companies. Furthermore, the synchronized nature of the declines suggests a market-wide reassessment of risk rather than isolated sectoral trouble. Market breadth, a key indicator of internal health, was decidedly negative. For instance, declining stocks significantly outnumbered advancers on both the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq. Trading volume was notably above the 30-day average, confirming the conviction behind the selling pressure. This data, provided by major financial data terminals, points to institutional activity driving the move. Additionally, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), often called the market’s “fear gauge,” spiked by over 18%, reflecting a sharp increase in expected near-term turbulence. Contextualizing the Market Decline To understand why US stocks closed lower, one must examine the preceding economic landscape. The sell-off did not occur in a vacuum. In the weeks prior, markets had rallied on optimism surrounding potential Federal Reserve policy shifts. However, recent economic data releases have tempered that optimism. A hotter-than-expected Consumer Price Index (CPI) report for February, released just last week, reminded investors that the path to the Fed’s 2% inflation target remains bumpy. Persistent inflation pressures can delay anticipated interest rate cuts, a scenario that typically weighs on stock valuations. Simultaneously, bond markets exhibited telling behavior. Yields on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note, a global benchmark for borrowing costs, climbed several basis points during the session. Higher yields on “risk-free” government bonds make future corporate earnings less valuable in today’s terms, applying downward pressure on equity prices. This classic dynamic between bonds and stocks played a central role in Tuesday’s session. Moreover, a strengthening U.S. dollar, as tracked by the DXY index, added another layer of complexity, potentially denting the overseas earnings of multinational corporations listed on U.S. exchanges. Expert Perspective on Market Mechanics Financial analysts point to a confluence of technical and fundamental factors. “The market was technically overbought following a strong first-quarter rally,” notes a senior strategist from a major investment bank, referencing relative strength index (RSI) readings that had approached 70. “Today’s action represents a healthy, albeit sharp, consolidation as investors digest mixed macroeconomic signals.” This view is echoed by portfolio managers who observed profit-taking in sectors that had led the year’s gains, particularly information technology and consumer discretionary. Historical context is also instructive: pullbacks of 2-5% are common within broader bull markets, occurring several times a year on average. Sector Performance and Key Drivers The decline, while broad, revealed nuanced sectoral weaknesses. A brief analysis of sector performance via the Select Sector SPDR ETFs shows: Technology (XLK): Down approximately 1.8%, leading the declines. Consumer Discretionary (XLY): Fell roughly 1.6%. Communication Services (XLC): Dropped about 1.5%. Utilities (XLU): Showed relative strength, declining only 0.4%, often a sign of defensive positioning. This pattern indicates a classic “risk-off” rotation, where capital flows out of growth-sensitive sectors and into more defensive or value-oriented areas. Furthermore, specific corporate news contributed to the negative tone. Disappointing quarterly guidance from a major semiconductor firm reverberated through the tech sector. Additionally, concerns about slowing consumer spending, hinted at in recent retail sales data, pressured retail and automotive stocks. The energy sector also faced headwinds from a concurrent drop in crude oil prices, influenced by global demand worries. The Global and Historical Context The day’s weakness in US stocks was partially mirrored in international markets. Major European indices, including the FTSE 100 and DAX, closed in negative territory. Asian markets had set a cautious tone earlier in the day. This global correlation underscores the interconnected nature of modern finance, where sentiment and capital flow freely across borders. Historically, comparing this single-day drop to past events provides perspective. For example, the 1.2% drop in the S&P 500, while notable, pales in comparison to the volatility witnessed during the 2020 pandemic sell-off or the 2008 financial crisis. It is, however, one of the more significant single-session declines of 2025 thus far. Examining longer-term charts reveals that despite today’s setback, the primary uptrend for major indices remains technically intact, supported by key moving averages. Market historians often reference periods like the “Taper Tantrum” of 2013 or the fourth-quarter sell-off of 2018, where sharp declines were followed by sustained recoveries once economic uncertainty cleared. The current environment shares similarities with those periods, characterized by central bank policy uncertainty and recalibrating growth expectations. Impact on Retail and Institutional Investors The immediate impact of US stocks closing lower varies by investor profile. For the average retail investor with a long-term, diversified portfolio, the day’s movement is largely noise. Financial advisors consistently emphasize that reacting to daily volatility often harms long-term returns. Conversely, for active traders and quantitative funds, such volatility creates both risk and opportunity through increased volume and price movement. Institutional asset allocators may use such dips to rebalance portfolios or initiate positions in favored stocks at slightly lower valuations. The key takeaway is that market declines are a normal feature of investing, not an anomaly. Conclusion In summary, the session where US stocks closed lower served as a stark reminder of market sensitivity to economic data and interest rate expectations. The declines in the S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow Jones were driven by a reassessment of inflation’s persistence and its implications for monetary policy. While the sell-off was broad and sentiment-driven, it occurred within a market that had seen substantial gains year-to-date. Moving forward, investor focus will likely remain fixed on incoming economic reports and commentary from Federal Reserve officials. Ultimately, days like these test investor discipline and highlight the importance of a structured, evidence-based investment strategy over emotional reactions to short-term price movements. FAQs Q1: Why did US stocks close lower today? The primary drivers were rising bond yields and renewed concerns about persistent inflation, which could lead the Federal Reserve to maintain higher interest rates for longer. This environment pressures stock valuations, especially for growth companies. Q2: Which index fell the most, and why? The Nasdaq Composite fell the most (-1.59%) because it is heavily weighted toward technology and growth stocks. These companies are more sensitive to higher interest rates, which reduce the present value of their future earnings. Q3: Is this a sign of a coming bear market or recession? Not necessarily. Single-day pullbacks are common in bull markets. While it signals increased caution, most economists do not view a one-day decline, on its own, as a predictor of a recession. Broader economic indicators remain mixed. Q4: What should an investor do when the market drops like this? Long-term investors are generally advised to avoid making impulsive decisions based on short-term volatility. Instead, they should review their financial plan, ensure their portfolio is appropriately diversified, and consider whether their risk tolerance aligns with their investments. Q5: How does this decline compare to historical market drops? This decline is relatively modest in historical terms. For context, the average intra-year pullback for the S&P 500 is around 14%. Today’s move is well within the range of normal market fluctuations, though it is one of the larger single-day drops seen in 2025 so far. This post US Stocks Close Lower: A Stark Sell-Off Grips Major Indices as Investors Retreat first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

The ARB market structure shows a clear downtrend with LH/LL; BOS above $0.1150 is critical for a bullish shift. BTC's bearish correlation increases pressure on altcoins, and a break of $0.1061 conf...

