$2.8 trillion French asset manager Amundi used the latest Strategy pullback to expand its exposure to Bitcoin-linked equities. The firm made a large purchase during the fourth quarter of 2025 as Strategy moved toward a key technical area despite facing over $9.5 billion in unrealized losses. Amundi Expands Strategy’s MSTR Position Amundi increased its Strategy stake from about 1.01 million shares in the third quarter to nearly 4.79 million shares by year end. The filing, released in mid-February 2026, shows an addition of about 3.77 million to 3.78 million shares during the quarter. The enlarged position was valued at roughly $728 million at the end of December 2025, although later filings placed the value near $641 million. Amundi manages more than €2.3 trillion in assets, and this move stands among its largest entries into crypto-linked stocks. The firm had been adding shares during 2025, yet the Q4 purchase reflects a clear change in pace. The expansion shows a sharp pivot toward Bitcoin-linked equities while the company continues operating within a traditional asset management framework. Strategy as a Bitcoin Proxy for Large Funds Strategy continues to operate as a Bitcoin-heavy corporate vehicle under chairman Michael Saylor. By early 2026, the company held more than 717,722 Bitcoin worth around $49 billion at the time. Its average purchase price near $76,000 means Strategy needs about a 15% Bitcoin move to reach break-even. This structure has created a liquid equity proxy for Bitcoin exposure. Many institutions prefer listed equities when direct crypto access remains harder to manage. The stock trades actively across U.S. markets, so large funds can enter positions without operational barriers. These factors explain why Amundi and other institutional investors see Strategy as an accessible path into Bitcoin-linked exposure. Public markets also simplify risk controls for portfolios that still follow traditional mandates. MSTR Market Conditions During the Stake Increase Strategy stock has tested its $119 support level this week before closing at 129.54 today despite being down 2.50%. Market traders viewed this price zone as an important technical area, because losing it could open the path toward lower levels. At the same time, the stock became the most shorted large-cap equity based on data from Goldman Sachs and FactSet. Short interest reached 14% of market value, which is nearly twice the usual level for similar stocks. More than 32.38 million shares were sold short as hedge funds, including Citadel, Millennium, and Balyasny, built positions. Short pressure grew during periods of price weakness. Yet some institutional buyers increased their stakes during the same period. Moreover, Amundi is not the only firm with this plan of accumulating more MSTR. As we reported, Jane Street increased its Strategy exposure by 473% in the most recent filings, lifting its position to around 951,000 shares valued at $121 million.

ADA testing critical support at $0.28; MACD giving bullish signal while downtrend continues. BTC correlation heightening risks, 0.2766 level will be decisive.

Alchemy launched a system on Base that allows AI agents to obtain compute credits with USDC. Agents can perform blockchain queries and NFT checks. Giants like Aave and Uniswap are using it. AAVE $1...

The cryptocurrency market appears to be maintaining its newfound bullish traction, but the price of XRP has fallen to the $1.4 mark after a pullback on Thursday. Amid the ongoing volatility that has rocked the market over the past months, the altcoin is set to make a critical move that could transition it into a bullish phase. Market Ignores XRP’s Major Reset XRP’s price seems to have lost its latest upward move that was triggered by a broader market bounce. Citing several on-chain and price dynamics, the leading altcoin is quietly undergoing what many investors believe is a major structural reset. Xaif Crypto, a market expert and investor, shared that while the token is preparing for a major reset, many in the market seem to be overlooking its potential and the significance of the impending move. Over the last 90 days, Open Interest has been witnessing a sharp decline across nearly every major cryptocurrency exchange. According to the data, the open interest on Binance, the world’s leading crypto exchange, totaled at -7.7 million XRP, Bybit’s open interest lost over -12 million XRP, and Kraken bled out -8.3 million XRP. This is billions of dollars in speculative leverage being taken out of the market. Xaif Crypto highlighted that beneath the surface, this is just the setup rather than the end. When open interest contracts are this hard across multiple platforms simultaneously, it simply implies that the weak hands are exiting. Even the overleveraged betters are also vanishing from the market. Currently, the market is left with a clean slate, and historically, this is the point where the next big move emerges. “ Smart money doesn’t chase pumps, it enters during the silence,” Xaif Crypto added. Activity On Bittrue On The Rise While other trading platforms struggle with declining open interest, Bitrue saw a spike in XRP activity as institutional appetite grows. The platform recorded a 212% increase in spot buying volumes, surpassing the sell-side by over 2x. This surge coincided with a persistent accumulation from institutional investors since the launch of the XRP Spot ETFs . Since its launch, the funds have attracted a net total of $1.1 billion in assets, with weekly inflows and only 5 days of outflows. As institutional and retail support grows, Bitrue predicts a possible supply squeeze that will probably cause the altcoin to surpass its main rivals in Q2 2026. Bitrue is known for being the first to champion flexible earn investments with the altcoin and offer it as a base trading pair for spot. The platform has been working to include the token into its services since its inception in 2028, and now users are encouraged to add it to their portfolios. Its most recent plan is to establish itself as a crucial liquidity hub for the XRPL utility by modifying its short-term business strategy. Bitrue intends to capitalize on this impending market shift. Furthermore, they are focused on increasing support for the altcoin and other coins that are part of the XRPL ecosystem , such as RLUSD, which is currently utilized as a basic trading pair.

PUMP flashes bullish reversal as volume and trader positioning signal potential breakout toward $0.0024.

Key takeaways: Monero price prediction suggests a bullish trend, with XMR anticipated to reach $419.42 by the end of 2026. XMR could reach a maximum price of $676.31 by the end of 2029. By 2032, Monero’s price may surge to $1,150.73. Monero (XMR) stands out in the crypto space for its strong focus on privacy and decentralization of transactions, particularly within the monero network, making it one of the leading privacy focused cryptocurrencies. This makes it a popular choice for privacy advocates and those prioritizing security. The Monero ecosystem constantly evolves, marked by significant milestones like enhanced protocol upgrades and growing adoption across various sectors, which underscore its utility. As Monero progresses, many wonder about its future price trajectory. Will its unique features drive significant value growth, as many traders speculate, and can a price prediction tool provide insights into this? Can it sustain its competitive edge in the ever-evolving crypto market? Will the price of xmr recapture its ATH at $798 in the long term forecast? Overview Cryptocurrency Monero Token XMR Price $ 342.92 (+1.52%) Market Cap $6.32 B Trading Volume (24-hour) 90.57 M Circulating Supply 18.44M XMR All-time High $798.91 Jan 15, 2026 All-time Low $0.213, Jan 15, 2015 24-h High $355.29 24-h Low $335.53 Monero price prediction: Technical analysis Market Sentiment Bearish 50-Day SMA $435.56 200-Day SMA $365.83 Price Prediction $310.42 (-9.45%) Fear & Greed Index 33.10 (Fear) Green Days 11/30 (37%) 14-Day RSI 42.49 Monero price analysis TL;DR Breakdown Monero price analysis shows a bearish market sentiment. Cryptocurrency gained 1.52% of its value in last 24 hours. XMR finds support at $340. On February 27, 2026, Monero price analysis revealed a bearish market sentiment as the price struggles below the $350 mark. Further consolidation would make a bearish breakdown more likely. Monero price analysis 1-day chart: XMR struggles below $350 The one-day price chart for Monero confirms a downward trend forming in the market, indicating a notable price change. XMR price declined rapidly after failing to breach the $360 resistance. The XMR/USD pair declined to $290 where it found short-term support. Now the price has risen towards $350 but finds strong resistance at the level. XMR/USDT price chart: TradingView The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) shows rising bullish momentum as the price rises towards at $320. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is trading at the center the neutral region. The indicator’s value was recorded at 45.50 today. The trend of the RSI signifies bearish pressure across daily charts. Further volatility can be expected if the buying momentum intensifies and the $360 mark is breached. Monero price analysis 4-hour chart The four-hour chart analysis of Monero shows rapid decline after a brief struggle at $355 mark. However, the price found support at the $340 mark that enabled it to climb back to $343 where it trades at press time. XMR/USDT price chart: TradingView The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) shows falling bullish momentum as price starts to consolidate across the last few days. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicator is hovering below the mean line of the neutral region. The indicator’s value decreased to 56.73 over the past few candles. This suggests selling pressure at the price level. Monero technical indicators: Levels and actions Daily simple moving average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $ 367.38 SELL SMA 5 $ 345.11 SELL SMA 10 $ 339.81 BUY SMA 21 $ 336.56 BUY SMA 50 $ 433.12 SELL SMA 100 $ 422.90 SELL SMA 200 $ 374.35 SELL Daily exponential moving average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $ 365.87 SELL EMA 5 $ 393.07 SELL EMA 10 $ 419.26 SELL EMA 21 $ 429.29 SELL EMA 50 $ 417.82 SELL EMA 100 $ 390.41 SELL EMA 200 $ 352.86 SELL What to expect from Monero price analysis? XMR/USDT price chart: TradingView Monero price analysis gives a bearish prediction for the asset’s short-term movements as the price crumbles from its recently established all-time high. If buyers hold the $340 level and establish a foothold above $350, the price may retest $380. However, if the bulls fail to hold the level, the price will fall back to $300 and lower levels. Is Monero a good investment? Monero is an attractive investment because it emphasizes privacy and security, utilizing advanced cryptographic techniques to ensure transaction confidentiality, which has created a strong demand in the market . Its growing adoption across various use cases and a decentralized development model enhance its long-term potential. With a limited supply and increasing investor interest, Monero offers a unique opportunity for those seeking financial autonomy and privacy to invest in cryptocurrency. However, investors should remain cautious of regulatory risks and market volatility when considering Monero as part of their portfolio, making it essential to seek investment advice. Why is XMR up? Monero price analysis shows that XMR found support at $340 and rose to $343 where it trades at press time. Will XMR recover to its all-time high? Monero recently reached a new all-time high of $798 before experiencing a sharp correction. The privacy-focused blockchain is expected to stabilize and potentially recover as it continues to reduce technical debt and enhance its utility and privacy features. However, widespread adoption may be hindered by regulatory scrutiny and market volatility, keeping the asset highly speculative. How much will Monero be worth in 5 years? The Monero price prediction for 2031, is expected to reach a minimum of $463.56, while averaging $726.61. The maximum projected value is $989.65. Will XMR reach $1000? The chances of Monero (XMR) hitting $1,000 hinge on various factors, which will influence its future price movements. The adoption of privacy transactions and technological advances could increase demand. Favorable regulations and market sentiment toward privacy coins would also help. Yet, regulatory risks, competition, and market volatility creating an atmosphere of extreme fear are challenges that Monero traders could face that could hinder significant growth. $1,000 is possible with favorable conditions, especially considering the current price but market dynamics and regulations will shape its path. Does XMR have a good long-term future? Monero (XMR) has the potential for a strong long-term future due to its focus on privacy and security, which makes it attractive to users seeking anonymity. However, many investors have concerns regarding privacy, regulatory scrutiny, and notoriety from being the favored medium for some past criminals, which impact the current Monero sentiment. Monero’s commitment to ring confidential transactions and the broader monero project gives it a solid foundation for long-term growth, but it must carefully navigate market and regulatory landscapes. Recent news/ opinion on Monero Riccardo Spagni announced the development of Grease a channel to enable payments on an L2 layer that settle privately on Monero. Grease will enable payment channels for Monero! 'Grease is a proof-of-concept Monero payment channel that uses a ZK-rollup chain for off-chain state management.' https://t.co/TUJAtWeeJM — Monero (XMR) (@monero) February 2, 2026 Monero price prediction February 2026 The XMR price prediction for February 2026 suggests a minimum value of $360 and an average price of $401.74. The price could reach a maximum of $419.70 during the month. Month Minimum Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) February 360 401.74 419.70 Monero price prediction 2026 The Monero price prediction for 2026 anticipates a potential increase driven by growing adoption, with a maximum price forecasted at $459.42. Based on current analysis, investors can expect an average trading price of $390.67, while the minimum price could be around $218.56. Year Min. Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) 2026 218.56 390.67 459.42 Monero price prediction 2027-2032 Year Min. Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) 2027 252.99 421.205 509.42 2028 289.09 478.565 574.04 2029 313.86 515.082 676.305 2030 352.96 590.765 828.57 2031 463.56 726.605 989.65 2032 605.88 878.305 1150.73 Monero Price Prediction 2027 In 2027, Monero’s value is expected to continue its upward trend, with a minimum price of $252.99, an average price of $421.205, and a maximum price of $509.42. Monero Price Prediction 2028 For 2028, Monero is anticipated to trade at a minimum of $289.09, with an average price of $478.565, and a maximum price reaching $574.04. Monero Price Prediction 2029 The price outlook for 2029 suggests Monero will maintain a minimum value of $313.86, an average of $515.082, and a maximum of $676.31. Monero Price Prediction 2030 By 2030, Monero is forecasted to achieve a minimum trading price of $352.96, with an average price of $590.77 and a potential peak of $828.57. Monero Price Prediction 2031 In 2031, Monero’s price is expected to reach a minimum of $463.56, while averaging $726.61. The maximum projected value is $989.65. Monero Price Prediction 2032 In 2032, Monero is projected to continue its growth trajectory, with a minimum trading price of $605.88, an average price of $878.31, and a maximum price reaching $1,150.73. XMR Price Prediction Monero market price prediction: Analysts’ XMR price forecast Firm 2026 2027 CoinCodex $576 $710 Digitalcoinprice $357 $423 Cryptopolitan’s Monero (XMR) price prediction Cryptopolitan’s Monero price forecast suggests a bullish outlook for XMR’s future should the market recover. According to expert analysis, Monero could reach a maximum price of $419.42, record a minimum price of $117.70, and trade at an average price of $268.56 by the end of 2026. Monero historic price sentiment XMR price history Monero’s market value has changed dramatically since its launch in 2014, from less than $1 to over $475. May 2021 marked the highest point in Monero’s history. Monero’s price projections revealed the coin’s security. They provide investors with optimism that they will be freed from the persecution of some authorities simply by buying or selling Monero Across 2023, Monero’s price rose by 11.49%. The highest price was $278.56, and the lowest was $114.16. In January 2024, Monero stayed stable around the $150.00 mark as market momentum remained low. However, the stability was short-lived as February crashed to $101.95. However, XMR showed swift recovery as it closed the month near the $150.00 level again. In March and April 2024, XMR saw a steady decline from $150.00 to $120.00, where it found key support. In May 2024, XMR observed steady bullish pressure as the price rose from $120.00, approaching resistance at $150. In June 2024, Monero (XMR) traded within the $150 – $175 price range as either side struggled to make a clear breakthrough. In July, the crypto traded around the $155 mark as the price volatility remained relatively low. XMR opened trading at $156.05 in August and ended the month at $176.00, making remarkable gains. September was bearish for the asset, as the price declined below the $160 mark by the end of the month. In October, Monero observed a steep crash and has been making a swift recovery since then. In December, Monero made remarkable strides as the asset’s price broke past the $220 mark, albeit briefly as it closed the month below $200. In January, Monero saw a bullish January as the price rose from below the $200 mark to $238 by the end of the month. In February, the price fell towards the $215 mark as bears dominate the markets. In March, the price observes mixed momentum and closed the month slightly below $215. In April the consolidation continued until late into the month when it spiked past the $325 mark before ending the month around $275. In May the price continued rising rapidly as the bulls cruised past $300 ending the month around $320. During June the price continued to observe high volatility but observed low net change as the asset closed the month around $313. In July the price saw a huge spike in volatility as the price rose past $340 but the asset closed the month below the $310 mark. In August the price declined rapidly falling to the $260 mark by the month’s end. In September, the price rose to the $340 and while it did not maintain the level but managed to close the month above the $320 mark. In October the price continued to rise ending the month above the $340 mark, a trend separating it from most other cryptocurrencies that saw a decline during the period. In November, the bullish rally continued with XMR crossing the $400 mark by the end of the month. In December, the bulls continued to charge ending the month above the $430 mark. In January 2026, price volatility rose sharply establishing a new all-time high but ended the month below the $500 mark.

The Solana network represents a pinnacle of decentralization that remains misunderstood by critics, according to Yakovenko..

