Bitcoin is trading near $66,800 as market consolidation continues. Against this backdrop, Eric Trump predicted the asset could reach $1,000,000 per coin. His remarks came during a CNBC interview at the World Liberty Forum. Eric Trump has renewed their public support for Bitcoin, describing it as the defining asset class for a new generation. Eric Trump said he has “never been more bullish on Bitcoin” despite recent price weakness. This prediction follows Strategy chairman Michael Saylor's prediction that Bitcoin could reach $1,000,000 by 2035. Trump Sons Outline Case for $1 Million Bitcoin Eric Trump linked his $1 million projection to long-term performance and fixed supply. He pointed to Bitcoin’s recovery from lows near $16,000 two years ago. He also referenced strong average annual returns over the past decade. Trump argued that volatility is natural for an emerging asset. He compared Bitcoin with municipal bonds and U.S. Treasuries. He said traditional instruments offer lower yields and limited upside. He also cited growing institutional adoption. Firms such as Fidelity, Charles Schwab, JPMorgan, BlackRock, and Goldman Sachs were mentioned. According to Trump, private wealth allocations to crypto have increased in recent years. Trump serves as co-founder of American Bitcoin Corp., which holds about 6,039 BTC as of February 2026, placing it among the top public corporate Bitcoin holders. Goldman Sachs CEO Confirms Personal BTC Exposure Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon also addressed Bitcoin during the forum. He disclosed that he owns a small amount of BTC. Solomon described his holdings as “very, very limited.” He said he is not a “great Bitcoin prognosticator.” He positioned himself more as an observer than an advocate. His comments mark a shift from earlier skepticism. In a previous CNBC interview, Solomon described Bitcoin as speculative. He questioned its real-world use case while acknowledging investor demand. His recent disclosure signals growing proximity between traditional finance and digital assets. The interaction between Wall Street leaders and crypto firms has expanded. Regulatory developments in Washington remain a central focus. Industry executives continue to call for clearer statutory frameworks. Coinbase CEO and Policy Outlook Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong also spoke at the forum. He attributed recent Bitcoin price weakness to market psychology. He dismissed speculation that macro-political factors were the main driver. Armstrong maintained that Bitcoin remains one of the best-performing assets of the past decade. He emphasized that Coinbase does not take a short-term view of volatility. “I think the bill will get done,” Armstrong said regarding pending crypto legislation. He suggested a market structure bill could advance under President Donald Trump’s administration. He said regulatory clarity would provide long-term certainty. Armstrong added that Coinbase would continue operating under existing rules if legislation stalls. Wells Fargo Sees $150B Liquidity Boost Wells Fargo analysts projected that up to $150 billion in tax refunds could enter the economy. The bank suggested part of this liquidity may flow into risk assets. Historically, refund seasons have triggered retail trading activity. The bank noted that Bitcoin has tracked domestic liquidity trends. Domestic liquidity declined by $105 billion in recent weeks. Over the same period, Bitcoin fell about 28%, according to TradingView data. Analysts expect over 60% of refunds to be distributed by late March 2026. They believe a liquidity rebound could support speculative flows. Bitcoin’s fixed supply of 21 million coins remains a core narrative for long-term holders. Source: CoinCodex Currently, Bitcoin’s circulating supply stands near 19.99 million coins. Its total market capitalization is about $1.34 trillion. However, the BTC price action remains within a tight weekly range between $66,800 and $68,300.

Dogecoin faces sustained selling pressure. The memecoin has traded between $0.09 and $0.1 following a rejection at $0.117 during a broader market pullback. At the time of writing, DOGE traded at $0.09878 , down 1.92% in the last 24 hours. The asset has posted lower highs for three consecutive sessions, a pattern that reflects weakening bullish conviction. Bulls Fail to Reclaim Lost Ground Dogecoin's upside momentum broke down after the price peaked at $0.15. Since then, bulls have attempted multiple recoveries. None has succeeded. Each rally has faded before establishing a higher high, and the cumulative result is a price that has slipped beneath the psychologically significant $0.1 threshold. Buyers have not disappeared entirely. Each time DOGE dipped below $0.1, demand emerged to defend the level. This buying activity has prevented a sharper decline but has not been strong enough to trigger a reversal. The market remains in a fragile equilibrium, with $0.1 serving as both a battleground and a barometer of sentiment. Spot market inflows have been inconsistent. Sustained institutional or retail buying in the spot market has not materialized in meaningful volumes. This absence of spot-driven momentum limits the probability of a strong near-term recovery without a significant change in market conditions. Futures Demand Surges Despite Price Weakness One divergence stands out. While spot demand remains soft, Dogecoin's futures market has seen a notable spike in activity. According to CoinGlass, futures inflows totaled $591.5 million, while outflows totaled $574.19 million. The resulting net inflow of $18.33 million marks a 161% surge, a clear signal that traders are aggressively positioning themselves for the next major move. This divergence between spot and futures activity is significant. It suggests that a segment of the market anticipates a directional breakout, even if current price action has not yet confirmed it. Futures positioning at this scale can amplify price movements once a breakout occurs in either direction. However, increased futures activity alone does not guarantee a bullish outcome. Leveraged positions can unwind quickly, particularly in a market already under sustained selling pressure. If sentiment shifts or macro conditions deteriorate further, a spike in liquidations could accelerate any downward move. Dogecoin's technical picture reinforces the bearish case. The Relative Strength Index has remained below 50 for four consecutive days. A sustained RSI reading in this territory indicates that sellers are in control and that buying pressure has not been sufficient to reverse momentum. The Directional Movement Index adds further weight to this analysis. The DMI dropped to 19, while the ADX climbed to 46 and the ADXR rose to 54. The positive directional index, sitting at its lowest recorded level, signals strong downward momentum. A high ADX reading confirms that the prevailing trend is dominant, not exhausted. These readings, taken together, suggest that the current downtrend has strength behind it. Trend continuation is the path of least resistance unless a catalyst changes market dynamics. Two scenarios are now in play. If selling pressure persists and buyers fail to defend $0.1 consistently, DOGE is likely to slide toward the $0.08 support zone. That level would represent a meaningful decline and could trigger further liquidations in the futures market.

Those who are unwilling to operate within a U.S. legal system should "move to El Salvador, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon says..

BitcoinWorld Coinbase CEO Reveals Wall Street Feels Threatened by Crypto, Claims Company is Undervalued In a revealing statement on social media platform X, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has articulated a compelling perspective on the financial industry’s evolving relationship with digital assets. Armstrong contends that Wall Street institutions feel genuinely threatened by cryptocurrency’s disruptive potential, while simultaneously arguing that his own company, despite a challenging stock performance, has never been stronger. This declaration comes at a pivotal moment for the crypto industry, as regulatory frameworks begin to solidify and institutional adoption accelerates. The CEO’s analogy comparing traditional finance’s skepticism to a taxi company’s view of Uber underscores a fundamental technological shift now unfolding in global markets. Coinbase CEO Analyzes Wall Street’s Crypto Resistance Brian Armstrong’s commentary provides a direct window into the psychological and structural tensions between legacy finance and the emerging digital asset ecosystem. He observed that approximately half of large financial institutions are now actively engaging with cryptocurrency, a significant milestone driven by improving regulatory clarity. However, the other half continues to resist. Armstrong attributes this resistance not merely to technological unfamiliarity, but to a deeper, career-based threat. Professionals who built their expertise and status within the traditional system may perceive crypto as an existential challenge to their value proposition. This dynamic mirrors historical patterns of technological disruption. For instance, the rise of digital photography disrupted Kodak, and streaming services transformed the music and film industries. Armstrong explicitly linked crypto’s journey to other innovations like Uber, Airbnb, and artificial intelligence, all of which faced initial skepticism from entrenched incumbents. The key difference, however, lies in crypto’s target: the very core of financial services, including payments, asset custody, and capital formation. Consequently, the resistance is arguably more intense and systemic. The Undervaluation Thesis and Coinbase’s Strategic Position Despite Coinbase’s stock (COIN) declining approximately 36% over the past year, Armstrong asserts the company is fundamentally undervalued. This claim rests on several concrete pillars of evidence. First, Coinbase has successfully diversified its revenue streams beyond simple retail trading fees. The company now generates significant income from: Institutional Services: Custody, prime brokerage, and staking for large clients. USDC Stablecoin: Interest income from reserves. Blockchain Rewards: Staking and protocol services. International Expansion: Derivatives trading and exchange services in regulated overseas markets. Second, Armstrong highlights the strengthening regulatory environment. Clearer rules, even if stringent, provide a stable operating landscape that favors compliant, well-established players like Coinbase over smaller, less-regulated entities. The approval of Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024, for example, validated the asset class and funneled billions in institutional capital through regulated gateways, indirectly benefiting Coinbase’s custody and trading infrastructure. Cryptocurrency’s Direct Disruption of Traditional Finance Armstrong’s central argument is that cryptocurrency represents a direct, structural challenge to Wall Street’s traditional business models. This disruption operates on multiple levels. At its core, blockchain technology enables peer-to-peer value transfer and programmable money, reducing or eliminating the need for certain financial intermediaries. This threatens fee-based revenue models for clearing, settlement, and cross-border payments. The table below contrasts traditional finance functions with their crypto-based alternatives: Traditional Finance Function Crypto/Blockchain Alternative Key Disruption Cross-border payments (SWIFT) Global crypto transfers (e.g., USDC, XRP) Speed (minutes vs. days), lower cost, 24/7 operation Asset custody Self-custody wallets, multi-sig solutions Disintermediation, user control of assets Capital raising (IPO) Token offerings (ICO, IDO, STO) Global access, liquidity, reduced gatekeeping Securities settlement (T+2) Atomic settlement on-chain Instant settlement, reduced counterparty risk Furthermore, the rise of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocols offers lending, borrowing, and trading services algorithmically, without a central bank or brokerage. While DeFi currently complements more than replaces traditional finance, its growth trajectory signals a potential long-term shift. Armstrong’s statement acknowledges this tension, positioning Coinbase not as a destroyer of the old system, but as a critical bridge and beneficiary of the transition. Regulatory Clarity as a Catalyst for Institutional Adoption A critical component of Armstrong’s optimistic outlook is the evolving regulatory landscape. For years, regulatory uncertainty was the single largest barrier to institutional capital entering the crypto space. Large asset managers, pension funds, and banks require clear rules regarding custody, compliance, accounting, and taxation. The past 18-24 months have seen meaningful progress on these fronts globally. In the United States, despite ongoing debates, the passage of specific legislation like the FIT21 Act provided a foundational framework for digital asset markets. Regulatory agencies have also issued more detailed guidance on custody rules and securities law applicability. Internationally, jurisdictions like the European Union (with MiCA), the UK, Singapore, and the UAE have established comprehensive regulatory regimes. This global patchwork of rules, while complex, creates pathways for compliant operators. Armstrong notes this clarity is why 50% of large institutions are now “actively embracing crypto.” They finally have a rulebook to follow. Coinbase’s Performance and Market Resilience To support his “strongest position” claim, Armstrong can point to Coinbase’s operational and financial resilience through a volatile market cycle. The company navigated the 2022-2023 “crypto winter,” which saw the collapse of several major competitors (FTX, Celsius, Voyager), by maintaining rigorous risk management and compliance. This contrast bolstered its reputation as a trustworthy counterparty. Financially, Coinbase returned to profitability in 2024, demonstrating its ability to manage costs and monetize its diverse product suite even in lower-volume environments. The company has also made significant technological investments. Its Layer 2 blockchain, Base, has grown into a major ecosystem for decentralized applications, generating transaction fee revenue and fostering developer loyalty. Additionally, Coinbase’s international expansion strategy has reduced its dependence on the U.S. market, insulating it from domestic regulatory shocks. These strategic moves illustrate a company building for the long-term infrastructure of the crypto economy, not just short-term trading spikes. The Path Forward: Integration Versus Displacement The future relationship between Wall Street and crypto may not be a zero-sum game of total displacement. A more likely scenario, which Coinbase is positioning itself to lead, is one of integration and hybridization. Traditional financial institutions are increasingly likely to: Offer crypto custody and trading services to clients. Tokenize traditional assets (bonds, funds, real estate) on blockchains. Utilize blockchain technology for back-office efficiency. In this integrated future, companies like Coinbase provide the essential technology stack, compliance expertise, and market access. Armstrong’s comment about being “better suited than Coinbase to make these changes a reality” speaks to this intermediary role. The company aims to be the platform upon which both the new crypto-native economy and the adapting traditional system are built. This ambitious vision, if realized, could justify a valuation far exceeding that of a simple retail crypto broker. Conclusion Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s recent statements provide a strategic diagnosis of the current financial landscape. He identifies a Wall Street community grappling with the disruptive threat of cryptocurrency, leading to skepticism and resistance from those vested in the old system. Simultaneously, he makes a data-backed case for Coinbase’s undervaluation, citing its diversified revenue, strengthened regulatory position, and role as a critical bridge in finance’s digital transformation. While market sentiment and stock prices may fluctuate in the short term, the underlying trends of institutional adoption, regulatory clarity, and technological innovation continue to advance. Coinbase, according to its CEO, is uniquely positioned to capitalize on these seismic shifts, suggesting the current market valuation may not fully reflect its long-term strategic potential in a world where digital and traditional assets increasingly converge. FAQs Q1: Why does Brian Armstrong think Wall Street feels threatened by cryptocurrency? Armstrong believes the threat is both professional and structural. Many finance professionals built careers within the traditional system, and crypto disrupts its core functions like payments, custody, and fundraising, potentially diminishing the need for certain intermediaries. Q2: What evidence does Armstrong give for Coinbase being in a strong position? He points to diversified revenue streams (beyond retail trading), a strengthening regulatory environment, growing institutional adoption, and the company’s survival and growth through a severe market downturn while competitors failed. Q3: How has regulatory clarity improved for cryptocurrency? Globally, frameworks like the EU’s MiCA regulation and progress in the U.S. with legislation like FIT21 have provided clearer rules for custody, securities law, and operations, giving institutions the confidence to participate. Q4: What did Armstrong mean by the “taxi company and Uber” analogy? The analogy illustrates that incumbents in a system being disrupted are often the worst sources of objective analysis about the disruptor, as they have a vested interest in the status quo. Q5: If Coinbase is so strong, why has its stock price fallen? Stock prices reflect short-term market sentiment, speculation, and macroeconomic factors like interest rates. Armstrong argues the long-term fundamentals of the company and the crypto industry’s adoption curve are stronger than the current stock price indicates. This post Coinbase CEO Reveals Wall Street Feels Threatened by Crypto, Claims Company is Undervalued first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Billionaire investor Peter Thiel and Founders Fund held a 7.5% stake in Ethereum treasury company ETHZilla last year—but not anymore.

Ethereum traded near $1,977 on Feb. 17 on a daily Binance ETHUSDT perpetual chart, as price held inside a tight band around the $2,000 level after a sharp selloff earlier in the month. Ethereum holds a $1,800–$2,100 band near $2,000 Market watcher Daan Crypto Trades said ETH stayed “within this $1.8K–$2.1K range,” with no clear short term breakout while price “hover[ed] around this $2K region,” according to a post on X. Ethereum/TetherUS Perpetual Chart. Source: Daan Crypto Trades on X On the chart shared from TradingView, the marked range sits between roughly $1,800 on the downside and $2,118 on the upside, with price moving sideways after a steep drop from the low $3,000s. The latest candle showed ETH down about 1% on the day, after trading between roughly $1,963 and $2,008. The same post said the trader set alerts at $1,800 and $2,100 and planned to react only if price reaches either level, framing both zones as near term decision points for the next move. Ethereum forms ascending triangle on 4 hour chart Ethereum formed a tightening structure on the 4 hour Binance ETHUSDT chart as price compressed between rising support and a flat resistance line, according to technical analysis shared by The Cryptomist on X. Ethereum/TetherUS 4 Hour Chart. Source: The Cryptomist on X The chart showed higher lows building along an upward trendline while repeated pullbacks capped near the same horizontal level. This structure outlined an ascending triangle, a pattern that often appears during consolidation phases after a strong directional move. The Cryptomist said the setup pointed to a potential upside resolution if price breaks and holds above the marked resistance. The analyst flagged a first target near $2,090, while the broader breakout projection from the pattern sat near $2,350, based on the measured move of the triangle range. The same chart also showed a recent rebound from the rising support line, followed by tighter candles near the pattern’s upper boundary. As a result, the market remained compressed inside the structure, with short term direction depending on whether price clears resistance or returns to test trend support again.

The long-term value of XRP is increasingly tied to the development of the global financial infrastructure it was designed to support. Rather than relying on short-term price speculation or fixed adoption timelines, XRP was designed to operate at the plumbing level of global finance, where adoption depends on regulatory clarity, institutional integration, liquidity depth, and real transaction flow. These systems are built quietly, tested extensively, and activated only when reliability is proven. Why Financial Infrastructure Comes Before XRP Mass Adoption XRP’s journey has never been hitting precise timestamps on the chart, because utility does not operate on a calendar. An analyst known as ChartNerd on X has revealed that the journey to $27 has been a projected path for years, and based on a stack of multiple Fibonacci time maps and extension targets, the road to 2030 is where the vision fully aligns. Related Reading: Ripple’s Next Steps: Where XRP Stops Being Trade And Starts Being Infrastrucutre ChartNerd argues that what the market is witnessing right now is the groundwork for the foundation-building phase led by Ripple, following regulatory clarity from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This phase includes expanding institutional infrastructure, banking charters, and ETF inflows, all of which require time to scale before translating into measurable price impact. In that context, the short-term noise might fluctuate about the price action. However, the macro trend for XRP points toward progressive valuation milestones of $8, $13, and ultimately the $27 zone targets as the global settlement adoption scales. This thesis is not about timing individual candles, but about a structural shift towards 2030, where utility-driven value overtakes market speculation. How The XRP Ledger Becomes A Safe Infrastructure To Integrate The passing of the Clarity Act would mark a decisive turning point for XRP. A crypto analyst known as Bird on X has noted that the leading altcoin already has a unique level of legal clarity due to prior court rulings that confirmed it is not inherently a security when traded on secondary markets, an advantage most digital assets are still waiting to acquire. Related Reading: Japan’s XRP Integration Signals A Shift In Global Capital Flows According to Bird, the Clarity Act would move a step further by establishing a defined regulatory framework for digital assets, especially how they are classified and used, removing uncertainty for institutions, payment providers, and large-scale capital allocators. Once the rules are written into law, the biggest barrier, which is regulatory hesitation, will no longer sit in the background of every integration decision. With regulatory hesitation reduced, broader adoption can accelerate, liquidity will deepen, and real utility can finally scale at speed, because companies can now gain the confidence to build on and integrate the XRP Ledger (XRPL) without worrying about sudden rule changes. Featured image from Adobe Stock, chart from Tradingview.com

From weak start to strong finish: Is Ethereum set to repeat Q2 gains?