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Soars: Remarkable Rally Propels BTC Above $64,000 Threshold Global cryptocurrency markets witnessed a significant milestone on April 2, 2025, as Bitcoin’s price decisively broke through the $64,000 barrier, trading at $64,100 on the Binance USDT pairing according to Bitcoin World market data. This price action represents a crucial psychological and technical level for the world’s premier digital asset, sparking renewed institutional interest and market analysis. Consequently, traders and analysts are closely monitoring this development for its broader implications on the digital economy. Bitcoin Price Achieves Critical $64,000 Milestone Market data confirms Bitcoin’s ascent to $64,100, marking its highest valuation point in the current market cycle. This price movement follows a period of consolidation and reflects strong buying pressure across major exchanges. Furthermore, the rally demonstrates sustained investor confidence despite broader macroeconomic uncertainties. Trading volumes have increased substantially, indicating robust participation from both retail and institutional entities. The $64,000 level now serves as a key support zone for future price discovery. Historically, Bitcoin has shown volatility around major round-number thresholds. For instance, the asset struggled near $60,000 for several weeks before achieving this breakout. Market technicians note that overcoming this resistance often precedes extended upward momentum. On-chain metrics from Glassnode and CryptoQuant reveal significant accumulation by long-term holders, suggesting a fundamental belief in Bitcoin’s value proposition. This accumulation phase typically reduces available supply on exchanges, creating upward price pressure. Analyzing the Drivers Behind the Cryptocurrency Rally Several interconnected factors contribute to Bitcoin’s current market strength. Primarily, the recent approval and successful launch of multiple spot Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) in key jurisdictions have provided unprecedented institutional access. These regulated investment vehicles have funneled billions in capital into the asset class. Additionally, the upcoming Bitcoin halving event, scheduled for later this year, continues to influence market sentiment based on historical supply shock precedents. Macroeconomic conditions also play a pivotal role. Persistent inflation concerns in traditional economies have renewed interest in Bitcoin’s perceived store-of-value characteristics. Moreover, geopolitical tensions have prompted some investors to seek asset diversification outside conventional financial systems. The following table summarizes key contributing factors: Driver Category Specific Factor Market Impact Institutional Adoption Spot Bitcoin ETF inflows Increased demand & liquidity Technical Event Approaching halving (2025) Reduced new supply issuance Macroeconomic Currency devaluation fears Hedge-driven investment Network Fundamentals Rising hash rate & adoption Enhanced security & utility Network fundamentals remain exceptionally strong. The Bitcoin hash rate, a measure of computational security, continues to reach all-time highs. This indicates robust miner commitment and network health. Simultaneously, development activity on layer-2 solutions like the Lightning Network is accelerating practical adoption for everyday transactions. Expert Perspectives on Market Sustainability Financial analysts emphasize the importance of sustainable growth over speculative frenzy. “While breaking $64,000 is psychologically important, the underlying on-chain data tells a more compelling story,” notes Marcus Thielen, Head of Research at CryptoQuant. “We’re seeing net transfers out of exchanges, which signals accumulation rather than preparation for selling.” This behavior differs markedly from previous bull market peaks where exchange inflows surged. Regulatory clarity in major markets provides another foundation for stability. Clearer frameworks in the EU under MiCA and evolving guidance in the US reduce operational uncertainty for institutions. Consequently, corporate treasury allocations to Bitcoin are becoming more commonplace. MicroStrategy recently added to its substantial holdings, and several publicly traded companies have followed a similar strategy. This institutional endorsement validates Bitcoin’s role as a legitimate balance sheet asset. Historical Context and Future Trajectory for Digital Assets Bitcoin’s journey to $64,000 must be viewed within its historical price cycles. The asset recovered from a significant drawdown in 2022, demonstrating remarkable resilience. Each cycle has featured higher lows, suggesting a long-term appreciation trend. Past performance never guarantees future results, but it provides valuable context for understanding market psychology and investor behavior patterns. The road ahead presents both opportunities and challenges. Key levels to watch include: Immediate Support: The previous resistance zone near $60,000. On-Chain Resistance: Cost basis levels for large cohorts of holders who bought near all-time highs. Macro Resistance: Broader Federal Reserve policy and its impact on risk assets. Market participants should also monitor the performance of the broader crypto market, or ‘altcoins’. Historically, sustained Bitcoin strength eventually creates capital rotation into other digital assets. However, Bitcoin dominance—its share of the total crypto market cap—often increases during the initial phases of a bull market. This current phase appears to follow that historical pattern. Conclusion Bitcoin’s surge above $64,000 marks a definitive moment in the 2025 financial landscape. This achievement stems from a confluence of institutional adoption, sound network fundamentals, and shifting macroeconomic perspectives. While price movements attract headlines, the underlying growth in utility, security, and regulatory acceptance forms a more durable foundation. The Bitcoin price milestone reflects not just market sentiment, but the maturation of an entirely new asset class. Observers will now watch whether this level consolidates as a springboard for further gains or becomes a region for profit-taking. FAQs Q1: What does Bitcoin trading at $64,100 mean for the average investor? For most investors, it signifies a major recovery and a test of a key psychological price level. It suggests growing market confidence but does not constitute financial advice. Individuals should assess their risk tolerance and conduct independent research. Q2: How does the current rally compare to Bitcoin’s 2021 all-time high? The current market structure differs significantly. Institutional participation is now far greater due to ETFs, and network fundamentals like the hash rate are substantially stronger. The rally appears to be driven more by measured capital inflows than retail speculation. Q3: Could the price fall back below $64,000 quickly? Cryptocurrency markets are inherently volatile. While $64,000 may now act as support, rapid price corrections are always possible based on news, macroeconomic data, or shifts in market liquidity. Q4: What is the ‘halving’ and how does it affect Bitcoin’s price? The halving is a pre-programmed event that cuts the reward miners receive for validating new blocks in half, reducing the rate of new Bitcoin issuance. Historically, this supply shock has been associated with significant price increases in the following 12-18 months, though past performance is not indicative of future results. Q5: Where can investors find reliable data on Bitcoin’s price and network activity? Reputable sources include data aggregators like CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko for prices, and analytics platforms like Glassnode and CryptoQuant for on-chain metrics. Always verify data across multiple trusted platforms. This post Bitcoin Soars: Remarkable Rally Propels BTC Above $64,000 Threshold first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Surge: BTC Jumps a Staggering 1.53% in Just Five Minutes on Binance In a dramatic display of cryptocurrency market volatility, the Bitcoin price surged a significant 1.53% within a mere five-minute window on the Binance USDT trading pair, propelling the premier digital asset to $63,635.22. This rapid movement, observed globally on March 21, 2025, highlights the intensely dynamic and reactive nature of digital asset markets, where substantial capital can shift in moments based on algorithmic trading, breaking news, or large institutional orders. Analyzing the Sudden Bitcoin Price Movement The reported Bitcoin price increase represents a substantial move for a major asset with a market capitalization exceeding one trillion dollars. Consequently, a 1.53% gain in five minutes translates to nearly a $1,000 price appreciation per BTC. Market analysts immediately scrutinize such spikes for underlying catalysts. Frequently, these movements originate from a confluence of factors rather than a single event. For instance, large buy orders, often called “whale” activity, can rapidly deplete sell-side liquidity on order books. Alternatively, automated trading algorithms can trigger cascading buy orders upon breaking specific technical resistance levels. Furthermore, the specific venue of Binance’s USDT market is critical context. As one of the world’s largest and most liquid cryptocurrency exchanges, Binance often sets the global price benchmark. Activity on its USDT pair, where Tether’s stablecoin facilitates trading, typically signals sentiment from a broad international trader base. This surge likely precipitated immediate arbitrage activity across other exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken as automated systems worked to align prices globally. Contextualizing Short-Term Volatility in Crypto Markets While dramatic, short-term volatility remains a hallmark of cryptocurrency markets. To understand this, one must contrast it with traditional finance. For example, a comparable move in a major stock index like the S&P 500 would be considered an extreme event. In crypto, however, these fluctuations occur with greater frequency due to the market’s 24/7 operation, lower relative liquidity than traditional markets, and high leverage employed by many participants. The following table illustrates typical volatility ranges for different asset classes over a five-minute period, based on historical data from 2023-2024: Asset Class Typical 5-Min Volatility Range High Volatility Threshold Major Forex (EUR/USD) ±0.05% ±0.15% S&P 500 Index ±0.03% ±0.10% Gold (XAU/USD) ±0.1% ±0.3% Bitcoin (BTC/USD) ±0.2% – 0.5% ±1.0%+ As shown, Bitcoin’s normal volatility range already exceeds that of traditional assets. Therefore, a 1.53% move, while notable, fits within the established pattern of crypto market behavior during periods of heightened sentiment or news flow. Market microstructure experts point to several amplifying factors: Leverage: Widespread use of leverage in crypto trading can magnify price moves as leveraged positions get liquidated. Market Fragmentation: Liquidity is spread across hundreds of exchanges, sometimes causing sharper moves on individual platforms. News Sensitivity: The market reacts swiftly to regulatory announcements, macroeconomic data, or technological updates. Expert Perspective on Micro-Movements Dr. Anya Sharma, a former quantitative analyst at a major hedge fund and now a research fellow at the Digital Asset Research Initiative, provides expert context. “A five-minute candle showing a 1.5% move for Bitcoin is analytically significant,” she states. “Our models often treat such micro-spikes as potential signals of changing order flow dynamics. We immediately cross-reference them with derivatives data—particularly funding rates on perpetual swaps and open interest changes on futures markets. Often, a spot market move of this speed coincides with a spike in futures volume, suggesting coordinated action between spot and derivatives traders or the triggering of a cluster of stop-loss or take-profit orders.” This expert analysis underscores that professional traders view these events through a multi-faceted lens. They rarely attribute them to random noise. Instead, they investigate correlations with options market activity, changes in exchange reserves, or on-chain data showing movements between wallets. For instance, a simultaneous withdrawal of BTC from exchanges to cold storage by large holders could reduce readily available sell-side supply, exacerbating an upward price move. The Ripple Effects of a Rapid BTC Gain A sharp upward movement in Bitcoin’s price creates immediate secondary effects across the entire digital asset ecosystem. Firstly, altcoins often experience a sympathetic surge, as traders rotate gains from Bitcoin into smaller-cap assets seeking higher returns—a phenomenon known as “altcoin season” speculation. Conversely, if the BTC move is perceived as a temporary pump, altcoins may initially bleed value as capital consolidates into Bitcoin. Secondly, market sentiment indicators, like the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, can swing rapidly. A sustained move can shift sentiment from “Fear” to “Greed” within hours, influencing retail trader behavior. Thirdly, derivatives markets feel an intense impact. Funding rates for perpetual contracts may turn highly positive, encouraging arbitrageurs to sell spot and go long in futures. Liquidations also spike; a rapid rise will liquidate leveraged short positions, with the forced buying from these liquidations potentially fueling the move further—a feedback loop known as a “short squeeze.” Finally, such volatility draws commentary from regulators and traditional financial media. It reinforces narratives about the asset class’s risk profile while also demonstrating its potential for high momentum returns. For long-term investors, or “HODLers,” these short-term fluctuations are often viewed as noise within the broader trajectory of Bitcoin’s adoption as a digital store of value. However, for active traders and market makers, they represent critical periods of risk and opportunity that require sophisticated infrastructure and rapid execution to navigate profitably. Conclusion The event of Bitcoin rising 1.53% in five minutes to $63,635.22 on Binance serves as a potent case study in modern digital asset market dynamics. This Bitcoin price surge, while a single data point, encapsulates the interplay of high-frequency trading, leveraged speculation, global liquidity, and instant information flow that defines cryptocurrency trading. Understanding the context behind such moves—including market microstructure, derivative interactions, and broader macroeconomic conditions—is essential for any participant. While volatility presents risk, it also creates the liquidity and price discovery mechanisms that attract institutional and retail interest to this evolving asset class. As markets mature, the frequency of such extreme micro-movements may dampen, but their analysis will remain a cornerstone of crypto market intelligence. FAQs Q1: What does a 1.53% move in five minutes mean for Bitcoin? It is a significant short-term volatility event indicating intense buying pressure or a liquidity squeeze on the sell-side. For a trillion-dollar asset, it represents a nearly $1,000 move per coin in minutes, often triggering broader market reactions. Q2: Could this rapid Bitcoin price surge be caused by a single trader? While possible, it is unlikely. Moving the market on a major exchange like Binance typically requires an order in the tens of millions of dollars. More commonly, it results from a cluster of algorithmic trades reacting to the same signal or a cascade of liquidations. Q3: How do traders protect against such sudden volatility? Traders use risk management tools like stop-loss orders (which can also exacerbate moves if clustered), position sizing to withstand swings, and diversification across assets and timeframes. Institutions use sophisticated hedging with options and futures. Q4: Does this type of movement happen often in cryptocurrency markets? Yes, relative to traditional markets. Cryptocurrencies trade 24/7 with high leverage and lower relative liquidity, leading to more frequent sharp price movements. However, their magnitude and frequency can vary with overall market conditions. Q5: What should a long-term investor take from this news? A long-term investor should view short-term volatility as expected noise. The focus should remain on fundamental adoption metrics, network security, and macroeconomic trends rather than intraday price fluctuations, unless they alter the core investment thesis. This post Bitcoin Price Surge: BTC Jumps a Staggering 1.53% in Just Five Minutes on Binance first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

The price of bitcoin sank to roughly $62,200 on Feb. 5, 2026, as a full-blown risk-off mood rippled through global markets, fueled by rising geopolitical strain, economic jitters, and a cascade of forced liquidations across the cryptocurrency sector. Bitcoin Breaches Key Support as Liquidations Snowball and Stocks Stumble Roughly $2.06 billion in crypto derivatives positions

More on markets Volatility roars back: VIX tops 20 amid tech and crypto sell-offs Nasdaq-100 dips again, with over 30 of its stocks now in oversold territory Crypto meltdown intensifies as $1T in market cap is erased in less than three weeks ETFs heavily allocated to Alphabet feel the pressure as GOOG and tech slide SpaceX–xAI deal reignites IPO countdown as prediction markets take bets on the date