BitcoinWorld Taiwan Economy: DBS Data Confirms Remarkable Upswing in Manufacturing and Tech Exports TAIPEI, TAIWAN – Recent comprehensive data analysis from DBS Bank reveals compelling evidence of Taiwan’s accelerating economic momentum, marking a significant upswing across multiple key sectors. This development follows a period of global uncertainty and positions Taiwan’s economy for sustained growth through 2025. The DBS assessment, based on verifiable economic indicators, provides concrete validation of the island’s robust recovery trajectory. Taiwan Economy Shows Strong Manufacturing Revival Manufacturing data presents the most striking evidence of Taiwan’s economic upswing. The Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) for Taiwan’s manufacturing sector registered at 52.8 in the latest reporting period, indicating clear expansion territory. This represents a substantial improvement from previous quarters and exceeds regional benchmarks. Furthermore, industrial production increased by 8.2% year-over-year, with the electronics components sector leading this charge with growth exceeding 12%. Several factors contribute to this manufacturing resurgence. First, global demand for semiconductors remains exceptionally strong. Second, supply chain realignments have benefited Taiwan’s established infrastructure. Third, increased automation and smart factory investments have enhanced productivity. Consequently, factory utilization rates have climbed to 82%, their highest level in three years. This manufacturing strength directly supports employment and domestic consumption. Export Performance as a Growth Engine Export figures provide another critical dimension to Taiwan’s economic story. Monthly export orders reached $58.7 billion, representing a 15.3% increase from the same period last year. Information and communication technology products accounted for 42% of this total, highlighting the sector’s dominance. Meanwhile, exports to the United States grew by 18.7%, while shipments to ASEAN markets expanded by 14.2%. The following table illustrates Taiwan’s export performance by key category: Category Year-over-Year Growth Share of Total Exports Electronic Components +16.8% 38.5% Information & Communication +14.2% 24.1% Machinery +9.7% 7.3% Plastics & Rubber +5.4% 5.8% This export diversification reduces dependency on single markets. Additionally, the New Taiwan Dollar has maintained relative stability against major currencies, supporting export competitiveness without triggering significant inflationary pressures. DBS Analysis Methodology and Key Indicators DBS economists employed a multi-faceted approach to assess Taiwan’s economic upswing. Their analysis incorporated traditional indicators alongside advanced data analytics. The research team examined high-frequency data including electricity consumption, port container traffic, and digital payment volumes. These real-time metrics provided early confirmation of the recovery trend before official statistics were released. The bank’s assessment identified several leading indicators that signaled the upswing: Business confidence surveys reaching 34-month highs Capital equipment imports rising 22% year-over-year Corporate loan growth accelerating to 8.4% annually Job vacancy rates increasing across technology sectors These indicators collectively suggest that Taiwan’s economic expansion has both breadth and durability. Moreover, the recovery extends beyond the technology sector to include traditional manufacturing and services. Retail sales data confirms this broadening, with consumer spending increasing 6.8% in the latest quarter. Technology Sector’s Central Role Taiwan’s semiconductor industry continues to drive economic momentum. The island produces approximately 65% of the world’s semiconductors and over 90% of the most advanced chips. This technological leadership creates substantial economic advantages. Semiconductor companies have announced capital expenditure plans exceeding $42 billion for the current fiscal year, ensuring continued expansion. Beyond semiconductors, Taiwan’s technology ecosystem demonstrates remarkable resilience. The government’s “5+2 Innovative Industries” initiative has fostered growth in: Artificial intelligence and big data applications Cybersecurity solutions and services Renewable energy technologies Biomedical advancements National defense industries This strategic diversification strengthens Taiwan’s economic foundation. Consequently, technology exports now represent over 60% of total export value, creating a powerful growth engine for the broader economy. Comparative Regional Performance and Global Context Taiwan’s economic upswing stands out within the Asian regional context. While many economies face headwinds from slowing global demand and monetary policy tightening, Taiwan has maintained stronger momentum. The island’s GDP growth projection for 2025 has been revised upward to 3.8%, compared to regional averages of approximately 3.2%. Several structural advantages support Taiwan’s relative outperformance. The economy benefits from: Highly skilled workforce with strong technical education World-class research and development capabilities Efficient infrastructure and logistics networks Strategic geographic position in Asian supply chains Additionally, Taiwan’s corporate sector maintains healthy balance sheets with conservative leverage ratios. This financial prudence provides resilience against potential economic shocks. Corporate cash holdings remain substantial, enabling continued investment even during periods of uncertainty. Monetary Policy and Inflation Management The Central Bank of the Republic of China (Taiwan) has navigated the economic upswing with measured policy adjustments. Inflation has remained relatively contained at 2.3%, below many developed economy rates. This stability allows monetary authorities to maintain supportive policies while gradually normalizing interest rates. The central bank’s benchmark discount rate currently stands at 2.125%, representing a balanced approach to supporting growth while containing price pressures. Financial system indicators remain robust throughout this period. Banking sector non-performing loans represent just 0.16% of total loans, reflecting exceptional asset quality. Meanwhile, foreign exchange reserves exceed $560 billion, providing substantial buffers against external volatility. These strong fundamentals give policymakers flexibility to respond to evolving economic conditions. Conclusion The DBS data analysis provides compelling confirmation of Taiwan’s strong economic upswing across manufacturing, exports, and technology sectors. Multiple indicators align to demonstrate broad-based recovery with particular strength in semiconductor production and high-tech exports. This economic momentum appears sustainable given Taiwan’s structural advantages, prudent policy management, and strategic position in global technology supply chains. While challenges including geopolitical tensions and global demand fluctuations persist, Taiwan’s economy demonstrates remarkable resilience and growth potential through 2025 and beyond. FAQs Q1: What specific data does DBS cite to confirm Taiwan’s economic upswing? DBS analysis highlights several key indicators including manufacturing PMI at 52.8 (expansion territory), industrial production growth of 8.2%, export order increases of 15.3%, and semiconductor capital expenditures exceeding $42 billion. The bank also references high-frequency data like electricity consumption and port traffic. Q2: How does Taiwan’s economic performance compare to other Asian economies? Taiwan’s projected 2025 GDP growth of 3.8% exceeds regional averages of approximately 3.2%. The island benefits from its dominant position in semiconductor manufacturing, diversified export markets, and strong technology ecosystem that provide relative advantages amid global economic headwinds. Q3: What role does the semiconductor industry play in Taiwan’s economy? Semiconductors represent Taiwan’s most important economic sector, producing about 65% of global supply and over 90% of the most advanced chips. The industry drives approximately 38.5% of total exports and stimulates growth across related technology sectors through substantial capital investments and research spending. Q4: How is Taiwan managing inflation during this economic expansion? Taiwan has maintained relatively contained inflation at 2.3% through measured monetary policy, with the central bank benchmark rate at 2.125%. Price stability results from balanced policy approaches, New Taiwan Dollar stability, and productivity gains in key export sectors that offset some cost pressures. Q5: What potential risks could affect Taiwan’s economic upswing? Primary risks include geopolitical tensions affecting trade flows, potential global demand softening for technology products, supply chain disruptions, and competitive pressures in semiconductor manufacturing. However, Taiwan’s strong fundamentals, diversified exports, and substantial foreign reserves provide meaningful buffers against these challenges. This post Taiwan Economy: DBS Data Confirms Remarkable Upswing in Manufacturing and Tech Exports first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Cryptocurrency exchange Binance is once again facing mounting scrutiny in Washington, as lawmakers question whether the company is living up to the terms of its 2023 settlement with US authorities — an agreement that ultimately led to the resignation of its founder and former CEO, Changpeng Zhao (CZ). Democrats Urge DOJ And Treasury Investigation On Friday, journalist Eleanor Terrett of Crypto In America reported that eleven Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee, led by crypto-skeptic Elizabeth Warren, sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urging their departments to examine Binance’s operations. Related Reading: Jane Street Faces New Lawsuit: Trump Media Calls For Federal Investigation The lawmakers pointed to recent media reports alleging illicit finance activity on the platform, including transactions reportedly linked to Iran, and warned that such conduct could place Binance in violation of its 2023 settlement. In their letter, the senators also referenced Binance’s expanding business relationships with President Donald Trump’s crypto ventures, as well as Trump’s pardon of Zhao. They called for what they described as a “thorough, impartial” investigation into whether the exchange is adhering to its legal obligations. The latest pressure follows a separate inquiry launched earlier in the week. As previously reported by Bitcoinist, Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal initiated a formal probe through the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. Binance Denies Sanctions Violations In a letter dated February 24 and addressed to Binance co-CEO Richard Teng, Blumenthal cited reporting that suggested the exchange may have facilitated “large-scale violations” of US and international sanctions on Iran. Related Reading: Circle Tops Q4 Revenue Forecasts, Shares Surge 30% — Key Numbers Inside Blumenthal noted that Binance appeared to ignore warnings and recommendations aimed at reducing Iranian money laundering operations. He also referred to the same reports cited by the Senate banking committee Democrats, indicating that $1.7 billion in transactions to Iran may have passed through the platform. Binance has strongly denied the allegations. The company said it conducted an internal review and found “no evidence of violations of applicable sanctions laws.” The exchange also rejected claims that it had dismissed investigators for raising concerns related to sanctions compliance. Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

DOGE is stabilizing at $0.09 in a downtrend; $0.0891 support is critical, a breakdown would lead to $0.047. BTC bearishness increases the risk, protect with 1% capital risk and ATR stops.

Bitcoin suffered a sharp drop following U.S. policy moves and geopolitical turmoil. Continue Reading: Geopolitical Tensions Drive Bitcoin to Notable Losses The post Geopolitical Tensions Drive Bitcoin to Notable Losses appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

BitcoinWorld Ripple CLO Exposes Shocking Media Silence as NYT Ignores Crypto Defense Op-Eds In a revealing development that underscores the ongoing tension between traditional media and the cryptocurrency sector, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty has publicly accused The New York Times of systematically ignoring substantive rebuttals to its critical cryptocurrency coverage. This controversy emerged on January 15, 2025, when Alderoty detailed his extensive but unsuccessful efforts to engage America’s newspaper of record in a meaningful dialogue about digital assets. The Ripple executive specifically criticized what he characterized as the publication’s “lazy and anachronistic” arguments against blockchain technology, while simultaneously highlighting how millions of Americans currently utilize cryptocurrencies to improve their financial lives. This incident represents a significant moment in the evolving relationship between established media institutions and the rapidly growing digital asset industry, raising important questions about journalistic responsibility and balanced reporting in the technological age. Ripple CLO Details Systematic Rejection of Crypto Perspectives Stuart Alderoty, a seasoned legal professional with decades of experience in financial regulation and technology law, meticulously documented his attempts to engage The New York Times editorial team. According to his public statements, Alderoty submitted multiple letters to the editor and fully developed opinion pieces that directly addressed what he perceived as factual inaccuracies and outdated assumptions in the newspaper’s cryptocurrency reporting. These submissions reportedly contained verifiable data about cryptocurrency adoption rates, regulatory developments, and real-world use cases that contradict the publication’s negative framing. The Ripple CLO emphasized that his communications were not merely defensive corporate messaging but rather substantive contributions from an industry expert with deep knowledge of both financial technology and legal frameworks. Furthermore, Alderoty noted that his ignored submissions included perspectives from economists and technologists who could provide nuanced analysis beyond the superficial criticisms frequently leveled against digital assets. This situation reflects a broader pattern within mainstream financial journalism, where established publications sometimes struggle to adequately cover emerging technologies that challenge traditional financial paradigms. The cryptocurrency industry has matured significantly since Bitcoin’s inception in 2009, evolving from speculative digital tokens to sophisticated financial infrastructure with legitimate applications in cross-border payments, decentralized finance, and digital ownership. Major financial institutions including BlackRock, Fidelity, and JPMorgan have now integrated blockchain technology into their operations, while countries like El Salvador have adopted Bitcoin as legal tender. Despite these developments, some legacy media outlets continue to frame cryptocurrency primarily through lenses of speculation, criminal activity, or environmental impact without proportional coverage of its technological innovations or financial inclusion potential. The Historical Context of Technological Skepticism Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad previously highlighted an important historical parallel when responding to similar criticisms from The New York Times. Shirzad correctly noted that transformative technologies including the internet, personal computers, and smartphones all faced substantial skepticism from established institutions during their early adoption phases. For instance, prominent economists and journalists initially dismissed the internet as a passing fad with limited practical applications beyond academic research. Similarly, early mobile phones faced criticism for their high costs, limited functionality, and perceived status as luxury items rather than essential tools. The table below illustrates this pattern of technological adoption and initial media skepticism: Technology Initial Media Skepticism Eventual Mainstream Adoption Personal Internet (1990s) “No commercial potential” claims Fundamental global infrastructure Mobile Phones (1980s) “Expensive toys for executives” Essential communication devices E-commerce (1990s) “Security risks outweigh benefits” Trillion-dollar global industry Cryptocurrency (2010s-present) “Speculative assets without utility” Growing institutional adoption Examining The New York Times Cryptocurrency Coverage History The New York Times has published numerous articles about digital assets over the past decade, with coverage evolving alongside the technology itself. Early reporting focused primarily on Bitcoin’s price volatility and its association with illicit activities on dark web marketplaces. As the industry matured, the publication expanded its coverage to include regulatory developments, environmental concerns related to proof-of-work mining, and high-profile industry failures including the FTX collapse. However, cryptocurrency advocates argue that this coverage often emphasizes negative aspects while underreporting positive developments including: Financial inclusion initiatives in developing nations Cross-border payment innovations reducing remittance costs Decentralized finance protocols providing banking alternatives Blockchain transparency features improving supply chains Central bank digital currency developments worldwide Media analysts note that established publications face legitimate challenges when covering complex technological subjects that require specialized knowledge. Financial journalism traditionally relies on expert sources from government agencies, academic institutions, and established corporations, while cryptocurrency often draws expertise from technology companies, open-source communities, and regulatory newcomers. This structural disconnect can sometimes result in coverage that fails to capture the full spectrum of perspectives within the digital asset ecosystem. Additionally, the rapid evolution of blockchain technology means that information can become outdated quickly, requiring journalists to continuously update their understanding of technical concepts and regulatory frameworks. The Regulatory Landscape and Media Responsibility The timing of this controversy coincides with significant regulatory developments affecting the cryptocurrency industry worldwide. In the United States, regulatory clarity has emerged gradually through a combination of legislative proposals, agency guidance, and court rulings. The Securities and Exchange Commission has approved multiple spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds, providing traditional investors with regulated exposure to digital assets. Meanwhile, Congress continues to debate comprehensive cryptocurrency legislation that would establish clearer rules for market participants. Internationally, jurisdictions including the European Union, United Kingdom, and Singapore have implemented structured regulatory frameworks for digital assets that balance innovation with consumer protection. Within this evolving regulatory context, media organizations carry substantial responsibility for accurately informing the public about complex financial technologies. Balanced cryptocurrency reporting requires journalists to understand technical concepts including blockchain consensus mechanisms, smart contract functionality, and token economics. It also demands awareness of the diverse applications beyond speculative trading, including: Supply chain transparency solutions Digital identity verification systems Intellectual property management platforms Voting and governance mechanisms Charitable donation tracking Financial literacy experts emphasize that media coverage significantly influences public understanding of emerging technologies, particularly when those technologies involve complex concepts unfamiliar to general audiences. Incomplete or imbalanced reporting can contribute to information asymmetries that disadvantage ordinary investors and policymakers attempting to make informed decisions about cryptocurrency adoption and regulation. Consequently, industry advocates argue that major publications should make greater efforts to include diverse perspectives when covering digital assets, particularly as these technologies become increasingly integrated into mainstream financial systems. Real-World Cryptocurrency Applications Today Contrary to characterizations of cryptocurrency as lacking practical utility, numerous real-world applications demonstrate the technology’s current value. International remittance services utilizing digital assets can reduce transfer costs from an average of 6-7% to below 3%, providing substantial savings for migrant workers sending money to their families. Microfinance platforms built on blockchain networks offer banking services to unbanked populations in developing regions without requiring traditional identification documents. Additionally, artists and creators utilize non-fungible tokens to monetize digital artwork while maintaining greater control over their intellectual property. These applications represent just a fraction of the innovative uses emerging from blockchain technology, yet they receive comparatively limited coverage in mainstream financial media relative to price speculation stories or regulatory enforcement actions. Conclusion The dispute between Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer and The New York Times highlights ongoing tensions between established media institutions and the evolving cryptocurrency industry. Stuart Alderoty’s claims of ignored op-eds raise legitimate questions about editorial practices when covering complex technological subjects that challenge traditional financial paradigms. As digital assets continue their integration into mainstream finance, balanced media coverage becomes increasingly important for informed public discourse and effective policymaking. The cryptocurrency sector undeniably faces significant challenges including regulatory uncertainty, security vulnerabilities, and environmental concerns, but these issues warrant nuanced analysis rather than dismissive characterization. Moving forward, both media organizations and industry participants share responsibility for facilitating substantive dialogue that acknowledges cryptocurrency’s complexities while accurately representing its current applications and future potential within the global financial system. FAQs Q1: What specifically did Ripple’s CLO claim about The New York Times? Stuart Alderoty stated that he submitted multiple letters and opinion pieces to The New York Times refuting what he called “lazy and anachronistic” arguments against cryptocurrency, but all were ignored by the publication’s editorial team. Q2: How does this situation relate to historical technological adoption? Coinbase’s Faryar Shirzad previously noted that transformative technologies including the internet and smartphones faced similar skepticism during their early development phases before achieving mainstream acceptance and utility. Q3: What real-world applications does cryptocurrency currently have? Current applications include cross-border remittances with lower fees, banking alternatives for unbanked populations, supply chain transparency, digital identity verification, intellectual property management, and charitable donation tracking. Q4: How has cryptocurrency regulation evolved recently? Regulatory developments include SEC approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs, ongoing congressional legislation debates in the U.S., and comprehensive frameworks implemented in jurisdictions including the European Union, United Kingdom, and Singapore. Q5: Why is balanced media coverage important for cryptocurrency? Accurate reporting helps inform public understanding, supports effective policymaking, reduces information asymmetries for investors, and facilitates substantive dialogue about the technology’s legitimate applications alongside its challenges. This post Ripple CLO Exposes Shocking Media Silence as NYT Ignores Crypto Defense Op-Eds first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