Net selling from altcoins topped $209 billion, far outpacing the sell volumes seen during Bitcoin's five-month sell-off. Will these traders reposition into Bitcoin?

Bitcoin hovered near $67,000 after a steep pullback from late 2025 highs. A monthly CME liquidity shelf and a weekly stochastic golden cross now sit under the same price area. Bitcoin CME Futures Test $67K Liquidity Shelf as $87K Level Reappears on Chart Bitcoin CME futures traded near $67,800 on the monthly chart as price slipped into a high-volume liquidity area highlighted by X user Cantonese Cat. The profile on the right side of the chart showed a dense band of historical trading activity in the $60,000 to $72,000 region. As a result, price moved into a zone where the market previously spent significant time building positions. Bitcoin CME Futures Monthly Chart. Source: Cantonese Cat on X The latest candles showed a sharp retreat from late-2025 highs in the low $100,000s into the mid-$60,000s. Meanwhile, the decline followed a string of lower monthly closes after price failed to hold above earlier resistance near the top of the range. Therefore, the market shifted from trend extension into a tighter, more balanced phase around the liquidity shelf. The chart’s volume profile concentrated heavily around current levels, which often signals a battleground where buyers and sellers repeatedly trade size. In addition, several monthly candles printed wicks into the same area, which suggested recurring tests rather than a clean slide through the range. Consequently, the zone functions as a technical reference for whether price stabilizes or continues to search for lower acceptance. Cantonese Cat said the liquidity zone is “holding” and added that, if it remains intact, Bitcoin CME futures could revisit $87,000 above. That level sits higher on the chart near another visible area of activity. Still, the chart also showed thick overhead supply across the $70,000s and beyond, so any rebound would need to reclaim those levels to confirm a broader shift. Bitcoin Weekly Chart Shows Stochastic Golden Cross as Price Trades Near $68K Bitcoin traded near $68,115 on the weekly BTCUSDT chart from Binance as a stochastic golden cross appeared, according to X user CryptosBatman. The indicator crossover formed after several weeks of downside pressure that pushed price from the low $100,000s into the mid-$60,000s. As a result, momentum shifted from a steady decline into a short-term stabilization phase on the weekly timeframe. Bitcoin Weekly BTCUSDT Chart. Source: TradingView / X The chart highlighted two prior stochastic golden crosses over the past six months. In both cases, Bitcoin posted rebounds of about 15% to 21% before the broader trend resumed. The current setup placed price inside a tight consolidation box between roughly $63,500 and $75,000, which marked a zone where selling slowed after the recent drop. Therefore, the market now sits at a technical point where prior signals aligned with short-term recoveries. Price structure on the weekly chart showed a sequence of lower highs and lower lows since the late-2025 peak near the low $110,000s. Meanwhile, the latest candles printed long lower wicks near the $60,000 area, which signaled rejection of lower prices on recent tests. Consequently, the crossover emerged as price held above recent lows rather than after a strong upside break. The stochastic oscillator moved up from the lower band, with the faster line crossing above the slower line near the oversold zone. In addition, the indicator stayed well below mid-range levels, which framed the signal as a momentum reset rather than a confirmed trend change. The chart also showed that previous rebounds from similar conditions stalled near nearby resistance shelves, which remain visible above current price.

CHZ is trading sideways at $0.04 on the daily chart, RSI is neutral, and Supertrend is giving a bearish signal. As Bitcoin's decline increases pressure on altcoins, 0.0347 support and 0.0411 resist...

BitcoinWorld WLFI RWA Product Launch: Revolutionary Institutional Tokenization of Trump’s Maldives Hotel Asset World Liberty Financial (WLFI) announced a groundbreaking institutional RWA product today, marking a significant milestone in blockchain-based asset tokenization. The DeFi project, associated with the Trump family, revealed its partnership with Securitize and Dar Global to tokenize the Trump International Hotel & Resort in the Maldives as its inaugural asset. This development represents a major convergence of traditional finance, luxury real estate, and decentralized technology. WLFI RWA Product Architecture and Partnership Framework World Liberty Financial designed its institutional RWA product with regulatory compliance and institutional adoption as primary considerations. The platform leverages Securitize’s digital securities technology and Dar Global’s real estate development expertise. Consequently, this partnership creates a robust ecosystem for tokenizing high-value physical assets. The collaboration addresses several critical challenges in traditional real estate investment, including liquidity constraints, high entry barriers, and complex ownership structures. The technical architecture incorporates multiple blockchain layers for security and transparency. WLFI utilizes permissioned blockchain components for regulatory compliance while maintaining public verifiability for transaction records. This hybrid approach enables institutional participation without compromising blockchain’s core benefits. The system includes automated compliance checks, real-time auditing capabilities, and seamless integration with traditional financial infrastructure. Key Technical Specifications The WLFI RWA product features several innovative technical components: Multi-chain settlement layer supporting Ethereum and compatible networks Regulatory compliance modules for KYC/AML verification Automated dividend distribution through smart contracts Cross-border transaction capabilities with currency conversion Real-time asset valuation using oracle data feeds Trump Maldives Hotel as Premier Tokenized Asset The Trump International Hotel & Resort in the Maldives represents an ideal candidate for initial tokenization. This luxury property features 120 overwater villas, multiple restaurants, and extensive recreational facilities. Located in the South Male Atoll, the resort commands premium rates and maintains high occupancy levels. The property’s established revenue streams and brand recognition provide tangible value backing for the tokenized offering. Tokenization will divide ownership into digital shares representing fractional interests in the property. Each token corresponds to a specific percentage of ownership rights and revenue participation. The structure enables investors to purchase fractions of the luxury asset previously accessible only to ultra-high-net-worth individuals. This democratization of luxury real estate investment represents a fundamental shift in property ownership models. Trump Maldives Hotel Tokenization Details Parameter Specification Property Type Luxury Resort Hotel Location South Male Atoll, Maldives Total Villas 120 Overwater Units Tokenization Model Fractional Ownership Minimum Investment To Be Announced Revenue Distribution Quarterly via Smart Contract Institutional Real-World Asset Market Evolution The RWA tokenization market has experienced exponential growth since 2023, with institutional participation increasing dramatically. Major financial institutions now recognize blockchain’s potential for asset fractionalization and liquidity enhancement. According to industry reports, tokenized RWAs could represent a $16 trillion market opportunity by 2030. This projection reflects growing acceptance among traditional investors seeking exposure to alternative assets through digital channels. WLFI’s entry into this space follows established patterns of DeFi projects expanding into traditional finance domains. The project’s focus on institutional-grade products distinguishes it from consumer-oriented tokenization platforms. This strategic positioning targets pension funds, family offices, and accredited investors seeking compliant digital asset exposure. The partnership with Securitize provides necessary regulatory frameworks for institutional participation. Comparative Market Analysis Several platforms have pioneered RWA tokenization with varying approaches: RealT focuses on residential properties in the United States Tangible tokenizes real estate and precious metals Centrifuge connects real-world assets to DeFi protocols Maple Finance offers institutional lending against RWAs WLFI differentiates itself through exclusive focus on luxury institutional assets and strategic partnerships with established real estate developers. The Trump brand association provides immediate recognition, though it also introduces specific market dynamics. The project must navigate both technological implementation and brand perception management simultaneously. Regulatory Landscape and Compliance Framework Real-world asset tokenization operates within complex regulatory environments across multiple jurisdictions. WLFI’s partnership with Securitize addresses these challenges through established compliance protocols. Securitize maintains necessary licenses for digital securities issuance and trading in key markets. The platform complies with SEC regulations in the United States and equivalent frameworks in other regions. The Maldives property tokenization involves cross-border regulatory considerations. Investors from different countries must satisfy their local securities laws while participating in the offering. WLFI implements geographic restrictions and investor accreditation verification to maintain compliance. These measures ensure the platform operates within legal boundaries while maximizing accessibility for qualified participants. Regulatory developments continue to shape the RWA tokenization landscape. Recent guidance from financial authorities worldwide indicates growing acceptance of properly structured digital securities. The European Union’s MiCA regulations, effective 2024, provide clearer frameworks for crypto-asset issuance and trading. Similarly, Hong Kong and Singapore have established progressive regulatory regimes for digital assets. WLFI’s institutional approach aligns with these evolving standards. Economic Implications and Market Impact The tokenization of luxury real estate assets creates several economic benefits for various stakeholders. Property owners gain access to liquidity without traditional sale processes. Investors obtain exposure to premium assets with lower capital requirements. Local economies benefit from maintained property operations and continued tourism revenue. The hospitality industry observes new investment models that could transform property development financing. For the Maldives specifically, this development represents continued innovation in tourism infrastructure financing. The island nation has actively explored blockchain applications for various sectors, including environmental conservation and tourism management. Successful implementation of this tokenization model could inspire similar projects across the Maldives’ extensive resort portfolio. This potential expansion might significantly impact the country’s economic development strategy. The broader real estate market monitors this development for potential disruption of traditional ownership models. Fractional ownership through blockchain tokens could increase market efficiency and accessibility. However, successful implementation requires addressing valuation challenges, regulatory compliance, and market acceptance. WLFI’s institutional focus positions it to navigate these complexities more effectively than consumer-oriented platforms. Technical Implementation and Security Considerations WLFI’s RWA product employs advanced blockchain technology to ensure security, transparency, and efficiency. The system utilizes non-custodial wallets for investor asset protection. Multi-signature protocols control critical operations, requiring multiple authorized parties for significant transactions. Regular security audits by independent firms verify system integrity and identify potential vulnerabilities. The tokenization process involves several technical steps: Legal structuring of ownership rights and revenue sharing Digital representation of these rights as blockchain tokens Integration with property management systems for revenue tracking Implementation of automated distribution mechanisms Development of secondary market trading infrastructure Each component undergoes rigorous testing before deployment. The platform maintains redundancy across multiple blockchain networks to ensure continuous operation. Disaster recovery protocols address potential technical failures or security breaches. These comprehensive measures provide institutional investors with confidence in the platform’s reliability and security. Future Developments and Expansion Plans WLFI’s roadmap extends beyond the initial Maldives property tokenization. The platform plans to expand its RWA portfolio across multiple asset classes and geographic regions. Potential future offerings include commercial real estate, infrastructure projects, and intellectual property rights. Each addition will follow the same institutional-grade standards established with the inaugural offering. The project also explores integration with decentralized finance protocols for enhanced functionality. Potential developments include collateralized lending against tokenized RWAs, automated portfolio rebalancing, and cross-chain interoperability. These features would create additional utility for token holders while expanding the platform’s addressable market. Strategic partnerships with traditional financial institutions remain a priority for sustainable growth. Market education represents another critical focus area. WLFI plans educational initiatives targeting institutional investors unfamiliar with blockchain technology. These programs explain technical concepts, regulatory considerations, and investment opportunities in accessible formats. Successful education efforts could accelerate institutional adoption of tokenized RWAs across the financial industry. Conclusion WLFI’s launch of an institutional RWA product with the Trump Maldives hotel as its first asset marks a significant advancement in blockchain-based finance. The partnership with Securitize and Dar Global combines regulatory expertise, technical capability, and real estate development experience. This convergence addresses critical challenges in traditional asset ownership while creating new investment opportunities. The successful implementation of this WLFI RWA product could establish new standards for luxury asset tokenization and institutional participation in digital markets. FAQs Q1: What is an RWA product in blockchain terms? An RWA (Real-World Asset) product represents physical assets like real estate, commodities, or intellectual property as digital tokens on a blockchain. These tokens provide fractional ownership rights and enable trading on digital platforms. Q2: How does WLFI’s institutional RWA product differ from other tokenization platforms? WLFI focuses specifically on institutional-grade assets and investors, partnering with regulated entities like Securitize for compliance. The platform targets luxury properties and accredited investors rather than consumer markets. Q3: What are the investment requirements for participating in the Trump Maldives hotel tokenization? Specific investment minimums haven’t been announced, but institutional RWA products typically require significant capital commitments. Participants must undergo accreditation verification and comply with geographic restrictions based on securities regulations. Q4: How does tokenization benefit the Maldives hotel property? Tokenization provides liquidity to property owners without requiring traditional sale processes. It also enables fractional ownership, potentially increasing the investor base and creating more stable long-term ownership structures. Q5: What regulatory frameworks govern this type of tokenization? The offering complies with securities regulations in relevant jurisdictions, including SEC rules in the United States. Cross-border participation requires adherence to local securities laws in each investor’s country of residence. Q6: Can token holders influence property management decisions? Token structures vary, but most institutional RWA products separate ownership rights from operational control. Professional management teams typically handle day-to-day operations while token holders receive proportional revenue distributions. This post WLFI RWA Product Launch: Revolutionary Institutional Tokenization of Trump’s Maldives Hotel Asset first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

DerivaDEX launched its ETH-based perpetual swap DEX with a BMA T license. Offchain orders + onchain Ethereum settlement. BlackRock's staked ETH ETF application is increasing institutional interest....

BitcoinWorld AI Startup Scaling: Google Cloud’s Critical Warning About Reading Your ‘Check Engine Light’ Before Catastrophe In the high-stakes race to build the next generation of AI companies, founders face a paradoxical challenge: move faster than ever while making infrastructure choices that won’t cripple them later. According to Darren Mowry, Google Cloud’s Vice President of Global Startups, the ability to read early warning signals—what he calls the startup ‘check engine light’—separates scaling successes from catastrophic failures. This insight comes from extensive conversations with hundreds of founders navigating the 2026 AI landscape, where cloud credits and foundation models create deceptive simplicity before real bills arrive. AI Startup Scaling in the Post-Credit Reality The current AI startup ecosystem operates under unprecedented pressure. Founders must leverage artificial intelligence while confronting tighter funding environments, rising infrastructure costs, and investor demands for early traction. Cloud providers aggressively compete through generous credit programs, GPU access, and managed foundation models. These offerings significantly lower initial barriers to entry. However, Mowry emphasizes that early technical and architectural decisions create lasting consequences. Once startups exhaust their free credits and transition to paying customers, inefficient choices can consume capital at alarming rates. Consequently, understanding this transition represents a fundamental survival skill for modern founders. The Cloud Competition Landscape Google Cloud positions itself distinctly against AWS and Microsoft Azure in the AI startup race. While all three giants offer robust machine learning platforms, Google highlights its vertical integration with DeepMind research and custom Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) hardware. The company’s strategy focuses on capturing startups at the seed and Series A stages, providing not just infrastructure but also technical guidance and go-to-market support. This ecosystem approach aims to build loyalty before startups reach scale. Meanwhile, market data shows cloud infrastructure spending by AI startups grew 47% year-over-year in 2025, making vendor choice a significant competitive factor. TPUs vs GPUs: The Hardware Decision Matrix For early-stage companies, hardware selection involves more than performance benchmarks. Mowry breaks down the critical considerations beyond mere teraflops. Tensor Processing Units, Google’s custom application-specific integrated circuits, excel at large-scale, predictable workloads common in training foundation models. Graphics Processing Units from NVIDIA and AMD offer greater flexibility for varied and experimental workloads. The choice fundamentally influences development velocity, operational costs, and team hiring requirements. Consideration TPU Advantage GPU Advantage Cost Predictability Higher for optimized workloads Variable based on instance type Developer Ecosystem Growing, framework-specific Vast, mature with broad tools Time-to-Result Faster for compatible models Flexible for rapid iteration Lock-in Risk Higher (Google Cloud only) Lower (multi-cloud portable) Mowry advises founders to analyze their specific workload patterns before committing. Startups focusing on inference rather than training, or those using less common model architectures, might find GPUs more practical initially. The key is avoiding premature optimization for scale that hasn’t yet arrived. High-Growth AI Verticals and Investment Signals Across thousands of startups in Google’s portfolio, clear patterns emerge in where artificial intelligence delivers tangible business value. Mowry identifies several verticals demonstrating real, measurable growth beyond hype cycles: Biotech and Drug Discovery: AI-driven protein folding and compound screening accelerate research timelines from years to months. Companies like Isomorphic Labs (backed by Alphabet) showcase the potential. Climate Tech and Sustainability: Machine learning optimizes complex systems for energy grids, carbon capture, and agricultural yields. These models require processing enormous geospatial datasets. Developer Tools and Platform Engineering: The ‘AI for developers’ space expands as engineering teams seek to automate coding, testing, and deployment workflows. World Models and Simulation: Startups building digital twins for manufacturing, logistics, and urban planning leverage AI to predict outcomes in complex environments. These sectors attract venture capital because they solve expensive, measurable problems. They also generate proprietary datasets that create sustainable competitive advantages. Conversely, Mowry observes weaker traction in consumer-facing AI applications where differentiation proves difficult and customer acquisition costs remain high. Red Flags: Signals a Startup Won’t Scale Successfully Beyond market fit, specific operational patterns predict scaling failures. Mowry shares observable warning signs that often precede downturns. First, teams that prioritize model accuracy over inference cost and latency typically struggle with unit economics. Second, startups that haven’t instrumented their cloud spend with granular visibility cannot make informed optimization decisions. Third, companies avoiding architectural refactoring after product-market fit often face exponential cost growth. Finally, founders who view cloud providers purely as vendors rather than partners miss crucial guidance on best practices. These red flags manifest in financial metrics before becoming existential threats. Monthly cloud bills growing faster than revenue, engineering time dominated by infrastructure firefighting, and customer complaints about performance or reliability all serve as the ‘check engine light’ Mowry references. Proactive founders establish monitoring for these indicators from day one, treating infrastructure as a core business function rather than a technical detail. The Founder’s Scaling Checklist Based on patterns from successful scale-ups, Mowry recommends a practical framework for founders: Establish cost-per-transaction or cost-per-user metrics from first revenue Conduct quarterly architecture reviews with external experts Negotiate cloud commitments based on usage forecasts, not just discounts Build a dedicated platform engineering role before reaching 50 employees Test multi-cloud or hybrid cloud capabilities for critical workloads This disciplined approach prevents technical debt from accumulating unnoticed until it requires painful and expensive correction. Conclusion The journey from AI startup to scaled enterprise presents unique infrastructure challenges that founders cannot ignore. Google Cloud’s perspective, as articulated by Darren Mowry, emphasizes strategic foresight over reactive problem-solving. Reading the ‘check engine light’ means implementing rigorous financial and performance monitoring from the earliest stages. It requires understanding the long-term implications of hardware choices, architectural patterns, and vendor relationships. As AI continues transforming industries, startups that master their operational foundations will outperform those chasing purely technological innovation. Ultimately, sustainable AI startup scaling depends on treating infrastructure as a competitive advantage worthy of executive attention and strategic investment. FAQs Q1: What does Google Cloud’s ‘check engine light’ analogy mean for AI startups? It refers to early warning signals in a startup’s infrastructure and cost metrics that indicate future scaling problems. These include cloud bills growing faster than revenue, poor workload optimization, and lack of cost visibility. Identifying these signals early prevents catastrophic failures later. Q2: How should early-stage startups choose between TPUs and GPUs for AI workloads? Founders should analyze their specific model architectures, framework requirements, and workload patterns. TPUs offer cost efficiency for compatible, large-scale training jobs. GPUs provide greater flexibility for experimentation and diverse model types. The decision should balance current needs with future scaling paths. Q3: Which AI verticals show the most sustainable growth according to Google Cloud’s data? Biotech and drug discovery, climate tech and sustainability solutions, developer tools/platform engineering, and world models/digital twins demonstrate strong traction. These sectors solve measurable business problems with clear ROI, attracting sustained venture investment. Q4: What are the most common red flags that signal a startup won’t scale successfully? Key warning signs include prioritizing model accuracy over inference costs, lacking granular cloud spend visibility, avoiding necessary architectural refactoring, and treating cloud providers as mere vendors rather than strategic partners. These patterns typically appear in financial metrics before becoming critical. Q5: What practical steps can founders take to monitor their ‘check engine light’? Establish cost-per-transaction metrics early, conduct quarterly architecture reviews with experts, negotiate cloud commitments based on usage forecasts, hire platform engineering talent before reaching 50 employees, and test multi-cloud capabilities for critical workloads. Proactive monitoring prevents technical debt accumulation. This post AI Startup Scaling: Google Cloud’s Critical Warning About Reading Your ‘Check Engine Light’ Before Catastrophe first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