BitcoinWorld Schwab Prediction Markets Stance: A Principled Rejection Leaves Robinhood in the Spotlight In a defining statement that clarifies the philosophical boundaries of modern finance, Charles Schwab CEO Rick Wurster has drawn a firm line in the sand, declaring the brokerage giant will cede the burgeoning prediction markets arena to firms like Robinhood. This strategic decision, revealed in an exclusive interview with The Block, underscores a deepening divergence in how major financial institutions view their role amidst the fusion of investing, speculation, and entertainment. The move highlights Schwab’s commitment to its foundational mission, even as competitors explore new, controversial revenue streams. Schwab Prediction Markets Analysis: A Tripartite Division Rick Wurster, who assumed the CEO role at the $8 trillion asset behemoth Charles Schwab in 2023, provided a nuanced dissection of prediction markets during his interview. He systematically outlined three core functions, creating a framework for understanding the industry’s split personality. Firstly, he acknowledged these markets’ utility in generating probabilistic insights into future events, from election outcomes to product launches. This data-centric function offers genuine value for investors seeking informational edges. Secondly, Wurster highlighted the direct linkage to economic indicators. Modern prediction markets now feature contracts tied to inflation reports, employment data, and Federal Reserve decisions. Consequently, institutional and retail investors can use these instruments for hedging or positioning portfolios ahead of major macroeconomic announcements. This function blurs the line between traditional finance and novel information markets. However, the third function—sports betting—presented an irreconcilable conflict. Wurster stated this component runs contrary to Schwab’s core mission of responsible stewardship and long-term wealth building. “We will leave this business to companies that position themselves in gambling, such as FanDuel and Robinhood,” he asserted, making a clear distinction between financial services and gambling-adjacent activities. The Brokerage Mission Clash and Regulatory Landscape This stance is not merely philosophical; it is deeply rooted in regulatory and brand identity considerations. Charles Schwab, founded in 1971, has built its reputation on trust, education, and empowering mainstream investors. The company’s public messaging consistently emphasizes financial literacy and secure retirement planning. Introducing sports-based prediction markets could potentially alienate its core clientele and attract scrutiny from regulators like the SEC and FINRA, who are already grappling with defining these new products. Conversely, Robinhood Markets Inc., launched in 2013, cultivated a brand synonymous with democratization, gamification, and accessible trading. Its foray into prediction markets, including sports-themed events, aligns with its disruptive identity and younger user base. This strategic divergence illustrates a broader industry schism: traditional brokerages prioritizing fiduciary duty versus fintech platforms leveraging engagement-driven features. Expert Perspectives on Market Segmentation Financial analysts observe that Wurster’s comments reflect a deliberate market segmentation strategy. “Schwab is signaling it serves the ‘investor’ segment, focused on asset accumulation and planning, while firms like Robinhood cater to the ‘trader’ or ‘speculator’ segment, comfortable with higher-risk, entertainment-linked products,” notes financial industry consultant, Dr. Alisha Vance. This segmentation protects Schwab’s brand but also concedes a growing market niche to competitors. Furthermore, data from the North American Securities Administrators Association shows increased regulatory attention on prediction markets. Several states have initiated reviews to determine if certain event contracts constitute unlawful gambling or legitimate securities. Schwab’s preemptive withdrawal mitigates regulatory risk, while Robinhood and similar platforms navigate an evolving compliance frontier. The Economic Utility Versus Entertainment Debate Wurster’s analysis invites a critical examination of prediction markets’ dual nature. Proponents, including many academic economists, argue these markets are powerful information aggregation tools. The Iowa Electronic Markets, for instance, have a long history of forecasting election results with notable accuracy. When applied to economic indicators, they can provide real-time sentiment data unavailable through traditional surveys. However, the integration of sports betting creates a perceptual and ethical challenge. The table below contrasts the two primary aspects: Economic/Info Utility Sports/Entertainment Focus Contracts on CPI inflation data Contracts on Super Bowl outcomes Fed interest rate decision markets Major League Baseball game results Corporate earnings prediction shares Academy Award winner markets Primary function: Price discovery & hedging Primary function: Speculation & engagement For a firm like Schwab, associating with the right column risks undermining the seriousness of the left column. The commingling could deter institutional clients and attract undesirable regulatory classification. Therefore, Schwab’s exit is a defensive move to preserve the integrity of its core analytical and investment tools. Impact on the Competitive Landscape Schwab’s principled retreat reshapes the competitive battlefield. Key players are now positioned as follows: Robinhood & Fintechs: Will aggressively develop prediction markets as a user engagement and revenue tool, leveraging their tech-savvy base. Traditional Brokerages (Schwab, Fidelity): Likely to avoid sports-linked markets but may quietly develop institutional-grade economic event contracts. Sportsbooks (FanDuel, DraftKings): Possess the licensing and expertise for sports betting but lack integrated brokerage platforms. Cryptocurrency Exchanges: Many already host diverse prediction markets; they may fill the void for users seeking combined asset trading. This fragmentation means no single entity will dominate all prediction market facets. Instead, specialized leaders will emerge in each segment, forcing investors to use multiple platforms if they seek comprehensive access. Schwab’s decision, therefore, reinforces industry specialization over consolidation. Conclusion Charles Schwab’s definitive stance on Schwab prediction markets , as articulated by CEO Rick Wurster, represents a significant moment of corporate identity assertion in a blurred financial landscape. By explicitly rejecting the sports betting component and leaving that domain to Robinhood and others, Schwab prioritizes mission alignment and regulatory safety over potential short-term engagement gains. This decision underscores a critical industry divide between entertainment-focused speculation and traditional investment stewardship. As prediction markets evolve, Schwab’s choice will serve as a benchmark for how established financial institutions navigate the intersection of finance, information, and gambling. FAQs Q1: What are prediction markets? Prediction markets are exchange-traded platforms where participants buy and sell contracts based on the outcome of future events. Prices reflect the collective probability of an event occurring, ranging from economic data releases to sports results. Q2: Why did Schwab’s CEO say they will avoid this business? CEO Rick Wurster stated that while prediction markets offer useful economic insights, their integration with sports betting conflicts with Schwab’s core mission of responsible, long-term investing and wealth stewardship. Q3: Which companies does Schwab’s CEO mention will handle prediction markets? Wurster specifically mentioned companies like Robinhood and FanDuel, which position themselves in the gambling or speculative trading space, as the likely operators of these markets. Q4: Are prediction markets considered legal gambling? The legal status is complex and varies by jurisdiction. Contracts based on economic indicators may be treated as financial instruments, while sports outcome contracts often fall under gambling regulations, creating a significant regulatory gray area. Q5: How might Schwab’s decision affect its investors? For Schwab’s clients, the decision means the platform will not offer sports-based prediction contracts. However, Schwab may still provide research and tools based on the economic insights generated by these markets from third-party sources. This post Schwab Prediction Markets Stance: A Principled Rejection Leaves Robinhood in the Spotlight first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Tether formalized its USAt stablecoin partnership by investing 100M$ in Anchorage Digital. While BTC falls below 70K (-%14, 63K$), RSI 16.56 is oversold. Supports: 64K$, 61K$. Stablecoin strength s...

The price of bitcoin fell from about $120,000 to $89,000 during the final three months of 2025.

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $63,000 as Market Sentiment Shifts Global cryptocurrency markets witnessed a significant correction on March 25, 2025, as the Bitcoin price broke below the critical $63,000 support level. According to real-time data from Bitcoin World market monitoring, BTC is currently trading at $62,880.32 on the Binance USDT perpetual futures market. This movement represents a notable shift in short-term market dynamics, consequently prompting analysis from traders and institutions worldwide. Bitcoin Price Breaks Key Support Level The descent below $63,000 marks a crucial technical development. Historically, this level has acted as both support and resistance during previous market cycles. Market data shows increased selling volume accompanied the break, indicating genuine bearish pressure rather than mere volatility. Furthermore, the move triggered a cascade of liquidations in the derivatives market, amplifying the downward momentum temporarily. Several concurrent factors likely contributed to this price action. Firstly, on-chain analytics from Glassnode indicate a recent spike in exchange inflows, suggesting some holders moved to take profits. Secondly, broader macroeconomic indicators, including U.S. Treasury yield movements, have created headwinds for risk assets. Finally, the market is digesting the implications of recent regulatory statements from multiple jurisdictions. Analyzing the Current Cryptocurrency Market Context To understand this Bitcoin price movement, one must examine the wider digital asset ecosystem. Altcoins generally experienced more pronounced declines, a typical pattern during BTC-led corrections. The global cryptocurrency market capitalization dipped approximately 4.2% in the 24-hour period surrounding the drop. Meanwhile, trading volumes spiked by over 35%, confirming active participation in the sell-off. The following table compares key market metrics before and after the break below $63,000: Metric 24 Hours Prior Current Change BTC Price (Binance) $64,215.50 $62,880.32 -2.08% BTC Dominance 52.8% 53.1% +0.3% Fear & Greed Index 68 (Greed) 54 (Neutral) -14 points 24h Futures Liquidations $120M $420M +250% This data reveals a market transitioning from greed to neutrality. The slight increase in Bitcoin dominance suggests capital rotated from altcoins back into BTC during the uncertainty, a common flight-to-safety behavior. Historical Precedents and Technical Perspectives Examining past cycles provides essential context. For instance, similar 5-10% pullbacks occurred frequently during the 2021 bull market ascent. Veteran analysts often view these retracements as healthy consolidations that shake out weak leverage. The $60,000 to $62,000 zone now represents the next significant support cluster, backed by substantial volume profiles from earlier this year. Technical indicators present a mixed picture. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the daily chart cooled from overbought territory. Conversely, the 50-day moving average continues to slope upward around $58,000, indicating the primary trend remains intact. Market structure, therefore, suggests this is likely a correction within a larger trend, not a reversal. Potential Impacts on Investors and the Ecosystem The immediate impact centers on trader psychology and portfolio management. Short-term speculators using high leverage faced the brunt of the liquidation wave. Long-term holders, often called ‘HODLers,’ showed remarkable resilience. Data from CryptoQuant confirms exchange reserves did not see a massive exodus, implying conviction among core stakeholders. For the broader ecosystem, price volatility affects several areas: Mining Economics: Hash price and miner revenue experience direct correlation with the BTC price. DeFi Protocols: Loan collateral ratios on lending platforms require monitoring to avoid automatic liquidations. Institutional Activity: Public companies with Bitcoin treasuries may report mark-to-market accounting impacts. Regulatory Discourse: Policymakers often cite volatility in discussions about investor protection frameworks. Market analysts emphasize the importance of distinguishing between price and network fundamentals. The Bitcoin hash rate recently achieved a new all-time high, signaling robust underlying security and investment in infrastructure. Network activity, measured by unique addresses, also remains elevated compared to previous years. Conclusion The Bitcoin price falling below $63,000 serves as a reminder of the asset’s inherent volatility. This event underscores the importance of risk management and fundamental analysis in cryptocurrency investing. While short-term sentiment has cooled, key on-chain and macroeconomic fundamentals for 2025 remain a primary focus for institutional allocators. Market participants will now watch for consolidation above the $62,000 level and a potential rebound in buying pressure from long-term accumulation zones. FAQs Q1: What caused Bitcoin to fall below $63,000? A combination of factors likely contributed, including profit-taking by short-term holders, a spike in leveraged long liquidations, and a cautious shift in broader risk asset sentiment influenced by macroeconomic data. Q2: Is this a bear market for Bitcoin? Based on current technical and on-chain analysis, most metrics suggest this is a correction within a larger bullish trend, not the start of a new bear market. The primary moving averages and network fundamentals remain strong. Q3: Where is the next major support level for BTC? Analysts identify the zone between $60,000 and $62,000 as the next significant support cluster, based on previous consolidation volumes and key moving averages like the 50-day SMA. Q4: How does this drop affect Bitcoin miners? A lower BTC price directly pressures miner revenue in dollar terms. However, miners with efficient operations and hedged treasury strategies are better positioned to weather short-term volatility. Q5: Should investors buy the dip? Investment decisions depend entirely on individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and strategy. Historically, buying during fear-driven sell-offs has yielded positive long-term results, but this is not financial advice. This post Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $63,000 as Market Sentiment Shifts first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

The price of Bitcoin crashed below $63,000 on Thursday, not far above the average production cost of publicly traded miners.

Bitcoin’s plunge below $65,000 is intensifying the crisis rocking the digital-asset complex — and few companies are more exposed than Michael Saylor’s Strategy Inc.

Kyle Samani , one of the founders of Multicoin Capital, has announced that he will step down as managing partner after ten years in the cryptocurrency field.

BitcoinWorld Crypto Futures Liquidated: A Staggering $353 Million Hour Reveals Market Fragility A sudden and severe wave of forced selling has rocked cryptocurrency derivatives markets, with major exchanges reporting a staggering $353 million worth of futures positions liquidated within a single hour, signaling intense volatility and shifting trader sentiment as of late March 2025. Crypto Futures Liquidated: Anatomy of a $353 Million Hour This substantial liquidation event represents a rapid unwinding of leveraged positions across global trading platforms. Consequently, market analysts immediately scrutinized the order books to identify the catalysts. Typically, such a concentrated wave of liquidations occurs when asset prices move sharply against a majority of leveraged bets, triggering automatic margin calls. For instance, a rapid price decline can liquidate long positions, while a sudden spike can wipe out short sellers. This mechanism is fundamental to derivatives trading but can exacerbate price movements. Therefore, the scale of this one-hour event, amounting to $353 million, highlights the significant leverage present in the current market structure. The Broader Context of Derivatives Market Stress Zooming out to a 24-hour window reveals even more profound stress. Specifically, total liquidations have reached approximately $1.84 billion. This broader context is crucial for understanding the market’s condition. To clarify, futures contracts allow traders to speculate on price directions without owning the underlying asset, often using borrowed funds or leverage. When the market moves against these positions, exchanges automatically close them to prevent further losses, a process known as liquidation. Historically, clusters of liquidations often coincide with major news events, technical breakdowns, or large, orchestrated trades. By comparing this event to past data, we see it ranks among the more significant hourly liquidation clusters of the past two years, though not unprecedented. Expert Analysis on Market Mechanics and Impact Market structure experts point to several contributing factors. First, elevated leverage ratios across retail and institutional platforms increase systemic fragility. Second, clustered liquidity around certain price levels can create a domino effect when breached. “Liquidations are not merely a result of volatility; they are a primary driver of it,” explains a veteran derivatives analyst from a major financial data firm. “The $353 million figure represents a massive, instantaneous transfer of capital from losing traders to the exchange and counterparties. This process can create violent price slippage and impact spot markets, as exchanges sell collateral assets to cover losses.” Furthermore, data shows a majority of the liquidated positions were likely long bets, suggesting a swift downward price move triggered the cascade. Risk Management and Trader Psychology Events of this magnitude serve as a stark reminder of the risks inherent in leveraged trading. Key risk management principles include: Using Stop-Loss Orders: Setting automatic exit points can help manage risk before a margin call. Understanding Leverage Multipliers: Higher leverage magnifies both gains and losses exponentially. Monitoring Funding Rates: In perpetual futures markets, shifting funding rates can signal overcrowded trades. Psychologically, liquidation events often induce fear and prompt a broader market retreat. However, they can also reset overleveraged conditions, potentially creating stability afterward. The rapid $1.84 billion in daily liquidations indicates a market flushing out excessive speculation, which some analysts view as a necessary, if painful, correction. Conclusion The episode of $353 million in crypto futures liquidated within one hour underscores the volatile and interconnected nature of modern digital asset markets. This event, part of a larger $1.84 billion daily flush, demonstrates how leverage can accelerate price movements and compound volatility. Ultimately, it reinforces the critical importance of robust risk management for all market participants navigating the high-stakes world of cryptocurrency derivatives. FAQs Q1: What does ‘futures liquidated’ mean? A futures liquidation occurs when an exchange forcibly closes a trader’s leveraged position because it has lost enough value that the trader’s initial margin (collateral) can no longer support it. This is an automatic process to prevent negative balances. Q2: Why did $353 million get liquidated in one hour? Such a large, concentrated liquidation typically happens when the market price moves violently against a large number of leveraged positions clustered around a specific price point, triggering a cascade of automatic margin calls. Q3: Who loses money when futures are liquidated? The trader whose position is liquidated loses their remaining margin (collateral). The exchange uses these funds to keep the contract whole. The ‘liquidation price’ is the level at which this automatic closure occurs. Q4: Do large liquidations affect the spot price of Bitcoin or Ethereum? Yes, they often do. To cover losses, exchanges may sell the collateral assets from liquidated positions on the spot market. This can create additional selling pressure, driving the spot price down further in a feedback loop. Q5: How can traders avoid being liquidated? Traders can avoid liquidation by using lower leverage, depositing additional margin collateral if the market moves against them, and employing careful risk management tools like stop-loss orders set well above their actual liquidation price. This post Crypto Futures Liquidated: A Staggering $353 Million Hour Reveals Market Fragility first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