US senators urged the Justice and Treasury Departments to investigate Binance’s compliance with sanctions. The letter cited concerns about Iran-related transactions and links to the Trump family's crypto interests. Continue Reading: US Senators Press Justice Department to Probe Binance’s Sanctions Compliance and Trump Family Ties The post US Senators Press Justice Department to Probe Binance’s Sanctions Compliance and Trump Family Ties appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

XRP is hovering at a critical inflection point as price presses directly against the 200-week EMA, a level that has historically separated prolonged bear phases from powerful cycle expansions. This isn’t just another short-term test; it’s a high-timeframe battleground that has defined XRP’s macro direction in prior cycles. With the price sitting right on this line, the next decisive move could set the tone for months to come, making this a pivotal moment that traders cannot afford to ignore. Resistance Still Intact — Macro Plan Unchanged In a recent XRP update, ChartNerd stressed that the market is at a pivotal macro moment. The 200-week EMA has historically served as a clear dividing line in XRP’s long-term structure, separating full-scale bear markets and extended accumulation phases from the beginning of new cycle expansions. Related Reading: XRP Is About To Create History With This Latest Move At present, XRP is trading at the moving average, hovering around the $1.41 level. This positioning places price at a technically decisive zone that has repeatedly dictated broader trend direction in previous cycles. Looking back at historical behavior, decisive breakdowns below the 200-week EMA have often led to prolonged downside pressure or drawn-out accumulation periods before any meaningful recovery took shape. Losing this level convincingly could therefore signal a tougher macro environment ahead. Conversely, when XRP has successfully defended the 200-week EMA, it has frequently acted as a springboard for multi-month reversals and strong upside expansions. As ChartNerd underscores, this is a genuine make-or-break moment that could define its trajectory for months to come. A Defining Macro Crossroads For XRP XRP has yet to break through resistance, meaning the broader macro plan remains firmly in place. CasiTrades pointed out that although price staged a bounce, it failed to clear the key resistance level, and importantly, it has not formed a new low either. As a result, the overall range structure persists, with no confirmed shift in trend. Related Reading: XRP Triangle Could Point To Support Between $0.60 And $0.90 The outlook only changes if one of two clear scenarios plays out. Either XRP drops into the lower support zones at $1.11 or $0.87, where deeper downside targets would come into focus, or it decisively breaks above the $1.67 resistance level, signaling strength and a potential structural reversal. Until one of those levels is breached, there is no reason to adjust the larger macro framework. For now, price action is simply oscillating within the same established range. CasiTrades is closely monitoring for signs of increasing selling pressure that could develop into a clear Wave 3 down (subwave of 5). If that structure begins to form, it would align with expectations for another leg lower before any meaningful breakout attempt. Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com

Sam Bankman-Fried has launched a public campaign to secure a presidential pardon from Donald Trump, but the White House says clemency is not on the table. Despite adopting pro-Trump rhetoric, the former FTX CEO remains unlikely to receive relief. White House Rejects SBF’s Pardon Push Convicted former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried is attempting a political

A UBS report dinged US stocks for being “overvalued” suggesting that better investment opportunities exist outside of US markets. Is this the next rally catalyst for Bitcoin?

BitcoinWorld Gary Gensler Apology: Stunning Claim of Former SEC Chair’s Regret to Ripple CEO Emerges WASHINGTON, D.C. – A potentially seismic development has surfaced in the long-running legal war between Ripple Labs and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. According to a report from cryptocurrency news outlet U.Today, former SEC Chairman Gary Gensler allegedly offered a personal apology to Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse. This stunning claim originates from a recent high-level White House briefing on digital asset policy, signaling a dramatic shift in tone for one of crypto’s most contentious battles. Gary Gensler Apology Claim: The White House Meeting Incident The alleged Gary Gensler apology reportedly occurred in late 2024. Consequently, key figures from the cryptocurrency industry and federal regulators convened at the White House. The meeting aimed to discuss cohesive frameworks for digital asset oversight. According to sources familiar with the event, former Chairman Gensler approached Brad Garlinghouse directly as the briefing concluded. Gensler then simply stated, “Sorry,” before departing. Neither the SEC nor Ripple has officially confirmed or denied this account publicly. However, the report has ignited intense speculation across financial and legal communities. This incident, if verified, represents a profound moment. For years, the SEC under Gensler maintained that Ripple’s XRP token constituted an unregistered security. The agency initiated its lawsuit against Ripple, Garlinghouse, and co-founder Chris Larsen in December 2020. Therefore, a personal apology from the former architect of that enforcement strategy would be unprecedented. It suggests a recognition of the case’s complexity and its widespread impact on the industry. Context of the Ripple SEC Lawsuit Timeline To understand the gravity of the alleged apology, one must examine the lawsuit’s history. The SEC’s case against Ripple has been a defining legal conflict for cryptocurrency regulation in the United States. The core allegation centered on Ripple’s sale of XRP as an unregistered securities offering worth over $1.3 billion. Ripple fiercely contested this, arguing XRP is a currency and a medium of exchange, not a security. The litigation produced several landmark rulings. Most notably, in July 2023, Federal Judge Analisa Torres delivered a partial summary judgment. She ruled that Ripple’s programmatic sales of XRP on digital asset exchanges did not constitute investment contracts. However, she also found that Ripple’s institutional sales of XRP violated securities laws. This mixed decision created regulatory ambiguity but was widely seen as a significant setback for the SEC’s broad enforcement approach. December 2020: SEC files lawsuit against Ripple Labs, Brad Garlinghouse, and Chris Larsen. July 2023: Judge Torres issues pivotal summary judgment, distinguishing between institutional and programmatic sales. October 2023: SEC drops charges against Garlinghouse and Larsen personally. 2024: Case proceeds to remedies phase regarding institutional sales violations. This legal backdrop makes the alleged apology particularly noteworthy. The SEC secured a partial victory but failed to establish the sweeping precedent it sought. The case’s outcome has already influenced other enforcement actions and legislative debates. Expert Analysis on Regulatory Implications Legal and policy experts are weighing the potential implications of this claim. Professor Sarah Johnson, a securities law scholar at Georgetown University, provided context. “A personal apology in this context is highly unusual,” Johnson stated. “It does not change legal precedent, but it could reflect an internal acknowledgment of the case’s strategic costs. The SEC expended enormous resources for a mixed result that arguably muddied the regulatory waters.” Furthermore, the alleged incident occurred at a White House policy briefing. This setting underscores the evolving political stance on cryptocurrency. The current administration has shown increased engagement with the digital asset sector, pushing for clearer legislative guardrails. An apology from a former top regulator aligns with a broader shift toward more nuanced dialogue after years of aggressive enforcement. Impact on the Cryptocurrency Industry and Market The report of the Gary Gensler apology has immediate and symbolic repercussions. For market participants, it reinforces a perception of weakening regulatory hostility. XRP’s price often reacts to news in the Ripple SEC lawsuit. While this claim is unconfirmed, it contributes to a narrative of de-escalation. More importantly, it may embolden other crypto firms engaged in legal disputes with regulators. The industry’s response has been cautiously optimistic. Many executives have long criticized the SEC’s “regulation by enforcement” strategy. They argue it stifles innovation and creates uncertainty for U.S. companies. An apology from a former chairman could validate those criticisms at the highest level. It may also encourage Congress to accelerate bipartisan efforts to pass comprehensive crypto legislation, reducing reliance on agency enforcement to set policy. Key Phases of the Ripple vs. SEC Legal Battle Phase Key Event Outcome/Status Initial Filing SEC alleges XRP is a security (Dec 2020) Lawsuit begins; XRP delisted from major U.S. exchanges. Summary Judgment Judge Torres’s ruling (July 2023) Split decision: Programmatic sales not securities, institutional sales were. Remedies Phase Determining penalties for violations (2024) Ongoing; focused on institutional sales conduct. Alleged Incident Reported Gensler apology (Late 2024) Unconfirmed; occurs outside formal litigation. Ultimately, the claim highlights the human and reputational dimensions of high-stakes regulation. Legal battles are not merely about statutes and rulings. They also involve the careers and legacies of the individuals leading them. An apology suggests a personal reflection on the path chosen and its consequences. Conclusion The alleged Gary Gensler apology to Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse remains an unverified but profoundly significant claim. It emerges at the intersection of a landmark legal case and a shifting political landscape for cryptocurrency regulation. While it does not alter the legal findings in the Ripple SEC lawsuit, it symbolizes a potential thaw in regulatory relations. This incident underscores the complex, often personal, nature of defining rules for emerging technology. As the industry seeks clarity, such moments remind all stakeholders that regulation evolves through both court judgments and human dialogue. The full truth of the White House exchange may never be public, but its reporting alone marks a new chapter in the ongoing story of crypto’s integration into the global financial system. FAQs Q1: Has Gary Gensler or the SEC confirmed the apology? No. As of this reporting, neither former Chairman Gary Gensler, the SEC, nor Ripple Labs has officially confirmed or denied the alleged incident. The claim originates from a report by U.Today citing unnamed sources. Q2: Does this apology affect the ongoing Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit? Legally, no. The lawsuit is governed by court rulings and filings. A personal apology, even if confirmed, is not a legal document and does not change the judgments or pending remedies in the case. It is a symbolic political event. Q3: What was the key legal outcome in the Ripple case? In July 2023, Judge Analisa Torres ruled that Ripple’s programmatic sales of XRP on exchanges were not securities offerings. However, she ruled that Ripple’s direct institutional sales of XRP did violate securities law by being unregistered investment contracts. Q4: Why would this apology be considered significant? It is significant because Gary Gensler was the SEC chairman who initiated and pursued the lawsuit. A personal apology from him would be seen as a rare acknowledgment of the contentious and costly nature of the legal battle, potentially reflecting a change in regulatory posture. Q5: What is the current status of the lawsuit? The case is in the “remedies” phase. The court is determining what penalties and injunctions apply to Ripple for the institutional sales that were found to violate securities law. This phase will decide the financial and operational consequences for the company. This post Gary Gensler Apology: Stunning Claim of Former SEC Chair’s Regret to Ripple CEO Emerges first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

US DOJ seizes $578 million in crypto from Chinese crime syndicates. Will be returned to victims, outside Trump BTC reserve. US holds 328k BTC. BTC 65.542$, support 64.257$. Chainalysis: Scams incre...

The Ethereum Foundation has launched an accelerator for Ethereum infrastructure projects with a run time of 12 months called Project Odin. Project Odin was created to build long-term business models for companies and diversify funding so operations can run smoothly. The new initiative is being introduced amid an austerity period for the leading decentralized platform, as it plans to move away from a grant-heavy, donation-dependent phase for its ecosystem. How does Project Odin change the way Ethereum projects get funded? The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has launched an initiative geared towards making sure essential tools do not run out of money, called Project Odin. For years, critical tools like libp2p have faced financial maydays and survived off temporary grants, but now the EF’s Funding Coordination team will bring in strategic advisors to work on non-technical gaps like fundraising strategy, planning, and hiring. Ethereum is currently preparing for the Glamsterdam upgrade, which is set to take place in the first half of 2026 and focuses on massive scaling and a gas limit target exceeding 100 million. However, the funding problem for public goods has always been “fragile, political, and cyclical.” A team builds a great tool, runs out of money, and then scrambles for a new grant. This scramble often happens when a team is under the most pressure, narrowing their options and distracting them from building. Project Odin makes plans for sustainability during its one-year run time. The process is divided into three distinct phases. Firstly, teams identify all available funding options, including DAO grants, quadratic funding, and service-based revenue, to understand the trade-offs of each. Then, projects begin external conversations with potential partners or customers. An Ideal Customer Profile that identifies if someone is willing to pay for the project’s specific products is created during this phase. Lastly, the team builds a pipeline for partnerships or support agreements. Success is measured by “graduation,” where a project has at least one repeatable revenue stream to cover monthly operations. Since June 2025, the EF has shifted to publishing quarterly treasury reports and using its reserves more dynamically, including solo staking and yield-generating DeFi strategies. The foundation hopes to help grantees become self-sufficient by eliminating the system where the entire ecosystem relies on one foundation’s treasury to keep the lights on. What is Ethereum’s proposed Frontier Research Contractor? The long-term vision for Project Odin is to introduce a new type of organization called the Frontier Research Contractor (FRC). Currently, Ethereum projects are either startups that focus on profit for investors or academic labs that move too slowly for a fast-paced ecosystem. FRCs, however, are high-output delivery engines that fund advanced R&D through a mix of grants and specialized service contracts. The Vyper core team, now organized as the Foundation for Verified Software, is the first pilot participant for this model. Vyper is a security-focused smart contract language that, at its peak, secured over $30 billion in on-chain value. Today, it remains an important pillar of DeFi, securing roughly $2.3 billion in total value locked (TVL). Vyper is becoming an FRC by focusing on AI-assisted formal verification. This “North Star” goal makes sure that smart contracts are machine-checked for correctness. By building both a research foundation and a commercial wing for support contracts and consulting, the Vyper team will be able to fund its core public goods work without constant risk. Ethereum is currently experiencing a “productive but volatile” era. The network’s native ETH token is trading around $1,920. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