BitcoinWorld FOMC Minutes Unleash Hawkish Surge: USD Firms as ECB Succession Drama Unfolds Global forex markets entered a new phase of volatility this week as the U.S. dollar found renewed vigor following the release of hawkish Federal Open Market Committee minutes. Meanwhile, across the Atlantic, escalating speculation over the European Central Bank’s next president injected fresh uncertainty into the euro’s trajectory. Consequently, traders are now navigating a landscape defined by diverging central bank narratives and shifting political winds. FOMC Minutes Reveal Underlying Hawkish Resolve The Federal Reserve released the minutes from its April-May policy meeting on Wednesday, May 21, 2025. Market participants immediately scrutinized the document for clues about the future path of interest rates. Significantly, the minutes revealed a committee more concerned about persistent inflation than previously communicated. Several members expressed willingness to tighten policy further if incoming data showed insufficient progress on price stability. This stance provided a powerful tailwind for the U.S. dollar. The DXY Dollar Index, which tracks the greenback against a basket of six major currencies, rallied 0.8% in the subsequent 24-hour trading session. Moreover, the USD/JPY pair breached the 158.00 level, a multi-decade high. Analysts point to two key drivers from the minutes: Patience on Rate Cuts: The discussion showed a consensus for maintaining the current restrictive stance for longer, pushing back market expectations for the timing of the first rate cut. Data Dependence: Officials emphasized that their decisions would remain “meeting-by-meeting,” tied closely to inflation reports, jobs data, and broader economic activity. This firm messaging contrasts with a more dovish tilt observed in some other major economies. Therefore, the interest rate differential story, a classic forex driver, has regained prominence. ECB Leadership Vacuum Weighs on the Euro Simultaneously, political maneuvering in Europe is clouding the monetary policy outlook for the Eurozone. The term of the current ECB President, Christine Lagarde, concludes in October 2025. The succession process, always a delicate political ballet, has become particularly contentious this cycle. Currently, no clear consensus candidate has emerged from behind-the-scenes discussions among EU member states. This uncertainty creates a tangible headwind for the euro. Typically, markets prefer continuity and predictability in central bank leadership, especially during periods of economic fragility. The EUR/USD pair fell 0.6% following the FOMC release, but analysts note it underperformed other majors, suggesting an ECB-specific discount. The key concerns for forex traders are: Policy Direction: Will the next president maintain a hawkish stance to combat inflation or pivot toward growth support? Credibility: A politically fraught appointment process could undermine the perceived independence of the institution. Central Bank Policy Stance Comparison (May 2025) Central Bank Current Policy Rate Forward Guidance Market Sentiment U.S. Federal Reserve 5.25% – 5.50% Hawkish Hold USD Positive European Central Bank 4.00% Data-Dependent, Leadership Uncertainty EUR Cautious/Negative Bank of Japan 0.0% – 0.1% Ultra-Accommodative, Watching Yen JPY Negative Expert Analysis on the Forex Crossroads Financial institutions are adjusting their forecasts in response to these developments. For instance, strategists at major investment banks highlight the growing policy divergence. “The Fed’s minutes closed the door on imminent easing,” noted a senior currency analyst. “Conversely, the ECB is now fighting a two-front war: managing inflation and its own internal politics. This dynamic inherently supports a stronger dollar in the near term.” Historical data supports this view. Periods of Federal Reserve policy tightening, especially when coupled with stability or easing elsewhere, have frequently led to broad-based USD appreciation. The current environment echoes elements of the 2014-2015 “Taper Tantrum” period, though with distinct global economic conditions. Furthermore, geopolitical tensions and commodity price fluctuations add additional layers of complexity to currency valuations. Market Impact and Trader Positioning The immediate reaction in the forex market has been pronounced. Beyond the major pairs, emerging market currencies have also felt pressure. Higher U.S. yields and a robust dollar typically increase borrowing costs and capital outflow risks for developing economies. Meanwhile, the CFTC’s Commitments of Traders report will be closely watched next week for signs of extended long positioning on the dollar. Risk sentiment in equity markets has become more cautious. A stronger dollar can negatively impact the earnings of U.S. multinational corporations. Additionally, it tightens global financial conditions. For retail forex traders, volatility presents both opportunity and risk. Key technical levels are being tested, and breakouts could signal sustained trends. Therefore, attention now turns to upcoming data releases, including the U.S. PCE inflation report and Eurozone CPI figures, which will provide the next major catalysts. Conclusion The release of the FOMC minutes has solidified a hawkish narrative for the U.S. Federal Reserve, providing fundamental support for U.S. dollar strength. Concurrently, the unfolding ECB succession drama introduces a unique element of political uncertainty that weighs on the euro. This divergence in central bank clarity and direction is the dominant theme in the current forex market . Traders must now monitor economic data for confirmation of the Fed’s stance and political developments in Europe for clues on future central bank policy . The interplay between these forces will likely dictate currency valuations throughout the second quarter of 2025. FAQs Q1: What was the key takeaway from the latest FOMC minutes? The primary takeaway was a more hawkish-than-expected tone, with Fed officials expressing greater concern about persistent inflation and a willingness to maintain restrictive policy for longer, delaying expectations for interest rate cuts. Q2: Why does ECB succession matter for the euro? The leadership appointment influences future monetary policy direction. Uncertainty over the next president’s stance on inflation versus growth creates volatility and can lead to a “political discount” on the currency until a credible candidate is confirmed. Q3: Which currency pairs are most affected by these developments? EUR/USD is directly impacted by the divergence between Fed and ECB policy. USD/JPY is sensitive to rising U.S. yields. GBP/USD and AUD/USD are also vulnerable to broad USD strength. Q4: How might this affect other financial markets? A stronger dollar can pressure global equity markets, particularly export-oriented and emerging market stocks. It also increases the burden of dollar-denominated debt for foreign entities and can suppress commodity prices. Q5: What data should traders watch next? The U.S. Core PCE Price Index (the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge) and monthly Non-Farm Payrolls reports are critical. For Europe, inflation (CPI) data and any official statements regarding the ECB presidential selection process are key. This post FOMC Minutes Unleash Hawkish Surge: USD Firms as ECB Succession Drama Unfolds first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

More on SOL Strategies Sol Strategies Inc. (STKE) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript SOL Strategies reports December 2025 update SOL Strategies leverages ATM offering program to raise up to $50M in common shares Seeking Alpha’s Quant Rating on SOL Strategies Historical earnings data for SOL Strategies

Bitcoin is now on track for its fifth consecutive weekly decline, and losing this level could open the floor for a fresh leg lower.

INJ is being tested at critical support levels at $2.99, RSI giving an oversold signal but downtrend remains dominant. Bitcoin's decline is increasing pressure on altcoins, while MTF confluence may...

The Hyper Foundation has invested 1 million of its HYPE tokens into the creation of the Hyperliquid Policy Center. The center will focus on making sure that issues in the decentralized finance sector do not go unaddressed in the current crypto policy environment. The Hyperliquid policy center will be an independent nonprofi t fo cused on advocating for updated decentralized finance policies that match current realities. The Hyper Foundation commits almost $30 million t o De Fi policy push The Hyper Foundation has announced that i t has co mmitted 1 million HYPE tokens to fund the creation of the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC). Based o n the cu rrent market price, this grant is worth nearly $30 million. The tokens are set to be unstaked later today. The Hyperliquid Policy Center is an independent research and advocacy nonprofit that ensures that decentralized finance, or DeFi, has a clear and legal path to grow in the USA. Jake Chervinsky will come on board as the founding CEO of the organization. Chervinsky is a well-known figure in the crypto legal world who previously served as the Chief Legal Officer at the venture firm Variant and held a senior leadership role at the Blockchain Association. Last month, Hyperliquid processed over $256 billion in perpetual futures volume, but despite its massive growth, many of the products offered by the company, such as perpetual derivatives, currently operate offshore because U.S. financial laws were written for traditional, centralized systems. Hyperliquid processed $256 billion over the last 30 days. Source: Defillama Hyperliquid believes its community needs direct representation in Washington to protect its interests and explain how decentralized markets actually work. HYPE is currently trading at approximately $29.16, down significantly from its peak of $59.39 in late 2025. In collaboration with Policy Counsel Brad Bourque, formerly of the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, and Policy Director Salah Ghazzal, who was previously the policy lead at Variant, the company hopes to provide expert support and technical research that will lead to the creation and implementation of modern rules. The center is also actively hiring for several high-level roles, including a Chief of Staff, a Head of Communications, and a Head of Government Relations. How can the HPC impact DeFi regulation? To better establish a legal framework for on-chain perpetual contracts and properly close the gap between how these products are used globally and how they are viewed by U.S. regulators like the SEC and CFTC, the center will publish research that explains why decentralized protocols are different from traditional exchanges and how they can be regulated without destroying their unique benefits. In 2025, crypto policy progressed significantly with the GENIUS Act , which focused on stablecoin regulation, becoming law in July. The CLARITY Act has stalled in Congress after months of significant progress. The HPC aims to build on this momentum to ensure that DeFi-specific issues are addressed. Other groups, like the Blockchain Association, are making efforts to work with the current administration and Congress. Former CFTC Commissioner Summer Mersinger took over as The Blockchain Association’s CEO. The company held a major policy summit in December 2025, which saw record attendance from both industry leaders and bipartisan members of Congress. They have been focused on challenging restrictive IRS reporting rules and pushing for a comprehensive market structure bill. Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

The OTHERS D chart, which tracks the crypto market cap excluding the top 10 cryptocurrencies, is showing signs of a rotation away from Bitcoin and other large market cap cryptos. After months of Bitcoin holding relative strength, new technical analysis is implying that the balance could tilt in favor of the altcoin market very soon. Biweekly Breakout Signals Shift In Momentum Technical analysis of the crypto market capitalization is showing a developing shift in capital flows, particularly into altcoins outside the top 10 by total market value. Major names like Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana have struggled through a period of price weakness, leading to smaller-cap cryptocurrencies quietly gaining relative ground. This subtle rotation has not necessarily translated into explosive price rallies yet, but it has shown up clearly in dominance metrics. This quiet change in dominance is reflected in the OTHERS D index. At the beginning of 2026, dominance was sitting below the 5% mark. Since then, however, the metric has steadily climbed, recently pushing above 7%. The latest biweekly candlestick now places dominance at approximately 7.6%, bringing it right up against a descending resistance trendline that capped a previous breakout attempt. Interestingly, this move has occurred in tandem with a break above a downward-sloping resistance trendline in the Relative Strength Index (RSI). This trend was also noted on the social media platform X by a crypto analyst that goes by the name RickUntZ. As noted by the analyst, the most recent biweekly confirmed breakout in trend on altcoin dominance. Dominance appears to have formed a higher low off the multi-year support band on the chart, followed by a push upward that challenges overhead resistance. The horizontal zone around 7.5% to 8% has repeatedly served as both support and resistance for years. In terms of resistance, each prior reclaim of this region has preceded extended periods where altcoins gained ground against Bitcoin. Watch Resistance For Confirmation Despite the improving structure, the resistance mentioned above is still in play. This resistance is notable because the altcoin dominance was rejected somewhere here in the second half of 2025. However, according to the analyst, the 3-week trend is already looking really good. At the time of writing, Bitcoin has a market dominance of 58.1%. A decisive Bitcoin breakout could cause the OTHERS D to dwindle a bit longer, but the expectation is that alts will still outperform BTC regardless. Once this level of dominance is taken, then it would confirm on all major time frames for the next couple of months when the altcoin niche is expected to outperform Bitcoin. Such a move would align with the altcoin season where large-cap altcoins such as Ethereum, Solana, and XRP would also post stronger percentage gains relative to Bitcoin.

Crypto analyst Javon Marks has identified what he believes is a classic bullish divergence forming on the SHIB chart. The RSI is recording higher lows while the price continues to print lower lows. This divergence suggests that downside momentum may be fading. Marks projects a potential recovery exceeding 400%, with a price target of $0.000035. That figure represents a significant structural shift, one that would reset sentiment entirely for long-term holders still sitting on losses. Shiba Inu posted a 7.81% gain over the past 7 days, but the daily losses stand at around 2.81%. The memecoin currently trades at around $0.00000632. Ethereum's Influence on SHIB's Recovery Thesis Marks extended his analysis to Ethereum, pointing to a similar divergence pattern on the ETH chart. His upside target for Ethereum sits near $4,900. This is relevant because Shiba Inu operates on the Ethereum blockchain. When ETH rallies, liquidity often flows into ecosystem tokens. Speculative assets like SHIB tend to benefit when the base layer gains strength. The relationship, however, is not one-sided. Ethereum's weakness would create headwinds for SHIB's recovery. Meme coins amplify base layer movements in both directions. A stalling ETH market would make the 400% target significantly harder to reach. Traders tracking SHIB cannot afford to ignore ETH price action. The two assets are structurally linked, and that connection will likely determine whether Marks' thesis materializes. Marks added that the current Ethereum momentum will remain a key variable for SHIB through the coming weeks. At the time of writing, Ethereum trades at around $1,940.85, down 2.80% in the last 24 hours. Long-Term Forecasts Tell a Different Story Short-term technical optimism contrasts sharply with longer-term projections. CoinCodex estimates place SHIB near $0.000008532 by the end of 2026. That figure reflects approximately 30% upside from current levels, a far cry from the explosive move Marks describes. Looking further out toward 2030, some models even project prices below current levels. This gap between short-term setups and long-term outlooks is not unusual in crypto. Markets routinely overshoot in both directions. Technical patterns can trigger sharp rallies that fade without structural support. Sustainable growth requires more than chart signals.

The decentralized exchange has begun offering crypto perpetual swaps after receiving a test license from Bermuda’s regulator, operating under DAO governance and formal oversight.

Ethereum layer-2 network Base is leaving behind the Optimism technology stack as it seeks faster upgrades and reduced overhead.

DASH market structure is in sideways consolidation, weak with LH/LL bearish bias. 37.71$ BOS bullish, 34.95$ break brings bearish CHoCH.