CEA Industries and YZi Labs are involved in a public dispute, as both sides trade claims over fees, governance, and board control.

Bitcoin miners are now earning just $28 million a day. That’s the lowest they’ve made all year. The crash in revenue comes as the price of Bitcoin sinks and electricity bills go through the roof. Many of the big mining companies are powering down their machines. It’s just not worth keeping them on anymore. The hash price index, which shows how much money miners make for every unit of computing power, has dropped to 3 cents per terahash, based on data from Luxor Technology. Back in 2017, it was $3.50. That’s a total collapse. Mining difficulty is also expected to fall by more than 13%, which would be one of the biggest drops since the China crackdown in 2021. Newhedge says this is already locked in for the next adjustment. Companies slash operations and scramble for backup plans Bitcoin dropped below $70,000 on Thursday. That price hit made things even worse for miners. Over the past few months, as traders got liquidated and crypto slid lower, mining profits kept getting squeezed. Some mining companies like CleanSpark and Terawulf have been trying to pivot. They’ve started using their mining buildings to host AI chips instead. But most of their actual cash still comes from mining, not from artificial intelligence. Harry, who runs the business side at CleanSpark, called this the worst drop since the China ban. “It is due to the combination of both the sell off and winter storms,” he said. That same day, mining stocks tanked. CleanSpark lost 10%, Terawulf dropped 8.5%, MARA Holdings fell 11%, and Riot Platforms slid 4.8%. Wall Street was not in the mood to wait this out. Source : Luxor Technology Mining Bitcoin burns a lot of energy. These companies have borrowed billions to buy custom machines and pay electricity bills that can hit tens of millions every month. They earn their reward in Bitcoin by keeping the network running. But when the token price falls too far or power gets expensive, they shut off machines. No one mines at a loss. The latest problem came from a January winter storm that slammed the U.S. Electricity costs shot up across the country. States like Texas and Tennessee, which usually welcome crypto miners, got hit hard. Some companies were able to flip their power back to the grid through demand response programs. The rest just shut down. Crypto winter continues as OGs take profits and buyers vanish This isn’t just a bump in the road. It’s a full-on freeze. Matt from Bitwise Asset Management said this is “not a dip,” calling it a “Leonardo DiCaprio in The Revenant-style crypto winter.” He said this collapse was triggered by leverage and old Bitcoin investors cashing out while retail traders took the hits. Matt believes this whole thing started back in January 2025, but no one noticed because big investors were still pouring money into crypto. That distracted everyone from the real damage happening to small traders. “Good news doesn’t matter,” Matt wrote. He said things like Wall Street hiring more crypto teams or banks getting involved won’t stop the bleeding right now. “Crypto winters don’t end in excitement; they end in exhaustion.” He listed a few things that could end this mess: a good economy, a surprise law win like the Clarity Act, or a country deciding to adopt Bitcoin officially. But the most likely fix? Time. Bannister from Stifel added another reason for the crash. Tech credit is in trouble. And since people treat Bitcoin like a risky tech stock, that’s dragging it down too. Crypto winters usually last about 13 months. If this one started when Matt says, then the end might be close. But that doesn’t help miners today. Their revenue is gone. Power prices are up. And the machines are off. Everyone’s waiting. Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

The deep decline over the past week may have exhausted sellers enough for a V-shaped reversal to bring bullish Solana price predictions up to speed. The violent sell-off over the past week bears all the hallmarks of capitulation. Crypto’s tenth-largest liquidation event on record flushed out excess leverage, forced indiscriminate selling, and drove the altcoin down to cycle lows in a single, compressed move. Solana $SOL is capitulated to max pain by @binance pic.twitter.com/OGyE984i22 — MartyParty (@martypartymusic) February 24, 2025 Such episodes tend to occur near market bottoms, when fear peaks and weak hands are forcibly removed. Once that process completes, selling pressure collapses rapidly, often setting the stage for sharp V-shaped reversals. With forced selling largely absorbed and leverage reset, the market has shifted from panic to stabilization. This transition often marks the inflection point where downside momentum fades, and buyers quietly regain control. If follow-through demand emerges from here, Solana could transition rapidly from capitulation to recovery — putting a fresh all-time high back into focus as the broader bull market matures. Solana Price Prediction: V-Shaped Rally Sets Up New Highs There is a technical basis for capitulation. With this final push lower, Solana has fully retraced the November breakout of its 7-month ascending channel, completing the corrective move. The downtrend Solana has been locked into now appears exhausted, with price meeting the pattern’s original support near $100, a bottom marker over the past two years. SOL USD 1-day chart – ascending channel exhausts. Source: TradingView . Momentum indicators show it. The RSI has crossed below the 30 oversold threshold, a level indicative of seller exhaustion and a pivot into a long-term uptrend as buyers step back in. While the MACD has cratered with the liquidity event, it stands to be a setback in the previous trend towards a golden cross above the signal line. With forced selling largely absorbed and leverage reset, any reversal attempt from here is likely to be sharp rather than gradual. From here, the next major upside targets sit at the $200 psychological level and Solana’s prior all-time highs near $300 — a potential 240% move from current prices. And if Solana’s bullish fundamentals are re-priced as the broader market recovers, a push into fresh price discovery could follow. Maxi Doge: A Hedge Against Short-Term Volatility Tried and tested altcoins like Solana are the easy bet, but for those life-changing gains crypto is renowned for, a more speculative approach is needed. One trend has proven stubbornly consistent across cycles: capital eventually concentrates on one Doge-themed token. The pattern is clear. Dogecoin led the charge, Shiba Inu followed in 2021, then came Floki, Bonk, Dogwifhat, and Neiro. Every bull cycle eventually sees capital rotate into a new Doge-inspired frontrunner. This time around, Maxi Doge ($MAXI) is tapping into those same early Dogecoin vibes with a community built around sharing early alpha, trading ideas, and competitive engagement. Engagement drives the ecosystem. Weekly Maxi Ripped and Maxi Pump competitions keep activity high, rewarding top performers with leaderboard recognition, incentives, and bragging rights. The hype is already showing in the numbers. The $MAXI presale has raised almost $4.6 million, while early backers are earning up to 68% APY through staking rewards. For traders who missed previous Doge-led runs, Maxi Doge could offer another early entry before meme coins swing back into full focus. Visit the Official Maxi Doge Website Here The post Solana Price Prediction: Against All Odds, This V-Shaped Rebound Could Launch SOL Toward New Highs appeared first on Cryptonews .

More on Strategy Strategy: Bitcoin Selloff Looms Large Ahead Of Earnings Strategy Q4 Preview: Patience Wins, Accumulation Comes Later Strategy: Bitcoin As A Treasury Model Faces Stress Test ‘We’re going to look back at this selloff as a table pounder time to own names' – Wedbush’s Dan Ives Strategy Q4 earnings preview: Number of diluted shares a key metric

Bitcoin has finally swept the sell-side liquidity that had been building beneath the market, driving price into a deep demand zone where stronger buyers are expected to step in. With the downside move now largely complete, attention shifts to whether this level can spark a meaningful reaction or mark the start of a broader reset. Why The 100-Week SMA Remains A Proven Bitcoin Accumulation Zone Crypto analyst Brett emphasized that accumulating Bitcoin below the 100-week Simple Moving Average has repeatedly proven to be one of the most reliable long-term investment strategies. According to the expert, this zone has historically marked periods of maximum pessimism, where risk-to-reward strongly favors patient buyers rather than short-term traders. Related Reading: Bitcoin Drop Below $80,000 May Not Be The Final Capitulation Event, Checkonchain Says Brett explained that his personal approach deliberately avoids trying to pinpoint the exact market bottom. Instead, he focuses on steady accumulation by placing buy orders across a wide range between $55,000 and $75,000, supported by daily recurring purchases. For investors with a more conservative mindset, Brett pointed out that waiting for confirmation can be just as effective. Looking at past cycles, Brett noted that buying after Bitcoin moves back above the 100-week SMA has consistently delivered strong returns. He stressed that BTC has never fallen below the previous cycle’s 100-week SMA, reinforcing its importance as a structural support level. Those who followed this strategy in prior market cycles are now sitting on significant long-term profits. Breakdown Confirmed As Key Lows Failed To Hold According to the latest BTC Heatmap update by Columbus, the market has followed the exact trajectory previously mapped out. Columbus notes that the inability of the local lows to hold, combined with weak reactions on the tape, signaled that the liquidity stacked below would act as a magnet. Consequently, the continuation leg played out as an inevitable result of this structural weakness. Related Reading: Is The Bitcoin Bottom In? CMT Reveals What Investors Need To See Now In his analysis of the current price action, Columbus highlights that Bitcoin is now trading directly within a cluster of heavier bids located around the low-$70,000 region. The analyst identifies this specific zone as the first area where a “real reaction” is likely to occur, as it represents a significant concentration of buy-side interest. For Columbus, the sweep into these deeper pockets was the necessary clearing event to reach this primary demand zone. Columbus concludes that since the anticipated downside has fully played out, the focus now shifts entirely to the immediate response from buyers. With the liquidity targets hit and the price sitting on heavy support, Columbus is now closely watching for a definitive reaction to determine if this level will provide the foundation for the next leg of the trend. Featured image from Freepik, chart from Tradingview.com

More on Bitcoin, Ethereum Wall Street Lunch: Bitcoin Tumbles Below $70K Bitcoin's 45% Plunge Is A Warning Of A Bigger Liquidity Problem Risk-Off Flows And A Tech/AI Panic - Market Reactions Crypto rout drags related stocks down amid likely macroeconomic-induced pullback Bitcoin selloff intensifies as the cryptocurrency drops 8%