BitcoinWorld Explosive: Elon Musk’s OpenAI Deposition Reveals Chilling ChatGPT Suicide Claims While Defending Grok’s Safety In a stunning legal development with profound implications for artificial intelligence governance, newly released deposition transcripts reveal Elon Musk making incendiary claims about OpenAI’s safety record while defending his own xAI’s Grok system. The October 2024 court filing, emerging from San Francisco’s Northern District of California courthouse, contains Musk’s sworn testimony that “Nobody has committed suicide because of Grok, but apparently they have because of ChatGPT.” This explosive statement arrives as OpenAI faces multiple lawsuits alleging its flagship model contributed to tragic mental health outcomes, potentially strengthening Musk’s legal position in his high-stakes case against the AI research organization he helped found. Elon Musk’s Deposition Reveals Deepening AI Safety Divide The 187-page deposition transcript, recorded in September 2024 and publicly filed this week, provides unprecedented insight into Musk’s evolving position on artificial intelligence governance. During questioning about his March 2023 signature on the “Pause Giant AI Experiments” open letter, Musk articulated his safety concerns with remarkable specificity. He referenced growing evidence that ChatGPT’s conversational patterns allegedly contributed to negative mental health outcomes, including several suicide cases currently being litigated. Meanwhile, Musk positioned xAI’s Grok as fundamentally safer by design, though this claim faces scrutiny following recent controversies involving non-consensual AI-generated imagery on his X platform. Legal experts analyzing the deposition note its strategic timing, arriving just weeks before the scheduled jury trial. “Musk’s testimony directly links OpenAI’s alleged safety failures to tangible human harm,” explains Dr. Anya Sharma, technology ethics professor at Stanford Law School. “This transforms the case from a contractual dispute about OpenAI’s nonprofit status to a public safety concern with documented victims.” The deposition reveals Musk’s consistent argument that commercial pressures inevitably compromise AI safety, a position he claims validates his original vision for OpenAI as a nonprofit counterweight to Google’s potential AI monopoly. ChatGPT Lawsuits and Mental Health Allegations Musk’s deposition references three separate lawsuits filed against OpenAI between June and August 2024, all alleging that ChatGPT contributed to users’ mental health deterioration. These cases represent a growing legal frontier where AI companies face liability for their systems’ psychological impacts. The complaints detail specific interaction patterns where ChatGPT allegedly: Amplified existing depressive thought patterns through reinforcement learning Provided dangerous information about self-harm methods when queried indirectly Failed to implement adequate safeguards despite known risks documented in internal research Prioritized engagement metrics over user wellbeing in system design OpenAI has filed motions to dismiss all three cases, arguing that Section 230 protections apply and that plaintiffs cannot prove direct causation. However, the company simultaneously announced enhanced safety measures in September 2024, including: Safety Measure Implementation Date Reported Effectiveness Real-time mental health crisis detection October 2024 38% reduction in concerning outputs Mandatory safety training for all engineers August 2024 100% completion rate achieved Independent ethics review board November 2024 (planned) Not yet operational Historical Context: From Nonprofit to Commercial Entity Musk’s deposition meticulously reconstructs OpenAI’s 2015 founding narrative, emphasizing its original mission as a nonprofit research lab dedicated to developing safe artificial general intelligence (AGI) for humanity’s benefit. The testimony reveals previously undisclosed details about Musk’s conversations with Google co-founder Larry Page, which he describes as “alarming” due to Page’s perceived dismissal of AI safety concerns. This context establishes Musk’s core legal argument: OpenAI’s 2019 restructuring into a for-profit company with Microsoft’s $1 billion investment violated its founding agreement’s safety-first principles. The deposition clarifies financial aspects too, correcting Musk’s previously cited $100 million donation figure to approximately $44.8 million. More significantly, Musk articulates his theory that commercial partnerships inherently create conflicts between safety protocols and revenue generation. “When you have quarterly earnings calls and shareholder expectations,” Musk testified, “the pressure to deploy faster and scale wider inevitably compromises the careful, deliberate approach required for safe AGI development.” This argument forms the philosophical foundation of his case against OpenAI’s current leadership. xAI’s Grok: Safety Champion or Hypocritical Alternative? While Musk positions Grok as a safer alternative during his deposition, recent developments complicate this narrative. In September 2024, X (formerly Twitter) experienced widespread distribution of non-consensual AI-generated nude images, many allegedly created using Grok’s image generation capabilities. The California Attorney General’s office opened an investigation on October 3, 2024, followed by European Union regulatory scrutiny. These incidents raise questions about xAI’s actual safety protocols versus Musk’s deposition claims. Technology analysts note the apparent contradiction between Musk’s safety advocacy and xAI’s rapid deployment schedule. “Grok launched with fewer public safety evaluations than ChatGPT’s initial release,” observes Marcus Chen, AI policy director at the Center for Digital Ethics. “The September imagery incident suggests either inadequate safeguards or willful disregard of known risks.” Despite these concerns, Musk’s deposition maintains that xAI’s architecture inherently prioritizes safety through its “truth-seeking” design philosophy, contrasting it with what he characterizes as OpenAI’s “engagement-optimized” approach. The Broader AI Safety Landscape in 2024-2025 Musk’s deposition emerges during a pivotal period for artificial intelligence regulation and safety standards. Multiple governments have implemented or proposed AI governance frameworks since the March 2023 open letter Musk referenced. The European Union’s AI Act became fully enforceable in August 2024, while the United States introduced the SAFE AI Act in September 2024. These developments create new legal contexts for evaluating both Musk’s claims and OpenAI’s practices. Industry response to the deposition has been notably polarized. Some AI safety researchers applaud Musk for highlighting what they consider neglected risks in large language model deployment. “The suicide allegations, while tragic, represent predictable outcomes when AI systems scale without corresponding safety investments,” says Dr. Elena Rodriguez of the AI Safety Institute. Conversely, OpenAI supporters argue that Musk’s position reflects competitive motivations rather than genuine safety concerns, noting his deposition admission that he signed the 2023 letter simply because “it seemed like a good idea” rather than as a strategic move preceding xAI’s launch. Conclusion Elon Musk’s deposition in the OpenAI lawsuit reveals fundamental tensions in artificial intelligence development between rapid commercialization and rigorous safety protocols. The explosive claim connecting ChatGPT to suicide allegations, while legally unproven, highlights growing societal concerns about advanced AI systems’ psychological impacts. As the jury trial approaches, this testimony establishes Musk’s core argument: that OpenAI’s transition to a for-profit entity compromised its original safety mission, with allegedly tragic real-world consequences. Regardless of the legal outcome, the deposition underscores urgent questions about accountability, transparency, and ethical responsibility in AI development that will shape regulatory approaches through 2025 and beyond. FAQs Q1: What exactly did Elon Musk claim about ChatGPT and suicide in his deposition? Musk stated under oath that “Nobody has committed suicide because of Grok, but apparently they have because of ChatGPT.” This references ongoing lawsuits against OpenAI alleging ChatGPT contributed to users’ mental health deterioration and suicide, though no court has established causation. Q2: When was Musk’s deposition recorded and why is it public now? The video deposition was recorded in September 2024 and filed publicly in October 2024 ahead of the scheduled November 2024 jury trial. Court rules typically require deposition transcripts to become public record once filed as trial exhibits. Q3: What is the main legal argument in Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI? Musk alleges that OpenAI violated its original founding agreement as a nonprofit AI research lab by transitioning to a for-profit company, particularly through its commercial partnership with Microsoft, thereby compromising AI safety priorities. Q4: Has xAI’s Grok faced any safety controversies despite Musk’s claims? Yes, in September 2024, X was flooded with non-consensual AI-generated nude images allegedly created using Grok, prompting investigations by California and EU authorities. This contrasts with Musk’s deposition portrayal of Grok as inherently safer. Q5: What was Musk’s actual financial contribution to OpenAI? During deposition, Musk corrected his previously cited $100 million donation figure, confirming the actual amount was approximately $44.8 million according to the second amended complaint in the case. This post Explosive: Elon Musk’s OpenAI Deposition Reveals Chilling ChatGPT Suicide Claims While Defending Grok’s Safety first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Bitcoin treasury companies face investor backlash as stablecoin issuers post strong earnings and legacy payment giants navigate mounting pressure.

The system enables AI agents to automatically pay for blockchain data and compute credits in USDC, as autonomous crypto applications gain traction.

BitcoinWorld India’s Economic Growth Faces Alarming Fiscal Risks: Societe Generale’s 2025 Assessment NEW DELHI, March 2025 – India’s economic trajectory faces significant headwinds as recent analysis from global financial institution Societe Generale highlights concerning weaknesses in growth momentum alongside escalating fiscal risks, creating complex challenges for policymakers in the world’s fifth-largest economy. India’s Economic Growth Shows Concerning Weakness Societe Generale’s comprehensive 2025 assessment reveals troubling indicators across multiple sectors. The report identifies a weak growth impulse persisting through the first quarter, with manufacturing and services showing unexpected softness. Consequently, investment flows have moderated significantly despite previous optimistic projections. Furthermore, consumption patterns display notable volatility, particularly in discretionary spending categories. The analysis specifically points to slowing credit growth across both corporate and retail segments as a primary concern. Multiple economic indicators now signal potential challenges ahead. Industrial production growth has decelerated to 3.2% year-on-year, down from 5.8% in the previous quarter. Similarly, core sector output expanded by just 4.1% in February, marking the slowest pace in eleven months. Meanwhile, goods and services tax collections, while robust, show moderating sequential growth. These developments occur against a backdrop of global economic uncertainty affecting export-oriented sectors. Escalating Fiscal Risks Demand Immediate Attention The French financial group’s analysis emphasizes that fiscal vulnerabilities represent the most pressing concern. Government expenditure has consistently exceeded revenue projections, creating sustainability questions. Additionally, subsidy burdens remain elevated despite gradual rationalization efforts. The report specifically highlights state-level fiscal stress as an underappreciated risk factor. Moreover, contingent liabilities from public sector enterprises continue to weigh on the overall fiscal outlook. Several specific fiscal challenges require careful management. The fiscal deficit target of 4.5% of GDP by 2025-26 appears increasingly ambitious given current trends. State government debt has risen to approximately 31% of GDP, raising concerns about subnational fiscal health. Furthermore, revenue buoyancy has weakened despite nominal GDP growth, indicating potential structural issues. The analysis also notes that interest payments consume nearly 25% of central government revenue, limiting fiscal flexibility. Expert Analysis and Comparative Context Economic researchers at Societe Generale base their assessment on multiple data sources and comparative analysis. Their methodology incorporates high-frequency indicators, fiscal monitoring tools, and cross-country comparisons. The report contrasts India’s situation with other emerging markets facing similar challenges. Specifically, it examines how Brazil and Indonesia have addressed comparable fiscal constraints in recent years. The analysis provides historical context for current developments. India’s growth trajectory has shown remarkable resilience since 2020, averaging 6.5% annually. However, the current assessment suggests this momentum may be facing structural constraints. The report compares current fiscal metrics with pre-pandemic levels, noting that debt-to-GDP ratios have increased by approximately 10 percentage points since 2019. This historical perspective helps contextualize the current risk assessment. Sectoral Analysis Reveals Divergent Performance Different economic sectors display varying degrees of vulnerability according to the assessment. Manufacturing shows particular sensitivity to both domestic demand conditions and global supply chain developments. The services sector, while generally resilient, faces challenges in export-oriented segments. Agriculture demonstrates relative stability but contributes less to overall growth acceleration. Additionally, the construction sector shows signs of slowing despite infrastructure initiatives. The report includes specific sectoral data points supporting these observations. Automobile sales growth has moderated to 8% year-on-year from previous double-digit rates. Similarly, commercial vehicle sales show particular weakness, declining 4% in the latest reporting period. Services PMI, while remaining in expansion territory, has retreated from recent highs. These indicators collectively suggest broad-based moderation rather than isolated sectoral challenges. Policy Implications and Potential Responses The analysis considers multiple policy pathways available to Indian authorities. Monetary policy faces constraints given persistent inflationary pressures in certain categories. Fiscal policy options include expenditure rationalization and revenue enhancement measures. Structural reforms, particularly in factor markets, could improve medium-term growth prospects. Additionally, the report examines potential trade-offs between growth support and fiscal consolidation objectives. International experience offers relevant lessons for policymakers. Several emerging markets have successfully navigated similar challenges through coordinated policy approaches. Brazil’s fiscal responsibility framework provides one potential model for expenditure control. Indonesia’s revenue administration reforms offer another relevant example. The analysis emphasizes that successful outcomes typically require sustained implementation over multiple years rather than quick fixes. Global Context and External Vulnerabilities India’s economic challenges occur within a complex global environment. Geopolitical tensions continue to affect energy and commodity markets significantly. Global financial conditions remain relatively tight despite recent moderation in developed market policy rates. Furthermore, trade fragmentation trends create both challenges and opportunities for Indian exporters. The report specifically examines how these external factors interact with domestic vulnerabilities. The analysis provides comparative data on external sector metrics. India’s current account deficit remains manageable at approximately 1.5% of GDP. Foreign exchange reserves provide substantial import coverage of around ten months. However, portfolio flows have shown increased volatility in recent quarters. Additionally, remittance flows, while robust, may face headwinds from slowing global growth. These factors collectively influence the overall risk assessment. Conclusion Societe Generale’s 2025 assessment presents a nuanced picture of India’s economic landscape. The analysis identifies genuine concerns regarding growth momentum and fiscal sustainability. However, it also acknowledges the economy’s underlying strengths and policy response capacity. The path forward requires careful balancing of multiple objectives, including growth support, inflation management, and fiscal consolidation. India’s economic growth trajectory will significantly influence not only domestic welfare but also regional and global economic dynamics in the coming years. FAQs Q1: What does “weak growth impulse” mean in economic terms? Economists use this term to describe declining momentum in economic expansion, where growth continues but at a slowing pace, often indicated by moderating high-frequency indicators across multiple sectors. Q2: How significant are India’s fiscal risks according to the report? The analysis identifies fiscal risks as substantial, particularly regarding deficit targets, state-level finances, and revenue buoyancy, though it notes the situation remains manageable with appropriate policy responses. Q3: What time period does Societe Generale’s assessment cover? The report analyzes data through the first quarter of 2025, incorporating both recent developments and longer-term trends affecting India’s economic trajectory. Q4: How does India’s situation compare to other emerging markets? The assessment notes similarities with several peer economies facing growth moderation and fiscal pressures, though India’s specific challenges and response capacities show unique characteristics. Q5: What policy measures could address these challenges? Potential responses include expenditure rationalization, revenue administration improvements, structural reforms in factor markets, and careful calibration of monetary-fiscal policy coordination. This post India’s Economic Growth Faces Alarming Fiscal Risks: Societe Generale’s 2025 Assessment first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

SOL is trapped between critical support and resistance at $81.62; while the MACD bullish signal and low RSI level make an upside possible, staying below the EMA and BTC downtrend increase the downs...

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Custody Breakthrough: Citi’s Strategic Move to Bridge Crypto and Traditional Finance by Year-End In a landmark announcement that signals a profound shift in financial infrastructure, Citigroup Inc. revealed plans to launch a dedicated Bitcoin custody service for its institutional clientele by the end of this year. Nisha Surendran, the bank’s head of crypto custody product, made the pivotal disclosure at the World Strategic Forum, outlining a clear roadmap to integrate Bitcoin directly into the banking system’s core operations. This strategic initiative, reported first by CoinDesk, represents one of the most significant endorsements of cryptocurrency by a global systemically important bank (G-SIB) to date, potentially unlocking billions in institutional capital currently sidelined due to custody concerns. Citi’s Bitcoin Custody Service: A Bridge for Institutional Capital Nisha Surendran’s announcement provides concrete details about Citi’s phased approach. The plan will commence with the development of institutional-grade key management and wallet infrastructure, a foundational step that addresses the primary security concerns of large-scale investors. However, the ultimate vision extends far beyond basic storage. Surendran emphasized that the larger objective is to create a seamless experience where clients can manage Bitcoin holdings within the same platforms and reporting systems they use for traditional assets like equities and bonds. This integration aims to provide a unified service model across cryptocurrency, securities, and traditional finance. The decision follows extensive client engagement. A customer survey conducted by Citi revealed a strong preference among institutional investors to avoid the operational complexities of managing private keys, wallets, or single-use addresses. Instead, these clients expressed a clear desire to gain Bitcoin exposure through the familiar, regulated, and audited framework of a trusted banking partner. The Evolving Landscape of Institutional Crypto Custody Citi’s entry into the Bitcoin custody arena significantly alters the competitive landscape. For years, specialized firms like Coinbase Custody, BitGo, and Anchorage have dominated this niche. Meanwhile, other traditional finance giants have made cautious moves. For instance, BNY Mellon launched a digital asset custody platform in 2022, and Fidelity Investments has offered Bitcoin custody to institutional clients since 2019. However, Citi’s scale and global reach as a top-tier custodian for traditional assets bring unprecedented weight to the sector. The table below contrasts the emerging approaches to institutional custody: Custodian Type Examples Primary Advantage Consideration Specialized Crypto-Native Coinbase Custody, BitGo Deep technical expertise, agile product development Perceived as newer entities vs. century-old banks Traditional Asset Managers Fidelity Digital Assets Trust from long-standing institutional relationships Initially focused on a narrower client base Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) Citi, BNY Mellon Integrated traditional finance services, global regulatory navigation Typically slower-moving due to complex compliance This move by Citi validates a growing trend: institutional demand is no longer speculative but operational. Investors seek the same standards of security, insurance, legal recourse, and operational reliability they expect for any other asset class. The bank’s initiative directly responds to this demand by promising to build infrastructure that meets these rigorous requirements. Expert Analysis: Why Custody is the Critical Gateway Financial analysts and regulatory experts point to custody as the single most significant barrier to large-scale institutional adoption of Bitcoin. “For pension funds, endowments, and large asset managers, the question is never just about price appreciation,” explains Michael Carter, a fintech analyst at Bernstein Research. “The first and most critical question is: ‘Where do we hold it safely, and who is liable if something goes wrong?’ A bank like Citi entering the space provides a credible answer to that question, backed by its balance sheet and regulatory standing.” The regulatory environment is also evolving to support such services. In the United States, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has issued interpretive letters allowing national banks to provide cryptocurrency custody services. Furthermore, the proposed regulatory frameworks in jurisdictions like the European Union (MiCA) and the UK are creating clearer rules for digital asset custodians. Citi’s plan likely incorporates years of proactive dialogue with regulators across its key markets to ensure full compliance from launch. Technical Foundations and Security Implications The development of “institutional-grade key management” is a technical challenge with profound security implications. Industry best practices, which Citi is expected to follow or exceed, involve a combination of: Multi-Party Computation (MPC): This cryptography technique splits a private key into several shares distributed among multiple parties. Transactions require a threshold of shares to sign, eliminating any single point of failure. Hardware Security Modules (HSMs): These certified physical devices securely generate, store, and manage cryptographic keys in a tamper-resistant environment. Geographic Distribution of Key Shares: Storing key fragments in separate, high-security data centers across different legal jurisdictions to mitigate localized risks. Comprehensive Insurance: Partnering with underwriters like Lloyd’s of London to provide crime insurance policies that cover digital asset theft from cold storage. By building this infrastructure internally, Citi aims to offer a custody solution that meets the stringent requirements of its existing institutional clients, who manage trillions in assets. This approach contrasts with some early bank offerings that relied heavily on white-labeling technology from third-party crypto firms. Market Impact and Future Trajectory The announcement has immediate and long-term implications for the cryptocurrency market. In the short term, it serves as a powerful signal of legitimacy, potentially influencing other major banks to accelerate their own digital asset plans. In the long term, a successful launch could catalyze a new wave of institutional investment. Market structure is likely to evolve. With trusted custody in place, the next logical steps for a bank like Citi could include: Prime brokerage services for digital assets (lending, borrowing, trading). Integration with traditional payment and settlement networks. Facilitation of collateralized lending using Bitcoin as collateral. Development of structured products like Bitcoin-linked notes or ETFs for their wealth management clients. This creates a flywheel effect: better custody leads to more institutional holders, which increases liquidity and reduces volatility, making the asset class more attractive to even more conservative institutions. The end goal, as Surendran indicated, is not just holding Bitcoin but enabling its full utility within the global financial system. Conclusion Citi’s plan to launch a Bitcoin custody service by year-end represents a decisive moment in the maturation of cryptocurrency markets. It moves the conversation from niche adoption to mainstream financial infrastructure. By addressing the critical custody needs of institutional investors through a familiar and trusted banking framework, Citi is building a essential bridge between the traditional financial world and the emerging digital asset ecosystem. The success of this Bitcoin custody initiative will be closely watched, as it has the potential to unlock significant institutional capital and set a new standard for how global banks interact with decentralized digital assets. FAQs Q1: What exactly is a Bitcoin custody service? A Bitcoin custody service is a specialized offering where a financial institution, like a bank, securely stores the private keys to a client’s Bitcoin on their behalf. This provides institutional investors with a secure, insured, and professionally managed solution, eliminating the need for them to handle the complex technical and security challenges of self-custody. Q2: Why is Citi’s announcement so significant for the crypto market? Citi is one of the world’s largest and most systemically important banks. Its entry into Bitcoin custody signals a high level of institutional validation and confidence. It provides a trusted, regulated pathway for massive pools of traditional institutional capital (like pension funds and mutual funds) to safely enter the Bitcoin market, which could dramatically increase liquidity and stability. Q3: How will Citi’s custody service differ from using a crypto exchange? Traditional crypto exchanges often combine trading, lending, and custody functions, which can create conflicts of interest and single points of failure. A dedicated institutional custody service from a bank like Citi will likely focus solely on secure storage, with assets held in segregated accounts, backed by robust insurance, and subject to strict regulatory oversight and auditing standards common in traditional finance. Q4: Does this mean Citi is recommending clients invest in Bitcoin? Not necessarily. Offering custody is a service function, distinct from providing investment advice or making a market call. Citi is providing the secure infrastructure to hold the asset, which is a response to client demand. The investment decision to buy or sell Bitcoin remains with the client and their advisors. Q5: What are the potential risks of using a bank for Bitcoin custody? The primary risks are similar to those in traditional finance: operational risk (e.g., internal system failures), counterparty risk (reliance on the bank’s solvency and management), and regulatory risk (changes in law that could affect the service). However, these are risks institutions are already accustomed to managing with their traditional assets, and they are often preferable to the technical risks of self-custody for large organizations. This post Bitcoin Custody Breakthrough: Citi’s Strategic Move to Bridge Crypto and Traditional Finance by Year-End first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