BitcoinWorld Fed Minutes Reveal Crucial Pause: Rates Hold Steady Amid Conditional Economic Crossroads WASHINGTON, D.C. – May 22, 2025: The Federal Reserve released minutes today from its latest policy meeting, revealing a unanimous decision to maintain current interest rates while emphasizing that the future policy path remains strictly conditional on incoming economic data. This development signals a pivotal moment in the central bank’s fight against inflation, marking a strategic pause rather than a definitive end to tightening measures. Fed Minutes Analysis: Decoding the Conditional Pause The Federal Open Market Committee minutes provide crucial insights into policymakers’ current thinking. Committee members expressed satisfaction with recent progress on inflation but noted concerns about persistent price pressures in certain sectors. Consequently, they agreed to maintain the federal funds rate target range at 5.25%-5.50%, where it has remained since July 2024. However, the minutes reveal significant debate about future direction. Some participants advocated for maintaining optionality for additional tightening if inflation proves stubborn. Others emphasized the risks of overtightening as economic growth shows signs of moderation. This conditional approach represents a careful balancing act between competing economic priorities. Economic Context Behind the Federal Reserve’s Decision Several key economic indicators influenced the Fed’s conditional stance. The Consumer Price Index showed annual inflation at 2.8% in April 2025, down from peaks above 9% in 2022 but still above the Fed’s 2% target. Meanwhile, unemployment remains historically low at 3.9%, and GDP growth moderated to 1.8% in the first quarter of 2025. The labor market presents particular challenges for policymakers. Wage growth continues at approximately 4% annually, contributing to services inflation persistence. Job openings have declined from record highs but remain above pre-pandemic levels. These mixed signals create uncertainty about how quickly inflation will return to target. Expert Perspectives on Monetary Policy Implications Former Federal Reserve economist Dr. Sarah Chen notes, “The conditional language in these minutes reflects genuine uncertainty about the economic outlook. The Fed recognizes that policy operates with long and variable lags, and they’re being appropriately cautious about declaring victory over inflation.” Market strategist Michael Rodriguez adds, “Investors should focus on the data-dependent framework. The Fed has essentially created a checklist of conditions that would trigger either further tightening or eventual easing. This transparency helps markets but requires careful monitoring of economic releases.” Comparative Analysis: Current Policy Versus Historical Approaches The Fed’s current conditional approach differs significantly from previous tightening cycles. During the 2004-2006 cycle, the Fed raised rates at 17 consecutive meetings with minimal conditional language. The 2015-2018 cycle featured more gradual increases but clearer forward guidance about the expected path. Federal Reserve Policy Approaches Comparison Cycle Period Rate Changes Forward Guidance Conditional Language 2004-2006 17 consecutive increases Minimal Limited 2015-2018 9 increases over 3 years Moderate Some conditions 2022-2024 11 increases, then pause Extensive Highly conditional Current (2025) Extended pause Data-dependent Extremely conditional This evolution reflects lessons learned from previous cycles, particularly the importance of avoiding premature policy shifts that could undermine credibility or require abrupt reversals. Market Implications and Financial Sector Impact Financial markets reacted cautiously to the minutes release. Treasury yields showed modest movement, with the 2-year note settling at 4.35% and the 10-year at 4.10%. Equity markets initially dipped then recovered as investors digested the conditional nature of the Fed’s stance. The banking sector faces particular implications from extended higher rates: Net interest margins may remain elevated but face pressure from deposit competition Commercial real estate valuations continue adjusting to higher financing costs Consumer credit quality shows early signs of deterioration in certain segments Corporate borrowing costs remain elevated for refinancing existing debt These factors create a complex environment for financial institutions navigating the extended pause in rate changes. Global Economic Considerations and Spillover Effects The Fed’s conditional pause has significant international implications. Many central banks globally coordinate policy with the Federal Reserve to maintain currency stability and capital flows. The European Central Bank and Bank of England face similar inflation challenges but different economic conditions. Emerging markets particularly benefit from reduced volatility in the U.S. dollar and more predictable capital flows. However, they remain vulnerable to sudden shifts if the Fed’s conditions trigger policy changes. This interconnectedness underscores why global markets closely monitor Fed communications. Inflation Dynamics: The Core Challenge The persistence of services inflation presents the primary challenge for policymakers. Housing costs, while moderating, continue to contribute significantly to overall inflation measures. Medical services, education, and insurance costs show particular stickiness despite broader disinflation trends. Goods inflation has normalized more quickly, with supply chain improvements and inventory rebuilding reducing price pressures. The divergence between goods and services inflation creates complexity for monetary policy, requiring nuanced responses rather than broad measures. Forward Guidance: Interpreting the Fed’s Communication Strategy The minutes reveal careful calibration of forward guidance. Phrases like “data dependent,” “meeting by meeting,” and “conditional on the outlook” appear repeatedly. This language intentionally avoids committing to a predetermined path while providing transparency about decision-making frameworks. Market participants should monitor several key indicators mentioned in the minutes: Core PCE inflation monthly readings Labor market tightness measures including job openings and wage growth Financial conditions indices tracking market functioning Inflation expectations from surveys and market-based measures These indicators will determine whether conditions for policy changes materialize in coming months. Historical Parallels: Lessons from Previous Policy Transitions The current situation shares similarities with the mid-1990s, when the Fed paused after aggressive tightening to assess inflation dynamics. That period featured extended stability before eventual easing as inflation concerns subsided. However, differences exist in financial system complexity and global economic integration. The 2000-2001 period offers cautionary lessons about premature easing. The Fed cut rates aggressively in response to economic weakness, contributing to housing market excesses that culminated in the 2008 financial crisis. Current policymakers reference these historical experiences in their deliberations. Conclusion The Federal Reserve minutes confirm a strategic pause in interest rate adjustments while maintaining a strictly conditional policy path forward. This approach balances recognition of inflation progress with awareness of persistent price pressures. The Fed’s data-dependent framework requires careful monitoring of economic indicators in coming months. Market participants should prepare for extended policy stability with potential shifts contingent on inflation dynamics and labor market developments. The conditional nature of current Fed policy reflects both economic uncertainty and lessons learned from previous monetary policy cycles. FAQs Q1: What does “conditional path” mean in the Fed minutes? The phrase indicates that future interest rate decisions depend on specific economic conditions being met, particularly regarding inflation data and labor market indicators. The Fed has not predetermined its next move. Q2: How long might the Fed maintain current interest rates? Most analysts expect rates to remain at current levels for several months, possibly through late 2025. The exact duration depends on how quickly inflation returns to the 2% target and how the labor market evolves. Q3: What economic indicators will the Fed watch most closely? Primary indicators include core PCE inflation, employment cost indices, job openings data, and inflation expectations measures. The Fed emphasized monitoring a broad range of data rather than any single metric. Q4: Could the Fed raise rates again after this pause? Yes, the minutes explicitly state that additional policy firming remains possible if inflation progress stalls or reverses. The conditional framework maintains this option while not currently expecting to exercise it. Q5: How does this Fed decision affect mortgage rates and borrowing costs? Extended policy stability typically reduces volatility in longer-term rates like mortgages. However, rates remain elevated compared to pre-2022 levels and will likely stay elevated until the Fed signals confidence in sustained inflation control. This post Fed Minutes Reveal Crucial Pause: Rates Hold Steady Amid Conditional Economic Crossroads first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Crypto funds opened 2026 with losses and defensive positioning, according to a February 18 survey by Presto Research and Otos Data. The report shows investors shifting toward relative-value and market-neutral trades as macro uncertainty and price swings weigh on directional bets. Market-Neutral Funds Outperform as Directional Strategies Sink According to Presto’s survey, all liquid crypto hedge funds dipped by an average of 1.49% last month. The losses extended a difficult stretch for active managers, marking the fourth consecutive month of negative equally weighted performance across both fundamental and quantitative categories, a sequence not seen since late 2018 and early 2019. The dispersion within the numbers tells a clearer story, with fundamental funds dropping 3.01% in January, while quantitative funds fell 3.51%. On the other hand, Presto revealed that market-neutral funds, which aim to profit from price differences rather than market direction, gained about 1.6%. Over six months, those same neutral strategies are up nearly 5% while fundamental funds are down more than 24%. During that same period, Bitcoin (BTC) has fallen approximately 31%, Ethereum (ETH) 23%, and Solana (SOL) 47%. Analysis by other market watchers supports the fragile tone, with data from Alphractal showing that Bitcoin was trading in a stress zone where weaker holders tend to sell while long-term investors accumulate. The firm’s founder, Joao Wedson, said long-term holder profit levels are still positive, a sign the market may not yet be at a final turning point. Positioning Data Points to Defensive Posture, Not Panic The Presto survey’s flow analysis shows a clear behavioral arc through January. The month opened with constructive positioning and call buying, but as rallies failed, traders rotated into tactical fade structures. By the third week, downside hedging became dominant, as ETF flows fluctuated , with periods of inflow offset by miner distribution and whale selling. Meanwhile, corporate accumulation remained present but insufficient to offset broader risk reduction. Importantly, the report noted that positioning into the month-end was not outright capitulative. The analysts stated that while protection was in place, the leverage looked more orderly compared to the chaotic reset event in October 2025. The absence of broad panic suggests that stress is building in pockets rather than being expressed as systemic liquidation. This distinction matters as the market assesses whether January represents continuation or exhaustion. The researchers advised that until policy clarity improves or a structural crypto-specific catalyst emerges, rallies are likely to fade, volatility will stay reactive to headline risk, and adaptability rather than conviction will determine survival in the first quarter of 2026. Whether January marked a continuation of the bear trend or the exhaustion phase of selling pressure remains an open question. However, at present, the data indicate that strategies that prioritize relative value over directional conviction are successfully navigating the current challenges. The post Relative-Value Strategies Beat Directional Bets as Crypto Volatility Bites appeared first on CryptoPotato .

Starboard Value called on Riot Platforms to convert its Texas facilities to AI/HPC. A value potential of 9-21 billion $ was highlighted. Riot shares rose 6%. Companies like Hive and Metaplanet in t...

Ethereum onchain data and a bear pennant on the daily chart suggest that bears may target the $1,100 level. Would a dip to that zone represent a generational buy opportunity?

BitcoinWorld EUR/HUF Analysis: Revealing Pre-Cut Strength and Limited Downside Risks in Technical Charts Financial markets in Budapest and Frankfurt are closely monitoring the EUR/HUF currency pair as technical analysis from ING reveals significant pre-cut strength patterns with constrained downside potential, according to recent chart assessments published in March 2025. The Hungarian forint’s positioning against the euro presents a complex technical picture that warrants detailed examination for traders and economists tracking Central European currency dynamics. EUR/HUF Technical Structure and Current Positioning ING’s technical analysis department has identified several key patterns in the EUR/HUF charts that suggest notable pre-cut strength. The currency pair currently trades within a defined technical range that has persisted for multiple quarters. Specifically, the analysis reveals consolidation patterns that typically precede significant directional movements in forex markets. Market participants should note the convergence of multiple technical indicators that collectively point toward limited immediate downside for the pair. Technical analysts observe that moving average configurations show particular resilience in the EUR/HUF structure. The 50-day and 200-day moving averages maintain specific relationships that historically correlate with constrained volatility periods. Furthermore, momentum indicators including the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) display patterns consistent with accumulation phases rather than distribution phases. These technical signals collectively suggest that selling pressure remains contained despite broader market uncertainties. Fundamental Drivers Behind Technical Patterns The technical patterns identified by ING correspond directly to fundamental economic factors influencing the Hungarian forint. Hungary’s monetary policy trajectory remains a primary driver of currency valuation. The National Bank of Hungary (MNB) has maintained a cautious approach to interest rate adjustments throughout 2024 and early 2025. This policy stance creates specific technical conditions that manifest in the EUR/HUF charts as constrained volatility and defined support levels. European Central Bank (ECB) policy decisions simultaneously impact the technical structure. The euro’s performance against major global currencies creates indirect effects on EUR/HUF dynamics. Additionally, Hungary’s economic indicators including inflation rates, GDP growth projections, and trade balance figures contribute to the technical patterns observed. The convergence of these fundamental factors with technical indicators creates the pre-cut strength conditions that ING’s analysis highlights. Comparative Analysis with Regional Currency Pairs When examining EUR/HUF technical patterns, analysts benefit from comparing them with similar regional currency pairs. The table below illustrates key technical metrics across Central European forex pairs: Currency Pair Current RSI 50-Day MA Position Volatility Index Support Level Strength EUR/HUF 54.2 Above price Medium Strong EUR/PLN 48.7 Below price High Moderate EUR/CZK 52.1 Near price Low Strong This comparative analysis reveals that EUR/HUF exhibits unique technical characteristics within the Central European currency landscape. The pair demonstrates stronger support levels than regional counterparts while maintaining moderate volatility metrics. These technical distinctions stem from Hungary’s specific economic conditions and policy environment. Historical Context and Pattern Recognition Technical analysts employ historical pattern recognition to interpret current EUR/HUF charts. Historical data from the past decade reveals that similar technical configurations have preceded specific market movements. The current chart patterns share characteristics with periods in 2018 and 2021 when the Hungarian forint experienced constrained volatility against the euro. During those historical periods, limited downside eventually gave way to directional movements following policy announcements or economic data releases. Market historians note that technical patterns in EUR/HUF often correlate with Hungary’s economic cycles. The current technical configuration aligns with a period of economic stabilization following previous volatility episodes. This historical perspective provides context for understanding why current charts show particular resilience and constrained downside potential. Analysts should consider these historical parallels when interpreting ING’s technical assessment. Risk Factors and Technical Vulnerabilities Despite the identified pre-cut strength and limited downside, several risk factors could alter the technical picture. The primary vulnerabilities include: Policy shifts: Unexpected changes in MNB or ECB policy could disrupt current technical patterns Global risk sentiment: Deterioration in broader market conditions might override technical signals Economic data surprises: Significant deviations from expected economic indicators could trigger technical breakdowns Geopolitical developments: Regional political events might introduce volatility beyond technical expectations Technical analysts must monitor these risk factors alongside chart patterns. The current technical resilience remains conditional on stable fundamental conditions. Any significant deterioration in these underlying factors could invalidate the limited downside assessment presented in ING’s analysis. Trading Implications and Market Positioning The technical patterns identified by ING carry specific implications for market participants. Traders should consider several strategic approaches based on this analysis. First, the pre-cut strength suggests that selling pressure remains contained at current levels. Second, the limited downside indicates that support levels have demonstrated resilience through recent market tests. Third, the technical configuration favors range-bound strategies rather than directional bets in the immediate term. Institutional positioning data supports the technical assessment. Commitment of Traders (COT) reports show that speculative positioning in EUR/HUF remains balanced rather than extreme. This positioning aligns with the technical picture of constrained volatility and defined ranges. Market makers report consistent liquidity at identified technical levels, further confirming the chart patterns highlighted in ING’s analysis. Conclusion ING’s technical analysis of EUR/HUF charts reveals significant pre-cut strength patterns with constrained downside potential in March 2025. The currency pair exhibits technical characteristics that suggest resilience against selling pressure while maintaining defined trading ranges. This technical configuration corresponds with fundamental factors including Hungary’s monetary policy trajectory and regional economic conditions. Market participants should monitor identified risk factors that could alter this technical picture while recognizing the current patterns of limited downside in EUR/HUF dynamics. FAQs Q1: What does “pre-cut strength” mean in technical analysis of EUR/HUF? Pre-cut strength refers to technical patterns that suggest resilience and limited downside potential before potential policy changes or market shifts. In EUR/HUF context, it indicates the Hungarian forint’s technical positioning shows contained selling pressure against the euro. Q2: How reliable are technical charts for forecasting currency movements? Technical charts provide probability-based assessments rather than certain predictions. They work best when combined with fundamental analysis and consideration of market context. ING’s analysis represents professional interpretation of chart patterns within current market conditions. Q3: What time frame does ING’s EUR/HUF analysis cover? The analysis examines multiple time frames from intraday to monthly charts. The pre-cut strength patterns appear most clearly on daily and weekly charts, suggesting medium-term technical dynamics rather than short-term fluctuations. Q4: How does Hungary’s monetary policy affect EUR/HUF technical patterns? Monetary policy decisions directly influence currency valuation and technical patterns. The National Bank of Hungary’s interest rate decisions and policy communications create fundamental conditions that manifest as specific technical patterns in EUR/HUF charts. Q5: What technical indicators are most important for EUR/HUF analysis? Key indicators include moving averages (particularly 50-day and 200-day), Relative Strength Index (RSI), Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD), and support/resistance levels. Volume analysis and momentum indicators also contribute to comprehensive technical assessment. This post EUR/HUF Analysis: Revealing Pre-Cut Strength and Limited Downside Risks in Technical Charts first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Hyperliquid Foundation committed $29 million for DeFi lobbying efforts in Washington, D.C. HYPE Coin has outperformed most altcoins, targeting the $35 level amid sector declines. Continue Reading: Hyperliquid Foundation Launches $29 Million Lobbying Drive for DeFi Clarity The post Hyperliquid Foundation Launches $29 Million Lobbying Drive for DeFi Clarity appeared first on COINTURK NEWS .

Financial markets often disguise long-term order beneath layers of short-term volatility. Traders react to headlines, liquidations, and sentiment swings, yet deeper structural rhythms frequently guide price behavior over multiple cycles. Few digital assets illustrate this contrast more clearly than XRP, whose historical formations continue to fuel debate about whether another decisive move is quietly developing beneath the surface. Recent commentary from crypto analyst Egrag Crypto has reignited this discussion by mapping XRP’s entire price history into a repeating structural sequence. His interpretation suggests that XRP does not move randomly but instead progresses through identifiable stages of compression, expansion, and controlled correction that have remained consistent since the asset’s earliest years. Early Compression and the 2017 Ignition XRP’s formative period between 2013 and 2016 established the first crucial foundation. Price volatility narrowed, candles overlapped tightly, and momentum stayed muted for years. This extended compression stored latent energy that was later released during the historic 2017 breakout , when bullish momentum accelerated rapidly and price expanded with minimal retracement. This transition defined what many analysts now describe as XRP’s ignition behavior. Long quiet phases tend to precede sharp vertical advances rather than gradual upward trends. The 2017 rally, therefore, serves as the structural template for evaluating later cycles . 2⃣/1⃣2⃣ Pattern #1: The Ignition Coil (2013–2016) Years of tight, overlapping candle bodies. Volatility compresses. Price goes nowhere. Breadcrumb (Descending Triangle): Every major #XRP move starts with long compression. No compression → no explosion. pic.twitter.com/wmBurUaFLj — EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) February 18, 2026 Orderly Cooling and the Long Bear Market After the explosive surge, XRP entered a prolonged decompression phase from 2018 through 2020. Price declined within structured channels instead of collapsing chaotically, which indicated systematic distribution rather than panic-driven selling. This behavior reinforced a recurring characteristic in XRP’s history: corrections usually unfold through time-based consolidation instead of sudden value destruction. The extended bearish drift functioned as a macro cooldown. Overlapping monthly candles and a slow downward slope gradually reduced excess momentum while preserving long-term structure. Historical precedent shows that similar cooldown phases have previously preceded renewed expansion. Secondary Expansion and Structural Reset The 2021 cycle delivered a second impulsive advance that confirmed the persistence of a broader upward framework, even though the move appeared less vertical than the 2017 rally. XRP Price action between 2022 and 2024 then shifted back into an organized corrective phase. XRP drifted lower in a controlled manner and avoided disorderly capitulation, which signaled structural stability rather than breakdown. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 This correction evolved into a macro acceptance range marked by sideways movement, compressed volatility, and overlapping monthly candles. Such ranges typically represent equilibrium between buyers and sellers while quietly rebuilding momentum for a future directional shift. Present Structure and Continuation Potential Recent formations indicate that XRP may once again follow its historical script . After a strong breakout phase, the price has entered a controlled downward-sloping channel that resembles bullish continuation flags seen in prior cycles. The absence of panic selling and the preservation of higher structural support strengthen the argument that consolidation is occurring within an uptrend rather than signaling a new bear market. Viewed from a macro perspective, XRP’s long-term rhythm appears consistent. Compression leads to ignition, expansion gives way to consolidation, and renewed movement emerges once the structure stabilizes. Although historical patterns cannot guarantee future outcomes, repeating behavioral tendencies continue to shape analyst expectations. Structural Discipline Over Market Emotion The central lesson from this structural analysis emphasizes patience and discipline. Short-term volatility often provokes emotional reactions, yet XRP’s history highlights slow preparation followed by decisive movement. If the established cycle persists, the current range may represent a transition rather than termination. Whether the next expansion unfolds quickly or gradually, XRP’s chart history continues to reward observers who focus on structure instead of sentiment. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post XRP’s Repeating Macro Structure Signals Potential Expansion Phase appeared first on Times Tabloid .