XRP’s online mood is holding up even as prices slide, creating a split between what traders say and what markets are doing. XRP Social Mood Outpaces Peers According to Santiment , social chatter around XRP has a far higher positive-to-negative ratio than the big two coins. The platform’s score for XRP sits at 2.19, while Ethereum posts 1.08 and Bitcoin 0.80. That gap points to a crowd that sounds confident even while values are falling. Swyftx lead analyst Pav Hundal said holders have a different stance on volatility, adding that many view the token’s fundamentals as steady enough to ignore short-term drops. In plain terms: lots of talk, and most of it is upbeat. Sentiment has turned extremely bearish toward Bitcoin and Ethereum following crypto’s major downswing this past week. XRP is seeing a more optimistic outlook among traders. As we know, markets move opposite to the fear & greed of retail traders. There remains a strong… pic.twitter.com/1U23pQ48D6 — Santiment (@santimentfeed) February 4, 2026 Price Action Shows Weakness XRP has been struggling in the first week of February 2026, falling towards multi-month lows in the mid-$1.50s. The major support levels, including the $1.80 level, have been breached, and the token is now trading below multiple moving averages. In the last seven days, XRP has depreciated by approximately 6%, while Bitcoin and Ethereum have fallen by 5% and 4.5%, respectively. Market participants have been closely monitoring the charts to determine if a relief rally is likely or if the downtrend will continue. Hundal emphasized that XRP remains down about 35% over the past 30 days, highlighting the challenges the token faces despite optimistic chatter. Supply Trends Suggest Holder Patience Reports note that exchange balances of XRP are shrinking. That suggests tokens are moving off trading platforms into private wallets, not being flushed onto the market. When supply tightens while demand is uncertain, prices can stabilize faster than many expect. Santiment argued this kind of nervousness among small traders can sometimes spark a relief rally — a quick bounce driven more by halted selling than by fresh buying. Models that look at exchange flows and on-chain metrics give a decent chance for a rebound if selling pressure eases. https://t.co/Hh8ZXJC13c — Matt Hougan (@Matt_Hougan) February 3, 2026 Broader Market Signals Remain Cautious The CoinMarketCap Altcoin Season Index sits at 32 out of 100, a reading that signals a Bitcoin-focused market rather than one led by altcoins. Reports say Bitwise chief investment officer Matt Hougan warned on X that market participants are feeling the effects of a prolonged crypto winter that began in January 2025, though he suggested the low point might be closer to passing than arriving. That view is cautious optimism: recovery is possible, but it is not guaranteed. Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView

BitcoinWorld Crypto Futures Liquidations Trigger Staggering $456 Million Hourly Market Carnage Global cryptocurrency markets experienced staggering turbulence today as $456 million worth of futures positions liquidated within a single hour, triggering widespread concern among traders and analysts worldwide. This dramatic event represents one of the most intense liquidation clusters in recent months, with total liquidations reaching $1.948 billion over the preceding 24-hour period. Major exchanges including Binance, Bybit, and OKX reported significant margin call activity as leveraged positions collapsed under sudden price pressure. Crypto Futures Liquidations Reach Critical Levels The cryptocurrency derivatives market faced unprecedented stress during the liquidation event. Specifically, long positions accounted for approximately $380 million of the hourly liquidations, while short positions represented the remaining $76 million. This imbalance indicates that bullish traders suffered disproportionately during the market downturn. Furthermore, Bitcoin futures dominated the liquidation volume with $312 million, while Ethereum contracts contributed $98 million. Other altcoin futures comprised the remaining $46 million in liquidated value. Exchange data reveals that Binance processed the largest share of liquidations at $187 million. Meanwhile, Bybit handled $123 million, and OKX managed $89 million in forced position closures. These three platforms collectively accounted for 87% of the total hourly liquidation volume. The cascade began when Bitcoin’s price dropped 7.2% within 45 minutes, breaching multiple critical support levels that triggered automated liquidation protocols across trading platforms. Historical Context and Market Comparisons Today’s liquidation event ranks among the top 15 hourly liquidation clusters in cryptocurrency history. For comparison, the May 2021 market correction generated $8.7 billion in liquidations over 24 hours, while the November 2022 FTX collapse triggered $2.6 billion in forced position closures. Although today’s numbers appear smaller in absolute terms, the concentration within a single hour makes this event particularly noteworthy for market structure analysts. The table below illustrates recent significant liquidation events: Date 24-Hour Liquidations Primary Trigger May 19, 2021 $8.7 billion China mining ban announcement November 9, 2022 $2.6 billion FTX collapse rumors January 3, 2025 $1.95 billion Technical breakdown & leverage unwinding August 17, 2023 $1.2 billion Fed minutes release Market analysts immediately noted several contributing factors to today’s volatility. First, open interest in perpetual futures contracts had reached annual highs before the decline. Second, funding rates turned excessively positive across major platforms, indicating overcrowded long positions. Third, macroeconomic uncertainty surrounding interest rate decisions created underlying market tension. These conditions created a perfect environment for rapid deleveraging once price movement began. Mechanics of Futures Liquidations Explained Futures liquidations occur automatically when traders’ positions lose sufficient value to trigger margin calls. Specifically, exchanges maintain liquidation engines that calculate position health in real-time. When maintenance margin requirements breach predetermined thresholds, the exchange forcibly closes positions. This process happens through these sequential steps: Margin Warning: Traders receive notifications when positions approach liquidation levels Partial Liquidation: Some exchanges close portions of positions to restore margin ratios Full Liquidation: Complete position closure when margin cannot be restored Auto-Deleveraging: In extreme cases, profitable positions may be reduced to cover losses The liquidation process creates a self-reinforcing cycle in volatile markets. As positions liquidate, they generate additional selling pressure. Consequently, this pushes prices further against remaining leveraged positions. Therefore, cascading liquidations can amplify relatively modest price movements into significant market events. Today’s $456 million hourly liquidation demonstrates this amplification mechanism in action. Immediate Market Impacts and Reactions The liquidation cascade produced several immediate market consequences. First, Bitcoin’s price volatility spiked to 85% on an annualized basis, compared to its 30-day average of 45%. Second, the futures funding rate flipped from strongly positive to slightly negative within hours. Third, spot trading volumes surged 220% above daily averages as traders adjusted positions. Fourth, the futures basis (price difference between futures and spot) compressed significantly, reducing arbitrage opportunities. Market participants responded with varied strategies following the liquidations. Institutional traders increased hedging activity through options markets, particularly purchasing put options for downside protection. Meanwhile, retail traders demonstrated mixed behavior—some capitulated entirely while others viewed the dip as a buying opportunity. Exchange data shows substantial stablecoin inflows to major platforms during the volatility, suggesting prepared capital awaiting market entry points. Regulatory observers noted the event’s timing relative to ongoing derivatives market discussions. Specifically, multiple jurisdictions currently debate leverage limits for retail cryptocurrency trading. Today’s liquidations may provide additional evidence for proponents of stricter regulations. However, industry advocates emphasize that liquidations represent normal market functioning rather than systemic failure. They point to the absence of exchange insolvencies or settlement failures during the event. Expert Analysis and Risk Management Perspectives Financial risk specialists emphasize several lessons from today’s liquidation event. Primarily, they highlight the importance of position sizing and leverage management. Professional traders typically maintain lower leverage ratios than retail participants, which provides greater resilience during volatility. Additionally, sophisticated market participants employ multiple risk management tools simultaneously: Stop-loss orders at technical support levels Options hedging to limit downside exposure Portfolio diversification across asset classes Scenario planning for various market conditions Market structure analysts observe that liquidation clustering has decreased relative to historical patterns. This improvement stems from several industry developments. First, exchanges have implemented more sophisticated risk engines that prevent single-point failures. Second, traders have access to better educational resources about leverage risks. Third, the growth of options markets provides alternative hedging instruments. Despite these advances, today’s event demonstrates that liquidation risks remain substantial during periods of high leverage utilization. Technical Analysis and Chart Patterns Technical analysts identified several chart developments preceding the liquidation event. The Bitcoin chart showed a classic descending triangle pattern with diminishing volume. This pattern typically indicates weakening bullish momentum before breakdowns. Additionally, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) displayed bearish divergence, with price making higher highs while momentum made lower highs. These technical warnings went unheeded by many leveraged traders. On-chain data provided further context for the market movement. Exchange net flows turned positive two days before the decline, indicating increasing selling pressure. Meanwhile, the Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) ratio approached historically high levels, suggesting overvaluation. Whale transaction counts surged 40% above average in the hours preceding the drop, suggesting informed participants adjusting positions before the volatility. The liquidation event created several new technical developments. Bitcoin’s price broke below its 50-day moving average for the first time in 42 days. Additionally, it breached the psychologically important $60,000 support level. These technical breaks triggered algorithmic trading systems that contributed to the selling pressure. Market structure now shows increased resistance above previous support levels, indicating potential distribution patterns. Conclusion The $456 million crypto futures liquidation event provides a stark reminder about leverage risks in volatile markets. While the cryptocurrency ecosystem has matured significantly, today’s cascade demonstrates that crowded positioning combined with technical breaks can still produce dramatic deleveraging. Market participants should note the importance of risk management, particularly during periods of high leverage utilization and positive funding rates. The $1.948 billion in 24-hour liquidations represents one of the most significant deleveraging events of 2025, highlighting both the growing scale of cryptocurrency derivatives markets and their continued vulnerability to rapid position unwinding. As regulatory discussions continue and market infrastructure evolves, such events will likely remain features of the cryptocurrency landscape, though their frequency and severity may diminish with improved risk management practices across the industry. FAQs Q1: What causes futures liquidations in cryptocurrency markets? Futures liquidations occur when traders’ positions lose sufficient value to breach maintenance margin requirements. Exchanges automatically close these positions to prevent losses exceeding collateral. High leverage amplifies this risk significantly. Q2: How does today’s $456 million liquidation compare to historical events? Today’s hourly liquidation ranks among the top 15 in history. While smaller than the $8.7 billion liquidation day in May 2021, the concentration within one hour makes it notable. The 24-hour total of $1.95 billion represents a significant deleveraging event. Q3: Which cryptocurrencies experienced the most liquidations? Bitcoin futures accounted for $312 million (68%) of the hourly liquidations. Ethereum contracts represented $98 million (22%), while various altcoins comprised the remaining $46 million (10%). This distribution reflects market capitalization and trading volume patterns. Q4: Can liquidation events predict future price movements? Liquidations typically follow rather than predict price movements. However, large liquidation clusters often mark local extremes in sentiment. The removal of leveraged positions can reduce selling pressure, sometimes creating conditions for price stabilization or reversal. Q5: What risk management strategies help avoid liquidation? Effective strategies include using lower leverage ratios, maintaining adequate margin buffers, setting stop-loss orders, diversifying across positions, hedging with options, and continuously monitoring position health. Education about leverage mechanics remains crucial for all derivatives traders. This post Crypto Futures Liquidations Trigger Staggering $456 Million Hourly Market Carnage first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

With 68.4% user dominance and rising demand, the USDT engine is at full power!