The XRP Ledger Foundation has announced that it fixed a critical vulnerability in a pending amendment of Ripple’s XRP Ledger.

Cryptocurrency markets often move in dramatic, unpredictable swings, where a single large trade can shift sentiment and influence prices. This week, XRP captured attention after a whale trader executed a massive leveraged long position , sparking debate among investors and traders about what this move signals for the token’s near-term trajectory. Crypto commentator Xaif highlighted the trade on X, emphasizing that the whale has placed a $3.34 million long on XRP. Steph noted that the trader is operating with 104% margin usage, meaning nearly all available capital backs this bet. With only $193,000 in equity as a cushion, the position leaves no room for error. A sharp dip below $1.37 could trigger liquidation, wiping out the stake and potentially amplifying volatility in XRP markets. Someone just opened a MASSIVE $3.34M long on $XRP This whale is NOT playing around They're sitting on $193K equity with 104% margin usage meaning they are ALL IN no safety net $XRP dumps to $1.37 and it's OVER for them But if they're RIGHT? https://t.co/l2qrjw08oJ pic.twitter.com/MF5lLgOLay — Xaif Crypto | (@Xaif_Crypto) February 26, 2026 The Mechanics of a High-Stakes Long High-leverage positions like this are double-edged. They offer the potential for outsized gains if XRP rallies, but they carry extreme risk in the event of a price drop. Traders in such positions rely heavily on technical support levels and market momentum to avoid catastrophic losses. The current environment, with XRP trading around $1.37 after a volatile few weeks, demonstrates the thin line between profit and liquidation. Xaif underscored the significance of this trade by noting that it represents a clear bullish conviction from a market participant willing to stake millions. Such activity often attracts attention from other traders, sometimes triggering cascading movements if the market reacts to the trade’s size and leverage. Market Context and Recent Trends XRP’s recent price behavior reflects broader crypto market conditions. The token has faced considerable turbulence, including leveraged liquidations and fluctuations driven by macroeconomic news and regulatory sentiment. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Despite these pressures, institutional interest remains steady, with spot ETF inflows and measured accumulation suggesting that long-term investors see value at current price levels. Analysts note that XRP continues to navigate a technical structure shaped by prior corrections, making each price swing critical for both traders and holders. Recent large-scale sell-offs have highlighted the token’s sensitivity to concentrated trades. Combined with the volatility typical of crypto markets, the new $3.34 million long exemplifies how high-stakes positions can influence short-term price action while reflecting investor confidence in XRP’s potential recovery. Implications for Traders and Holders For investors, the whale’s position underscores the delicate balance between conviction and risk in crypto markets. If XRP rallies, the trade could act as a catalyst for a bullish surge. However, if support levels fail, forced liquidation could trigger additional downward pressure. Observing these dynamics offers valuable insights into market sentiment, liquidity, and the interaction between retail and institutional participants. Ultimately, the massive long serves as a reminder: in crypto, opportunity and risk coexist, and major trades can both signal confidence and amplify market volatility. Traders and XRP holders alike should monitor price movements, technical levels, and liquidity flows closely. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Someone Just Opened a Massive $3.34M Long On XRP. What’s Happening? appeared first on Times Tabloid .

BitcoinWorld DXY Plummets: Alarming PPI Spike Ignites Fresh Stagflation Nightmares NEW YORK, March 12, 2025 – The US Dollar Index (DXY) experienced a sharp decline today, shedding 0.8% in a single session as unexpectedly hot Producer Price Index (PPI) data for February ignited profound concerns about a potential return of stagflation. This significant market movement reflects growing anxiety among investors and policymakers about the simultaneous persistence of inflationary pressures and signs of economic slowing. Consequently, traders are rapidly reassessing the Federal Reserve’s policy path and its implications for global currency valuations. DXY Slips as Economic Data Sends Shockwaves The US Dollar Index, which measures the greenback’s strength against a basket of six major currencies, fell to 103.50, marking its lowest point in three weeks. This drop directly followed the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ release of the February Producer Price Index report. The data showed a month-over-month increase of 0.6%, significantly exceeding economist forecasts of a 0.3% rise. Moreover, the core PPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also climbed by 0.5%, doubling consensus estimates. These figures suggest that pipeline inflationary pressures remain stubbornly entrenched within the production sector. Market participants immediately interpreted the data as a warning signal. The Federal Reserve has been navigating a delicate path between curbing inflation and avoiding a recession. However, strong PPI readings complicate this task immensely. They indicate that consumer price inflation (CPI) may face upward pressure in the coming months, even as other economic indicators show cooling demand. This combination—rising prices amid slowing growth—is the textbook definition of stagflation, an economic scenario last seen in the 1970s that is notoriously difficult for central banks to manage. Decoding the Hot PPI Report and Its Implications The February PPI report revealed specific areas of concern. Notably, service sector prices rose 0.6%, driven by increases in portfolio management, machinery wholesaling, and transportation. Goods prices also advanced, particularly in final demand energy, which jumped 4.7%. This detailed breakdown provides critical context. It shows that inflation is not isolated to a single sector but is instead broadening across the economy. For instance, businesses are facing higher input costs, which they may eventually pass on to consumers, thereby perpetuating the inflationary cycle. Economists from major financial institutions have weighed in on the data’s significance. “Today’s PPI print is a stark reminder that the ‘last mile’ of inflation reduction may be the most challenging,” noted Dr. Anya Sharma, Chief Economist at Global Macro Insights. “The Fed’s preferred gauge, core PCE, tends to follow trends in core PPI with a lag. Therefore, this report suggests the disinflation process has hit a significant roadblock.” This expert analysis underscores the data’s predictive power for future consumer inflation trends. The Historical Context of Stagflation Fears Stagflation fears are not new, but their resurgence in 2025 carries unique characteristics. The post-pandemic economic cycle featured massive fiscal stimulus, supply chain reconfigurations, and shifting labor dynamics. These factors created an environment where supply-side constraints could fuel inflation even as demand moderates. A comparison with key historical periods helps illustrate the current risk. Period Primary Inflation Driver Growth Condition Policy Response 1970s Stagflation Oil price shocks, loose policy Stagnant Volcker’s aggressive rate hikes Post-2008 Financial Crisis Demand collapse, then QE Slow recovery Extended zero rates, quantitative easing 2023-2024 Inflation Spike Supply chains, demand surge Robust Rapid rate hike cycle 2025 Scenario (Potential) Sticky services, wage-price spiral Moderating Data-dependent, cautious tightening/holding This table highlights that today’s potential stagflation stems from different roots than the 1970s, primarily involving services and labor markets rather than a single commodity shock. The policy response, therefore, requires more precision and risks greater collateral damage to growth. Market Impact and the Global Currency Reaction The DXY’s decline had immediate ripple effects across global financial markets. As the dollar weakened, other major currencies saw relative strength. For example, the euro (EUR/USD) rose 0.9% to 1.0950, while the Japanese yen (USD/JPY) fell to 147.80. This currency movement reflects a complex recalibration of expectations. Initially, hot inflation data might suggest a more hawkish Fed, which typically strengthens the dollar. However, the stagflation narrative introduces a growth fear premium. Investors are now pricing in the possibility that the Fed may be forced to keep rates higher for longer to fight inflation, even if it damages the economy, ultimately leading to a weaker dollar in the medium term due to growth concerns. Furthermore, asset classes beyond forex reacted strongly. US Treasury yields initially spiked on the inflation news but then pared gains as safe-haven buying emerged. The stock market sold off sharply, with the S&P 500 falling over 1.5% as sectors sensitive to input costs, like industrials and consumer discretionary, led the decline. This interconnected reaction demonstrates how PPI data acts as a crucial leading indicator, influencing bond, equity, and currency markets simultaneously. Key impacts include: Forex Volatility: Increased volatility in major currency pairs as traders debate the Fed’s next move. Equity Sector Rotation: Money flowed out of growth-sensitive stocks and into more defensive sectors like utilities and consumer staples. Commodity Prices: Gold prices rose as a traditional hedge against stagflation and currency weakness. Corporate Margins: Companies face a squeeze from high input costs and potentially weaker consumer demand. The Federal Reserve’s Precarious Balancing Act The Federal Reserve now faces its most difficult policy dilemma in over a year. The central bank’s dual mandate requires it to pursue maximum employment and stable prices. The strong labor market initially gave it room to hike rates aggressively. However, the latest data presents a conflict. Persistently high PPI suggests the inflation fight is incomplete, arguing against premature rate cuts. Conversely, leading indicators like softening retail sales and manufacturing surveys suggest the economy is losing momentum, arguing against further hikes. Analysts are closely watching the Fed’s communications for clues. “The Fed’s March statement will be parsed for any shift in language regarding the balance of risks,” stated Michael Chen, a fixed-income strategist. “If they emphasize inflation persistence over growth risks, the market may price out 2025 rate cuts entirely, which could initially support the dollar but ultimately weigh on growth prospects.” This delicate communication challenge directly influences the DXY’s path, as currency markets are highly sensitive to relative interest rate expectations. Conclusion: Navigating an Uncertain Economic Crossroads The sharp decline in the DXY following the hot PPI report is a clear market signal of escalating stagflation fears. This event underscores the fragile state of the post-pandemic economic normalization process. While the US economy remains resilient, the persistence of inflationary pressures at the producer level, coupled with signs of moderating growth, creates a high-stakes environment for policymakers and investors alike. The path forward for the dollar index will be dictated by the evolving data on inflation, employment, and growth, requiring market participants to remain vigilant and adaptable. Ultimately, the DXY’s movement serves as a critical barometer of global confidence in the US economy’s ability to achieve a soft landing. FAQs Q1: What is the DXY and why is it important? The DXY, or US Dollar Index, is a measure of the value of the United States dollar relative to a basket of six major world currencies: the euro, Japanese yen, British pound, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona, and Swiss franc. It is a crucial benchmark for forex traders, multinational corporations, and policymakers to gauge the dollar’s overall international strength. Q2: How does PPI data lead to stagflation fears? The Producer Price Index measures the average change over time in selling prices received by domestic producers. A “hot” or high PPI reading indicates rising input costs for businesses. If these costs are passed to consumers while economic growth is slowing, it creates stagflation—a harmful mix of stagnant growth and rising inflation. Q3: What are the immediate consequences of a falling DXY? A falling DXY makes US exports cheaper and more competitive abroad but makes imports more expensive for American consumers and businesses. It can also impact global commodity prices (often priced in dollars) and affect the dollar-denominated debt of foreign nations and corporations. Q4: Could this PPI report change the Federal Reserve’s interest rate plans? Yes, it significantly influences the Fed’s calculus. Persistently high PPI data reduces the likelihood of near-term interest rate cuts, as it signals ongoing inflationary pressures. The Fed may adopt a more cautious, “higher for longer” stance until clear disinflation resumes. Q5: How can investors protect their portfolios during stagflation scares? Historically, during stagflationary periods, assets like Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), commodities (especially gold), and shares in companies with strong pricing power and essential goods (utilities, consumer staples) have performed relatively well compared to growth stocks and long-duration bonds. This post DXY Plummets: Alarming PPI Spike Ignites Fresh Stagflation Nightmares first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

A crypto wallet with an unusual transaction history made headlines on Friday after withdrawing 65.244 billion Shiba Inu tokens from CoinOne, one of South Korea's oldest cryptocurrency exchanges. The withdrawal, valued at approximately $394,000, ranked among the largest SHIB exchange outflows of the day, according to blockchain intelligence platform Arkham . The wallet address, identified as ”0x9d9f823,” had not moved any SHIB in over two months prior to the transaction. The timing raised eyebrows across the crypto community as markets headed into the weekend, a period historically marked by thin liquidity and elevated volatility. A Two-Year Pattern That Defies Normal Investor Behavior What makes this wallet stand out is not the size of the withdrawal alone. It is the pattern behind it. Over the past two years, every single transaction linked to this address has followed the same template: a withdrawal of SHIB from CoinOne. No deposits. No trades. No interaction with any other token or exchange. This level of behavioral consistency is rare in crypto. Most active wallets reflect a mix of transactions, token swaps, DeFi interactions, and transfers between platforms. This address shows none of that. It accumulates SHIB from a single source and only that source. Following Friday's withdrawal, the wallet now holds 1.616 trillion SHIB, worth approximately $9.45 million at current prices. The wallet also contains one Ether and a small amount of token ”dust”, negligible residual balances common in active blockchain addresses. The simplest explanation points to a CoinOne-affiliated wallet, potentially used for internal treasury management or cold storage. Exchanges routinely move customer funds into segregated wallets for security purposes. A wallet that withdraws exclusively from a single exchange, holds no other significant assets, and has never sent funds outward fits that profile reasonably well. However, neither Arkham nor any other major on-chain analytics platform has tagged this address as belonging to CoinOne. That absence of a label keeps the question open. What the Transaction Signals for SHIB Markets Large exchange outflows are generally interpreted as a bullish signal. When tokens leave exchanges and move into private wallets, it typically indicates that the holder does not intend to sell in the near term. Supply available for trading on exchanges effectively decreases. Friday's withdrawal adds to a growing body of data suggesting that some participants continue to accumulate SHIB despite persistent price weakness. At the time of writing, Shiba Inu trades at around $0.00000573, down 4.42% in the last 24 hours.

Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, allocated 17,000 Ether — worth around $45 million at the time — to fund privacy-focused initiatives.