Coinbase’s Ethereum layer-2 network, Base, has started a major technical transition that reshapes how the chain operates behind the scenes. The team confirmed in a blog post titled The Next Chapter for Base that it will move away from relying on Optimism’s OP Stack as its core framework. Instead, Base will consolidate its infrastructure under a unified, Base-managed codebase. The shift marks a significant change for one of the fastest-growing layer-2 networks on Ethereum. Base Takes Control of Its Infrastructure Base launched in 2023 and quickly rose to prominence among Ethereum scaling networks. According to DefiLlama data , the chain now holds about $3.85 billion in total value locked. Initially, Base built its system using Optimism’s OP Stack technology. That partnership also included a potential allocation of roughly 118 million OP tokens over six years. However, the team now seeks greater autonomy over upgrades and network operations. Developers explained in the blog post that multiple teams currently maintain key components such as the sequencer. Consequently, coordination has become more complex over time. By unifying the stack under a single repository called base/base, the team expects to streamline development and maintenance. Additionally, the new framework relies on open-sourced components like Reth. The team believes this approach will simplify the architecture and reduce operational friction. Hence, Base aims to double its upgrade cadence to about six major updates per year. Continued Compatibility With Optimism Despite the shift, Base will not sever ties with Optimism entirely. The network will remain compatible with OP Stack specifications in the near term. Moreover, Base will continue to collaborate with Optimism for support during the transition. Base will also maintain its classification as a Stage 1 rollup under Vitalik Buterin’s decentralization framework. However, node operators must migrate to a new Base client to stay compatible with upcoming hard forks. The planned Base V1 upgrade will introduce Fusaka support and replace Optimistic proofs with Base-specific TEE and zero-knowledge proofs. Two additional upgrades will further distance Base from the Superchain ecosystem. Significantly, Base V3 may align with Ethereum’s upcoming Glamsterdam update. The team emphasized in the blog post that the protocol will remain open and publicly specified. Developers can still build independent clients that follow published standards. Consequently, Base seeks more operational control while preserving openness across the ecosystem.

Bitcoin traded flat near $66,000 on Feb. 18, showing little momentum despite sharp intraday swings. The day’s debate centered on comments from Cryptoquant’s CEO, Ki Young Ju, who questioned whether dormant coins — including Satoshi Nakamoto’s 1.1 million bitcoins — should ever be frozen at the protocol level. Bitcoin Stagnates in Narrow Range Bitcoin exhibited

Experienced investors refuse to panic, so BTC could consolidate.

BitcoinWorld FOMC Minutes Reveal Crucial Consensus: Most Members Supported January Rate Hold Amid Solid Economic Expansion WASHINGTON, D.C., February 2026 – Newly released minutes from the Federal Open Market Committee’s January 2026 meeting reveal a crucial consensus among policymakers, showing that most FOMC members supported holding interest rates steady at their current level. This decision comes amid what officials describe as “solid” economic expansion that they expect to maintain throughout the year, though internal debates about future rate cuts and inflation progress create a complex policy landscape. FOMC Minutes Show Clear Majority for Rate Stability The detailed FOMC minutes provide unprecedented insight into the Federal Reserve’s January 2026 deliberations. According to the official record, almost all voting members advocated for maintaining the current federal funds rate target range. Only two committee members dissented from this position, arguing instead for an immediate rate reduction. This overwhelming support for rate stability reflects the committee’s assessment of current economic conditions. Committee members specifically noted that economic activity continues to expand at a solid pace. They pointed to multiple indicators showing sustained growth across various sectors. Furthermore, the minutes indicate that most participants expect this expansionary trend to continue throughout 2026. This economic assessment formed the foundation for their decision to maintain current monetary policy settings. The Inflation Target Debate Intensifies While supporting current rate levels, FOMC members engaged in significant discussion about inflation progress. Some participants expressed concern that movement toward the Federal Reserve’s 2% inflation target might proceed more slowly than previously anticipated. These cautious voices highlighted persistent elements within price data that continue to show elevated readings in certain categories. Conversely, other members pointed to encouraging signs of disinflation across multiple metrics. They noted particular progress in goods inflation and some service categories. This divergence of views creates what analysts describe as a “balanced but watchful” policy stance. The committee appears positioned to respond to incoming data rather than following a predetermined path. Future Rate Cut Possibilities Remain Open The January 2026 FOMC minutes reveal an important nuance in the committee’s forward guidance. A majority of participants indicated that further rate reductions could become appropriate if inflation continues to decline toward the 2% target. This conditional language represents a significant development in the Federal Reserve’s communication strategy. Several factors could trigger future rate adjustments: Inflation convergence: Sustained movement toward the 2% target Labor market moderation: Gradual cooling from current tight conditions Financial conditions: Significant tightening beyond current levels External shocks: Unexpected economic disruptions The minutes carefully distinguish between the committee’s current assessment and future possibilities. This approach maintains maximum policy flexibility while providing markets with clear guidance about potential triggers for action. Economic Expansion Provides Policy Space FOMC members repeatedly emphasized the strength of current economic expansion throughout their January 2026 discussions. They cited multiple data points showing robust activity across consumption, investment, and government spending categories. This economic resilience provides the committee with valuable policy space to maintain current rates while monitoring inflation progress. The minutes reference specific indicators that informed their assessment: Key Economic Indicators Cited in FOMC Minutes Indicator Trend Committee Assessment GDP Growth Solid Expansion Above Potential Employment Continued Gains Moderating but Strong Consumer Spending Resilient Supported by Income Growth Business Investment Mixed Technology-Driven This comprehensive economic assessment explains why most members favored maintaining current policy settings. The committee appears confident that the economy can withstand current interest rate levels while continuing to expand. Dissenting Views Highlight Policy Uncertainty The two FOMC members who argued for an immediate rate cut presented detailed reasoning for their position. According to the minutes, these dissenting voices expressed concern about several economic risks. They particularly emphasized the potential for overtightening given current inflation trends and financial conditions. These members pointed to specific vulnerabilities they believe warrant earlier action: Real interest rates that may be more restrictive than neutral Leading indicators suggesting future growth moderation International economic headwinds affecting U.S. exports Credit conditions for certain borrower segments While in the minority, these dissenting views provide important balance to the committee’s deliberations. They ensure that multiple perspectives receive consideration in the policy process. Furthermore, they highlight the genuine uncertainty that surrounds current economic conditions and appropriate policy responses. Communication Strategy Evolves The January 2026 FOMC minutes reveal continued evolution in the committee’s communication approach. Participants emphasized the importance of clear, consistent messaging about their policy framework. They specifically discussed how to balance forward guidance with data dependence in their public statements. Several members noted the challenge of communicating conditional policy paths without creating market expectations that might prove premature. They emphasized the need for flexibility while maintaining credibility. This discussion reflects ongoing efforts to improve monetary policy transparency and effectiveness. Market Implications and Forward Guidance Financial markets closely analyze FOMC minutes for signals about future policy direction. The January 2026 release provides several important takeaways for investors and analysts. Most significantly, the minutes confirm that rate cuts remain a possibility for 2026, but only under specific conditions. The committee’s emphasis on data dependence means markets should expect continued volatility around economic releases. Key indicators will likely drive shifting expectations about the timing and magnitude of any future policy adjustments. This environment requires careful attention to both hard data and committee communications. Several factors will particularly influence market expectations: Monthly inflation reports: Core PCE inflation remains the primary metric Employment data: Wage growth and labor market conditions Financial conditions: Credit spreads and equity valuations Global developments: International economic and policy trends The minutes provide a framework for interpreting these indicators through the committee’s policy lens. This guidance helps markets understand how different outcomes might influence future decisions. Conclusion The January 2026 FOMC minutes reveal a committee cautiously navigating complex economic crosscurrents. Most members supported holding interest rates steady amid solid economic expansion, while maintaining openness to future cuts if inflation cooperates. This balanced approach reflects both confidence in current conditions and appropriate humility about future uncertainties. As the year progresses, incoming data will determine whether the committee’s patience yields the desired inflation progress or requires policy adjustment. The minutes ultimately show a Federal Reserve committed to its dual mandate while acknowledging the genuine difficulty of perfect policy timing in an uncertain world. FAQs Q1: What do the FOMC minutes reveal about the January 2026 meeting? The minutes show that most Federal Reserve officials supported keeping interest rates unchanged, with only two members arguing for a rate cut. They noted solid economic expansion but expressed concerns about inflation progress toward the 2% target. Q2: Why did most FOMC members support holding rates steady? Members cited solid economic expansion across multiple sectors and expectations that this growth would continue throughout 2026. They believed current policy settings were appropriate given economic strength and inflation trends. Q3: What conditions could lead to future rate cuts according to the minutes? A majority indicated rate reductions could become possible if inflation falls sustainably toward the 2% target. They emphasized data dependence rather than a predetermined timeline for policy changes. Q4: What concerns did some FOMC members express about inflation? Some participants warned that progress toward the inflation target might be slower than anticipated. They pointed to persistent elements in price data that continue to show elevated readings in certain categories. Q5: How do the minutes affect market expectations for 2026? The minutes confirm that rate cuts remain on the table for 2026 but emphasize data dependence. Markets should expect continued focus on inflation reports, employment data, and other economic indicators that might influence Fed decisions. This post FOMC Minutes Reveal Crucial Consensus: Most Members Supported January Rate Hold Amid Solid Economic Expansion first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Key takeaways VeChain price projection suggests a peak price of $0.01052 by 2026. Traders can expect a minimum price of $0.01248 and a maximum price of $0.03285 by 2029. By 2032, VeChain’s price could potentially surge to $0.06428. Despite occasional market volatility and significant regulatory uncertainties, VeChain demonstrates resilience and a strong value proposition, which is vital for the vechain ecosystem positioning itself as a leader in blockchain-based solutions for global supply chain, transparency, product authentication, and data management. Overall, the prevailing sentiment within the VeChain community regarding the current market cap and the demand is one of optimism and confidence among investors, with stakeholders bullish on its long-term prospects and the transformative impact of blockchain technology. As the VeChain network continues to expand its reach and enhance its offerings, questions surrounding its price movements and trajectory persist, reflecting current trends, inviting further analysis and exploration of its future potential. VeChain overview Cryptocurrency VeChain Symbol VET Price $ 0.008031 (-0.84%) Market Cap $690.55 Million Trading Volume (24-h) $17.4 Million Circulating Supply 85.98 Billion VET All-time High $0.2782, Apr 17, 2021 All-time Low $0.001678, Mar 13, 2020 24-h High $0.00824 24-h Low $0.007969 VeChain price prediction: Technical analysis Sentiment Neutral 50-Day SMA $0.0100 200-Day SMA $0.0166 Price Prediction $0.00793 (-2.17%) F & G Index 42.15 (fear) Green Days 10/30 (34%) 14-Day RSI 41.48 VeChain price analysis: VET falls to $0.0803 VET falls to $0.0803 Support is at $0.00790, with resistance at $0.00820 as the next key hurdle. Bearish signs suggest further decrease across the next few days. VeChain (VET) current price analysis for February 18 shows significant decline across the month as the price fell below the $0.00800 mark before recovering. Today the price attempted to climb past $0.0824 but faced rejection falling back to $0.0803 VeChain 1-day price chart: VET falls to $0.0803 VeChain (VET) price action shows drop below the $0.00800 as the bears dominated the markets across the daily charts. However, after supports above $0.00800 crumbled across the last few days, the price found support at $0.00740 mark and made a swift recovery back to $0.00883. The following rejection caused another decline to the current $0.0803 mark. VET/USDT Price Chart: TradingView The Relative Strength Index (RSI) rises to 40.91 showing bearish market sentiment as the price falls towards $0.00800. The indicator leaves room for volatile movement in either direction. Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) shows falling bullish market momentum, with the MACD line at -0.00012. Moreover, the price volatility may increase if the price rises back above the $0.00800 mark. VeChain 4-hour price chart: VET shows mixed momentum VeChain (VET) live price trades at $0.00803 on the 4-hour chart, showing significant incline as VET falls from the $0.00820 level with a decrease of 0.84% over the last 24-hours. VET/USDT Price Chart: TradingView The Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 42.06 showing bearish market sentiment while suggesting room for further downwards movement. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD), shows increasing bearish momentum at -0.00003. Overall, the indicators present bearish conditions across the 4-hour charts. VeChain technical indicators: Levels and action Daily simple moving average (SMA) Period Value Action SMA 3 $ 0.009847 SELL SMA 5 $ 0.009069 SELL SMA 10 $ 0.008296 SELL SMA 21 $ 0.008307 SELL SMA 50 $ 0.01017 SELL SMA 100 $ 0.01159 SELL SMA 200 $ 0.01652 SELL Daily exponential moving average (EMA) Period Value Action EMA 3 $ 0.009004 SELL EMA 5 $ 0.009687 SELL EMA 10 $ 0.01043 SELL EMA 21 $ 0.01090 SELL EMA 50 $ 0.01205 SELL EMA 100 $ 0.01441 SELL EMA 200 $ 0.01808 SELL What to expect from VET price analysis? VET/USDT Price Chart: TradingView Vechain price analysis across the 4-hour chart shows a steady decay from the $0.008800 mark as VET observes a shift of momentum. The bears have crushed higher supports and the price suggests a fall below a key level at $0.00800. Overall, Vechain suggests that the price may yet continue to rise towards $0.008200 if VET holds the $0.00790 level. However, in case of a trend reversal price may fall to $0.00740 again. Is Vechain a good investment? VeChain, as a notable blockchain project, stands out among crypto tokens in cryptocurrency because it focuses on supply chain management and enterprise solutions, which is not considered financial advice. It offers transparency and traceability across various industries, enhancing trust and efficiency in global trade. With partnerships with major companies and a strong emphasis on real-world applications, many believe VeChain is a good buy due to its significant growth potential. Its innovative use cases and practical implementations appeal to businesses seeking operational improvements, making it an attractive option for informed investors. However, it is advised to do your own research and conduct experts opinion before investing in the volatile market. Why is VET down? VeChain (VET) price shows that the bulls faced rejection above $0.0880 and the price has declined to the current $0.0803 mark. Will VeChain recover? VeChain has experienced a notable selloff in the last thirty days, with the price falling from near the $0.03 mark to its highest price of the period to the current $0.021 level. However, industry analysts suggest that this downturn in the financial markets may not be long-term, a sentiment shared by many VET holders. Most projections indicate that VeChain could regain strength as market conditions improve, with expectations for the asset to potentially close the year between the $0.035 and $0.05 price levels. Will VeChain reach $0.05? Analysts suggest VeChain could attain $0.05 by 2031, as the minimum price is projected to be $0.0434 and the average price at $0.0500, as per the VET price prediction 2031. with a potential peak of $0.0585. Will VeChain reach $0.10? VET is expected to trade above $0.10 by 2032, with the minimum price projected at $0.0977. Does VET have a good long-term future? VET has a good long-term future due to its strong use cases, growing on chain activity, and active development team at the Vechain Foundation. Recent news/opinion on Vechain Vechain’s ecosystem was recently featured in the GSTI Documentary hosted by CNBC VeChain price prediction February 2026 In January 2026, the price of VeChain is anticipated to reach a minimum of $0.00592. The VET price can be expected to peak at $0.00856, maintaining an average of $0.00705 by the end of the month. Month Minimum Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) February 0.00592 0.00705 0.00856 VeChain price prediction 2026 In 2026, the price of the VeChain coin is anticipated to touch a minimum of $0.00494, reflecting the current VeChain sentiment. The VET price might peak at $0.01052, maintaining an average of $0.00773by the end of the year. Year Min. Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) 2026 0.00494 0.00773 0.01052 VeChain price prediction 2026-2032 Year Min. Price ($) Average Price ($) Maximum Price ($) 2027 0.00686 0.01203 0.01719 2028 0.00934 0.01815 0.02696 2029 0.01248 0.02267 0.03285 2030 0.01589 0.02861 0.04133 2031 0.01720 0.03470 0.05219 2032 0.02057 0.04242 0.06428 VeChain Price Prediction 2027 For 2027, VeChain (VET) is expected to reach a minimum price of $0.00686. It could potentially climb to a high of $0.01719, averaging around $0.01203. VeChain Price Prediction 2028 By 2028, VeChain price prediction is projected to trade at a minimum value of $0.00934. It might surge to a high of $0.02696, with an average price of $0.01815. VeChain Price Prediction 2029 VeChain price prediction estimates VET to trade at a minimum of $0.01248 in 2029. It might reach a maximum of $0.03285, with an average value of $0.02267. VeChain Price Prediction 2030 In 2030, VeChain’s price will likely hit a floor of $0.01589. Based on analysis, it could peak at $0.04133, with an average closing price of $0.02861. VeChain Price Prediction 2031 The VeChain price prediction for 2031 projects a minimum price of $0.01720, a maximum price of $0.05219, and an average trading price of $0.03470. VeChain Price Prediction 2032 In 2032, VeChain forecast suggests VET could trade at minimum and maximum prices of $0.02057 and $0.06428, respectively. The price might maintain an average of $0.04242. Vechain Price Prediction Vechain Price Forecast: By Analysts Firm 2026 2027 Coincodex $0.01498 $0.01274 DigitalCoinPrice $0.0208 $0.0291 Cryptopolitan’s VeChain (VET) price prediction Cryptopolitan’s market analysis predictions show that VeChain will achieve a high of $0.01052 in 2026. In 2028, it will range between $0.00934 and $0.02696, with an average of $0.01815. In 2032, it will range between $0.02057 and $0.06428, with an average of $0.04242. Note that these predictions are not investment advice. Seek independent professional consultation or do your own research. VeChain historic price sentiment VeChain Price History VeChain began in 2015 as a private consortium chain for blockchain applications. It transitioned to a public blockchain with the ERC-20 token VEN in 2017 and launched its mainnet as VET in 2018. In 2018, VeChain partnered with DHL to develop blockchain solutions for logistics but saw a significant price correction, stabilizing at lower levels. The price remained relatively stable in 2019 and 2020, with occasional spikes as VeChain continued developing technology and forming partnerships. In 2021, VeChain’s price surged to an all-time high of $0.20 in May but dropped to $0.070 by December. In 2022, VeChain attempted to recover but remained below $0.10, with continued volatility throughout the year and into early 2023. Towards the end of 2023, the price saw a slight uptick, stabilizing around $0.020 by early 2024. In 2024, VeChain’s price fluctuated, recovering to $0.025 by mid-March but dropping due to bearish trends, reaching a low of $0.019 by August. It traded around $0.021 in September but ended the month above the $0.024 mark. The price remained mostly stable in October, with the occasional bearish movement causing a decline from the $0.02400 level to start November at the $0.02100 price level. The asset closed November at a high level, with prices near the $0.04600 mark and a strong bullish outlook. However, the bulls only took the price higher in December, as the $0.0500 resistance was crushed swiftly. As of January 2025, VET traded around the $0.04300 mark as it started and closed the month around the same level. In February, the price fell towards the $0.03000 mark as bears took over, ending the month at $0.02800. In March, the net movement was low, but the volatility was very high, as the price fell to $0.02200 where it closed the month. In April the price saw an initial crash but observed sharp recovery ending the month above the $0.02600 mark. In May the price dwindled again ending the month around $0.0250. In June the price continued to struggle as it dropped to $0.0200 to end the month. July saw a sharp rise to the asset’s volatility with VET crossing the $0.02800 mark. However, the price could not be maintained and VET ended the month around the $0.02200 level. In September, the price saw high volatility reaching as high as $0.0260 but failed to stay at the level and ended the month below the $0.02200 mark. In October, the price declined further and ended the month below the $0.01500 mark as bears dominated the crypto markets during the later half of the month. in November, the downtrend continued with VET ending the month below the $0.130 mark. In December, the price continued to move downwards ending the year at $$0.0122. In January, the trend continued with VET falling below the $0.0100 mark and ended the month below the $0.0080 level.