Bitcoin (BTC) continues to dominate the market, but recent price action suggests that the asset is stalling, with momentum remaining stagnant as traders await a clearer direction. As a result, more and more traders are turning to early-stage opportunities that have a more promising growth trajectory, and among the top crypto projects now seeing significant traction is Mutuum Finance (MUTM) , a token priced at just $0.04 that is catching the attention of investors due to its decentralized approach to lending and borrowing and a successful presale that has raised more than $20 million. Bitcoin (BTC) Faces Selling Pressure After Weekend Bounce The price of Bitcoin (BTC) made a concerted effort to recover, but the significant amount of selling pressure that subsequently emerged led to a chop in the price of the token, moving back into the mid-$70,000s. Support levels have been breached, and the overall market conditions have resulted in a significant amount of liquidations. Although BTC remains a major anchor point for the overall market, its recent price action is a stark contrast to the growth opportunities that can be found in new crypto coins. Investors are now looking for the best crypto to buy elsewhere. MUTM Presale: Early Investors Reap the Rewards Since its presale began at $0.01 in Phase 1, the Mutuum Finance token price has risen to $0.04 in Phase 7. Phase 8 is set at $0.045, with the official launch at $0.06. This gives investors who take part in the presale early a significant edge over others who will buy in later. For instance, if an investor buys $2,000 worth of MUTM at $0.04, they would own 50,000 MUTM tokens. During the crypto’s launch at $0.06, this position will have ballooned to $3,000. This makes the investor $1,000 richer before MUTM even enters the market. With over $20.35 million raised from almost 19,000 investors, MUTM is a top crypto to buy, with high potential to be the next cryptocurrency to explode. Earning Passive Income with mtTokens Mutuum Finance provides investors with additional incentives for providing liquidity. A portion of the revenue generated by the protocol is used to buy back MUTM tokens, which are then distributed as additional rewards for investors who stake their mtTokens. For example, if the protocol generates $1,500,000 in revenue from highly utilized p2c pools such as USDT or ETH, 20% of that, $300,000, would go back to loyal liquidity providers, in addition to their interest earned from lending pools. This system makes MUTM the best crypto to buy for investors seeking passive income. Robust Risk Management for Investor Confidence Security is an essential part of the MUTM protocol. All loans are over-collateralized for security. For instance, stable assets such as ETH are set with an 80% loan-to-value (LTV) ratio. A user who holds $15,000 ETH can borrow $12,000 safely while still benefiting from any potential upside in the price of ETH. The Chainlink Oracles give real-time price feeds, so no unfair liquidation occurs when there is a rapid change in price. If the price of ETH were to drop 20% in a matter of minutes, the Chainlink Oracles will immediately adjust, protecting the borrowers, lenders, and the protocol from price manipulation. While Bitcoin continues to stall at the hands of resistance, investors are now turning their focus towards newer investment opportunities that are in their infancy but have stronger growth potential. Mutuum Finance is currently the best crypto to buy, with its price at $0.04, a live DeFi lending platform, passive income through mtTokens, and a strong risk management system in place. Mutuum Finance is set to list on exchanges in the near future, making it currently one of the top crypto opportunities for smart investors. For more information about Mutuum Finance (MUTM) visit the links below: Website: https://mutuum.com/ Linktree: https://linktr.ee/mutuumfinance

Major meme cryptocurrencies suffered significant losses as Bitcoin fell below $70,000. The meme coin sector saw its market capitalization shrink to $33.5 billion, representing a 10.7% decline in 24 hours. Dogecoin traded below the $0.10 threshold amid sustained bearish momentum. Shiba Inu recorded a 15.64% price decrease in the last 24 hours. Pepe Coin suffered the steepest decline, falling 17.11%. The selloff mirrored broader weakness in the cryptocurrency market. Total crypto market capitalization dropped 8.13% to $2.3 trillion. Bitcoin has shed nearly $2 trillion in value since reaching its October all-time high. The leading cryptocurrency now trades at levels last seen during its 2021 peak. Macroeconomic pressures continue to weigh on digital asset valuations. Risk-averse sentiment has dominated trading activity across all crypto categories. Dogecoin Tests Critical Support Level Dogecoin changed hands at $0.0889 after a 14.89% decline in the last 24 hours. The $0.10 level now represents crucial support territory for Dogecoin. Traders are monitoring this threshold for signs of stabilization or further deterioration. Derivatives market data reveals weakening institutional interest. Open interest in Dogecoin futures contracted from 1.27 billion to 1.06 billion. This reduction suggests traders are closing positions amid uncertainty. A sustained hold above $0.09 could enable a recovery attempt. Breaking back above $0.10 would signal a potential trend reversal. However, failure to maintain current levels may trigger additional selling pressure. Shiba Inu Faces Diminished Burn Activity Shiba Inu declined 15.64% in the last 24 hours to trade at $0.000005650 at the time of writing . The token's burn rate decreased by 19.50%, with 1,453,488 SHIB tokens removed from circulation. This represents a sharp slowdown in deflationary activity. The cryptocurrency is testing support at $0.0000063. This level has provided stability in previous downturns. Maintaining prices above this zone could facilitate a bounce toward $0.0000069. A breakdown below the current support would expose the next support area. The reduced burn rate suggests decreased community engagement or strategic conservation of tokens. This metric often correlates with market sentiment and trading volumes. Pepe Coin Approaches Annual Lows Pepe Coin dropped 17.11% to $0.000003553 over 24 hours. The token has struggled to overcome major resistance despite multiple attempts. Price action suggests consolidation within a triangle pattern. The meme coin has plunged 41% over the past month. Current trading levels sit near yearly lows. Two weeks of persistent selling have eroded earlier gains substantially. Technical analysts identify potential support at $0.0000035. This represents a critical defense line for bulls. Bitcoin finding stability around $66,000 could provide relief for Pepe. A recovery scenario would target the $0.000004 level. However, continued market weakness threatens to establish new lows. The token's performance remains highly correlated with Bitcoin's movements. The trajectories of Dogecoin, Shiba Inu, and Pepe Coin depend on Bitcoin's stability. A Bitcoin recovery would likely lift meme coins from current levels. Continued downward pressure risks testing deeper support zones.

Tether invests $100 million in Anchorage Digital to bolster collaboration. Anchorage plays a vital role in secure, regulation-compliant digital asset operation. Continue Reading: Tether Amplifies Influence with a Strategic $100 Million Investment The post Tether Amplifies Influence with a Strategic $100 Million Investment appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

KAS is approaching the critical support at 0.0264$ from the 0.03$ level, with resistances at 0.0284$ and 0.0305$. In the downtrend, liquidity hunt risk is high, and BTC correlation is suppressing a...

BitcoinWorld Liquidity Problem Triggers Alarming Market-Wide Plunge Across Crypto and Traditional Assets Financial markets experienced a dramatic synchronized decline this week, with Bitcoin, gold, and major stock indices posting their largest weekly losses in months. This alarming market-wide plunge represents a fundamental liquidity problem rather than sector-specific weakness, according to comprehensive analysis of recent trading patterns and monetary policy impacts. The unusual correlation between typically uncorrelated assets signals forced deleveraging across portfolios as investors face mounting pressure from tightening financial conditions. Understanding the Liquidity Problem Behind Market Movements Market analysts identified a clear liquidity problem as the primary driver behind recent volatility. This issue stems from broader financial system constraints rather than cryptocurrency-specific concerns. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy decisions have created tightening conditions that affect all risk assets simultaneously. Consequently, investors face margin calls and must sell positions across their portfolios. This mechanical response explains why diverse assets moved in unusual correlation during the downturn. Historical data reveals similar patterns during previous liquidity crunches. For instance, the 2008 financial crisis and 2020 pandemic crash both featured correlated declines across asset classes. The current situation differs in its gradual onset rather than sudden shock. Market participants now navigate reduced market depth and higher transaction costs. These conditions particularly impact leveraged positions in both traditional and digital asset markets. Forced Deleveraging Mechanism Explained Forced deleveraging occurs when investors must reduce borrowed positions due to declining collateral values or changing margin requirements. This process creates a self-reinforcing cycle of selling pressure. As asset prices fall, leveraged positions trigger automatic liquidations. These liquidations then push prices lower, affecting even unrelated assets in diversified portfolios. The phenomenon explains why gold and Bitcoin declined together despite their different fundamental drivers. Several factors contributed to the deleveraging pressure: Rising interest rates increased borrowing costs across financial markets Reduced market depth amplified price movements during liquidations Cross-margin requirements forced sales across correlated positions Institutional rebalancing triggered systematic selling programs This technical selling pressure overwhelmed fundamental valuations temporarily. Market structure thus played a larger role than investor sentiment in the recent downturn. Monetary Policy’s Central Role in Market Dynamics The Federal Reserve’s policy decisions directly influenced market liquidity conditions throughout 2024 and early 2025. Quantitative tightening measures reduced the central bank’s balance sheet by approximately $1.7 trillion since 2022. This reduction decreased system-wide liquidity substantially. Additionally, the Fed maintained higher interest rates for longer than many market participants anticipated. This policy stance increased pressure on leveraged positions across all asset classes. Market reactions to Fed communications revealed growing uncertainty about policy direction. Analysis of Fed meeting minutes shows consistent concern about inflation persistence. These concerns justified continued restrictive policy despite economic growth moderation. The resulting liquidity reduction affected market functioning across traditional and digital asset spaces equally. This demonstrates how monetary policy transmits through global financial systems. Comparative Analysis of Asset Class Performance The synchronized decline across typically uncorrelated assets provided compelling evidence for liquidity-driven selling. Bitcoin declined approximately 15% during the week, while gold fell 8% and the S&P 500 dropped 6%. This unusual correlation coefficient approached 0.7 during peak selling pressure, compared to typical readings below 0.2. Silver experienced even steeper declines at 12%, reflecting its higher volatility during risk-off periods. Weekly Performance Comparison Across Asset Classes Asset Weekly Change Volatility Increase Liquidity Impact Score Bitcoin (BTC) -15.2% +42% High Gold (XAU) -8.1% +28% Medium S&P 500 -6.3% +35% Medium Silver (XAG) -12.4% +51% High The data reveals how liquidity constraints affected assets differently based on their market structure. Cryptocurrency markets showed higher sensitivity due to greater leverage utilization. Traditional markets experienced more orderly declines thanks to established circuit breakers and deeper liquidity pools. However, all assets demonstrated clear correlation during the selling episode. Historical Context and Market Structure Evolution Financial market structure has evolved significantly since previous liquidity events. The growth of algorithmic trading and cross-asset strategies increased correlation during stress periods. Additionally, cryptocurrency market maturation integrated digital assets into broader financial systems. This integration means Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies now respond to traditional market signals. The development explains why recent patterns differ from earlier cryptocurrency market cycles. Several structural changes contributed to increased correlation: Institutional adoption of cryptocurrency in diversified portfolios Cross-market arbitrage strategies linking traditional and digital assets Regulatory developments creating more standardized market structures Risk management systems that treat diverse assets similarly during stress These developments mean liquidity events now transmit more efficiently across markets. The recent downturn demonstrated this transmission mechanism clearly. Expert Analysis and Market Implications Financial analysts emphasize the distinction between liquidity-driven and fundamentals-driven selling. Liquidity events typically create better buying opportunities because they don’t reflect deteriorating fundamentals. Market participants should therefore analyze whether specific assets suffered from broader conditions or individual weaknesses. This analysis helps identify potential value discrepancies after correlated declines. Looking forward, market recovery depends on liquidity condition improvements. The Federal Reserve’s policy path remains the primary determinant of these conditions. Any indication of easing could trigger rapid recovery across affected assets. However, sustained improvement requires actual liquidity injection rather than merely expectations. Market participants should monitor Fed balance sheet movements and banking system reserves for early signals. Conclusion The recent market-wide plunge resulted primarily from a liquidity problem affecting all risk assets simultaneously. This analysis reveals how forced deleveraging triggered correlated declines across cryptocurrency, precious metals, and equity markets. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy created tightening conditions that reduced system-wide liquidity substantially. Understanding this liquidity problem helps investors distinguish between technical selling pressure and fundamental deterioration. Market participants should monitor liquidity indicators alongside traditional fundamental metrics when assessing future opportunities across all asset classes. FAQs Q1: What exactly is a liquidity problem in financial markets? A liquidity problem occurs when market participants cannot easily buy or sell assets without significantly affecting prices. This often happens when available capital decreases, margin requirements increase, or market makers reduce their activity, leading to wider bid-ask spreads and more volatile price movements. Q2: How does forced deleveraging work across different asset classes? Forced deleveraging happens when investors using borrowed funds must sell assets to meet margin requirements as prices decline. Since many portfolios contain diversified assets, selling pressure spreads across unrelated holdings, creating unusual correlations between typically independent markets like cryptocurrencies and traditional assets. Q3: Why did Bitcoin and gold decline simultaneously despite their different characteristics? Both assets declined because investors holding leveraged positions in either market faced margin calls that required selling across their entire portfolios. This mechanical selling pressure overwhelmed the usual fundamental drivers that typically keep these assets uncorrelated during normal market conditions. Q4: What role does the Federal Reserve play in market liquidity conditions? The Federal Reserve influences liquidity through its balance sheet management and interest rate policies. When the Fed reduces its balance sheet (quantitative tightening) or raises interest rates, it effectively removes liquidity from the financial system, making borrowing more expensive and reducing the capital available for investment across all asset classes. Q5: How can investors distinguish between liquidity-driven selling and fundamental deterioration? Investors should examine whether negative news specifically affects an asset’s underlying value proposition. Liquidity-driven selling typically affects multiple unrelated assets simultaneously, shows unusual correlation patterns, and occurs alongside specific monetary policy developments rather than asset-specific news events. This post Liquidity Problem Triggers Alarming Market-Wide Plunge Across Crypto and Traditional Assets first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Gemini withdrew from the UK, EU, and Australia and reduced its workforce by 25%. It's focusing on Gemini Predictions in the US with AI efficiency: 10K+ users, $24M volume. Prediction markets grew 5...