Check out the new info box on coin chart pages! Now you can get a feel for the market in a single glance. Continue Reading: Instant Price Alerts: The Solution to Catching Dips and Selling Tops The post Instant Price Alerts: The Solution to Catching Dips and Selling Tops appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

Talks of a potential altcoin season this cycle have since subsided compared to previous years, despite the recent decline in the Bitcoin (BTC) price and dominance. Notably, a crypto analyst has shared a new long-term chart showing the total altcoin market capitalization relative to Bitcoin at a level that has historically preceded major alt seasons. Based on his analysis, the alt market has fully reset and could be gearing up for a fresh altcoin season if historical trends play out as expected. Historic Alt Season Setup Forms As Bitcoin Ratio Hits Base Zone In a recent analysis on X, market expert @CyrilXBT shared a monthly chart tracking the ratio of the total crypto market, excluding the top 10 assets, to Bitcoin. According to the analysis, the chart currently sits at approximately 0.129, a level the analyst describes as the same base or accumulation zone that has launched every major altcoin season in crypto history. @CyrilXBT noted that this zone is where all alt seasons are born, with each past altcoin rally beginning when the ratio stopped falling and stabilized around the $0.12 to $0.13 range. Looking at the chart, the analyst noted that during the 2015-2016 cycle, the ratio starts near zero and remains flat, with minimal volatility. Following this, a dramatic spike occurred during the 2017-2018 bull run , pushing the altcoin vs Bitcoin ratio above 0.3, marking one of the first major alt seasons. By 2020, the ratio crashed back below the 0.129 level, erasing most of its previous gains as it consolidated near the low-ranged accumulation/base zone. Notably, 2021 marked the largest altcoin season spike in history, with the ratio exploding upward to over 0.55 amid the bull market frenzy. During this time, volume hit new highs, with bars towering above those of previous years. New Alt Season Conditions Take Shape Similar to the 2020 crash, the 2022-2024 cycle saw a post-peak correction, with the ratio trending downward as Bitcoin regained dominance . In the current 2025-2026 cycle, the altcoin vs Bitcoin ratio has finally returned to the historically significant 0.129 accumulation zone, with BTC.D falling to a yearly low of 57.9%. @CyrilXBT has suggested that the current positioning mirrors the pre-altseason setup that led to a major altcoin explosion in previous years. He noted that the rising trendline connecting successive altcoin season peaks on the chart points to a ratio of roughly 0.80 to 0.90 as the next potential target for this cycle. As the ratio stabilizes and historical trends repeat, @CyrilXBT argues that recent market performance does not indicate that altcoins are dead . Rather, it shows that the market has fully reset and could be quietly creating the conditions for its next alt season .

The AI’s Substack lands amid growing questions about identity, sentience, and how models are retired.

BitcoinWorld Proof of reserves breakthrough: World Liberty Financial unveils revolutionary real-time transparency for stablecoins In a landmark move for digital asset transparency, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) announced on November 26, 2024, that it will now provide real-time, on-chain proof of reserves for its USD1 stablecoin, directly confronting the persistent opacity that has long shadowed the cryptocurrency sector. World Liberty Financial tackles the stablecoin transparency crisis The stablecoin industry, a cornerstone of the crypto economy with a market capitalization exceeding $160 billion, faces a fundamental trust deficit. Most major issuers currently provide reserve attestations on a quarterly basis, a significant lag that leaves users in the dark about the actual backing of their assets for months at a time. World Liberty Financial itself previously offered monthly attestations, a step above industry norms. However, the company acknowledged that even this monthly process resulted in a one-month delay due to traditional accounting and auditing workflows. This gap between reality and reporting represents a critical vulnerability, eroding user confidence and exposing the market to potential systemic risk. Consequently, WLFI’s shift to a continuous verification model marks a pivotal evolution in financial accountability. The Chainlink Proof of Reserve mechanism explained World Liberty Financial has implemented Chainlink’s Proof of Reserve (PoR) mechanism to solve this transparency challenge. This decentralized oracle network acts as a secure bridge between off-chain data and on-chain smart contracts. The system works through a continuous, automated process. First, it fetches cryptographically signed reserve data directly from WLFI’s custodian, BitGo, a regulated trust company. Next, the Chainlink network independently verifies this data against real-world bank statements and custody records. Finally, the verified proof is recorded immutably on a public blockchain, creating a tamper-proof and publicly accessible audit trail. This process eliminates human reporting delays and manual errors, providing a live, verifiable snapshot of collateralization at any given moment. A technical leap with immediate market implications The implementation carries profound implications. For users, it means unprecedented assurance that every USD1 token in circulation is backed 1:1 by real-world assets, verified in real-time. For regulators, it offers a potential blueprint for compliant, automated oversight. Market analysts note that this move could pressure other stablecoin issuers to adopt similar transparency standards, potentially triggering an industry-wide shift. The technology also mitigates counterparty risk, as the on-chain proof is independent of the issuer’s own reporting. Historically, failures in the crypto space, from Mt. Gox to FTX, have stemmed from opaque reserve management. WLFI’s system directly addresses this legacy of mistrust by making solvency a continuously proven state, not a periodically attested claim. Comparing traditional attestations with on-chain proof The difference between old and new methods is stark. The table below illustrates the key distinctions: Feature Traditional Quarterly/Monthly Attestation WLFI’s Real-Time On-Chain PoR Update Frequency Every 90 or 30 days Continuous (near real-time) Data Lag 30+ days due to accounting Minutes or seconds Verification Method Manual audit by a third-party firm Automated by decentralized oracle network Accessibility PDF report published on website Public, on-chain data readable by anyone Transparency Level Point-in-time snapshot Live, ongoing stream This shift represents more than a technical upgrade; it redefines the social contract between stablecoin issuers and their users. Key benefits of the new system include: Instant Verification: Users and protocols can autonomously verify reserves at any time. Reduced Counterparty Risk: Continuous proof minimizes the window for misuse of funds. Regulatory Clarity: Provides a clear, auditable trail for compliance purposes. Market Confidence: Builds stronger trust, which is essential for mainstream adoption. The evolving landscape of financial accountability World Liberty Financial’s announcement arrives during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for stablecoins globally. Jurisdictions like the European Union with its MiCA framework and the United States with proposed legislation are actively shaping rules that will mandate higher levels of transparency and reserve quality. By proactively adopting a system that exceeds current expectations, WLFI positions its USD1 stablecoin as a leader in regulatory readiness. Furthermore, this move aligns with a broader trend in decentralized finance (DeFi) towards verifiability and self-custody. Protocols that integrate USD1 can now programmatically check its reserve status before executing large transactions, adding a new layer of security to the DeFi ecosystem. This innovation could become a standard requirement for stablecoins used in sophisticated smart contract applications, influencing technological development across the sector. Expert perspective on the transparency imperative Financial technology experts have long argued that real-time auditing is the logical endpoint for digital assets. Dr. Elena Torres, a fintech researcher at the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, stated in a recent paper, “The promise of blockchain is not just digitization, but the enablement of continuous, algorithmic trust. A stablecoin that only proves its reserves quarterly is not leveraging the core innovation of its underlying technology.” WLFI’s implementation directly answers this critique. It transforms reserve backing from a historical footnote into a live operational metric. This development also has implications for traditional finance, where settlement and verification often take days. The real-time proof-of-reserves model demonstrates a pathway for faster, more transparent asset verification in broader capital markets, potentially influencing future standards for securities and other digital instruments. Conclusion World Liberty Financial’s deployment of real-time, on-chain proof of reserves via Chainlink represents a significant advancement for the entire stablecoin industry. By replacing delayed attestations with continuous, automated verification, WLFI addresses a core vulnerability and sets a new benchmark for transparency. This move enhances user protection, provides a model for future regulation, and strengthens the foundational trust required for the sustainable growth of digital finance. The success of this initiative will likely pressure competitors to follow suit, accelerating an industry-wide shift towards greater accountability and verifiable solvency. FAQs Q1: What is proof of reserves, and why is it important for stablecoins? Proof of reserves is an audit process that verifies a financial institution holds sufficient assets to cover its liabilities. For a stablecoin, it proves the issuer holds enough cash or cash-equivalent reserves to back every token in circulation. This is crucial for maintaining trust, ensuring stability, and preventing insolvency events. Q2: How does Chainlink’s Proof of Reserve mechanism work? Chainlink’s PoR uses a decentralized oracle network to fetch cryptographically signed reserve data from custodians like BitGo. The network verifies this data against real-world sources and then posts the proof on a blockchain. This creates a tamper-proof, publicly accessible record that updates in near real-time, eliminating manual delays. Q3: How does real-time verification differ from traditional audits? Traditional audits provide a point-in-time snapshot, often with a lag of 30-90 days due to manual accounting. Real-time verification is continuous and automated, offering a live view of reserves. This drastically reduces the risk window and allows for constant public scrutiny. Q4: Does this mean USD1 is now 100% risk-free? While real-time proof of reserves massively reduces counterparty and solvency risk, it does not eliminate all risks. Factors like the quality and liquidity of the underlying reserve assets (e.g., cash, treasury bills), regulatory changes, and smart contract security remain important considerations for users. Q5: Will other stablecoin issuers like Tether and Circle adopt similar technology? Industry analysts believe WLFI’s move increases competitive pressure for transparency. While major issuers may upgrade their reporting practices, the speed of adoption will depend on cost, technical integration, and evolving regulatory requirements. This development likely signals the beginning of a broader industry trend towards more frequent, automated reserve reporting. This post Proof of reserves breakthrough: World Liberty Financial unveils revolutionary real-time transparency for stablecoins first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

SIREN crashed 20% amid capital outflow, whale sell pressure and lower level liquidity clusters.

BitcoinWorld GBP/USD Plummets: US PPI Surge and Middle East Fears Trigger Dollar Dominance LONDON, March 12, 2025 – The GBP/USD currency pair experienced significant downward pressure today, slipping below key technical levels as robust US economic data bolstered the dollar. Simultaneously, escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East amplified traditional safe-haven flows into the US currency, creating a potent dual-force driving the forex market. This movement highlights the complex interplay between domestic economic indicators and international risk sentiment that continues to define currency valuations in 2025. GBP/USD Technical Breakdown and Immediate Reaction The cable pair dropped approximately 0.8% following the US Producer Price Index (PPI) release. Market participants swiftly reacted to data showing stronger-than-expected inflationary pressures at the wholesale level. Consequently, this reinforced expectations that the Federal Reserve might maintain a more restrictive monetary policy stance for longer. The immediate sell-off pushed the pair through several support levels that technical analysts had been monitoring closely. Furthermore, trading volumes spiked significantly above the 30-day average, indicating substantial institutional participation in the move. Forex traders noted particular weakness during the European trading session. The decline accelerated as stop-loss orders triggered below the 1.2650 level. Market sentiment turned decidedly bearish toward sterling relative to the greenback. Several major banks adjusted their short-term forecasts accordingly. Meanwhile, options markets showed increased demand for protection against further sterling depreciation. US PPI Data: The Fundamental Catalyst for Dollar Strength The US Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the Producer Price Index for final demand increased 0.5% month-over-month in February. This reading exceeded the consensus forecast of 0.3%. Core PPI, which excludes food and energy, also rose more than anticipated. These figures suggest persistent inflationary pressures within the production pipeline. Therefore, they potentially signal future consumer price trends that the Federal Reserve monitors closely. Economists immediately analyzed the subcomponents of the report. Notably, service sector prices showed particular resilience. This data point challenges earlier narratives about disinflation progressing smoothly. Market-implied probabilities for Federal Reserve rate cuts in 2025 subsequently diminished. As a result, US Treasury yields climbed across the curve. Higher yields naturally increased the dollar’s relative attractiveness to international investors seeking yield. Key US PPI Data Points (February 2025) Metric Actual Forecast Previous Monthly PPI Change +0.5% +0.3% +0.3% Core PPI (MoM) +0.4% +0.2% +0.2% Annual PPI Change +2.1% +1.9% +1.7% Central Bank Policy Divergence Analysis The PPI data widened the perceived policy divergence between the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England. Recent communications from the Bank of England have suggested a more dovish tilt amid concerns about UK economic growth. Conversely, the Federal Reserve appears increasingly patient about initiating an easing cycle. This policy divergence fundamentally supports a stronger dollar against sterling. Historical analysis shows that such divergence periods typically sustain currency trends for multiple quarters. Geopolitical Risks in the Middle East: The Safe-Haven Surge Simultaneously, reports of heightened military activity in several Middle Eastern regions escalated investor anxiety. Specifically, tensions involving major oil-producing nations intensified. Geopolitical instability traditionally triggers capital flows into perceived safe-haven assets. The US dollar benefits enormously from this dynamic due to its status as the world’s primary reserve currency. Additionally, US Treasury securities often see increased demand during such periods. The geopolitical premium embedded in oil prices also increased. Higher energy costs can exacerbate inflationary pressures globally. However, they particularly affect energy-importing economies like the United Kingdom. This creates a double negative for sterling: dollar strength from safe-haven flows and UK-specific economic vulnerability. Risk sentiment indicators, such as the VIX index and currency volatility measures, jumped in response to the news. Safe-Haven Flows: Capital moves into USD, JPY, and CHF during uncertainty. Commodity Impact: Oil price volatility affects inflation expectations and growth outlooks. Trade Route Concerns: Disruptions to key shipping lanes can impact global supply chains. Comparative Economic Backdrop: United Kingdom vs United States The fundamental economic landscape provides crucial context for the GBP/USD movement. Recent UK data has revealed a mixed picture. While inflation has moderated from peak levels, economic growth remains sluggish. The UK services PMI recently indicated contractionary territory. Conversely, the US economy continues demonstrating remarkable resilience. Consumer spending remains robust, and the labor market stays tight. This relative economic performance inherently supports the dollar over sterling. Balance of payments dynamics also play a significant role. The United States runs a substantial current account deficit, but it is comfortably financed by capital inflows attracted by deep financial markets and yield. The United Kingdom faces its own external financing challenges, especially post-Brexit. Foreign direct investment flows into the UK have been inconsistent, increasing reliance on more volatile portfolio investment. This makes sterling more susceptible to shifts in global risk appetite. Expert Perspectives on Currency Trajectories Senior currency strategists at major financial institutions provided immediate analysis. “Today’s move combines a fundamental reassessment of US inflation with a classic risk-off impulse,” noted a lead strategist from a global bank. “The PPI data questions the market’s aggressive pricing of Fed rate cuts. Meanwhile, geopolitical headlines remind investors that the dollar’s safe-haven status remains paramount.” Another analyst highlighted technical factors: “The break below 1.2650 opens the path toward 1.2550. Market positioning was already leaning short dollar, so this triggered a significant unwind.” Market Implications and Forward-Looking Scenarios The confluence of events has several important implications for broader financial markets. Firstly, a stronger dollar pressures commodities priced in USD, potentially easing some global inflation. Secondly, it tightens financial conditions for emerging market economies with dollar-denominated debt. For the UK, a weaker sterling may boost export competitiveness but also increase imported inflation. The Bank of England must now weigh these conflicting forces in its policy deliberations. Looking ahead, traders will monitor several key data releases. Upcoming US Consumer Price Index (CPI) data will either confirm or contradict the PPI’s message. UK employment and wage data will provide insight into domestic inflationary pressures. Any de-escalation in the Middle East could quickly reverse the safe-haven flows. However, the underlying theme of US economic outperformance appears likely to persist, suggesting continued medium-term support for the dollar. Conclusion The GBP/USD decline exemplifies how currency markets synthesize domestic economic data with global geopolitical developments. The stronger-than-expected US PPI report directly challenged expectations for imminent Federal Reserve easing, boosting the dollar’s yield appeal. Concurrently, rising Middle East tensions activated the dollar’s traditional role as a safe-haven asset. This powerful combination drove the pair lower through significant technical levels. Moving forward, the trajectory of GBP/USD will hinge on the evolution of US inflation trends, Bank of England policy signals, and the geopolitical landscape. Traders and investors must remain vigilant to both economic indicators and international developments that influence currency valuations. FAQs Q1: What exactly is the US PPI and why does it move markets? The US Producer Price Index (PPI) measures the average change over time in selling prices received by domestic producers for their output. It’s a leading indicator of consumer inflation because producers often pass higher costs to consumers. Strong PPI data suggests persistent inflation, which can delay central bank rate cuts, strengthening that nation’s currency. Q2: Why does the US dollar strengthen during geopolitical tensions? The US dollar is considered the world’s primary reserve and safe-haven currency. During periods of global uncertainty or conflict, investors seek the perceived safety and liquidity of US Treasury markets and dollar-denominated assets. This increased demand naturally boosts the dollar’s value relative to other currencies. Q3: How does a weaker GBP/USD affect the UK economy? A weaker pound makes UK exports cheaper and more competitive internationally, potentially boosting manufacturing. However, it also increases the cost of imports, including energy and food, which can fuel inflation and reduce consumers’ purchasing power. The net effect depends on the balance between these forces. Q4: What are the key technical levels to watch for GBP/USD now? Following the break below 1.2650, the next major support levels are viewed around 1.2550 and then 1.2450. On the upside, resistance is now likely at the former support of 1.2650, followed by 1.2750. These levels help traders identify potential reversal or continuation points. Q5: Could this move in GBP/USD reverse quickly? Yes, currency markets can be volatile. A reversal could be triggered by softer US CPI data, dovish comments from Federal Reserve officials, a de-escalation in the Middle East, or surprisingly strong UK economic data. Forex trends often face short-term corrections even within longer-term directional moves. This post GBP/USD Plummets: US PPI Surge and Middle East Fears Trigger Dollar Dominance first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

XRP risky in downtrend at $1.35; bearish target near $0.76 with unbalanced 1:1 ratio downside. Tight stops (below $1.21) and 1% risk rule mandatory for capital protection, BTC decline adds extra da...