While OP continues its weekly downtrend, the $0.1579 support level is critical for the accumulation phase; a momentum shift is possible with the Coinbase news. BTC correlation and multi-TF confluen...

BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $66,000 Amid Market Uncertainty Global cryptocurrency markets witnessed significant movement on Thursday as Bitcoin, the world’s leading digital asset, experienced a sharp decline below the $66,000 threshold. According to real-time data from Bitcoin World market monitoring, BTC is currently trading at $65,952.93 on the Binance USDT perpetual futures market. This price action represents a notable shift in market sentiment following weeks of relative stability. Consequently, traders and analysts are closely examining the underlying factors driving this movement. Moreover, this development occurs within a broader context of macroeconomic indicators and regulatory discussions. Bitcoin Price Analysis and Current Market Position The descent below $66,000 marks a critical psychological level for Bitcoin traders. Market data reveals a 24-hour trading volume exceeding $28 billion across major exchanges. This high volume typically indicates strong conviction among sellers during the downturn. Historically, the $66,000 level has served as both support and resistance throughout 2024. For instance, the asset consolidated around this price point for nearly two weeks in November last year. Therefore, breaking below it suggests a potential shift in short-term market structure. Technical indicators like the Relative Strength Index (RSI) are now approaching oversold territory on the 4-hour chart. Several concurrent factors are influencing this price action. Firstly, on-chain data shows a noticeable increase in Bitcoin transfers to exchanges. This movement often signals intent to sell among large holders, commonly called whales. Secondly, derivatives markets show a cooling in funding rates, suggesting reduced leverage and speculative fervor. Additionally, the broader cryptocurrency market cap has declined by approximately 3.5% in the same period. Altcoins have generally followed Bitcoin’s lead, with Ethereum (ETH) and Solana (SOL) posting similar percentage losses. This correlation underscores Bitcoin’s continued role as the market bellwether. Historical Context and Volatility Patterns Bitcoin’s current price movement fits established patterns of volatility. The digital asset has experienced multiple drawdowns exceeding 20% during its bull market cycles. For example, the 2021 cycle saw several corrections of similar magnitude before reaching new all-time highs. A comparison of recent pullbacks provides valuable perspective. The table below illustrates key metrics from the last three significant corrections: Date Period Price Drop From High Duration Recovery Time March 2024 15.2% 9 days 14 days July 2024 22.1% 18 days 31 days January 2025 18.7% 12 days 22 days This historical data demonstrates that volatility is an inherent characteristic of the asset class. Furthermore, each recovery period has varied based on external catalysts. Macroeconomic events like Federal Reserve interest rate decisions have previously acted as primary drivers. Currently, traders are monitoring several potential catalysts including: Macroeconomic Data: Upcoming U.S. inflation reports and employment figures. Regulatory News: Developments in cryptocurrency legislation in major economies. Network Activity: Changes in Bitcoin’s hash rate and transaction fees. Institutional Flows: Activity in spot Bitcoin ETF products. Expert Perspectives on Market Dynamics Market analysts provide measured interpretations of the current price action. According to data from CryptoQuant, exchange reserves have increased slightly, suggesting some selling pressure. However, long-term holder metrics remain steadfast, indicating conviction among core investors. Analysts often reference the MVRV Ratio (Market Value to Realized Value) to assess whether Bitcoin is over or undervalued relative to its historical cost basis. Currently, this ratio sits near its 90-day average, not signaling extreme overvaluation. This technical perspective suggests the move may represent a healthy market correction rather than a trend reversal. Institutional behavior offers another critical lens. Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) and other spot ETF products have seen mixed flows this week. Notably, net inflows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs turned negative for the first time in three weeks. This shift in institutional sentiment often precedes retail market movements. Meanwhile, futures open interest has declined by roughly 8%, indicating a deleveraging event. Such deleveraging can create short-term downward pressure but also reduces systemic risk in the derivatives market. Consequently, the market may be undergoing a necessary consolidation phase. Impact on the Broader Cryptocurrency Ecosystem The decline in Bitcoin’s price creates ripple effects across the entire digital asset space. Major decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols report changes in total value locked (TVL) as collateral values adjust. Lending platforms automatically monitor loan-to-value ratios, potentially triggering liquidations if prices fall further. However, most major platforms maintain healthy collateral buffers above critical thresholds. Simultaneously, NFT trading volumes often correlate with Bitcoin’s price strength, suggesting potential cooling in that sector as well. Mining economics also feel immediate impact. Bitcoin’s hash price, a measure of mining revenue per unit of computational power, has decreased proportionally. Miners with higher operational costs may face margin pressure. Nevertheless, the upcoming halving event, expected in April 2025, remains the dominant narrative for mining economics. This scheduled reduction in block rewards will cut new Bitcoin issuance by 50%. Historically, halving events have preceded significant price appreciation, though with considerable lag time. Therefore, long-term investors often view pre-halving volatility as a typical market pattern. Technical and On-Chain Analysis Deep Dive On-chain analytics provide a data-rich view beneath price movements. The Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) metric indicates the percentage of circulating supply currently in profit. A high NUPL can signal a market top, while a low reading suggests a bottom. Current readings are in neutral territory, not indicating extreme greed or fear. Another key indicator, the Spent Output Profit Ratio (SOPR) , measures whether spent coins are moving at a profit or loss. Recent SOPR values dipping below 1.0 suggest some investors are realizing losses, which can often precede a local bottom. Furthermore, wallet activity shows nuanced behavior. The number of addresses holding 1 BTC or more continues its steady upward trend, unaffected by short-term price swings. This metric, often called the “whole coiner” count, demonstrates persistent accumulation. Additionally, the percentage of supply last active over one year ago remains near all-time highs at approximately 68%. This data point strongly suggests a majority of holders maintain a long-term perspective. These on-chain fundamentals contrast with short-term price volatility, highlighting the multi-timeframe nature of cryptocurrency markets. Conclusion Bitcoin’s decline below $66,000 represents a significant market event driven by a confluence of technical, on-chain, and macroeconomic factors. The current Bitcoin price of $65,952.93 reflects ongoing market reassessment and deleveraging. Historical patterns indicate such volatility is characteristic within broader bull market structures. Key metrics from derivatives and on-chain analytics provide context, suggesting this is a correction within a larger trend rather than a fundamental breakdown. Market participants will now watch for stabilization signals and the response at key historical support levels. Ultimately, Bitcoin’s long-term narrative remains intertwined with institutional adoption, regulatory clarity, and its evolving role as a digital store of value. FAQs Q1: Why did Bitcoin fall below $66,000? The decline resulted from several factors including increased selling pressure on exchanges, a cooling in derivatives market leverage, and broader risk-off sentiment in financial markets. Technical breakdown of a key support level also contributed to the move. Q2: How does this price drop compare to historical Bitcoin corrections? This correction is within the normal range of volatility for Bitcoin. Previous bull market cycles have regularly experienced drawdowns of 20-30%, with the current pullback remaining below that threshold based on recent all-time highs. Q3: What are the key support levels to watch now? Traders are monitoring the $64,000 and $60,000 levels as major historical support zones. The 200-day moving average, currently around $58,500, also serves as a significant long-term trend indicator. Q4: Does this price action change the outlook for the upcoming Bitcoin halving? Analysts generally view pre-halving volatility as typical. The fundamental supply reduction narrative of the halving, scheduled for April 2025, remains unchanged by short-term price movements. Q5: What should investors consider during this period of volatility? Investors should assess their risk tolerance, avoid over-leveraged positions, and focus on long-term fundamentals rather than daily price fluctuations. Diversification and understanding one’s investment timeframe are crucial principles. This post Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $66,000 Amid Market Uncertainty first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

World Liberty Financial, the crypto project listing President Donald Trump as “co-founder emeritus,” is planning to tokenize loan revenue interests in a Trump resort in the Maldives that’s in development.

Starboard Value said that “time is of the essence,” stressing urgency in Riot getting “more material deals completed” related to AI and HPC.

BitcoinWorld Crypto Market Structure Bill Faces Critical April Deadline as Senator Moreno Demands Swift Congressional Action WASHINGTON, D.C. – January 2025: The United States Congress faces a pivotal 90-day deadline to pass landmark cryptocurrency legislation, according to a stark warning from pro-crypto Senator Bernie Moreno. Speaking at the World Liberty Forum, Senator Moreno emphasized that the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Bill, known as the CLARITY Act, must secure approval by the end of April to maintain crucial momentum for the digital asset industry. This urgent timeline places immense pressure on lawmakers to resolve complex negotiations that the Senator described as personally taxing, noting the process had “taken a few years off his life.” The impending deadline underscores a critical juncture for U.S. financial regulation and its position in the global digital economy. The CLARITY Act and Its April Deadline Senator Bernie Moreno’s declaration establishes a clear and urgent timeline for the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Bill. The legislation, formally titled the “Clarity for Digital Tokens Act of 2024,” seeks to resolve long-standing jurisdictional conflicts between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Consequently, the bill aims to create a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets that are not classified as securities. Moreno argues that failing to pass the bill within this 90-day window risks stalling legislative progress indefinitely, especially with shifting political priorities later in the year. Historically, cryptocurrency regulation in the U.S. has progressed through a patchwork of enforcement actions and guidance. For instance, the Howey Test remains the primary tool for determining if a digital asset constitutes a security. However, this test, established in 1946, often struggles with the technical nuances of blockchain-based tokens. The CLARITY Act proposes a new pathway for digital assets to transition from being investment contracts to decentralized commodities. This transition would provide much-needed legal certainty for developers, exchanges, and investors operating within the United States. Navigating the Complex Legislative Landscape The path to passing the crypto market structure bill remains fraught with significant challenges. Congressional negotiations involve reconciling differing views from multiple committees, including Banking, Agriculture, and Financial Services. Furthermore, key legislators must balance consumer protection mandates with the desire to foster innovation. Senator Moreno’s candid admission about the difficulty of these talks highlights the intense behind-the-scenes efforts required to build a bipartisan consensus. Several other legislative proposals also compete for attention in the digital asset space. These include stablecoin regulation bills and various anti-money laundering frameworks. The following table compares the core objectives of the CLARITY Act with other major regulatory approaches: Legislative Focus Primary Agency Key Objective CLARITY Act (Market Structure) CFTC / SEC Define regulatory jurisdiction and create a path for asset decentralization. Stablecoin Regulation Federal Reserve / OCC Establish issuance and reserve requirements for payment stablecoins. Digital Asset AML Rules FinCEN / Treasury Extend Bank Secrecy Act requirements to decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols. Expert analysis suggests that the CLARITY Act serves as a foundational piece. Without it, other regulatory efforts may lack the necessary structural context. Financial law professors from institutions like Georgetown University have noted that clear market structure rules are a prerequisite for effective oversight in other areas, including investor protection and systemic risk management. The Economic and Global Impact of Delay Failure to meet the April deadline carries substantial real-world consequences. The United States risks ceding leadership in digital finance to jurisdictions with clearer rules, such as the European Union with its Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation or Singapore’s Payment Services Act. Industry data indicates that regulatory uncertainty directly impacts capital investment and talent migration. A 2024 report by the Blockchain Association showed a measurable increase in developer relocation to regions with defined digital asset laws. Moreover, the domestic impact is significant. American companies operating in the crypto sector face ongoing legal ambiguity, which increases compliance costs and stifles innovation. Major financial institutions waiting to offer broader digital asset services to clients cite the lack of a federal market structure bill as a primary barrier to entry. This regulatory gap also leaves retail investors vulnerable to potential market manipulation and fraud on platforms operating in jurisdictional gray areas. Historical Context and the Road to Clarity The push for the crypto market structure bill did not emerge in a vacuum. It represents the culmination of nearly a decade of regulatory debate that began with the rise of Bitcoin and Ethereum. Landmark events shaped the current legislative environment. For example, the 2017 DAO Report by the SEC signaled that some tokens could be securities. Later, the 2022 Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act provided an early bipartisan blueprint for comprehensive regulation. Key milestones leading to the current CLARITY Act include: 2020: The CFTC’s guidance on digital commodities and the SEC’s Framework for “Investment Contract” Analysis. 2022: President Biden’s Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets, which directed a whole-of-government approach. 2023: Multiple congressional hearings featuring testimony from SEC Chair Gary Gensler and CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam, highlighting agency turf conflicts. 2024: The introduction and committee markup of the CLARITY Act, gathering support from both sides of the aisle. This historical progression demonstrates a clear legislative learning curve. Policymakers have moved from reactive enforcement to attempting proactive, structured rulemaking. The April deadline, therefore, represents a test of whether Congress can convert this accumulated understanding into actionable law. Expert Perspectives on the Deadline’s Feasibility Legislative analysts and former congressional staffers provide mixed assessments of the 90-day timeline. Some note that attaching the bill to must-pass legislation, like a government funding package, could expedite the process. Others caution that controversial amendments on topics like environmental impact or privacy could slow progress. The consensus among K Street policy advisors is that the deadline is ambitious but not impossible, provided leadership in both chambers prioritizes the issue. Industry advocates, including the Chamber of Digital Commerce, have mobilized support campaigns targeting key lawmakers. They argue that the bill provides essential consumer protections by bringing legitimate exchanges and token projects into a regulated environment. Conversely, some consumer protection groups urge more stringent provisions, creating a negotiation tightrope. The ultimate passage of the crypto market structure bill will depend on finding a delicate balance between these competing interests within the compressed timeframe. Conclusion The call from Senator Bernie Moreno for Congress to pass the crypto market structure bill by the end of April 2025 establishes a definitive and urgent deadline for U.S. digital asset policy. The CLARITY Act represents a critical effort to provide regulatory clarity, define agency roles, and foster responsible innovation. Meeting this deadline is essential for maintaining the United States’ competitive position in the global financial system and providing a secure environment for investors and businesses. The coming 90 days will be a decisive period, testing the legislative process’s ability to address complex, emerging technologies with both speed and thoughtful deliberation. FAQs Q1: What is the CLARITY Act? The Clarity for Digital Tokens Act (CLARITY) is a proposed U.S. law that aims to establish a clear regulatory market structure for cryptocurrencies. It specifically seeks to delineate authority between the SEC and CFTC and create a pathway for digital assets to be classified as decentralized commodities. Q2: Why is the end of April a critical deadline? Senator Bernie Moreno argues that Congress must pass the bill within 90 days to maintain legislative momentum. Beyond April, the political calendar becomes crowded with elections and other priorities, which could delay the bill indefinitely. Q3: What happens if the bill does not pass by the deadline? Continued regulatory uncertainty would likely persist. This could lead to more enforcement-based regulation by agencies, potential capital flight to jurisdictions with clearer rules, and stalled innovation for U.S.-based crypto businesses. Q4: How does this bill affect cryptocurrency exchanges and investors? The bill would provide legal certainty for exchanges about which rules they must follow. For investors, it aims to create a more standardized and protected market environment by bringing service providers under a formal regulatory umbrella. Q5: Are there other countries with similar crypto market structure laws? Yes. The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which began implementation in 2024, is a comprehensive framework often cited as a model. Other jurisdictions like Singapore, Japan, and Switzerland also have established regulatory regimes for digital assets. This post Crypto Market Structure Bill Faces Critical April Deadline as Senator Moreno Demands Swift Congressional Action first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