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Plummets Below $64,000: Analyzing the Sudden Market Downturn Global cryptocurrency markets witnessed a significant correction on Thursday, May 15, 2025, as the flagship digital asset, Bitcoin (BTC), broke below the critical $64,000 support level. According to real-time data from Binance’s USDT trading pair, Bitcoin’s price settled at $63,709.36, marking a notable retreat from recent highs and prompting analysis from traders and institutions worldwide. This movement represents a key moment for market sentiment and technical structure. Bitcoin Price Action and Immediate Market Context The descent below $64,000 did not occur in isolation. Consequently, analysts immediately scrutinized trading volume and order book data. Typically, such moves correlate with increased selling pressure on major exchanges. Furthermore, the broader cryptocurrency market cap often follows Bitcoin’s lead. Data from CoinMarketCap and Glassnode confirms this correlation remained strong during the sell-off. Market participants observed substantial liquidations in leveraged long positions across derivatives platforms. This activity frequently exacerbates short-term price declines. Several technical indicators flashed warning signals prior to the drop. For instance, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the daily chart had entered overbought territory. Meanwhile, the 20-day moving average failed to hold as dynamic support. Trading volume spiked by approximately 35% compared to the weekly average during the decline. This volume profile suggests institutional and large retail involvement. The table below summarizes key technical levels breached: Support Level Price (USD) Status Immediate Resistance $65,200 Tested and Held Psychological Support $64,000 Breached Next Major Support $62,500 Untested 200-Day Moving Average $58,400 Distant Historical Volatility and Comparative Analysis Bitcoin’s history is defined by volatility. Therefore, placing the current move in a historical context is essential. For example, the 2021 bull run saw multiple 20-30% corrections within the broader uptrend. Similarly, the 2023-2024 cycle experienced several sharp pullbacks. Current volatility metrics, however, remain within the asset’s long-term standard deviation. Analysts from firms like Fidelity Digital Assets and Grayscale often reference these cycles. They provide a framework for understanding price action. Comparatively, traditional markets showed mixed signals during this period. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite exhibited mild weakness. Meanwhile, the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) saw a slight strengthening. This inverse relationship between Bitcoin and the dollar often holds during risk-off sentiment. Key factors influencing this downturn include: Macroeconomic Data: Recent U.S. inflation reports exceeded expectations. Regulatory Headlines: Ongoing discussions about digital asset frameworks. Network Fundamentals: Bitcoin hash rate and active address counts remained robust. Derivatives Market: High funding rates preceded the correction, indicating excessive leverage. Expert Perspectives on Market Structure Market structure analysis reveals nuanced insights. Veteran trader and analyst, Lyn Alden, frequently emphasizes the role of liquidity. She notes that moves below round-number psychological levels often trigger automated selling. Additionally, on-chain analyst Willy Woo examines exchange net flows. His models track the movement of coins from long-term holders to exchanges. This metric often precedes increased selling pressure. Institutional flow data provides another layer. Reports from CoinShares show weekly digital asset investment product flows. These reports capture sentiment among professional investors. For instance, a shift from inflows to outflows can signal changing sentiment. The May 12 report indicated a slight slowdown in Bitcoin ETF inflows. This slowdown coincided with the price weakness. Potential Impacts and Trader Sentiment The immediate impact resonates across the crypto ecosystem. Altcoins, which often exhibit higher beta to Bitcoin, faced amplified losses. Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), and other major assets declined by a larger percentage. Consequently, decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol total value locked (TVL) metrics saw reductions. NFT trading volumes on platforms like Blur and OpenSea also typically cool during such periods. Trader sentiment, as measured by the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, shifted from “Greed” to “Neutral.” This shift is a healthy development for market veterans. Prolonged periods of extreme greed often precede corrections. Options market data shows increased demand for put options (bearish bets). This demand provides a hedge for large portfolio holders. The futures market basis, or the difference between futures and spot prices, narrowed significantly. This narrowing indicates reduced leverage and speculative fervor. Conclusion Bitcoin’s price decline below $64,000 represents a significant technical and psychological event for digital asset markets. The move highlights the inherent volatility of the asset class while operating within established historical patterns. Market structure, macroeconomic factors, and derivatives activity all contributed to the downturn. For investors, understanding these dynamics is crucial for navigating both risk and opportunity. The Bitcoin price action will continue to serve as the primary bellwether for the broader cryptocurrency sector. Monitoring on-chain data, regulatory developments, and global liquidity conditions remains essential for informed decision-making. FAQs Q1: Why did Bitcoin fall below $64,000? The drop resulted from a combination of technical selling after failing to hold support, liquidations of leveraged long positions, and a broader risk-off sentiment possibly influenced by macroeconomic data. Q2: Is this a normal occurrence for Bitcoin? Yes, historically, Bitcoin experiences sharp corrections within longer-term bull trends. Volatility is a defining characteristic of the asset. Q3: What is the next major support level for BTC? Based on technical analysis, the next significant support zone is around $62,500, followed by the 200-day moving average near $58,400. Q4: How do altcoins typically react when Bitcoin falls? Altcoins generally experience larger percentage declines than Bitcoin during market downturns due to their higher volatility and correlation with BTC’s price action. Q5: What should investors monitor following this price move? Key metrics include Bitcoin exchange net flows (signaling holder behavior), the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, derivatives market funding rates, and any significant regulatory or macroeconomic news. This post Bitcoin Price Plummets Below $64,000: Analyzing the Sudden Market Downturn first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

ETF redemptions and futures liquidations are pressuring crypto markets, the bank said, even as rising gold volatility quietly strengthens bitcoin’s longer-term investment case.

Wall Street desks are no longer talking about upside dreams. The talk right now is how far Bitcoin charts could fall if selling keeps piling up. According to data from TradingView, Bitcoin’s price now sits at a shocking $63,500, after falling from $70,000 just this morning, losing $13,000 in 6 days, and staying far below the peak close to $126,000 seen months ago. A drop of about 40% has forced traders to stop listening to big promises and start reading charts line by line. A lot of bullish talk collapsed at the same time. Momentum gauges sit deep in oversold zones but still fail to spark buying. The flood of exchange-traded fund demand has turned uneven. The asset also failed to act as protection during global stress. Cycle history points to deep downside risks for Bitcoin John Roque at 22V Research looks at long cycles, not hope. He says Bitcoin has gone through five major bear markets since 2011. The average drawdown across those cycles hit about 80%. The smallest drop still wiped out 72% of the value. If the current cycle hits that smaller level, price would fall to around $35,200. For now, John keeps a nearer level in view at $60,000, but only while that line holds. Michael Purves of Tallbacken Capital sees danger from longer signals. He flagged a monthly MACD crossover that triggered in November. He said the signal has an excellent track record for warning of large drops. The last four times it appeared, losses reached 60% to 65%. Michael also pointed to $76,000, which matches the average cost basis for Michael Saylor’s Strategy, the largest corporate holder of the asset. That price already failed. This week, Michael repeated a target of $45,000, which implies another drop of about 33% from current levels. “Bitcoin selling has accelerated,” he said . Key chart levels continue to fail Matt Maley, chief market strategist at Miller Tabak + Co., is watching retracement levels closely. He said the zone just below $70,000 matters because it lines up with the 50% retracement of the rally that started after the 2022 lows. Below that, his next focus is $65,000, tied to the 50% retracement from the pandemic low set in 2020. Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at Galaxy Digital, tracks long moving averages. In the last three bull markets, Bitcoin found support at the 50-week moving average. Once that line failed, price slid back to the 200-week moving average. Right now, the token trades below the 50-week line, and the 200-week average sits near $58,000. Alex also wrote that outside of 2017, a 40% drop from a record high never stopped there. In each case, losses stretched to 50% or more within three months. Valuation pressure and betting markets show fear Old valuation arguments are also losing grip. JPMorgan strategists say Bitcoin now trades well below its estimated production cost of about $87,000. If price stays under that level for a long stretch, unprofitable miners could exit, which would impact production economics even more. That backdrop is not pulling buyers back. Trading behavior looks more like a tech risk dump than a bargain hunt. On Polymarket, odds for a finish below $55,000 climbed to roughly 60%. Odds for a rebound to $100,000 fell to 54%, down from 80% at the start of the year. Short-dated bets lean even darker. One February market now prices a 72% chance that Bitcoin trades below $70,000 by March 1. That jump rose more than 35 percentage points this month, backed by about $1.7 million in bets. ETF flows no longer help. Tens of billions flowed into funds last year and lifted prices. That support faded. U.S.-listed crypto ETFs saw nearly $4 billion in outflows over the past three months, based on Bloomberg data. Research from Glassnode and K33 shows the average trader now sits underwater. This clashes with bullish calls still floating around Wall Street. Tom Lee predicted in November that Bitcoin could reach $150,000 to $200,000, which did not happen. Even after cutting targets, firms like Standard Chartered and Bernstein still see $150,000 by year end. The charts and the bets say the fight is far from over. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Plummets Below $65,000: Analyzing the Sudden Market Shift In a significant market movement on April 10, 2025, the Bitcoin price has decisively fallen below the $65,000 psychological support level, currently trading at $64,772.43 on the Binance USDT market according to Bitcoin World data. This development marks a pivotal moment for cryptocurrency investors globally, prompting a deep analysis of underlying factors and potential implications for the broader digital asset ecosystem. Bitcoin Price Dips Below Key Threshold The descent of the Bitcoin price below $65,000 represents more than a simple numerical change. Market analysts immediately scrutinized trading volumes and order book depth following this movement. Consequently, this price action triggered automated sell orders across multiple exchanges. Historically, the $65,000 level has served as both support and resistance during previous market cycles. For instance, Bitcoin struggled to maintain this level during the consolidation phase of early 2024. Therefore, breaking below it now signals potential increased volatility ahead. Technical indicators like the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and moving averages require careful monitoring in this new price environment. Contextualizing the Current Cryptocurrency Market Several macroeconomic and sector-specific factors currently influence the cryptocurrency market. First, traditional equity markets have shown increased correlation with crypto assets throughout 2025. Second, regulatory developments in major economies continue to create uncertainty. Third, on-chain data reveals specific patterns in whale wallet movements preceding this price drop. The table below summarizes key market metrics from the past week: Metric Value Change (7D) BTC Dominance 52.3% -1.2% Total Crypto Market Cap $2.41T -4.8% Fear & Greed Index 45 (Fear) -22 points BTC Exchange Netflow +12,400 BTC Significant Inflow Market participants should note these developments carefully. Exchange netflows, for example, often precede price movements. Meanwhile, the shift in market sentiment from “Greed” to “Fear” typically indicates a cooling period. Expert Analysis of Market Dynamics Leading cryptocurrency analysts emphasize the importance of perspective during such price corrections. According to data from Glassnode and CryptoQuant, this pullback aligns with historical patterns following major liquidity events. For example, similar corrections occurred after the approval of Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024. Furthermore, derivatives market data shows a healthy reset in funding rates and open interest. This reset often creates stronger foundations for subsequent price discovery. Seasoned traders frequently view these periods as necessary market mechanics that flush out excessive leverage. Ultimately, fundamental adoption metrics like active addresses and hash rate remain robust despite short-term price action. Historical Precedents and Volatility Patterns Bitcoin’s history provides crucial context for understanding current movements. The digital asset has experienced approximately fifteen corrections of 20% or more since 2020. Significantly, most corrections lasted between 14 and 60 days before resuming their primary trend. Key factors in historical pullbacks include: Liquidity Shifts: Movement of capital between asset classes. Regulatory News: Announcements from SEC, CFTC, or other global bodies. Technical Breaks: Violation of major support levels triggering algorithmic selling. Macro Conditions: Changes in interest rate expectations or inflation data. Currently, the market exhibits characteristics of a technical-driven correction rather than a fundamental breakdown. On-chain transaction volume for non-speculative purposes remains steady. Additionally, institutional custody solutions continue reporting net positive inflows month-over-month. Potential Impacts on the Broader Crypto Ecosystem The movement of the Bitcoin price invariably affects the entire digital asset space. Altcoins typically experience amplified volatility during BTC downtrends. However, some sectors may demonstrate resilience. Decentralized Finance (DeFi) total value locked (TVL), for instance, shows correlation but not perfect sync with BTC price action. Meanwhile, Layer 1 blockchain native tokens have developed more independent price discovery mechanisms in 2025. Market participants should monitor several key areas: Stablecoin market capitalization and redemption rates. Changes in network congestion and transaction fees across major blockchains. Activity in decentralized derivatives and perpetual swap markets. This ecosystem-wide view provides a more complete picture than Bitcoin price alone. Often, strength in underlying infrastructure metrics precedes price recovery. The Role of Institutional Investors Institutional behavior has fundamentally changed market dynamics since 2023. Public filings reveal that major asset managers maintain their long-term Bitcoin allocations despite short-term fluctuations. Their investment theses typically focus on multi-year horizons and portfolio diversification benefits. Consequently, their trading activity differs significantly from retail sentiment-driven flows. Reports from Fidelity and Coinbase Institutional indicate continued onboarding of new corporate treasury clients throughout Q1 2025. This structural demand creates a potential floor for prices during corrections. Moreover, the options market shows institutions using strategic puts for hedging rather than speculative downside bets. Conclusion The Bitcoin price falling below $65,000 represents a notable technical event within the ongoing market cycle. This analysis highlights the importance of contextual data, historical patterns, and fundamental metrics over reactive sentiment. While short-term volatility may persist, the underlying adoption trajectory for Bitcoin and digital assets remains intact. Market participants should prioritize risk management and long-term fundamentals during such periods. The Bitcoin price will likely continue to reflect the complex interplay of technicals, macroeconomics, and evolving global adoption. FAQs Q1: What does Bitcoin falling below $65,000 mean for investors? This price movement indicates a break of a key psychological support level, often leading to increased short-term volatility. Investors should review their risk exposure and consider historical patterns where such breaks preceded consolidation phases before potential trend resumption. Q2: How does this compare to previous Bitcoin corrections? Based on data since 2020, corrections of this magnitude are common, occurring approximately 2-3 times per year on average. The current pullback aligns with typical market cycles following periods of rapid appreciation. Q3: What are the main factors influencing the price drop? Primary factors include technical selling after breaking support, potential outflows from exchange-traded products, adjustments in derivatives market leverage, and broader macroeconomic sentiment affecting risk assets. Q4: Should I buy Bitcoin now that the price is lower? Investment decisions depend on individual financial goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. Historically, buying during fear periods has yielded positive long-term results for some investors, but this does not guarantee future performance. Q5: How long do Bitcoin price corrections typically last? Historical data suggests corrections in the 15-25% range often resolve within 14 to 60 days. However, the duration depends heavily on prevailing market conditions, liquidity, and external catalysts. This post Bitcoin Price Plummets Below $65,000: Analyzing the Sudden Market Shift first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