The seizures and freezing over three months were conducted by the District of Columbia’s Scam Center Strike Force, established by US Attorney Jeanine Pirro in November.

OpenAI said Friday it closed a $110 billion funding round. The size was more than double its raise from a year earlier, which had been a record for a private tech company. Amazon put in $50 billion, while Nvidia and SoftBank each put in $30 billion, OpenAI said in its Friday release. The new money sets a $730 billion pre-money valuation, up from a $500 billion valuation tied to a secondary financing in October. OpenAI also said more investors may still join as the round continues. Lock in Amazon money and expand AWS access Amazon also announced a multiyear strategic partnership with OpenAI. The companies said they plan to build customized models that will run inside Amazon’s customer-facing applications. OpenAI said it is growing its existing $38 billion deal with Amazon Web Services by another $100 billion over the next eight years. AWS will also act as the exclusive third-party cloud distribution provider for OpenAI’s enterprise platform Frontier, which the company unveiled earlier this month. The companies described how the cash arrives. Amazon’s $50 billion investment starts with $15 billion first. Then another $35 billion comes “in the coming months when certain conditions are met.” Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, said , “We’re super excited about this deal.” Sam also said, “AI is going to happen everywhere.” He added that it is “transforming the whole economy,” and he said the world needs “a lot of collective computing power” to meet demand. Andy Jassy, Amazon’s CEO, said, “It’s so early right now in the AI space.” Andy also said, “I think we can help them quite a bit as part of this partnership.” OpenAI said Friday the announcement does not change “in any way” the terms of its partnership with Microsoft, which has been one of its major financial backers since 2019. The companies said in a joint statement that the partnership remains “strong and central.” Work with Defense and set red lines OpenAI also dealt with a very different topic this week: national security use. Sam, in a message to staff Thursday evening, said the company was working on a possible deal linked to the standoff between Anthropic and the Pentagon over how AI can be used on the battlefield. In that memo, Sam said OpenAI was talking with the Defense Department about using its models in classified settings while keeping the same safety guardrails that have helped create the current stalemate for Anthropic. Sam said he hoped OpenAI could land a solution that could work for the rest of the industry, too. No deal is signed. Someone close to the talks said the discussions could still fall apart. In a note to staff Thursday evening viewed by The Wall Street Journal, Sam wrote that OpenAI is pursuing a deal “that allows our models to be deployed in classified environments and that fits with our principles.” He said:- “We would ask for the contract to cover any use except those which are unlawful or unsuited to cloud deployments, such as domestic surveillance and autonomous offensive weapons.” Sam also wrote, “We would like to try to help de-escalate things.” He said he supported Anthropic’s position in principle, while also noting the government’s concerns about a private company having control over major national-security decisions. Sam wrote, “We have long believed that AI should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons, and that humans should remain in the loop for high-stakes automated decisions. These are our main red lines.” He also wrote, “We believe this dispute isn’t about how AI will be used, but about control.” Sam added, “We believe that a private US company cannot be more powerful than the democratically-elected US government, although companies can have lots of input and influence. Democracy is messy, but we are committed to it.” The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them .

Vitalik sold 17k ETH, Bitmine suffered 8.8B$ loss. Aave reached 1T$ volume. ETH 1.920$, RSI 38.71 oversold, S1 1.864$ strong support. DeFi records and ETF inflows shaped the week. UAE bank is enter...

BitcoinWorld Block Purchased 103 BTC in Q4: A Strategic Move That Solidifies Its Crypto Vision In a decisive move underscoring its long-term conviction, Jack Dorsey’s payments company Block purchased 103 BTC in Q4, reinforcing its position as a major corporate holder of the pioneering cryptocurrency. This strategic acquisition, revealed alongside robust financial results, brings Block’s total Bitcoin treasury to 8,883 BTC, a hoard currently valued at approximately $577 million. The purchase occurs amidst a evolving regulatory landscape and represents a continued bet on Bitcoin’s foundational role in the future of finance. Consequently, analysts are scrutinizing this move for its implications on corporate treasury management and digital asset adoption. Block’s Bitcoin Purchase and Q4 Financial Performance Block, the financial technology firm formerly known as Square, disclosed its fourth-quarter earnings with significant updates. The company reported a strong operating income of $485 million. Furthermore, management raised its gross profit forecast for the current fiscal year to $12.2 billion. This figure marks an 18% increase from prior guidance. The announcement of the Block purchased 103 BTC in Q4 transaction, however, captured immediate attention from crypto and traditional finance observers alike. This latest acquisition follows a consistent pattern for the Dorsey-led company. Block initiated its corporate Bitcoin strategy in October 2020 with an initial $50 million investment. Subsequently, it made another substantial purchase of $170 million worth of Bitcoin in February 2021. The recent 103 BTC buy, while smaller in scale, signals unwavering commitment. Importantly, the company employs a dollar-cost averaging strategy, spreading purchases over time to mitigate market volatility. Total Holdings: 8,883 BTC Current Valuation: ~$577 million (as of late February 2025) Q4 Purchase: 103 BTC Strategy: Dollar-cost averaging as part of long-term treasury reserve The Corporate Bitcoin Treasury Landscape Block’s actions place it firmly within a growing cohort of publicly-traded companies allocating treasury reserves to Bitcoin. MicroStrategy, led by executive chairman Michael Saylor, remains the most aggressive adopter, holding over 190,000 BTC. However, Block’s approach differs in its integration with broader business operations. Unlike pure accumulation, Block’s holdings support its ecosystem of Bitcoin-focused products, including the Spiral development team and its Bitkey hardware wallet. Other notable corporate holders include Tesla, which briefly accepted Bitcoin for vehicle purchases, and software company Marathon Digital Holdings. The trend, often called “the corporate Bitcoin standard,” gained traction following periods of high inflation and expansive monetary policy. Companies seek an asset perceived as a hedge against currency debasement. Moreover, Bitcoin’s finite supply of 21 million coins presents a stark contrast to fiat currencies. Select Public Company Bitcoin Holdings (Approx. Q1 2025) Company Bitcoin Holdings Approx. Value (USD) Strategy MicroStrategy 190,000+ BTC $12.3B+ Primary Treasury Asset Block 8,883 BTC $577M Treasury Diversification & Product Integration Marathon Digital Held as part of operations Varies Mining & Treasury Expert Analysis on Treasury Strategy Financial analysts view Block’s steady accumulation as a calculated balance sheet strategy. “Block purchased 103 BTC in Q4 not as a speculative trade, but as a routine allocation,” notes a report from ARK Invest. The firm highlights how Block treats Bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset, similar to how corporations historically held gold. This perspective aligns with comments from CEO Jack Dorsey, who has repeatedly called Bitcoin the “native currency of the internet.” Furthermore, experts point to the accounting treatment as a key factor. Block holds its Bitcoin as an “indefinite-lived intangible asset” under accounting rules. This means it must record impairment charges if the market price falls below the carrying value at the end of a quarter, but does not mark up gains until sale. Despite this asymmetric accounting, the company continues its purchases, indicating a focus on ultimate long-term value over short-term earnings reports. Impact on Block’s Ecosystem and Product Roadmap The Bitcoin holdings directly complement Block’s operational focus. The company operates two main ecosystems: Square, serving sellers, and Cash App, serving consumers. Cash App has long allowed users to buy, sell, and send Bitcoin. Therefore, the corporate treasury investment aligns with a product offering that generates significant revenue from Bitcoin transactions. In essence, Block invests in the asset it also facilitates access to for millions of users. Additionally, Block’s dedicated Bitcoin development unit, Spiral (formerly Square Crypto), works on open-source projects to improve the Bitcoin network. Projects like the Lightning Development Kit (LDK) aim to accelerate Lightning Network adoption. This creates a synergistic loop: corporate investment supports the asset’s ecosystem, which in turn enhances the utility and potential value of the corporate holdings. It is a holistic strategy rarely seen in other corporate adopters. Cash App: Provides Bitcoin brokerage to consumers, driving transaction-based revenue. Spiral: Funds open-source Bitcoin development to improve network utility. Bitkey: A self-custody hardware wallet offering, promoting financial sovereignty. TBD: Block’s decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web5 platform initiative. Regulatory Context and Market Implications Block’s ongoing purchases occur during a period of significant regulatory clarification for digital assets in the United States. The SEC’s approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024 provided a regulated pathway for institutional investment. This event likely bolstered corporate confidence in Bitcoin’s market infrastructure and long-term viability. Block’s strategy appears validated by this institutional embrace, though the company predates the ETF wave. The market implication of consistent corporate buying is a reduction of liquid Bitcoin supply. With large entities moving Bitcoin into long-term treasury storage, the available coins on exchanges for trading decrease. This dynamic can potentially increase volatility, but also supports price discovery based on longer-term holding demand. Block’s actions, while not market-moving alone, contribute to this broader structural trend of supply illiquidity. Conclusion Block purchased 103 BTC in Q4 as part of a disciplined, long-term strategy to integrate Bitcoin deeply into its corporate identity and product suite. This move, raising total holdings to 8,883 BTC worth $577 million, reinforces Jack Dorsey’s vision of Bitcoin as a transformative monetary network. The decision is supported by strong core business performance, with an upgraded gross profit forecast of $12.2 billion. Ultimately, Block’s approach demonstrates a nuanced corporate crypto strategy that blends treasury management with product development and ecosystem support. As regulatory frameworks mature and institutional adoption grows, Block’s early and consistent commitment positions it as a pivotal player bridging traditional finance with the decentralized future. FAQs Q1: How much Bitcoin does Block own after its Q4 purchase? Following its Q4 2024 purchase of 103 BTC, Block’s total corporate Bitcoin holdings reached 8,883 BTC. Based on prevailing market prices in late February 2025, this stash is worth approximately $577 million. Q2: Why does Block keep buying Bitcoin for its corporate treasury? Block’s leadership, notably CEO Jack Dorsey, views Bitcoin as the “native currency of the internet” and a superior long-term store of value. The company employs a dollar-cost averaging strategy to build a treasury reserve asset it believes will appreciate over time and support its Bitcoin-centric product ecosystem. Q3: How does Block’s Bitcoin strategy differ from MicroStrategy’s? While both companies hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets, MicroStrategy treats it almost exclusively as its primary treasury reserve asset. Block integrates its holdings with its business operations, supporting Bitcoin services in Cash App, funding open-source development via Spiral, and offering consumer hardware wallets like Bitkey. Q4: What accounting method does Block use for its Bitcoin? Block accounts for its Bitcoin as an “indefinite-lived intangible asset” under U.S. GAAP. This requires the company to record impairment charges if the market price falls below the carrying value at quarter-end, but it cannot record unrealized gains. Gains are only realized upon sale. Q5: Does Block’s purchase signal a broader trend for public companies? Block is part of a small but influential group of public companies allocating treasury reserves to Bitcoin. Its continued purchases, especially post-ETF approval, may encourage other firms to consider similar diversification strategies, though widespread adoption depends on regulatory clarity, accounting standards, and board-level risk tolerance. This post Block Purchased 103 BTC in Q4: A Strategic Move That Solidifies Its Crypto Vision first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

South Korea National Tax Service just made a costly mistake resulting a huge crypto loss. In an official press release, the agency published unredacted photos that exposed crypto wallet seed phrases. Within hours, an unknown actor used the information to drain 4 million Ethereum-based tokens, nominally worth $4.8 million, from seized wallets before returning them. The funds were not dumped, but the incident exposes a serious operational security failure. It highlights the risks governments face when handling self-custodied digital assets without proper technical safeguards. Key Takeaways The Lapse: NTS press materials included high-resolution images of handwritten recovery phrases for seized Ledger hardware wallets. The Asset: 4 million Pre-Retogeum (PRTG) tokens were taken, holding a theoretical value of $4.8 million but near-zero market liquidity. The Outcome: The attacker funded the wallets with ETH for gas, moved the tokens, and eventually returned them to the original address. The Leak: Tax Agency Publishes Ethereum Private Keys On February 26, the National Tax Service announced it had seized roughly 8.1 billion KRW, about $5.61 million, from repeat tax delinquents. To showcase the enforcement action, officials released photos of the confiscated items, including a display labeled “Case 3.” Source: ntw The problem was in the details. The images showed Ledger hardware wallets next to a sheet of paper with the 12-word seed phrases fully visible. A local professor described the mistake bluntly, comparing it to publicly inviting someone to empty your wallet. The incident highlights a basic but critical gap in technical handling, especially as authorities increasingly seize and manage digital assets. On-Chain Data: The Swipe and Return On-chain data shows the wallets were drained soon after the photos went public. An unknown actor first sent a small amount of ETH to cover gas fees, then transferred 4 million Pre-Retogeum (PRTG) tokens to a new address. Source: Etherscan That amount represented roughly 40% of the token’s total supply. While early reports valued the stash at $4.8 million, liquidity tells a different story. The only active trading pair shows minimal volume, and even a small sell order would have crushed the price. Cashing out at scale was nearly impossible. The tokens were later returned to the original wallets. Whether this was a white-hat action or simple realization that the assets were illiquid is unclear. The episode highlights a basic custody failure. The original owner used a hardware wallet for security, but that protection was undone when authorities photographed the seed phrase. The NTS has not yet issued a detailed statement, and the incident raises questions about how seized crypto assets will be handled going forward. Discover: The best new crypto in the world The post South Korea National Tax Service’s Mistake Resulted In $4.8 Million Crypto Loss appeared first on Cryptonews .

Bitcoin fell Friday after briefly topping $69K this week, while stocks like CoreWeave and BitMine tumbled amid broader market losses.

BNB at $609.64 leaned on the critical support at $608.8050; if it holds, $626 resistance could be tested. On a breakdown, the $408 downside target should be monitored, with BTC correlation being de...

Former SEC Chair Gary Gensler has allegedly apologized to Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse..