BitcoinWorld Fed Minutes Expose Critical Divisions Over Interest Rate Path, Creating Market Uncertainty WASHINGTON, D.C. – March 18, 2025 – The Federal Reserve’s latest meeting minutes reveal significant internal divisions among policymakers regarding the appropriate path for interest rates, creating uncertainty for financial markets and the broader economy. These Fed minutes, released Wednesday, show committee members grappling with conflicting economic signals as they debate whether to maintain, raise, or potentially lower benchmark rates in coming months. The document provides unprecedented transparency into the Federal Open Market Committee’s deliberations, highlighting how differing interpretations of inflation data, employment figures, and global economic conditions are creating policy rifts. Fed Minutes Reveal Deep Policy Rifts The Federal Reserve’s March meeting minutes document substantial disagreements among voting members. Some committee members advocate for maintaining current restrictive policies to ensure inflation returns sustainably to the 2% target. Meanwhile, other officials express concerns about overtightening and potential economic damage. These divisions within the FOMC reflect broader debates in economic circles about appropriate monetary policy responses to mixed economic indicators. The minutes specifically note that “participants expressed a range of views” regarding the appropriate stance of policy, with some emphasizing patience and others advocating for flexibility. Historically, the Federal Reserve has presented a relatively unified front during policy announcements. However, the current economic environment presents unique challenges that are testing this tradition. The committee faces conflicting data points: while inflation has moderated from peak levels, certain core measures remain stubbornly elevated. Simultaneously, employment growth shows signs of cooling, yet the labor market remains historically tight. These competing signals create natural divisions among policymakers with different analytical frameworks and risk assessments. Interest Rate Policy at a Crossroads The Federal Reserve’s benchmark interest rate currently stands at 5.25%-5.50%, the highest level in over two decades. Committee members disagree fundamentally about whether this level represents appropriate restraint or excessive tightness. The minutes reveal three distinct camps emerging within the FOMC: Hawkish members emphasize persistent inflation risks and advocate for maintaining current rates or potentially hiking further Centrist members favor holding rates steady while assessing incoming data Dovish members express concerns about lagged policy effects and advocate for earlier rate cuts This division reflects genuine uncertainty about the economic outlook rather than ideological differences. The minutes note that “several participants” highlighted risks of prematurely easing policy, while “a number of participants” pointed to risks of maintaining restrictive policy for too long. This balanced presentation of competing views represents a departure from previous communications that emphasized consensus. Economic Context and Historical Comparisons The current policy debate occurs against a complex economic backdrop. Inflation, as measured by the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, has declined from over 7% in mid-2022 to approximately 2.5% currently. However, services inflation remains elevated at around 4%, creating concern among some committee members. Meanwhile, economic growth has slowed but remains positive, with GDP expanding at a moderate pace. The unemployment rate has ticked up slightly but remains below 4%, indicating continued labor market strength. Historical analysis reveals that such policy divisions are not unprecedented. During the 2015-2018 tightening cycle, similar debates emerged about the pace of rate increases. However, the current situation differs in important ways. The post-pandemic economy exhibits structural changes in labor markets, supply chains, and inflation dynamics that complicate traditional policy responses. Additionally, the rapid pace of previous rate increases—the most aggressive since the 1980s—creates uncertainty about lagged effects that may still be working through the economy. FOMC Policy Stance Distribution Policy Position Number of Members Key Arguments Maintain/Hike Rates 4-5 Inflation persistence, strong labor market Hold Steady 6-7 Data dependence, balanced risks Consider Cuts Sooner 3-4 Lag effects, growth concerns Market Implications and Financial Stability Financial markets have reacted with increased volatility to the revelation of Fed divisions. Treasury yields initially rose on concerns about persistent hawkish views, then retreated as investors focused on dovish commentary within the minutes. Equity markets showed similar two-way movement, reflecting uncertainty about the policy path forward. The minutes’ detailed discussion of balance sheet runoff—quantitative tightening—also attracted market attention, with some participants suggesting adjustments to the pace of asset runoff. The policy uncertainty highlighted in the Fed minutes affects various market segments differently. Short-term interest rate futures now price in a wider range of potential outcomes for the remainder of 2025. Currency markets have seen increased volatility as traders reassess interest rate differentials between the U.S. and other major economies. Corporate bond markets face additional uncertainty as businesses attempt to plan financing in an environment of unclear monetary policy direction. Banking sector implications are particularly significant. The minutes reveal ongoing discussions about financial stability risks, with some participants noting that prolonged high rates could stress certain segments of the banking system. However, others argued that premature easing could reignite inflationary pressures and ultimately require even more restrictive policy later. This debate reflects the complex trade-offs facing policymakers as they attempt to balance multiple objectives. Expert Analysis and Economic Projections Economic analysts have offered varied interpretations of the Fed minutes. Former Federal Reserve economists note that such transparency, while creating short-term uncertainty, ultimately strengthens institutional credibility. Market strategists emphasize that the divisions make future policy moves more data-dependent than ever. Academic economists point to the challenges of conducting monetary policy when traditional relationships between unemployment and inflation appear to have shifted. The minutes coincide with updated economic projections from FOMC members, which show a wider dispersion of views than in previous quarters. The famous “dot plot” of interest rate expectations now displays greater variation among participants’ rate forecasts for 2025 and 2026. This increased dispersion reflects genuine uncertainty about the economic outlook and appropriate policy response rather than mere disagreement about tactics. Global Context and International Considerations The Federal Reserve’s policy decisions occur within a global monetary policy landscape. Other major central banks, including the European Central Bank and Bank of England, face similar dilemmas regarding the timing of policy normalization. However, economic conditions differ across regions, creating potential policy divergence that could affect exchange rates and capital flows. The Fed minutes acknowledge these international considerations, with some participants noting that global economic weakness could affect U.S. growth prospects. Emerging market economies face particular challenges from Fed policy uncertainty. Many developing nations have borrowed in dollars and face increased debt servicing costs when U.S. rates remain high. However, premature Fed easing could weaken the dollar and create different challenges for these economies. The minutes show awareness of these spillover effects, though domestic considerations understandably dominate the policy debate. Conclusion The latest Fed minutes provide crucial insight into the Federal Reserve’s internal debates about interest rate policy. These documents reveal significant divisions among committee members as they navigate complex economic crosscurrents. The policy uncertainty highlighted in the minutes reflects genuine analytical disagreements about the appropriate path forward rather than mere tactical differences. Market participants and economic observers must now prepare for increased data dependence in Fed decision-making, with each economic release potentially shifting the balance of opinion within the committee. The Fed minutes ultimately demonstrate the challenges of monetary policy in a post-pandemic economy still experiencing structural changes and uncertain dynamics. FAQs Q1: What do the Fed minutes reveal about interest rate policy? The minutes show significant divisions among Federal Reserve officials about whether to maintain, raise, or lower interest rates, with members expressing conflicting views based on different interpretations of economic data. Q2: How do Fed minutes affect financial markets? The minutes create market volatility as investors reassess the likely path of monetary policy, affecting Treasury yields, equity prices, currency values, and corporate borrowing costs. Q3: What are the main points of disagreement among Fed officials? Officials disagree about inflation persistence, labor market strength, the effects of previous rate hikes, and the risks of maintaining restrictive policy versus easing prematurely. Q4: How often does the Federal Reserve release meeting minutes? The Fed releases minutes three weeks after each regularly scheduled Federal Open Market Committee meeting, which occurs approximately every six weeks. Q5: What economic indicators will influence future Fed decisions? The committee will closely monitor inflation data (particularly core PCE), employment reports, wage growth, consumer spending, and business investment indicators in coming months. This post Fed Minutes Expose Critical Divisions Over Interest Rate Path, Creating Market Uncertainty first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

BitcoinWorld FX Carry Trade: BNY’s Critical Warning on Looming Funding Risks Institutional investors face a pivotal moment as BNY Mellon, a global custody and asset servicing giant, issues a stark warning: long-held conviction in the foreign exchange (FX) carry trade now contends with escalating funding risks. This alert, emerging from the bank’s latest market analysis, signals a potential inflection point for a strategy that has defined currency markets for decades. Consequently, portfolio managers globally are reassessing their exposure to one of finance’s most classic plays. The FX Carry Trade: A Primer on Conviction and Mechanics The FX carry trade represents a fundamental currency strategy. Investors borrow capital in a currency with a low interest rate, the funding currency. Subsequently, they convert and invest that capital in a currency offering a higher interest rate, the target currency. The profit, or “carry,” stems from the positive interest rate differential between the two. For years, strategies involving the Japanese yen (JPY) or Swiss franc (CHF) as funding currencies, targeting higher-yielding assets in emerging markets or commodity-linked nations, have been cornerstone trades. However, this seemingly straightforward arbitrage hinges on critical stability factors. Primarily, exchange rates must remain relatively stable or appreciate in favor of the high-yield currency. A sudden depreciation can swiftly erase interest gains and trigger significant capital losses. Furthermore, the strategy depends on consistent, low-cost access to funding liquidity. BNY Mellon’s analysis now spotlights this latter pillar as increasingly vulnerable. Decoding BNY Mellon’s Warning on Funding Liquidity BNY Mellon’s research underscores a shifting global monetary landscape that directly threatens carry trade viability. Central banks, after an extended period of ultra-loose policy, have embarked on divergent tightening paths. The Federal Reserve and European Central Bank have historically been sources of ample dollar and euro liquidity. Now, quantitative tightening (QT) programs and elevated policy rates are systematically draining this liquidity from the financial system. This environment creates a dual pressure point for carry trades. First, the outright cost of borrowing funding currencies like the US dollar (USD) or euro (EUR) has risen substantially. Second, and more critically, the availability of this funding can become constrained during market stress. A 2024 report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) noted that global dollar funding shortages amplify FX volatility, disproportionately affecting leveraged strategies like carry trades. The Historical Precedent and Current Market Signals Market veterans recall the 2008 Global Financial Crisis as a stark lesson. A violent rush for US dollar liquidity triggered a massive unwinding of carry trades, causing catastrophic losses. While current conditions differ, warning signs are flashing. The ICE BofA MOVE Index, a key gauge of US Treasury market volatility, has remained elevated. High volatility often correlates with funding market dislocations. Additionally, cross-currency basis swaps, which measure the cost of accessing foreign currency funding, have shown intermittent signs of strain, particularly for currencies like the Australian dollar (AUD) and New Zealand dollar (NZD). BNY’s analysts point to recent episodes where seemingly stable interest rate differentials were overwhelmed by sudden funding cost spikes. For instance, during the March 2023 banking sector turmoil, funding costs briefly spiked, catching many leveraged positions off guard. Such events preview the risks in a less liquid 2025 market. Strategic Implications for Portfolio Managers This new reality demands a strategic overhaul. The classic “set-and-forget” carry trade is becoming dangerously obsolete. Sophisticated investors are now incorporating dynamic hedging programs and strict stop-loss protocols tied to funding market indicators, not just spot exchange rates. They are also scrutinizing the creditworthiness of their counterparties for swaps and repo transactions more intensely. Furthermore, the search for carry is evolving. Some institutions are shifting towards relative value carry trades within more stable currency blocs or using options structures to define risk. Others are allocating to alternative strategies less dependent on pure interest rate differentials. The table below contrasts the traditional approach with a modern, risk-aware framework: Component Traditional Carry Trade (Pre-2020) Modern Risk-Aware Approach (2025) Primary Focus Maximizing interest rate differential Optimizing risk-adjusted carry after funding costs Risk Management Basic stop-loss on spot FX rate Multi-factor monitoring (spot FX, basis swaps, volatility indices) Funding Assumption Abundant, cheap liquidity Scarce, expensive liquidity with tail risk Hedging Minimal or static Dynamic, often using options for downside protection Time Horizon Medium to long term Shorter term, more tactical The Broader Impact on Global Currency Markets The recalibration of the FX carry trade has profound ripple effects. Currencies traditionally used for funding may experience unexpected strength if leveraged positions unwind rapidly. Conversely, high-yielding currencies could face outsized selling pressure during risk-off episodes, as they lose the support of carry-seeking inflows. This dynamic potentially increases overall FX market volatility, creating a feedback loop that further discourages the strategy. For corporate treasurers and emerging market governments, this translates to heightened uncertainty in managing foreign debt and revenue streams. A world where carry trades are less dominant may see currency values more closely aligned with fundamental trade balances and growth differentials, though it may also reduce a source of consistent capital inflow for developing economies. Conclusion BNY Mellon’s warning on FX carry trade funding risks serves as a crucial market memo for 2025. The era of reliable, cheap leverage that powered this decades-old strategy is fading. While the core principle of harvesting interest rate differentials remains valid, its execution must now account for a treacherous new variable: the cost and availability of funding liquidity. Success will belong to investors who respect this complexity, adapt their risk frameworks, and move beyond simple conviction to nuanced, actively managed currency exposure. The FX carry trade is not dead, but it has entered a more demanding and volatile phase of its evolution. FAQs Q1: What is a simple example of an FX carry trade? A1: An investor borrows 1 million Swiss francs (CHF) at a 1% interest rate, converts them to Indonesian rupiah (IDR) where they earn 6% on a government bond. The goal is to profit from the 5% differential, assuming the IDR/CHF exchange rate stays stable. Q2: Why is funding risk particularly high now according to BNY? A2: Global central banks are reducing their balance sheets via quantitative tightening (QT), which drains system-wide liquidity. This makes borrowing currencies like the USD or EUR more expensive and less reliably available, especially during market stress. Q3: How can investors mitigate these funding risks? A3: Mitigation strategies include using shorter-dated positions, implementing dynamic hedges with options, monitoring cross-currency basis swaps closely, and reducing overall leverage to withstand potential funding cost spikes. Q4: Does this mean all carry trades are no longer profitable? A4: Not necessarily. It means the risk-adjusted return profile has deteriorated. Profits may still be found, but they require more sophisticated analysis of funding costs and tail risks, moving from a passive to a highly active management style. Q5: What is a cross-currency basis swap and why does it matter? A5: It is a derivative that allows an institution to swap interest rate payments (and often principal) in one currency for another. The “basis” is the premium or discount applied. A widening negative basis for a currency like AUD indicates it is becoming more expensive to secure USD funding, directly impacting the economics of a USD-funded AUD carry trade. This post FX Carry Trade: BNY’s Critical Warning on Looming Funding Risks first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Key takeaways: Our Bitgert price prediction anticipates a high of $0.000000087 in 2026. In 2028, it will range between $0.00000020 and $0.00000023, with an average price of $0.00000020. In 2031, it will range between $0.00000063 and $0.00000073, with an average price of $0.00000064. Bitgert, previously known as Bitrise, is a leading cryptocurrency exchange that boasts lightning-fast transaction processing speeds and low trading fees. Bitgert’s native token, the BRISE token, was initially launched on BNB Chain in July 2021 and underwent a rebranding in December 2021. Bitgert network continues to build centralized and decentralized applications and tools for its community. But how about BRISE’s performance? How high will it go? Is BRISE a good investment? Let’s explore these questions in our Cryptopolitan price predictions from 2026 to 2032. Overview Cryptocurrency Bitgert Ticker BRISE Current price $0.00000002174 Market cap $8.6M Trading volume $1.15M Circulating supply 395.69T All-time high $0.00000404 on Aug 13, 2021 24-hour high $0.00000002211 24-hour low $0.00000002156 Bitgert price prediction: Technical analysis Metric Value Volatility (30-day variation) 12.85% (Very High) 50-day SMA $0.00000002700 200-day SMA $0.00000003689 Sentiment Bearish Fear and Greed Index 8 (Extreme Greed) Green days 10/30 (33%) Bitgert price analysis: BRISE remains erratic Bitgert has consistently dropped this year. Notable is an uptick in positive momentum this week. BRISE/USD 1-day chart BRISEUSD chart by TradingView Bitgert has consistently dropped this year after reaching a peak of $0.0000000352. The drop was accompanied by negative market momentum for the better part of 2026. Something notable is an uptick in positive momentum this week. The move is now forcing BRISE into its consolidation phase. BRISE/USD 4-hour chart BRISEUSD chart by TradingView Zoomed in, BRISE is erratic as it cycles between overbought and oversold territory. The trend is evident in the RSI, which is fluctuating between the upper and lower boundaries. The William alligator is opening up, suggesting rising volatility. Bitgert technical indicators: Levels and action Daily simple moving average (SMA) Period Value ($) Action SMA 3 0.00000002364 SELL SMA 5 0.00000002283 SELL SMA 10 0.00000002156 BUY SMA 21 0.00000002284 SELL SMA 50 0.00000002700 SELL SMA 100 0.00000002830 SELL SMA 200 0.00000003689 SELL Daily exponential moving average (EMA) Period Value ($) Action EMA 3 0.00000002426 SELL EMA 5 0.00000002573 SELL EMA 10 0.00000002706 SELL EMA 21 0.00000002757 SELL EMA 50 0.00000002927 SELL EMA 100 0.00000003385 SELL EMA 200 0.00000004234 SELL What to expect from the Bitgert price analysis next? Bitgert remains highly volatile, with short-term analysis showing extreme greed among investors. The coin remained bearish over the last 30 days, recording green only on 10 days. Long term, it will remain bearish. Is Bitgert a good investment? Bitgert BRISE is a token full of utilities, such as paying fees on the Bitgert exchange, staking rewards, and being used as a buy-back mechanism. Over the last year, BRISE remained highly volatile; looking ahead, price predictions are optimistic about its trajectory. Why is Bitgert up? Bitgert’s recent surge can be attributed to the recovering crypto market, despite a bear run from January. Will Bitgert reach $0.00001? Per the Cryptopolitan price prediction, it remains unlikely that Bitgert will get to $0.00001 before 2030. Will Bitgert reach $0.0001? Per the Cryptopolitan price prediction, it remains improbable that Bitgert will get to $0.0001 before 2030. Will Bitgert reach $0.1? Per the Cryptopolitan price prediction, it remains improbable that Bitgert will reach $0.1 before 2030. Does Bitgert have a good long-term future? According to Cryptopolitan price predictions, Bitgert will trade higher in the years to come. However, factors like market crashes or difficult regulations could invalidate this bullish theory. Recent news: Bitgert’s new VC funding Users continue to anticipate new developments on Bitgert as the project received a major VC funding proposal to fuel its next phase of expansion. Bitgert BRISE price prediction February 2026 The Bitgert price forecast for February is a maximum price of $0.00000002101 and a minimum price of $0.00000001910. The average price for the month will be $0.00000002071. Month Potential low ($) Potential average ($) Potential high ($) February 0.00000001910 0.00000002071 0.00000002101 Bitgert price prediction 2026 For 2026, Bitgert will range between $0.00000001065 and $0.000000087, with an average price of $0.00000002071. Year Potential low ($) Potential average ($) Potential high ($) 2026 0.00000001065 0.00000002071 0.000000057 Bitgert BRISE price prediction 2027-2031 Year Potential low ($) Potential average ($) Potential high ($) 2027 0.000000060 0.00000014 0.00000016 2028 0.000000200 0.000000200 0.000000230 2029 0.000000280 0.000000290 0.000000340 2030 0.000000420 0.000000430 0.000000470 2031 0.000000630 0.000000640 0.000000730 2032 0.000000900 0.000000930 0.000001000 Bitgert price prediction 2027 For 2027, Bitgert will range between $0.00000006 and $0.00000016, with an average price of $0.00000014. Bitgert price prediction 2028 The Bitgert prediction estimates it will range between $0.0000002 and $0.00000023, with an average price of $0.0000002. Bitgert BRISE price prediction 2029 Bitgert key price levels are higher in 2029. According to the predictions, Bitgert’s price will range between $0.00000028 and $0.00000034, with an average price of $0.00000029. Bitgert prediction 2030 Our analysis indicates a further rise in BRISE’s price. It will trade between $0.00000042 and $0.00000047, with an average price of $0.00000043. Bitgert crypto price prediction 2031 According to the BRISE coin price prediction for 2031, the price of BRISE will range between $0.00000063 and $0.00000064, with an average price of $0.00000073. Bitgert price prediction 2032 According to the Bitgert price prediction 2032, the price of Bitgert will range between $0.0000009 and $0.000001, with an average price of $0.00000093. Bitgert price prediction 2026 – 2032 Bitgert market price prediction: Analysts’ BRISE price forecast Platform 2026 2027 2028 Coincodex $0.00000002065 $0.00000001592 $0.0000000562 Changelly $0.00000005 $0.00000007 $0.00000011 Gate.com $0.00000004046 $0.00000004308 $0.00000004675 Cryptopolitan’s Bitgert price predictions Our predictions show that BRISE will achieve a high of $0.000000087 in 2026. In 2028, it will range between $0.00000020 and $0.00000023, with an average of $0.00000020. In 2031, it will range between $0.00000063 and $0.00000073, with an average price of $0.00000064. Note that the predictions are not investment advice. Seek independent professional consultation or do your own research. Bitgert historic price sentiment Bitgert price history by CoinGecko When Bitgert Brise was released on the market in July 2021, it cost $0.000000003564. After a short while, Bitgert’s price increased, reaching an all-time high (ATH) of $0.00000404 on August 13, 2021. In 2022, BRISE was bullish, establishing highs of 0.000001605. However, later in June, the Bitgert market incurred a downturn and started trading with a bearish sentiment. The bear trend continued into 2023, falling to as low as $0.000000129. It recovered from October and peaked at $0.0000003337 in March 2024. It has dropped since, falling to as low as $0.000000068 in October, after which it started recovering. In December, it reached a high of $0.0000001518. The drop continued into the first half of 2025, falling below $0.00000007. By 2026, the coin had dropped below $0.00000025.

In VIRTUAL, the MACD positive histogram highlights a bullish momentum signal, with RSI divergence providing support despite the price decline. There is bearish short-term pressure below the EMA, an...