BitcoinWorld Futures Liquidated: Staggering $214 Million Hourly Wipeout Shakes Crypto Markets Global cryptocurrency markets experienced a dramatic surge in volatility today , with major exchanges reporting a staggering $214 million worth of futures contracts liquidated within a single hour. This intense activity forms part of a broader 24-hour liquidation total exceeding $1.7 billion, signaling a period of significant price dislocation and heightened risk in digital asset derivatives. Consequently, traders and analysts are scrutinizing the underlying causes and potential ramifications of this substantial market flush. Futures Liquidated: Anatomy of a $214 Million Hour The core event centers on the rapid forced closure of leveraged positions, known as liquidation. When traders use borrowed funds to amplify bets on price movements, a adverse move can trigger automatic sell-offs. Major platforms like Binance, Bybit, and OKX witnessed cascading liquidations. Primarily, long positions betting on price increases bore the brunt of this activity. This suggests a sharp, unexpected downward price movement acted as the catalyst. Market data indicates Bitcoin’s price dropped approximately 7% during this volatile window, breaching critical support levels that many leveraged trades relied upon. Furthermore, the scale of this hourly event places it among the more significant liquidation clusters of the past year. For context, the $1.702 billion cleared over 24 hours underscores sustained pressure. This scale of deleveraging often creates a self-reinforcing cycle. As positions are forcibly closed, they create additional selling pressure, potentially driving prices lower and triggering more liquidations. Market mechanics experts refer to this as a “liquidation cascade,” a phenomenon well-documented in high-leverage trading environments. Contextualizing the Crypto Liquidation Wave To understand this event’s significance, one must examine the current derivatives landscape. Cryptocurrency futures trading has grown exponentially, with aggregate open interest often surpassing $30 billion. The prevalence of high leverage, sometimes exceeding 100x on certain platforms, inherently increases systemic fragility. Historically, similar liquidation events have preceded both sharp recoveries and prolonged downtrends. For instance, the May 2021 market correction saw over $8 billion in liquidations in 24 hours. Several concurrent factors likely contributed to this volatility spike. Macroeconomic indicators, including shifting interest rate expectations, often impact risk assets like cryptocurrency. Additionally, large “whale” wallet movements or substantial sell orders on spot markets can initiate the initial price slide. Network congestion and funding rate imbalances between perpetual futures contracts and spot prices also play a crucial role. These funding rates turned sharply negative prior to the event, signaling overwhelming bearish sentiment in the derivatives market. Expert Analysis on Market Structure and Risk Financial analysts specializing in crypto derivatives highlight the structural vulnerabilities exposed by such events. “The concentration of leveraged positions around specific price points creates predictable fragility,” notes a report from a leading blockchain analytics firm. Exchanges employ sophisticated risk engines to manage these liquidations, but during extreme volatility, the process can exacerbate price gaps. This event demonstrates the critical importance of risk management protocols for both individual traders and trading platforms. Data from on-chain analytics providers reveals a notable increase in transfer volume to exchanges preceding the drop, suggesting preparatory selling. Meanwhile, the estimated leverage ratio across the market had reached elevated levels, indicating that the ecosystem was primed for a deleveraging event. The rapidity of the $214 million hourly liquidation underscores how automated trading systems and stop-loss orders can converge to create flash volatility. Immediate Impacts and Market Response The immediate effect was a pronounced increase in market volatility metrics. The Bitcoin Volatility Index spiked, reflecting trader uncertainty. Following the liquidations, exchange order books showed thinning liquidity at key levels, making the market more susceptible to large orders. However, this flushing of leveraged positions can also have a cleansing effect. It removes overextended bets, potentially laying the groundwork for a more stable price foundation if underlying demand remains. Market participants responded in varied ways. Institutional traders often use these periods to accumulate assets at lower prices, a strategy known as “buying the dip.” Retail traders, particularly those employing high leverage, faced the most significant losses. Social media sentiment analysis showed a sharp rise in fear-related commentary across trading communities. Meanwhile, exchange teams likely activated contingency protocols to ensure system stability and orderly processing of the high volume of liquidations. The Role of Exchange Mechanisms and Insurance Funds During mass liquidation events, exchange insurance funds and auto-deleveraging systems become critical. These funds cover losses when a liquidated position cannot be closed at its bankruptcy price. The scale of this event tested these safety buffers. Major exchanges publicly maintain robust insurance funds, with some holding billions in various assets. The proper functioning of these mechanisms is essential for maintaining trader confidence and preventing catastrophic systemic failures within the exchange ecosystem. Transparency in the liquidation process is another key consideration. Reputable exchanges provide real-time data on liquidations and funding rates. This allows the broader market to assess risk levels. The public nature of blockchain data also enables third-party analysts to verify exchange-reported figures, adding a layer of accountability. The reported $214 million figure aligns with aggregated data from multiple independent analytics platforms, confirming its accuracy. Historical Parallels and Future Implications Comparing this event to past data reveals patterns. Significant liquidation clusters frequently occur at market tops, during corrections, or at pivotal support/resistance breaks. They often mark peaks in short-term trader euphoria or panic. For the market’s health, periodic deleveraging is necessary to reset excessive risk. The long-term implication depends on subsequent price action. A swift recovery suggests strong underlying demand, while continued selling pressure could indicate a deeper market shift. Regulatory observers may also scrutinize such events. The magnitude of losses in a short period highlights the risks of retail access to high-leverage derivatives. This could prompt further discussions about leverage caps or investor suitability requirements in various jurisdictions. The event underscores the nascent and evolving nature of cryptocurrency market structure, where traditional financial risk models are constantly being adapted to a 24/7, global trading environment. Conclusion The liquidation of $214 million in cryptocurrency futures within one hour serves as a potent reminder of the market’s inherent volatility and the risks associated with leveraged trading. This event, part of a larger $1.7 billion 24-hour flush, was driven by a confluence of technical factors, market structure vulnerabilities, and likely external catalysts. While painful for affected traders, such deleveraging events are a cyclical feature of derivatives markets. They emphasize the paramount importance of disciplined risk management, robust exchange infrastructure, and a clear understanding of the mechanics behind futures liquidated. The market’s resilience in absorbing this shock will be a key metric watched by analysts in the coming days. FAQs Q1: What does “futures liquidated” mean? A futures liquidation is the forced closure of a leveraged derivatives position by an exchange. This occurs when a trader’s margin balance falls below the maintenance requirement, typically due to an adverse price move. Q2: Why did $214 million get liquidated in one hour? The primary cause was a rapid price drop in major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, which breached key support levels where many leveraged long positions were clustered. This triggered a cascade of automatic sell orders. Q3: Who loses money when futures are liquidated? The traders holding the liquidated positions lose their initial margin (collateral). If the liquidation cannot cover the full loss, the exchange’s insurance fund may be used, or other traders on the platform may be auto-deleveraged to cover the shortfall. Q4: Are large liquidations bullish or bearish for the market? They can be both. In the short term, they create selling pressure and are bearish. However, by flushing out excessive leverage, they can remove overhanging risk, which is sometimes considered a bullish reset for a healthier price advance. Q5: How can traders protect themselves from liquidation? Traders can use lower leverage, set prudent stop-loss orders, maintain adequate margin above requirements, avoid over-concentration, and continuously monitor market conditions and funding rates. This post Futures Liquidated: Staggering $214 Million Hourly Wipeout Shakes Crypto Markets first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Precious metals are tracking the sell-off in U.S. equities and crypto markets on Thursday, with bellwethers gold and silver continuing their downward march. Gold is down 1.35% on the day, while silver is taking the harder hit, shedding nearly 10% and making gold’s stumble look almost polite by comparison. Gold Drops, Silver Staggers as Market