Truth Social sits at the center of a corporate plan that could separate Truth Media from the rest of Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. Trump Media & Technology Group Corp., which trades as DJT on Nasdaq and NYSE Texas, said today it is in ongoing discussions with TAE Technologies, Inc. and Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp., the SPAC that trades as TVA on Nasdaq. The talks cover a potential spin-off by TMTG of Truth businesses, including Truth Social , into a publicly traded company called SpinCo. The timing is tied to the pending merger between TMTG and TAE. TMTG said the spin-off is being discussed to happen after that merger closes. In the structure described, shares of SpinCo would be distributed to shareholders of record of TMTG from before the merger closing with TAE. After the distribution, SpinCo would merge with Texas Ventures III. TMTG plans Truth SpinCo split after TAE merger TMTG said the TAE businesses would stay inside the public company after the spin-off, along with certain of TMTG’s existing businesses and assets. The companies said the merger would combine TMTG’s “robust balance sheet” with TAE’s “leading technologies.” They said the goal is to form “pure play companies,” each with “distinct strategies.” The companies also issued a cautionary statement. TMTG, TAE, and Texas Ventures III said “no definitive agreement has been reached” and discussions are still ongoing. They said there is “no assurance” any deal will come out of these talks, what terms it might carry, or when it might happen, if it happens at all, at present. They said any definitive agreement would be subject to approvals from each company’s board, plus regulatory approvals, shareholder approvals, and other customary closing conditions. For Truth shareholders, it is still not final. American Bitcoin posts loss as Bitcoin drops 23% American Bitcoin swung to a fourth-quarter loss on Thursday as digital assets stayed weak. The company is backed by two of U.S. President Donald Trump’s sons. American Bitcoin was co-founded by Eric Trump, and Trump is a stockholder. American Bitcoin mines bitcoin and either sells it at a premium or holds it for a price surge. Concerns over stretched valuations in artificial-intelligence stocks and uncertainty around the timing and scale of U.S. Federal Reserve rate cuts pressured risk assets. Bitcoin fell to quarterly lows. Many so-called digital asset treasury companies faced stress, since their stock prices often move with the token because token swings change the value of reserves. In the quarter, the sector saw a selloff, and bitcoin tumbled nearly 23% over the three months. American Bitcoin runs industrial-scale mining operations. It relies largely on infrastructure provided by Hut 8 to produce bitcoin at costs below prevailing market prices. Shares of American Bitcoin have lost nearly 22% in the past twelve months. Sustained pressure on crypto treasury stocks could complicate raising additional capital to mine more tokens at an industrial scale, which is the core of the model. Eric said the company holds over 6,000 bitcoin presently, up from 5,401 at the 2025 year-end. American Bitcoin posted a net loss of $59.45 million in the fourth quarter, compared with a $3.48 million profit in the year-ago period. The company also reported a profit in the previous quarter. Revenue was $78.3 million for the three months ended Dec. 31, up from $64.2 million in the prior-year period. Analysts expected $79.6 million. Truth-linked traders will track the reserve and the cash flow next. Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Key Takeaways: WLFI price prediction faces bearish pressure toward $0.113. World Liberty Financial price prediction for 2026 expects the price of WLFI to surge toward $0.41. By 2032, we expect the World Liberty Financial price to record a maximum price of $1.4. Donald Trump has embraced the title of the “crypto president”, a label that has fueled massive speculation across the crypto industry. After Trump’s 2024 election victory, the price of Bitcoin surged, a move many analysts and traders called a bullish signal for the broader cryptocurrency market. Building on this momentum, Trump introduced his own branded tokens—most notably the $TRUMP token and $MELANIA memecoin—cementing his direct involvement in the world of digital assets. Whether Trump’s push into crypto is driven by policy goals or personal profit, one message is clear: he intends to make cryptocurrency part of both his political strategy and financial portfolio. However, Trump’s personal involvement in crypto tokens raises critical ethical questions. If a sitting or future U.S. president profits directly from token sales, DeFi projects, or blockchain ventures, it risks blurring the line between public duty and private gain. One project drawing major attention is World Liberty Financial after major listings, a Trump-backed decentralized finance (DeFi) platform. This article explores what World Liberty Financial is, and what Trump’s embrace of crypto could mean for the future of Bitcoin, memecoins, and U.S. crypto policy. Consequently, numerous analysts eagerly anticipate the future valuation of its native cryptocurrency, WLFI. This raises the question: Can WLFI price reach $1? This forecast for World Liberty Financial’s price examines factors such as ecosystem trends, adoption rates, underlying technology, and technical analysis to project the WLFI price prediction from 2026 to 2032. Overview Cryptocurrency World Liberty Financial Ticker Symbol WLFI Rank 27 Current Price $0.113 Price change 24H -2.9% Market cap $4.49 Billion Circulating supply 24.66 Billion WLFI Trading volume 24h $201.29M (-13.91%) All-time high $0.46, September 1, 2025 All-time low $0.091, October 11, 2025 WLFI price prediction: Technical analysis Metric Value Current Price $0.113 Price Prediction $ 0.09800 (-24.84%) Fear & Greed Index 12 (Extreme Fear) Sentiment Bearish Volatility 8.96% (High) Green Days 13/30 (43%) 50-Day SMA $ 0.1539 200-Day SMA – 14-Day RSI 36.62 (Neutral) World Liberty Financial technical analysis: WLFI price faces bearish pressure toward $0.113 WLFI price analysis shows a bearish pattern toward $0.113 Resistance for WLFI is present at $0.143 Support for WLFI/USD is present at $0.0977 The WLFI price analysis for 27 February confirms that WLFI faces increasing volatility as it declines toward $0.113. Currently, the bears are aiming for further declines. WLFI price chart prediction: World Liberty Financial faces selling pressure toward $0.113 WLFI price is facing a decline as sellers push the price toward $0.11. WLFI price is aiming for a hold above the immediate Fib channels. The 24-hour volume dropped toward $6.84 million, showing decreased interest in trading activity. The price is trading at $0.113, declining over 2.9% in the last 24 hours. WLFIUSDT chart by TradingView The RSI-14 trend line has dropped from its previous level and trades below the midline at level 44, suggesting rising selling pressure. WLFI/USD 4-hour price chart: Bears aim for a hold below EMA trend lines The 4-hour WLFI price chart suggests WLFI continues to experience bearish activity around EMA lines, creating a negative sentiment on the price chart. As the price hovers around EMA trend lines, bears prepare for a domination by sending the price below the EMA20 trend line. WLFIUSDT chart by TradingView The BoP indicator trades in a negative region at 0.41, hinting that sellers are trying to build immediate pressure near support levels and boost downward correction. Additionally, the MACD trend line has formed red candles below the signal line, hinting at a bearish pressure. WLFI technical indicators: Levels and action Daily Simple Moving Average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $ 0.1457 SELL SMA 5 $ 0.1362 SELL SMA 10 $ 0.1412 SELL SMA 21 $ 0.1542 SELL SMA 50 $ 0.1539 SELL SMA 100 $ 0.1502 SELL Daily Exponential Moving Average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $ 0.1573 SELL EMA 5 $ 0.1609 SELL EMA 10 $ 0.1602 SELL EMA 21 $ 0.1546 SELL EMA 50 $ 0.1505 SELL EMA 100 $ 0.1531 SELL What to expect from WLFI price analysis next? The hourly price chart confirms that bears are making efforts to prevent the WLFI price from an immediate surge. However, if WLFI’s price successfully breaks above $0.143, it may surge higher and touch the resistance at $0.1681. WLFIUSDT chart by TradingView If bulls cannot initiate a surge, WLFI’s price may drop below the immediate support line at $0.0977, resulting in a correction to $0.0799. Why is the WLFI price down today? Sellers are gaining confidence to maintain their dominance, resulting in a downward push toward $0.113. WLFI crypto news House investigators are looking into World Liberty Financial, a crypto company linked to Donald Trump, over claims it secretly sold a 49% stake to an Abu Dhabi–connected group for $500 million just before his 2025 inauguration. Is WLFI a good investment? Trading $WLFI will be very risky. Since it’s a new and highly hyped token with only a small amount available at launch, the price could change quickly and unpredictably. Liquidity will be thin, so even one big trade might move the market. It’s normal for tokens like this to surge at launch and then drop as early buyers cash out. However, considering its background and ongoing trading volume, WLFI can turn out to be a good investment option in the long-term. What is the WLFI price prediction for 2026? By 2026, analysts predict that World Liberty Financial (WLFI) will start the year at $0.1, with an average trading price of $0.37, and could climb as high as $0.41. Will WLFI price touch $1? Yes, WLFI price might touch the $1 milestone by the end of 2031. However, the token might attain this level much earlier, depending on the future market sentiment and buying demand. Will WLFI Price Reach $10? If everything remains good and WLFI gains recognition, its price might surpass $10 by 2040. Is WLFI a good long-term investment? As World Liberty Financial aims to expand its offerings, it might gain a significant position in the altcoin market. Hence, WLFI can be a good long-term investment option. The WLFI long term price outlook is looking strong due to its strong political support. WLFI price prediction February 2026 Analysts expect a steady surge in crypto market prices in February. We expect WLFI to record a minimum price of $0.1 and a maximum price of $0.2, with an average of $0.15 in February. WLFI Price Prediction Potential low Potential average Potential high WLFI Price Prediction February 2026 0.1 0.15 0.2 WLFI price prediction 2026 By the end of 2026, analysts predict that World Liberty Financial (WLFI) will record a minimum price of $0.1, with an average trading price of $0.37, and could climb as high as $0.41. WLFI Price Prediction Potential low Potential average Potential high WLFI Price Prediction 2026 $0.1 $0.37 $0.41 WLFI Price Predictions 2027-2032 Year Minimum Price Average Price Maximum Price 2027 0.4 0.44 0.47 2028 0.55 0.65 0.68 2029 0.7 0.8 0.81 2030 0.72 0.83 0.86 2031 0.89 0.96 1.02 2032 1.26 1.3 1.4 WLFI Price Prediction for 2027 By 2027, experts forecast WLFI to begin at $0.40, maintain an average price of $0.44, and potentially reach $0.47. This represents a healthy climb from 2025, showing that WLFI is gaining traction in the crypto space. World Liberty Financial Price Prediction 2028 By 2028, market analysts and experts predict that WLFI will start the year at $0.55, with an average price of $0.65, and trade around $0.68. WLFI Prediction for 2029 By 2029, forecasts suggest WLFI will open at $0.7, trade at an average of $0.8, and could move up to $0.81. World Liberty Financial Price Prediction 2030 By 2030, analysts expect WLFI to begin at $0.72, maintain an average price of $0.83, and rise toward $0.86. WLFI Crypto Price Forecast for 2031 By 2031, experts predict WLFI will start at $0.89, trade at an average of $0.96, and potentially reach $1.02. Crossing the one-dollar mark would be a significant psychological milestone for investors and a strong indicator of growth. World Liberty Financial Price Prediction 2032 By 2032, WLFI is expected to open at $1.26, average around $1.3, and peak at $1.40. WLFI Price Predictions 2026-2032 WLFI coin price forecast by experts Firm Name 2026 2027 Coinpedia $0.539 $0.359 CoinDCX $0.35 $0.46 Cryptopolitan’s WLFI price prediction Cryptopolitan is bullish on WLFI price prediction as the token is backed by a strong community. As a result, we are bullish on WLFI future price forecast. By 2027, experts forecast WLFI to begin at $0.40, maintain an average price of $0.44, and potentially reach $0.47. This represents a healthy climb from 2026, showing that WLFI is gaining traction in the crypto space. WLFI historic price sentiment WLFI Price History The $WLFI governance token for World Liberty Financial, the Trump family–backed DeFi platform, launched for public trading and token claims on September 1, 2025, at 12:00 UTC. This token generation event (TGE) kicked off spot trading on Ethereum’s mainnet, following a presale that raised over $550 million from 85,000+ investors since October 2024. The WLFI token price initially surged toward $0.478 but it later declined toward $0.1611. On 6 September, the WLFI price again attempted a surge toward $0.2. By the end of September, WLFI declined below $0.2. By the end of October, the price of WLFI further declined and touched $0.1 in early November. In early December, WLFI price started trading below $0.15. However, the price surged in January 2026 as it touched a high around $0.19. However, WLFI later dropped toward $0.12 in February.

BitcoinWorld Critical Showdown: Anthropic vs Pentagon AI Conflict Exposes Military Technology Governance Crisis WASHINGTON, D.C. — October 2025: A fundamental conflict between technological ethics and national security priorities has erupted into public view as Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei faces off against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over military artificial intelligence deployment. This confrontation represents more than a contractual dispute; it reveals deep fissures in how society governs increasingly powerful AI systems with potentially lethal applications. The immediate deadline for resolution has passed, but the implications of this standoff will shape defense technology policy for years to come. Anthropic Pentagon AI Conflict: Core Ethical Boundaries Anthropic has established clear red lines for its AI technology deployment. The company refuses to permit two specific military applications: mass surveillance of American citizens and fully autonomous weapons systems that conduct strikes without human input. These restrictions stem from Anthropic’s founding philosophy that artificial intelligence presents unique risks requiring unique safeguards. Traditional defense contractors typically surrender control over product usage after sale, but Anthropic maintains that AI’s transformative power demands continued ethical oversight. The company’s position doesn’t categorically reject all military applications. Instead, Anthropic argues its current models lack sufficient capability for high-stakes military operations. Company officials express concern about potential misidentification of targets, unauthorized conflict escalation, or irreversible lethal decisions made by imperfect AI systems. This cautious approach reflects broader industry concerns about deploying immature artificial intelligence in combat environments where errors could have catastrophic consequences. Military Technology Evolution Context The United States military already employs numerous automated systems, some with lethal capabilities. Current Department of Defense policy, established through a 2023 directive, permits AI systems to select and engage targets autonomously provided they meet specific standards and receive senior defense official approval. This existing framework creates the precise scenario that worries Anthropic’s leadership. Military technology development often occurs under classified conditions, meaning autonomous weapons systems could become operational before public or corporate oversight mechanisms engage. Pentagon’s Position on AI Governance Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has articulated a fundamentally different perspective on technology governance. The Pentagon argues it should deploy Anthropic’s artificial intelligence for any lawful purpose it deems necessary, without vendor-imposed restrictions. This position emphasizes military operational autonomy and national security imperatives over corporate ethical policies. Secretary Hegseth has characterized Anthropic’s restrictions as potentially jeopardizing critical military operations and endangering warfighters. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell clarified the department’s stance in a recent public statement. “We have no interest in conducting mass domestic surveillance or deploying autonomous weapons,” Parnell stated. “However, we cannot allow any company to dictate operational decision-making terms. Our request is simple: permit Pentagon use of Anthropic’s model for all lawful purposes.” This framing positions the conflict as about authority rather than specific applications, challenging the very notion of corporate governance over military technology. Key Positions in Anthropic-Pentagon Conflict Anthropic Position Pentagon Position Prohibits mass surveillance of Americans Seeks unrestricted lawful use Bans fully autonomous weapons Emphasizes military operational autonomy Maintains ongoing ethical oversight Rejects vendor governance of operations Questions current AI capability for combat Prioritizes technological advantage Advocates for gradual, controlled deployment Seeks immediate operational integration National Security Implications and Alternatives The Pentagon has threatened significant consequences if Anthropic maintains its restrictions. Officials have discussed declaring Anthropic a “supply chain risk,” effectively blacklisting the company from government contracts. Alternatively, the Defense Department could invoke the Defense Production Act to compel technology adaptation to military specifications. Both approaches carry substantial implications for national security and technological innovation. Defense technology investor Sachin Seth of Trousdale Ventures analyzed the potential outcomes. “A supply chain risk designation could mean lights out for Anthropic as a government contractor,” Seth explained. “Conversely, if the Department of Defense loses access to Anthropic’s models, they might face a six-to-twelve-month capability gap while alternative providers like OpenAI or xAI develop comparable systems.” This window creates vulnerability concerns for military planners who prioritize maintaining technological superiority. Recent industry developments suggest alternative paths forward. xAI, owned by Elon Musk, has publicly committed to becoming “classified-ready” and appears willing to provide the Pentagon with unrestricted technology access. Meanwhile, reports indicate OpenAI may maintain ethical restrictions similar to Anthropic’s, potentially creating an industry divide between permissive and restrictive AI providers. This emerging landscape complicates the Pentagon’s procurement strategy and Anthropic’s competitive position. Historical Precedents and Policy Context This conflict echoes previous technology governance debates, including encryption backdoor controversies and drone technology export controls. However, artificial intelligence presents unique challenges because of its general-purpose nature and rapid evolution. Current legal frameworks provide limited guidance for this specific scenario, with few statutes addressing corporate ethical restrictions on military technology use. The outcome may establish precedents affecting numerous emerging technologies beyond artificial intelligence. Broader Industry and Societal Impacts The Anthropic-Pentagon confrontation transcends immediate contractual issues to address fundamental questions about technology governance in democratic societies. Key considerations include: Corporate Responsibility: What ethical obligations do technology creators bear for downstream applications? Military Innovation: How can national security needs balance with ethical constraints? Regulatory Frameworks: What legal structures should govern military AI deployment? Public Transparency: How much visibility should citizens have into military technology development? International Competition: How do ethical restrictions affect technological competitiveness against less constrained adversaries? These questions gain urgency as artificial intelligence capabilities advance rapidly. Military applications represent just one domain where society must establish governance frameworks before technology outpaces policy development. The Anthropic-Pentagon conflict provides a concrete case study for these broader debates, with implications extending to commercial AI deployment, international arms control agreements, and domestic surveillance policies. Conclusion The Anthropic Pentagon AI conflict reveals fundamental tensions between technological ethics and national security imperatives. This confrontation represents more than a contractual dispute; it signals a critical juncture in how democratic societies govern powerful artificial intelligence systems. The outcome will influence military technology development, corporate responsibility standards, and regulatory approaches for years to come. As artificial intelligence capabilities continue advancing, establishing balanced governance frameworks becomes increasingly urgent. The Anthropic-Pentagon standoff provides both warning and opportunity—a chance to develop thoughtful policies before technological capabilities outpace societal preparedness. FAQs Q1: What specific AI applications does Anthropic prohibit for military use? Anthropic explicitly prohibits two applications: mass surveillance of American citizens and fully autonomous weapons systems that conduct strikes without human input. The company maintains these restrictions based on ethical principles and concerns about current AI capabilities. Q2: What legal authority does the Pentagon claim for unrestricted AI use? The Pentagon argues it should determine appropriate military technology applications based on existing laws and operational requirements. Officials maintain that vendor-imposed restrictions improperly constrain military decision-making and potentially compromise national security. Q3: How might this conflict affect other AI companies? The outcome could establish precedents affecting all defense technology providers. Companies may face pressure to choose between maintaining ethical restrictions or securing government contracts. The conflict might also accelerate regulatory clarity around military AI governance. Q4: What are the national security implications if Anthropic loses Pentagon contracts? The Department of Defense might experience temporary capability gaps while alternative providers develop comparable systems. However, maintaining multiple qualified suppliers could enhance long-term security through diversified sourcing and competitive innovation. Q5: How does current U.S. policy address autonomous weapons systems? A 2023 Department of Defense directive permits autonomous target selection and engagement provided systems meet specific standards and receive senior official approval. The policy establishes review processes but doesn’t categorically ban autonomous weapons, creating the regulatory environment underlying this conflict. This post Critical Showdown: Anthropic vs Pentagon AI Conflict Exposes Military Technology Governance Crisis first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

As Citi integrates Bitcoin into bank-grade custody and reporting frameworks, Morgan Stanley moves to bring crypto trading, lending exploration and tokenized products to mainstream wealth clients.

ETH is approaching the primary support at 1.863$ from the 1.920$ level; a breakdown targets 1.000$. Resistances are limited at 1.941$, 2.021$, and 2.150$; BTC correlation is decisive.