BitcoinWorld Silver Price Forecast: XAG/USD Compresses Within Critical Triangle Pattern – Breakout Imminent Silver prices face a decisive moment in global markets as XAG/USD compresses within a significant triangle chart pattern, potentially signaling a major directional move for precious metals investors in 2025. The technical formation emerges against a complex backdrop of monetary policy shifts, industrial demand fluctuations, and geopolitical tensions that continue to influence commodity markets worldwide. Market analysts now closely monitor this compression phase, recognizing that triangle patterns typically precede substantial price movements once the consolidation period concludes. Historical data from the London Bullion Market Association shows similar patterns have preceded moves averaging 8-12% in either direction over the past decade. Consequently, traders and institutional investors increasingly position themselves for the impending breakout, with options markets showing elevated volatility expectations for the coming quarter. The current technical setup represents more than just chart lines; it reflects the ongoing battle between inflationary pressures and restrictive monetary policies that define today’s precious metals landscape. Silver Price Forecast: Understanding the Triangle Pattern Formation Technical analysts identify the current XAG/USD formation as a symmetrical triangle, characterized by converging trendlines connecting lower highs and higher lows. This pattern typically develops when neither bulls nor bears can establish dominance, creating a compression of price action and volatility. The XAG/USD pair has traded within this formation for approximately six weeks, with the apex projected to converge in late March 2025. Historical analysis from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission reveals that symmetrical triangles in silver have resolved with breakouts 78% of the time over the past fifteen years. Furthermore, the pattern’s reliability increases when volume diminishes during formation, a phenomenon currently observable in silver futures markets. Market technicians measure the pattern’s potential magnitude by calculating the widest part of the triangle, suggesting a projected move of approximately $2.50 per ounce upon resolution. This technical setup coincides with fundamental factors including central bank policies, industrial demand projections, and currency fluctuations that collectively influence silver’s valuation. Key Technical Levels and Indicators Several technical indicators provide additional context for the current silver price forecast. The 50-day and 200-day moving averages have converged near the triangle’s midpoint, creating a potential support-resistance confluence zone. Meanwhile, the Average True Range indicator shows volatility at its lowest level since October 2024, confirming the compression phase. Bollinger Band width has contracted to just 8.2%, indicating the tightest trading range in nine months. These technical conditions typically precede significant price expansions, according to historical data from the Silver Institute. The Relative Strength Index currently reads 48.7, positioned neutrally between overbought and oversold thresholds. This neutral positioning suggests the market lacks directional bias, reinforcing the triangle pattern’s significance. Fibonacci retracement levels from the 2024 high-low range align closely with the triangle’s boundaries, adding confluence to these technical barriers. Market participants should monitor volume patterns closely, as increasing volume on a breakout typically validates the directional move. Fundamental Drivers Impacting Silver’s Technical Pattern The technical compression in silver prices occurs against a complex fundamental backdrop that will likely influence the eventual breakout direction. Industrial demand represents approximately 55% of annual silver consumption, with photovoltaic solar panel manufacturing accounting for the fastest-growing segment. The International Energy Agency projects solar installations will increase 22% in 2025, potentially adding 120 million ounces to industrial demand. Simultaneously, monetary policy developments continue to impact precious metals, with the Federal Reserve’s projected rate path creating headwinds for non-yielding assets. However, persistent inflation concerns and geopolitical uncertainties provide counterbalancing support. Central bank purchases have remained robust, with official sector buying averaging 100 million ounces annually since 2022, according to World Gold Council data. These fundamental factors create competing influences that the triangle pattern’s resolution may clarify. The current technical compression essentially represents the market’s indecision regarding which fundamental narrative will dominate in the coming months. Silver Market Fundamentals: 2024-2025 Projections Factor 2024 Actual 2025 Projection Impact on Price Industrial Demand 510M oz 535M oz Bullish Mine Production 820M oz 835M oz Bearish Investment Demand 243M oz 255M oz Bullish Central Bank Purchases 105M oz 110M oz Bullish ETF Holdings 725M oz 740M oz Neutral Geopolitical and Macroeconomic Considerations Global economic conditions significantly influence silver’s technical patterns and potential breakout direction. The ongoing transition to renewable energy infrastructure continues to drive industrial demand, particularly in solar photovoltaic applications and electric vehicle components. Meanwhile, currency fluctuations, especially in the US dollar index, create inverse correlations with silver prices that technical patterns must account for. Geopolitical tensions in resource-producing regions have historically triggered safe-haven flows into precious metals, though silver’s dual nature as both monetary and industrial metal creates unique price dynamics. Inflation expectations, as measured by breakeven rates, remain elevated above central bank targets, supporting the inflation-hedging narrative for precious metals. These macroeconomic factors collectively create the fundamental environment within which the triangle pattern develops, with the eventual breakout likely reflecting which narrative gains dominance. Market participants should monitor upcoming economic data releases, particularly manufacturing PMIs and inflation reports, as potential catalysts for pattern resolution. Historical Precedents and Pattern Analysis Examining historical triangle patterns in silver provides valuable context for the current technical setup. Analysis of the past twenty years reveals seven significant symmetrical triangle formations in XAG/USD, with six resulting in decisive breakouts. The average duration of these patterns was 47 trading days, slightly shorter than the current formation’s timeline. Breakout direction showed no consistent bias, with four upward and three downward resolutions, emphasizing the importance of waiting for confirmation. The magnitude of post-breakout moves averaged 14.7% when measured from breakout point to subsequent peak/trough. Notably, triangles that formed during periods of monetary policy transition, similar to current conditions, tended to resolve upward 67% of the time. Volume analysis proves particularly insightful, as breakouts accompanied by volume increases of 40% or more showed significantly higher follow-through. These historical patterns suggest traders should prepare for increased volatility following the current compression phase, with position sizing and risk management becoming increasingly important. Expert Perspectives on Pattern Resolution Market analysts offer diverse perspectives on the impending triangle resolution. Technical strategists at major investment banks generally agree on the pattern’s significance but differ on directional bias. Some emphasize silver’s historical tendency to outperform gold during early-cycle economic recoveries, suggesting upward resolution. Others highlight the metal’s sensitivity to real interest rates, which remain elevated by historical standards. Independent analysts point to silver’s unusually low gold ratio as potentially supportive, while commodity specialists note inventory levels at COMEX warehouses remain within normal ranges. The consensus view acknowledges the pattern’s technical validity while emphasizing the importance of confirmation before establishing directional positions. Most experts recommend monitoring the $24.50 resistance and $22.80 support levels as key breakout thresholds, with closes beyond these levels on elevated volume providing the clearest signals. This expert analysis reinforces the critical nature of the current technical setup while acknowledging the fundamental uncertainties that will ultimately determine direction. Trading Strategies and Risk Management Approaches Market participants employ various strategies to navigate the current triangle pattern in XAG/USD. Position traders typically wait for confirmed breakouts before establishing directional exposure, while option traders utilize strategies that benefit from volatility expansion. Several approaches have demonstrated effectiveness in similar historical situations: Breakout Confirmation: Waiting for a daily close outside triangle boundaries with volume 25% above average Volatility Positioning: Utilizing strangle or straddle options to benefit from expansion regardless of direction Scale-in Approach: Building partial positions before breakout with additions following confirmation Correlation Hedging: Pairing silver positions with inversely correlated assets to manage directional risk Risk management proves particularly crucial during pattern resolutions, as false breakouts occur approximately 22% of the time in symmetrical triangles. Setting stop-loss orders just within the opposite side of the pattern helps mitigate whipsaw risk. Position sizing should account for the increased volatility typically following compression periods, with many professionals reducing normal position sizes by 20-30% during such technical setups. The current environment also warrants monitoring related markets, particularly gold, copper, and the US dollar index, as intermarket relationships often provide early directional clues. These strategic considerations help market participants navigate the uncertainty while positioning for the eventual resolution. Conclusion The silver price forecast remains at a critical juncture as XAG/USD compresses within a significant triangle chart pattern. This technical formation reflects broader market indecision regarding competing fundamental narratives, including industrial demand growth, monetary policy trajectories, and geopolitical developments. Historical analysis suggests the pattern will likely resolve with a decisive directional move in the coming weeks, with implications for precious metals investors and industrial consumers alike. Market participants should monitor key technical levels while considering the fundamental backdrop that will ultimately determine breakout direction. The triangle pattern’s resolution will provide valuable information about silver’s medium-term trajectory and its relationship to broader macroeconomic trends. Regardless of directional outcome, the compression phase highlights silver’s unique position at the intersection of monetary and industrial assets, ensuring continued relevance in diversified portfolios and strategic allocations. FAQs Q1: What does a triangle pattern indicate in technical analysis? A triangle pattern indicates a period of consolidation and compression where neither buyers nor sellers can establish dominance. The converging trendlines represent decreasing volatility and indecision, typically preceding a significant price movement once the pattern resolves. Q2: How reliable are triangle patterns for forecasting silver prices? Historical data shows symmetrical triangles in silver have resulted in decisive breakouts approximately 78% of the time over the past fifteen years. Reliability increases when accompanied by decreasing volume during formation and expanding volume on breakout. Q3: What factors will determine the breakout direction for XAG/USD? Breakout direction will likely depend on fundamental factors including industrial demand (particularly from solar energy), monetary policy developments, US dollar strength, inflation expectations, and geopolitical developments affecting precious metals flows. Q4: How long do triangle patterns typically last in silver markets? Historical analysis shows silver triangle patterns average 47 trading days in duration, though individual formations can range from 30 to 70 days depending on market conditions and volatility environments. Q5: What trading strategies work best during triangle formations? Effective strategies include waiting for confirmed breakouts with volume confirmation, utilizing options strategies that benefit from volatility expansion, implementing strict risk management with stop-loss orders, and monitoring related markets for directional clues. This post Silver Price Forecast: XAG/USD Compresses Within Critical Triangle Pattern – Breakout Imminent first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

Crypto analyst CryptoBull has highlighted a bullish pattern that could send the XRP price to as high as $60. This ultra-bullish prediction comes as the altcoin continues to struggle below key resistance levels amid the current crypto market downtrend. XRP Price Could Reach $60 With This Cup and Handle Pattern In an X post, CryptoBull revealed that a Cup and Handle pattern is unfolding on the monthly chart and that the measured target for XRP is $60. In another X post, the analyst suggested that the altcoin’s downtrend may be over soon and that it could begin a run into double digits. Related Reading: Analyst Predicts XRP Price Will Reach $13 In 3 Months As Accumulation Ends This came as he drew attention to the Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the weekly and monthly timeframes, noting that it is below the 2020 bottom of $0.11. He added that the upside for the RSI is huge and that this will put the XRP price well above $10 very soon. Interestingly, the analyst declared that XRP, not Ethereum, will lead the altcoin season. He added that the chart shows a rounding bottom and that the next move is up. Crypto analyst Dark Defender also predicted that the XRP price could reach double digits at some point. In an X post, he stated that the altcoin has been proceeding in an ascending trend channel since 2017 and that the W Pattern is intersecting the Fibonacci level at $18. He added that nothing can stop what is coming. His accompanying chart showed that the altcoin could reach this $18 price target this year. XRP Is Still Facing Resistance At The Moment Crypto analyst CasiTrades noted that the XRP price is still facing resistance at the $1.65 level. The altcoin had rallied to this price level over the weekend but faced resistance there, leading to a sharp decline below key levels. With the price now below $1.53 again, CasiTrades stated that this suggests that the altcoin is losing momentum. Related Reading: XRP On The Verge? The Major Bullish Structure Shift That Could Send Price Soaring The analyst further remarked that with the strength of the selloff a few weeks ago, it is unlikely that the market pivots straight into macro Wave 3 without one more wave down to fully exhaust sellers. As such, there is the likelihood of XRP dropping to new lows before any potential bullish reversal to a new all-time high. CasiTrades stated that on the subwaves, there is alignment for a double bottom near $1.11, with a further drop to around $0.90 also still possible. She added that what matters now on the next low is seeing strong bullish divergence and momentum shift. On the bullish side, she noted that if the XRP price reclaims $1.65 and holds, it would be the first real sign of strength. At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $1.47, down in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap. Featured image from Freepik, chart from Tradingview.com

BitcoinWorld Coinbase Loan Collateral Expansion Unlocks Major Utility for XRP, DOGE, ADA, and LTC In a significant move for cryptocurrency utility, Coinbase has strategically expanded its on-chain lending service. The platform now accepts XRP, Dogecoin (DOGE), Cardano (ADA), and Litecoin (LTC) as collateral, according to a report from The Block. This pivotal development, announced in early 2025, enables qualified U.S. customers to access liquidity without triggering a taxable event by selling their digital assets. Consequently, investors can leverage their holdings to borrow up to $100,000 in USDC, marking a new chapter for these major altcoins. Coinbase Loan Collateral Expansion Explained Coinbase’s lending service, built on the decentralized finance (DeFi) infrastructure protocol Morpho, represents a bridge between traditional finance and blockchain technology. Essentially, the service allows users to deposit their cryptocurrency as collateral to secure a loan in USDC, a regulated stablecoin. Previously, the service supported a more limited set of assets. However, the addition of XRP, DOGE, ADA, and LTC dramatically broadens its appeal and utility. This expansion directly responds to growing demand from the crypto community for flexible financial tools. Importantly, the service is available to most U.S. customers, though residents of New York state remain excluded due to specific regulatory requirements. The integration with Morpho ensures that the lending mechanics are transparent and operate on-chain, providing users with verifiable proof of their transactions and collateralization ratios. Deep Dive into the New Collateral Assets The selection of these four specific cryptocurrencies is not arbitrary. Each asset brings a substantial market capitalization, high liquidity, and a dedicated user base, making them ideal candidates for collateral. Below is a comparative analysis of the new collateral options: Asset Primary Use Case Key Advantage as Collateral XRP (Ripple) Cross-border payments & settlement Established institutional partnerships and high transaction speed Dogecoin (DOGE) Peer-to-peer digital currency Extremely high recognition, brand loyalty, and community support Cardano (ADA) Smart contracts & dApp platform Strong focus on peer-reviewed research and security Litecoin (LTC) Fast, low-cost payments Proven longevity as a Bitcoin fork with a robust network By accepting these assets, Coinbase acknowledges their stability and market significance. Furthermore, this move provides tangible utility beyond mere speculation. Holders can now actively use their portfolios to access capital for other investments, expenses, or business opportunities without divesting. Expert Analysis on Market Impact Industry analysts view this development as a maturation signal for the crypto lending sector. “The inclusion of high-profile assets like XRP and Dogecoin as loan collateral is a logical step toward mainstream financial integration,” notes a report from blockchain analytics firm IntoTheBlock. This analysis suggests that such moves increase the “productive yield” of holding cryptocurrencies, potentially reducing sell-side pressure during market downturns as users opt to borrow against assets rather than sell them. From a regulatory perspective, offering this service through a regulated entity like Coinbase provides a compliant framework. It contrasts with purely decentralized platforms, which may carry different risk profiles. The $100,000 borrowing limit also aligns with common thresholds in consumer finance, making the product accessible for both retail and more serious individual investors. Operational Mechanics and User Benefits Understanding how the service works is crucial for potential users. The process is designed for simplicity and security: Collateral Deposit: A user deposits XRP, DOGE, ADA, or LTC into a dedicated, non-custodial vault via the Coinbase interface. Loan Issuance: Based on the asset’s value and a predetermined loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, the user can draw USDC instantly. Interest and Management: Users pay interest on the borrowed USDC. They must maintain the LTV ratio to avoid liquidation. Repayment: Users repay the USDC plus interest to reclaim their full collateral. The core benefit is liquidity without taxation . In many jurisdictions, selling cryptocurrency is a taxable event. Borrowing against it is not, allowing holders to retain their market position. Additionally, this provides capital for: Covering unexpected expenses. Seizing new investment opportunities without exiting current positions. Business capital for crypto-native entrepreneurs. Context Within the Broader Crypto Lending Landscape Coinbase’s expansion occurs within a competitive and evolving market. Other centralized platforms like Nexo and BlockFi have offered similar services for years. However, Coinbase’s sheer size, regulatory standing, and integration with its primary exchange ecosystem give it a distinct advantage. Its use of Morpho’s on-chain technology also offers a hybrid model, combining user-friendly interfaces with DeFi’s transparency. This move also reflects a broader industry trend of making crypto assets financially productive. From staking to lending, the ability to generate yield or access liquidity is becoming a standard expectation for holding digital assets. Coinbase’s service specifically targets a gap in the market: a trusted, compliant venue for leveraging major altcoins that are not always supported elsewhere. Conclusion The decision by Coinbase to add XRP, DOGE, ADA, and LTC as loan collateral is a substantial development for cryptocurrency utility and adoption. It provides millions of holders with a powerful new financial tool, enabling them to unlock the value of their assets in a tax-efficient manner. This strategic expansion not only strengthens Coinbase’s product suite but also reinforces the legitimacy and financial relevance of these four major cryptocurrencies. As the digital asset ecosystem continues to mature, the integration of lending and borrowing services by leading platforms like Coinbase will undoubtedly play a critical role in bridging crypto with the wider world of finance. FAQs Q1: How does borrowing against crypto on Coinbase work? You deposit supported crypto like XRP or ADA as collateral into a vault. Coinbase then allows you to borrow a percentage of its value in USDC stablecoin, which you can use or withdraw. You must repay the USDC plus interest to get your full collateral back. Q2: What are the main benefits of using crypto as loan collateral? The primary benefit is accessing cash liquidity without selling your cryptocurrency, which typically avoids creating a taxable event. It also allows you to maintain exposure to potential price appreciation in your collateral assets. Q3: Why are New York state residents excluded from this service? New York has its own stringent financial regulations, including the BitLicense, which requires specific approvals for crypto businesses. Coinbase has not yet secured the necessary regulatory clearance to offer this lending product in that state. Q4: What happens if the value of my collateral falls significantly? If the value of your collateral drops too close to the value of your loan, you may receive a margin call requiring you to add more collateral or repay part of the loan. If not met, your position could be liquidated to repay the lender. Q5: Is the Coinbase lending service safe? The service is built on Morpho, a well-audited DeFi protocol, and operated through Coinbase’s regulated platform. However, as with any financial product involving collateralized debt, it carries risks, including market volatility and potential liquidation if the collateral value declines sharply. This post Coinbase Loan Collateral Expansion Unlocks Major Utility for XRP, DOGE, ADA, and LTC first appeared on BitcoinWorld .

More on Bitcoin USD Bitcoin's Battle: The $70k Wall And Technical Breakout Hint At Further Downside; Is $50k A Possibility? Whale's Tracking - Hotspots And Hedging Is $60,000 Bitcoin's Tripwire That Could Unleash A Cascade Of Selloffs? When will bitcoin cross back above $100K? See what prediction markets believe Galaxy Digital CEO: Bitcoin faces competition from sports betting, remains generational asset